This post includes the incorporation of book 2 into book 3. Oddly, I am simultaneously editing book 3 of the romance series. Just a coincidence I suppose. I am closer to the end of the rough draft of that book.
The pre-AuT physicists, those still clinging to their bozons like so many baby rattles are yelling, but if your theory is right, then all forces must act largely the same, realizing even as the words leave their mouths that just as magnetism pulls together, so does gravity. Just as thermal energy vibrates and separates matter, so does fusion bring together. The truth, striking as it should not be, is that we have forever looked at the universe from the point of view of a reflection. Distance and force of effect are more due to the concentrations required than any real distance. Gravity doesn't fade over distance because it works on a non-dimensional level. Space time is irrelevant to ct1 substitution. As the forces get more dense, of necessity their effect is more narrow because they require more concentration. Hence, the ct5 related effect (because force is a misnomer) occurs only at the nucleus level because it requries a concentration of exchange that cannot occur outside of that concentration of ct4 states.
This explains the difference between the weak and electromagnetic force as one of concentration of exchange rather than of a difference in the force itself. Likewise, the range of ct2 forces, electromagnetic, is see as having a great range because of the speed of light exchanges of ct1 states, 1:256 even though it is decidedly slower than the relatively infinite exchange at the ct1 level. At the compressed stage of the weak force, this same exchange rate is occurring and the pre-aut physicist cries in alarm, but it is misplaced, because the real difference because of the concentration of results, is that the ct states are more interchanged with wavelike structure and less so with free ct1 states that result in the straight line velocity. This is a relative solution rate caused by the F-series concentration (1,11,111,etc) represented as the relative number of changes occuring together which gives the appearance of space time even though individual changes all occur at the same rate, at least in theory.
I am the better physicist for having figured out super-symmetry; but in doing so I render it meaningless. while I understand the universe perfectly, it controls me more than any of my readers. I see exactly what I want just within my grasp, but I cannot make myself stretch out for the ring because of things that my physics insists do not matter to me. If I am a genius, why isn't my math up to the challenge of making the last connection yet. I am not invited to your meetings, my articles are not published. I sit in a shadow that I cannot control
If I am a fool, why are you reading this, knowing in your heart that you are the reflection and that I am on the other side of the glass?
Osmonides, you read this. You know it is written to you. You cry out, don't take my bozons away from me, even as your realize you are clinging to nothing. You want to lash out, but even as you do you realize you are a reflection, attempting to lash out at the true image. Tremble before me and read on if you dare.
This explains the difference between the weak and electromagnetic force as one of concentration of exchange rather than of a difference in the force itself. Likewise, the range of ct2 forces, electromagnetic, is see as having a great range because of the speed of light exchanges of ct1 states, 1:256 even though it is decidedly slower than the relatively infinite exchange at the ct1 level. At the compressed stage of the weak force, this same exchange rate is occurring and the pre-aut physicist cries in alarm, but it is misplaced, because the real difference because of the concentration of results, is that the ct states are more interchanged with wavelike structure and less so with free ct1 states that result in the straight line velocity. This is a relative solution rate caused by the F-series concentration (1,11,111,etc) represented as the relative number of changes occuring together which gives the appearance of space time even though individual changes all occur at the same rate, at least in theory.
I am the better physicist for having figured out super-symmetry; but in doing so I render it meaningless. while I understand the universe perfectly, it controls me more than any of my readers. I see exactly what I want just within my grasp, but I cannot make myself stretch out for the ring because of things that my physics insists do not matter to me. If I am a genius, why isn't my math up to the challenge of making the last connection yet. I am not invited to your meetings, my articles are not published. I sit in a shadow that I cannot control
If I am a fool, why are you reading this, knowing in your heart that you are the reflection and that I am on the other side of the glass?
Osmonides, you read this. You know it is written to you. You cry out, don't take my bozons away from me, even as your realize you are clinging to nothing. You want to lash out, but even as you do you realize you are a reflection, attempting to lash out at the true image. Tremble before me and read on if you dare.
The Pre-AuT “modern
(perturbative) quantum mechanical view” of the fundamental forces other
than gravity is that particles of matter (fermions) do not directly interact with each other, but rather carry a
charge, and exchange virtual particles (gauge bosons), which are the interaction carriers or force mediators. For example, photons mediate the interaction of electric charges, and gluons mediate the
interaction of color charges.
AuT provides a
dimension free method of describing this particle carrier as ct1 exchange
within solutions (Figures 3, 4 and 5).
While you can look at ct1 exchange as similar to bosons, they are
fundamentally different since one is an actual particle and the other is a
series of mathematical solutions.
Gravity has been described alternatively in AuT as the effect of time going
linear and as the exchange of ct1 states between two higher states, only
possible when there is linearity. A
linear system of ct1 states represented by spiral solutions allows for ct1
states to change positions in a chain as shown in Figure 3, for example, where
one solution being made up of prior solutions contains within it references
back to the prior histories which would reflect the true origin of
gravitational effects however difficult they would be to detect given the complete
absence of mass, dimension and time at this stage. It is, however, hypothesized later that this
could be a source of dark matter, in fact representing the majority of the
tendency towards either decompression or compression depending on how this underlying
information is functioning as part of the matrix of the higher information
states which are compressed.
The
exchange and the power of ct2 comes from the high ct1 exchange rate which we
observe as dimensional movement. Once a
ct2 state interacts with (as opposed to pass through) a higher state there is a
transition since the interaction of the ct2 state with, for example, a ct4
states comes at the expense of another ct2 state which must transition in some
way, either substituted or converted.
Let’s look at this briefly.
Lets
say you have a “cool” ct4 state. This
state internally has very slow substitution rates so there is little
vibration. This doesn’t change the rate
of change according to AuT theory, it only means that the rate of change results
from movement (ct1 exchange) through space and through other, non-physically
altering ct state exchanges. Now you
interject a beam of ct2 states. As these
states begin to substitute the rate of ct2 states going in and out of the ct4
states (Figure 4 and 5) increases. We
observe this a vibrational change, heat and the resulting expansion; and it, of
necessity, involves an increase in ct exchange since each of the ct2 states has
1:256 ct1 exchange whereas the higher ct states keep much of that ct1 exchange
internal as, for example ct3 exchanges within the matrix of densely compressed
ct4; the density being the number of shared solutions vs the number of external
solutions. In this way, you see how the
“force” of ct2 (photons) is not really a force at all but is instead merely a
solution density equation based on the number of solutions of different
compression states being incorporated sequentially.
All forces work essentially in this same way.
For electromagnetism, you imagine a coiled wire with a current passing
through it, you see the electromagnetic force. It is wrong to say that there is
a weak force/electromagnetic force acting on CT3, wave energy. Instead you should
be looking for how exchange rates are happening. In the case of ct2, it exchanges sequentially
fewer ct1 states relative to the ct4 it is approaching. This “sharing rate” is the same as the
proximity of solution, there are fewer independent solutions of ct1 between the
two and the approach. This same feature
occurs with ct2 and ct3 exchanges. It
isn’t a thing happening, instead it is just an algorithm being solved
sequentially for different compressive states in a particular order one
relative to the other.
As ct1 states are exchanged in
increasing density in response to the amount of exchange within the wire, the
surrounding solutions by definition of proximate solutions much change to match
the exchange rate and if you curve the ct4 state (coil the wire) the
surrounding ct1 states achieve ct2 density to keep up with the exchange rate,
not in response to the force, but as super symmetry giving rise to the force.
From our “backwards” perspective, we
see a current passing through a wire, this is wave length. if the exchanging
ct1 states keep up with the current (they have to or the current would not move
since movement is ct1 exchange) the average travel would be the observed as a
straight line through the middle. While each change is a quantum change
is small, the average curvature to bring substitute virtual ct2 (ct1 states
compressed sufficiently to allow substitution of one ct1 for each movement of
the ct3 along the ct4 (also sequential substitution) is exactly what you
expect.
The “magnetism” is merely the chain of shared ct1 states keeping up with the
moving waves as x changes or, if you must, over time while being shared with
another ct4 state. The exchange occurs
whether there are separated electromagnetic ct4 states or not, but if there are
two emct4 states then the exchange between them happens in essentially the same
way as gravity effect them although the rate of exchange is based on these
virtual ct2 states instead of the more pure ct1 state exchange with a
consequent loss of force and an increased effect of proximity of solution.
The “merger” of the weak and electromagnetic forces can be seen (at high
energies) of the substitution rate drawing the ct1 states from the surrounding
environment to a more proximate location. AuT suggests that at strong energies
or high speeds (both are speed, one being vibrational the other ‘straight line
movement’) ct1 exchanges are more or less instantaneous and have less of an
effect on an extended area.
The strong force is harder to deal with. As with the electromagnetic
force, we get completely away from the boson nonsense of pre-AuT physics.
Instead we stick with information theory and the distance (r) effects are based
on relative position of the solution which we’ll talk about more related to
gravity.
Conversion rates are seductive. The fact that an AuT “instant” is
1.07x10^-39th of a second is suggestive of the relationship.
But the better suggestion is that this is tied to the compression overlap ratio
of 3.40x10^38 to one for black holes. This does not mean that every atom is
a black hole, it merely means that the algorithm solutions that give rise to
compressed ct4 states, matter, generate the same compression ratios as are
experienced with black holes.
We look at the virtual ct2 states of
magnetism and are forced to draw an analogy of ct3 substitution rates being
increased to the point where ct4 occurs and where these ct4 elements begin
within their matrix to substitute at rates that make them “virtual black holes”
just as the ct1 states became “virtual ct2 states” due to compressive
substitution rates.
This suggests that while the
fundamental state of ct4 states have 4 coordinates changing at a time
(1111,2222, etc) that within the algorithm the solutions have 5 coordinates
changing at once where multiple fundamental ct4 states are joined together as
protons or neutrons. This would not be a type of wave, particle duality
but would, instead, be matter, black hole duality. It boggles the mind a
little bit but explains the disappearance of ct5 compression outside of the nucleus
of the atom.
It is critical to this understanding that we are NOT talking about a
force. Force is pre-AuT. We’re talking about a math solution that yields
the force. For a nucleus, the solution is yields compression up to five
coordinates changing at once. Once the nucleus dimension is breached,
that solution hits the inflection point and drops to the ct4 solution.
It’s important to note that ct4 solutions need not cease to exist, but they
become independent of one another.
This is largely covered in Book 2
This is largely covered in Book 2
No comments:
Post a Comment