AuT information arms part 3 (book 4)-range, positrons and electrons, and the demise of idols

Listening to the late night radio, I've heard the nonsense of aliens, spirituality and the dependence on an active type of god.  If I wasn't ahead of everyone else in physics, if my model didn't shame everything before me, perhaps I could put up with the superstitious meanderings, albeit it's equally likely that much of what is said is not believed.
I would write this off as entertainment.  But people believe this nonsense.  If they were looking at their pagan idols in the light of AuT and explaining them anyway, that would have some limited merit (limited in reality and in the period of time it could withstand scrutiny).  But they don't.  The vast majority of people believe in their gods or worse still, their governments, their money, their incorrect views of reality.
I can't help it that I've figure this out.  It would be better not to have done so, I could live in blissful ignorance.  Stop reading now, I warn you.
But the universe had other plans for me.  Despite my best efforts the theory is forced down my throat and I show it to you for whatever reasons.
For me, and for you whether you want it or not, the stories of Christ, Mohammad, and the Greek Pantheon all have equivalent factual support with stories of peter pan and santa clause.  Doesn't mean that people don't believe the religious aspects of them completely, but what a group of morons we are to accept history and mythology withotu proof when explanations are litterally forced down out throats with AuT physics.  Granted a pre-super symetry view of things would leave a lot to the imagination, we are not resigned to that view any longer.  I don't want to tell the superstitious among you to leave your gods.  That would be unfair, since I also would happily hide behind some wooden idol, some manner of dress and practice were it possible.  But if you are to really study the universe, you realize that while we have not yet done away with the concept of god, indeed the algorithm itself it a godlike function; man made superstitions are just total nonsense.  I use idols to refer to man's gods, not those forces in g-space that are godlike.
  If you knew that a movie made up a god story, no matter what the support, you'd still say, it's just a movie, notwithstanding the appearance of miracles in it.  All of the miracles of the bible can be accepted as aspects of the algoirthm, but they are still just part of a movie, mathematically induced and of no more consequence than a clam being eaten by someone at a restaurant in San Francisco or some similarly godless location.
We fight wars over idiocy, we separate ourselves based on primitive superstitions, we ignore, at our peril, the super-symmetry of the universe and we face a greater peril by learning about it.
Anyway, what were we talking about?  Ah yes, Range.
This post is from Book 2 which is already published, which goes into a little more detail but doesn't have some of the diagramitic references, page 16 if you are following along.  I'm working on the second edition of that book which will include some issues from this book.
When I read atricles that are predicted by AuT it is helpful, but the lack of acknowledgement by the community is...predictable.

https://www.inverse.com/article/34594-matter-antimatter-majorana-fermion-particle-electron-stanford

What makes a difference here in this article is that AuT defines positive and negative aspects.
And AuT has postive and negative aspects built in.

Figure 8

            So here are the steps shown by the drawing above.

            Step 1 ct0=0,1,0,-1.

            Step 2: ct1(space)=-1,0,1,1 or 1, 0,-1,-1 yielding (f(n)^2^0)=1,-2 or -1,2 then 4 (from -1^2*2^2*1) or 4 (from -1^2*2^2)

            Step 3: ct2(Photon and the beginning of time and dimension) 4^2^2.  There are 4 arms at play.  The first arm merely combines four ct1 states or takes one ct1 state and multiplies it by 4.  These are very different outcomes.  The use of a single ct1 state makes sense because as the ct1 is replaced with another ct1 state, movement is implied and this would work for all the higher states.  If there are 4 added together, then only one at a time is replaced to generate the next movement or all 4 can be replaced in which case the transition is 4:256, 1:64.  Either of these solutions appear possible, but the logical one is that the ct1 state comes in and solves for the ct2 state, then is replaced by the next ct1 state which solves for the ct2 state.  This suggests that stacking is illusory.  There is no real stacking, just a ct1 state creates a ct2 state by vibrating along the 2^2 arms.  Then the next ct1 state does the same thing.

This would mean that the 2^n is the durable part of the equation, that information is durable and that the durability of these information arms can carry more and more dense ct f(n) states.

The second step is 4^2 or 4^2 (or more particularly 4*4).  Either way you are at 16, then 16*4 at the next arm, etc as shown above.  However, these particles continue to have their initial history preserved based on AuT mathematics so some positive 4’s have negative part, in fact they all do!

The next step is to look at why AuT positively requires that the application of these states to the theory yield the range we observe, literally in the definitions of information arms and compressive series and, if you haven’t read Books 1 and 2, how time dilation (aging vrs movement through ct1 exchange) in incorporated into these models to explain the range of the different resulting forces from the equations solved.