Chapter 35 AuT and Universal expansion: 1 of 2 (52817)

This post revisits a prior post and is posted as chapter 35 in book 3 as a predecessor to the long awaited AuT and Universal expansion 2 of 2 which is soon to follow.  As you are aware if you are reading this, physics is turned on its head by AuT or more accurately it is shown as a mirror image of true symmetry.

          Dark and cold energy, cold energy being my term, is the topic of discussion on this muggy hot/cold morning, its paradoxes fitting so well with those I am going to write about.

          Dark energy is the algorithm solution that leads to expansion (related as the cause of gravity and not a reflection of it).  Cold energy is the same algorithm during the compression phase.

          Is it possible to have a universe that is expanding faster and slower at the same time?  This is a result that AuT suggests is possible, a part of the different converging series inherent in the intersecting f-series.

          The 2^n equation and the f-series equations change at different rates so you can have compression at a higher rate than the increase in information and you can have it be slower.  CT1 increases the size of the universe and compression decreases the size.  So it is possible that they give conflicting results.

          There are two types of expansion.  One driven by an increase in the amount of information and perhaps by F-series stacking and another is driven by the compression vs decompression solutions.  F-series expansion and informational expansion will constantly increase.  The only net change occurs with compression and decompression.

          A majority of intersecting vs a majority of moving apart cycles will change and compression is the result.

A discussion of ARTICLE 1:

http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2017/05/24/529675773/what-does-an-expanding-universe-really-mean

            This article says that "Current measurements indicate that the universe has a flat (or nearly flat) geometry.”

This is incorrect because there is no geometry.  But it supports strongly AuT because it shows as you look closer at quantum phenomena you look at 4 dimensions (CT4 with CT5 compression forces acting on it); then CT3, on down to a two-dimensional framework.  They are not so much wrong as most physicists have failed to read anything about AuT and instead are stuck in a space time framework.

            “For cosmology, a flat geometry means that rays of light actually travel on a straight line across space.”

There are several problems with this statement, but the idea of light moving in a two-dimensional framework is entirely accurate. The use of “space” renders it largely irrelevant as a quantum undertaking.  What they fail to cover is that the universe has multiple geometries that exist together. Pi itself varies.

            Relative solution order has nothing to do with space-time, but it does provide for perceived separation once you have dimensional elements which vary.

            "[T]here is no space ‘out there’ for it to expand into. What the cosmic expansion does is stretch space itself, as if space were made of some kind of stretchy rubber material. There is no physical border out here, only stretching space..."

            This is a limited view because it continues to look at space as a thing and it doesn’t stretch, the information is discrete and quantum and the physics.  Quantum bits do not stretch so this adds little to the discussion of AuT.

            Space is just the way that information is displayed during quantum solutions based on relative solution order.  Space isn't "stretchy," instead information increases constantly and at an exponential rate.  However it also compresses (1,11,111,1111,11111, etc) so that it can increase, but it can be displayed as more compressed which is what our premise says; depending on whether it is increasing faster than it is compressing.  Since compression is governed by an intersection/non-intersecting modality when space is non-intersecting, there is no more of it at any quantum instant, but it is increasing at a faster rate because more of 11111 is changing into 1 so it will expand faster between two states than if more 1's are changing to 11111 even though the amount of information increases more with either version.  This is the solution that AuT suggests and, oddly enough-not really odd at all, the one that observations suggest.

            "... every point is a center of the expansion, as observers measure their neighbors moving away, carried by the stretching geometry."

            This statement supports the AuT theory that relative solution order defines relative location.  The incorrect idea of stretching geometry supports the increase in information, quantum information, resulting from the equation.  This article and the observations that were misinterpreted fail more importantly because space does not stretch, instead the information (1) expands in quantity and (2) in state (cthigher to ctlower) but it also compresses which is expected to lead to a contracting universe, even while the amount of information will continue to grow.  While with this huge increase of information makes this questionable, the fact that space can contract exponentially, makes it possible.

            The solutions indicate: 1) initial expansion is an F-series expansion to get from nothing to something; 2) the initial expansion is vibrational in nature, having a positive and negative element as reflected by the converging series making up the pi equation; 3) quantum elements are informational in nature having in them two outcomes, positive and negative reflecting the vibrational generation of information; 4) compression results from both the F-series expansion and the concentration of information as shown by the AuT compression equation.

            The article goes on to describe the Hubble ‘law’:  "where the galaxies move away from one another with velocities that grow in proportion to their distances. So, an observer sees a galaxy that is twice as far away from a closer one move away (or recede) twice as fast."  

            AuT suggests that this is because of slowing expansion and uses this observation to predict when the universe will move from a net expansion to a net compression state.

            AuT suggests that the diverging solution (over values of x) the number of ct1 solutions between two points (or galaxies in this case) must increase, but compression will eventually change the balance of power between informational expansion and compression.

            CT1 substitution defines velocity.  Compression is seen as ct1 absorption.  This minor language change reflects the difference between velocity and compression.

            Gravity generating features relate to the exchange in ct1 between the two collections of quantum high ct state solutions (m1*m2/r^2 is solved relative to ct1 loosely in book 1 and book 2 and is a major source of the treatment here.  This translates into an internal form of gravity where ct1 states are shared within the matrix of a highly compressed state such as ct5 and ct4 and to a lesser extent ct3.

            A quantum universe means that locational features can be solved at quantum instances, but gravity does not exist except as a solution on the quantum scale because at any quantum point the solution is fixed even though the order of solution and the compression of the solution are different between any two points of necessity.

            This article, for all its errors in interpretation, factually supports AuT over pre-AuT physics.