AuT-the F-series The Pauli Exclusion Principle revisited

I'm getting close to publishing book 3. I am past, if not well past the half way point and mos of the math that will be presented in book 3 is done.  Dare I look for a July publication date?  Stay tuned, the weekend may well tell.

Chapter 38  Quantum information theory and traditional physics

          Force is a result.  For example, it is speculated that when compression results in long period of ct4 super compression in the presence of ct5.  This is solution based, in high compression states, ct5, you get super-compression 1111 to 11111 coordinate solutions and these last as the ct4 states move away leaving them as compressed ct4 which we experience as neutrons and electrons. 

          This transition is based on the necessary crowding of substitution states and is probably the strongest evidence that, for example at ct2-3 (photon to wave) the substitution is not purely ct1 substitution but ct2 substitution in waves.  I.E. substitution in higher states involves at least temporary super compression states of the next lower state.  Time dilation, on the other hand, shows that external ct1 substitution rates remain important in the complete management of math solutions.  In magnetism, as soon as the “current is shut off” the related spiral of ct2 temporary states also disappear, remembering that this is a math result and not a force consequence of shutting off the current.

          It appears that the same type of state substitution occurs during fusion reactions to some extent, but more likely this is an after effect of the generation of ct4 super compression during very high black hole type compression state that occur, for example during the big bang inflection point events.  The continuation of these nucleus super compression states indicates that for higher compression states, the temporary super compression states last longer, presumably because of internal sharing which leads to history and time dilation in conjunction with external ct1substitution.  Whether very large black holes reflect the same effect in the presence of as yet undetected ct6 or whether these very high compression states can generate their own super compression (e.g. by fusion in stars in ct4) remains to be determined with specificity, but can be determined by examining the results of compression in fusion reactions in stars for ct4.

          When you get ct1 linearity in the presence of massive overlaps of ct1 state you get comparative states between ct1 and ct2 and the result of these separation states is that you experience gravity which is more pronounced as there is ct1 sharing between higher compression states.  Again, this is solutions based resulting from math solutions that generate ct1 substitution and not force driven.

          Space and the effects of space affected over long periods of time in the presence of high compression may easily account for dark matter but this is only necessary to the extent that dark matter is compressed in certain circumstances.

          The idea that light is bent in areas where we believe there to be concentrations of dark matter potentially reflect intermediary states present with longer lifetimes.  The fact that it may be ct6, super compressed ct1 (space) resulting from earlier compression in the presence of a high ct state or some other result doesn’t change the ability of AuT to provide an explanation if enough data can be obtained.  

          In circumstances during very high compressive states (whether localized or during a big bang) super compression of ct states appears to occur and these compressive states continue and continue to circulate as magnetism and similar mathematical solutions as the combined high compression spirals begin to disperse during the phases of decompression.

          A lasting effect in the form of dark energy is net decompression which will eventually change to net compression lest the universe continue to expand exponentially.

          To call dark matter a particle is nonsense just as looking for bozons is nonsense.  It is attempting to force non-dimensional mathematical solutions into dimensional particles.

          While we see dimension, it has nothing to do with dark energy except that this decompression state is a result of decompression and exponential growth of F-series solutions of ct1 without offsetting higher state compression.  When the higher state compression is greater than the F-series growth, you get a compressing universe which approaches the big bang inflection point.

          Since the “length” measured in quantum states between these “turns” or “carrier lengths” at each carrier state is exponentially higher (almost but not quite double) at each change, the carrier lengths between turns have epoc type lengths and intersections between intersecting spirals or other compressive solutions instead of turns can play a role in “reversing” the compression/decompression solution theorized in the primary model.

          Substitution becomes a replacement for velocity.  1:256 is light speed.  It is noted that in a slow changing ct4 state, the rate of ct1 substitution remains at 1:256 for the ct1 states that make up the slower carriers at the remove of 3 steps (ct1 substitutions, ct1-ct2, ct2-ct3, ct3-ct4).

          We see the rate of change of ct2 as energy and we see ct1 as having more energy than ct2, but the truth remains that these things are just different forms of information, more specifically different solutions with different substitution rates, the substitution rate for space having not context in time or dimension and therefore difficult for us to understand until it reacts with higher ct states to give a spacetime relevant result.  

          To say that means that space has "more energy" than anything else is inaccurate, but it also has a grain of truth from our perspective because we see relative speed of information exchange as energy and from that standpoint you can say that space either (1) has infinite energy or, more accurately (2) that the effect that space has on ct2 gives it the maximum energy that we experience (the speed of light movement) before AuT.  

          Likewise, to say there is more of ct1 than anything else is a tautology because everything else is made of ct1.

          The mathematical solution or algorithm solution for the 256 states aligned by one ct1 carrier define a quantum photon or ct2 state.  At first glance, it appears that the one ct1 carrier state is added to 255 “carried” states to reach the 256 magic number and that as x changes, each time x changes, there is a substitution so that ct1 is always changing at light speed although other solutions are suggested by the mesh created when higher states are formed.  It can be noted here that ct1 has no internal substitution (at least none dimensional) so space does not experience velocity as we understand it, but does have solution order allowing it to provide separation without movement.

          Space varies along with x (the single variable). The suggestion of exponential change with each change in x is hard to escape without the math of f-series addition being altered.Overlap seems to be suggested by shared ct state origins  along with proximity of solution.  Compression seems to be based on the association of the “net” state of pi for a higher ct state.

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/the-quantum-rule-that-makes-existence-possible-d51a31381a09
This article contains a podcast that suggests fundamental is material and in spacetime.  It isn't even close to accurate, but discusses the standard model. It notes that particles can be reduced to identical features among at least like particles.
This is suggesting that on a more fundamental level these different generic particles can be reduced to a generic form.
1) Fermion or 2) Bozon and they are categorized by spin (fraction (in halves) or whole number).
He discusses annihilation as a feature.  AuT rejects the destruction of information, but its conversion into space, a non-dimensional element, is expected.
He talks about sharing binding particles, binding bozons, the "exchange" of gluons" which corresponds to information states being exchanged.
Half size information is important for Aut geometry because of this figure:

pi/2 means that you have to have half measurements and how is this possible? The answer suggested by AuT is the one shown in this figure.   Each result leading to geometry is a function of two parts, plus-plus to minus-minus.
The math required to get from information theory to Quark Theory is complex, but the given that the observed forces and masses are reflections of information solutions means that the math is also a reflection of the more simple underlying algorithms.  The simplicity of this
The other complicated difference between Fermions and Bozons-the pauli exclusion principle-no two identical F can occupy the same quantum state-not at same place as same time with same properties.  This would, of course
Bozons are allowed to be the same meaning that Bozons correspond to CT1 which isn't the "same" because of solution order (relative solution order) but it does show how the features of quark theory line up with AuT theory which is merely a more fundamental, more accurate way of approaching these issues.
Now this goes into molecular construction, but reconciling those features of the universe is for another book, not book 3 because it is very, very distant from quantum mathematics.  The idea here is that separation features correspond to the math, not the forces arising from the math and has to do with separation features of the geometry.

What's on your white board?