Pages

Sunday, July 12, 2020

Day 218 of the Covid apocalypse Selection Bias: Quarks vs AuT

I have stayed under 175 except hitting that number once this week.
The apocalypse continues, I know longer have to think about how to spell the word.
Even the wanker president is wearing a mask.  Progress.

I suffered to an unprecedented extent yesterday as I loved too deeply.   The choice of not loving at all seems reasonable if this pain is the alternative.

We sit on this top layer of rock, not even as secure as the virus that feeds on us, ready at any moment to settle down and have these thoughts of self importance and destiny.  Fly to the moon, to mars, go from a fly spec on one world to less than that on another.

AuT explains the weakness of our fever dreams in a way that is too painful by far, to honest by far, for us to comprehend.  It is no wonder my attempts to bring this science forward meet with such resistance, accepting it even though it is so terribly obvious means giving up so much.  I understand that this morning as I sat in pain waiting for words that never came, realizing how critical to my tiny little life a little reassurance was, realizing it was far too important to me.  It is worse than death which is a temporary sort of peace followed by varying degrees of impotence, I have lived pieces of a million lives and wonder if there is another one out there where I can find contentment for more than one night.

I have not been around much, weeks have passed since the last post, but still there are hits on this blog, one after another, because while the science is ignored by the ignorant, who after all ignored the crises of disease until it overwhelmed them, it is still recognized by readers for what it is and the few brave enough, or hopeless enough, to study it, understand.

Enough of that.

We'll touch briefly on two things, the letters are all broken up on this page and it is difficult for me to do more than a little work.

The first is this silly space time article.  If you read my work you know there is only dimensional change and that early dimensional change leads to the illusion of time as stop frame animation.  If you search my work (Algorithm Universe Theory) and find my youtube page, which you may find in prior posts, you can see a video on this.  I could give you a link, but a little effort on your part will not hurt.

https://www.vice.com/en_au/article/n7w3nw/ripples-in-spacetime-keep-revealing-bizarre-occurrences-in-space

I don't want to give you nothing today, so here are three pictures that show the compression fractal applied to a galaxy with surprising results.


I'd explain these but that would take me farther afield than I am ready to go this morning and if you understand the model, you can see where it goes.

There is nonsense out there and this nonsense comes fro Quora, "Quarks are fundamental particles. That is a given."  This is such obvious crap.  There are no quarks, the drawing above is the proof of the pudding after a fashion, the fractal model which starts with something, but nothing like these enormous quarks of fantasy.  The only way they can be anything is to say that quark=fractal stable state which would be entirely different, the difference in the electron as a "quark" and what an electron actually is.

"our universe has six quarks, but four are just heavy carbon copies of the first two, which means that they are unstable, decaying into lighter particles. So that leaves the two: the up quark and the down quark."

What a load of meaningless jibber-jabber.  Up, down, in out, when these terms mean nothing, color, etc, and it goes on to talk about "electromagnetism as one of three fundamental interactions along with weak and strong when all of the "forces" align only because they reflect different stages of fractal compression, just as the drawings above, those might as well be called three different forces even though they are only the same drawings at different scales.  Indeed, that is a perfect analogy of the stupidity of the prior art.

More nonsense, "the strong interaction works... has three charges (whimsically labeled after the principal colors red, green and blue), but a stable configuration of quarks has to be “color neutral”: either a quark and an antiquark of the same color, or three quarks, each with a different color."
This is worse than jibber jabber, it is an attempt to explain something that doesn't even exist.

That leaves just two possible combinations of three quarks: ddu and duu. One of these is electrically neutral; the other has +1 electric charge. We call the electrically neutral combination the neutron, the charged one the proton.

And now we get to the only slightly significant part of this article.
"Only one of these (combinations)  is truly stable: the charged one. The neutral one is ever so slightly heavier, which means that it can actually decay (through the weak interaction!) into the other, while emitting an electron and an antielectron-neutrino. Fortunately, when a neutron is inside an atom, things change, and the neutron becomes stable (most of the time). So we end up with a periodic table of elements."  Jibberist of the jabber, but why important?  Because stupid as the entire thing is it points out that the neutron is unstable alone, that it requires, for stability the balance of the surrounding fractal states, the smaller circles outside of the bigger circle by way of example, however poor it is dimension-ally because of the increased dimension of the neutron.  Therein lies a power in the true fractal science within limits, just as I live within limits and die within limits of a human orbit that breaks my heart.


It is time for a new book, I have it written, I only need to edit it and publish it.  I only need to be able to see it, like I can barely see this page.

No comments:

Post a Comment