it's the end of the world as we know it and i feel fine

http://www.ozy.com/fast-forward/its-the-end-of-the-world-how-do-you-feel/62757?utm_source=FTE&utm_medium=pp&utm_campaign=pp

It's been six days since my last post.  I'm rebooting right now and apparently it's taking a while for the system to come back up.
I am working on a 'break out' post, but even in the next few posts when I get to them I expect it to only come out in pieces.
I am busy, if inoperable.
Still, you couldn't ask for a life with more change in it, stay tuned.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY

The changing face of AuT part tres

Before launching into a discussion of each of the features of AuT that has changed, it is worth discussing how important the changes are to the theory, both as a positive and a negative feature.
It might be said that the initial concepts embodied in EHT are completely lost in AuT and that is not entirely incorrect.  The problem with EHT is it clung too tightly to prior theories.  It's very name combined Einstein and Hologram theory, both of which continue to have merit, although only Einstein had practical application.
The problem is that both of those remained locked in concepts which did not stand up to scruitiny when math was applied to them together.  They broke down.  There is a great deal of observation that withstands the scrutiny of AuT as well it should if AuT is to withstand scrutiny.  But the theoretical underpinnings of explanations broke down quickly.
And that is why there is a theory where all coordinates have to change at the same rate because they all change to a single variable.
That is why we are able to look past what old theories identified as forces and see that all of those forces were merely shadows reflected from the mathematics which took away the false power that they held over other theories, the theories which can all be identified as "pre-aut" mathematics.
That is why we can solve so many previously unsolved anomalies in observed physics because AUT looks beyond observation and explains those, not just black holes, not just unifying all states of information (space-black holes) but even cracked the question of the big bang open so wide that it becomes a small piece of the bigger universe that AuT explains so completely.
That is why it is possible to come up with algorithms that fit into a model that provides this type of solution.
It is why dimension and time can be eliminated in favor a solution and why with such a bizarre result, we can still see why the solid universe works because quantum changes occur at 10-39th of a second.
It shows why space can exist outside of the model by higher states by going from non-linear to linear solutions within the model (0,1,1,0 in the suggested model).
And even though the model is simple it shows how staggering of solutions provides the necessary complexity observed and why randomness and history can exist in a quantum environment.
And without any support from the "greater" scientific community or any government, although I'm open to proposals, especially places with scenic views from the scientific centers.

The zeno socrates dialogs

This is available in edited form on Amazon, but it's in line for a subsequent edit after the summer edit of The first battlefield of WWII and the several ongoing projects that have to share this little space..

AuT Countdown clocks part 2-count up clocks

X is not consistent.  you have during compression the size
1/(x-n) as n approaches x leads to an equation where stability is defined by a variable x that is set somewhere in the equation and n approaches x in the equation.
x is fueled during compression spiral phases.
n in this case is the variable that changes in one direction so x has to increase then become "fixed" or "relatively fixed" meaning it changes but not as fast as n so it out grows n in the compression phase and n outgrows it in expansive phases.
So the effect of "compression" or "capacitance" is the "fueling" of x.
This is more important than it looks because capacitance and the extent is not just a matter for macro-universe events (compression to expansion and back) but it defines individual quantum states.
So the base equation shows, as the dual spiral model shows that for individual spirals x grows and then for a lengthy period stays the same and then grows again.  Imagine that, the early model becomes prescient!
The "fueling of x" can be explained by the amount of overlap which is increasing.  This increasing amount of overlap is the "carrier" referred to.  In this way you can have two equations.  One defines in a very limited sense the spiral arms making up any state.  In the other is an equation which steadily increases the size of x in the x-n equation so that x increases while the numbers defining the base in the Base^2^n equation remains a function of only, for example in matter, 2,3,5 just as space may be 0,1,1,0 matter may be 2,3,5,2.
This requires spirals off of spirals, one circulating off of the 2,3,5,2 type model and the other acting as a capacitor for loading a lifespan so you have:
a) a changing solution to pi ad described previously
b) a charging solution using the capacitance equation described earlier but driven by the overlap based on a steadily increasing amount of overlap (e.g. in the diagram below the overlap shown by A is smaller than the Overlap shown by D) followed by periods where the "compression decreases and an equation of the "type" sin(pi(changing)/2(x-n)" is coupled with the compression equation (base)^2^y where y (to differentiate it form the ever changing values of x and n, is equal to the compression state (ct1,2,3,4,5) so that for matter the equation at any point in time is along the lines of sin(pi(changing)/2(xchanging-n) base^2^y where n is the single variable for the universe and x and y are solutions to changes in the value of n at any given quantum point but the universe is made up of the sum of points n alligned by a proximity equation which is essentially 1,11,111,1111,11111 building outward and with offsets so that it might look like 1,11,112,2131,etc with the offset defined by the irregularities (described in the prior posts) being defined by the staggered nature of the changes of each separate point over different values of n.

Aut-why base 10 has unfocused pre aut mathematics and countdown clocks in the universe Part 1

the problem with base 10
1,1,2,3,5,8,1' where 1' is 5 more than 8,2' where 2' is 8 more than1',3' where 3 is1' more than 2', etc.  The spacing and not the numbers is critical to the f-series analysis so you have:
11,22,33,55,88,1'1',2'2', etc to get a better feel for how the system works outside of a human based number analysis which screws up the picture of the F-series.
It is an interesting irony because the base 10 system was brought to Europe in its current form by the same Italian who brought the F-series to us.  The power of the universe.
Conceptually the build out of the universe is envisioned as a single algorithm built on a single variable change using variations that are built into the algorithm.  That is there are no dues ex machina in the universe.
The building allows for tremendous variety.
1,11,111,1111,11111 representing to transition from space,photonic,wave energy, matter, black hole/ct5.  The application of this, however is a much more complicated than just matching clock time states because it follows an equation as n=1,2,3,4,5 as a "stable form of minimum particle as Fseries^2^n where the F-series is 0,1,1;1,1,2;1,2,3;2,3,5;3,5,8 for each state.
This in turn suggests that each "stable" series is stable as a function of a specific set of equations for each type of state, matter being the 2,3,5 curves.  Opposing this is the term of stability observed which suggests that states at the inflection point of our universe (post big bang inflection) has each state of matter being largely stable for a period of billion years which means that "stability" is another factor in the equation, a countdown clock built into the equation.  While there are many ways to arrive at this division by zero is a good starting point since a transition (or inflection point) has to occur at any number divided by zero.  Alternatively, this suggests that "stability" is a function of an inflection point type equation.  These two equations can be represented by:
1/x-n and sin(pi/n2).
1/(x-n) as n approaches x leads to an equation where stability is defined by a variable x that is set somewhere in the equation and n approaches x in the equation.
These can be put together in several ways:
e.g. [1/(x-n)]sin(pi/n2) or sin(pi/2(n-x)
The exact methodology is some variation.
If I didn't have to fight constantly and if I had just a little support this would go quicker.

Aut is the right model but...

In order to get to the proper math model it is necessary to make determinations what don't come easy.
The first one is: what is the "right" base model.  The F-series or Fibonacci series appears logical and gives good results when studying compression states.  It actually works perfectly within the observational parameters we have, although those are far from perfect.
2) After the F series, the next question is how is the model developed.  Space curvature suggests spirals, the vibrational nature of things, compression phenomena,  and the formula derivation of the infinite series of pi suggests postive and negative intersecting spirals.
3) The degree of curvature suggests that curvature and the number of spirals (in a given solution zone or in the entire universe) suggests that pi is derived from the increase in the single variable defining the universe.
4) Dilation, the illusion of speed, suggests an interaction with lower clock time states creates the illusion of movement and higher gravity of higher clock time states.
Model choices however, are large and mean that different paths lead to different results.
1) Do CT states increase with the value of x or do ct states stay within a narrow range, does this range include lower states or just higher states, what model allows for spirals to stay within a range if they do.  The return is suggested by space.  That is for space you have 0-1-1-0.  This means that space returns to non-linearity every two changes in x.  For photonic this would translate to 1,1,2,1 as opposed to 1,1,2,3,1 for example which could be equally likely.  And then there is 0,1,1,2,1 or 0,1,1,2,0.  All of these various models have the strengths, the 01120 would provide for gravity.  Then you get to wave energy which 235 or 12351, 112351,0112350 and another version of the model gets to 223355 or 1122335511 and even these have permutations such as 233452 where the two "coordinates" changing together are offset.  This looks at one single element and shows how many different paths are suggested.
2) Then there is the interaction equation.  The interaction, for example, between space and photons might look like 01,11,12,01 or even 001,111,112,001 for example which would provide for diferent dimensional element and speed.  For example 001 might be faster than 01 as a solution but 011 and 012 might be the same speed or one may be faster.
3) Note that this formulation doesn't even begin to address an interaction with a negative ct state if such exists even.  for example a 0-1,2 interaction would presumably be very different from a 1,-1,2 interaction or a 0,1,2 interaction.   The ability to solve interactions without resulting to negative numbers as well as suggested interactions with negative numbers raises significant questions.
4) Spirals growing in size are suggested by observed stabilities (things stay together longer as we move away from the latests big bang, for example) which raises a number of questions as well as suggesting that either (1 states stay the same longer which is contraindicated by the single algorithm changing all coordinates togetehr or that a single ct state stays the same along a long spiral arm and that compression occurs along a growing spiral arm even though the individual states along that arm change according to their ct state.  for example one "spiral arm" may have a spiral solution at 1.251x10^100 in length but during that incredible length at each change a photon would be changing along a simple 1,1,2,1 type progression.  How other time states would interact between spiral arms is raised by this type of model.
The reason why this is important is that it shows how many different models there are that need to be investigated to get to the proper model suggested by observations.  Up till now, using words we have jumped between models to get where we need to be, but eventually choices need to be made..
There are certain "results" that the theory gives, certain misconceptions that are ruled out, but coming up with the right fundamental elements of the algorithm remains complicated and the transition between simple spiral theory and compression models are difficult.
Carrying and secondary spirals works well with the type of "building" you see with F-series progressions which embody a basis for history, but how these would be expressed mathematically is a yet another offshoot to be explored.  Unfortunately, the raw data from the super-colliders is still being examined using "hack" mathematics, everyone looking for the wrong thing, since some of the answers might be suggested by what is hidden in that data, but it remains possible to look at.
As has been mentioned in a recent post, base 10 mathematics and the extremely rapid increases in scale (how must space is incorporated even in a single quantum of wave energy for example) adds to the complexity of looking for patterns in the solution and, of course, I'm the only one making a comprehensive study of the phenomena although you could help at least indirectly.
Some "changes" are not so much changes in concept as changes in perspective.
Originally, the very first model, was Einsteinian-using "the only reason for time" led to "in the absence of time everything happens at once."  A corollary as opposed to an entirely new rule.  Next came the idea that there was an algorithm powered universe, the single variable model, but even that is less than perfect because while it does provide a model where any point can be solved with a value of x, the "building of time states" one state following the F-series model being the result of "at least 2" prior states means that there is an element of linearity raising questions about whether there is true non-linearity.  While there is limited support for the idea that any point may be solved, instead of "everything happening at once" it appears that there is a single variable algorithm that gives rise to every solution of time, but there is still a hidden element of linearity to the system raising questions as to whether anything that Einstein said has an element of fundamental truth.
Still, having the ideas of randomness, the types of divisions we see on the quantum, even the human evolution (political and genetic) level does nothing but strengthen the conviction the theory works and the if it is broken in places, it is broken no worse than we are.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yZ1uI5yPbY

I have been largely distracted from this, but I have been working from the blackboard.  i need a third blackboard already, but I'm not putting one up today.  I am dealing with one emergency after another and I have not been able to sit down and work consistently on anything other than dealing with emergencies.
I am writing this sitting outside in a world which seems like it will wash away with all the rain that has fallen.  Yesterday it wasn't even supposed to rain, but the roads were flooded in places.
There isn't much physics in this.  I have not made the kind of quantum leaps that are reflected in the last 5 or 10 posts and those are "mostly" shown in the last published volume.
My plan continues to be to have a comprehensive, if basic, formula for the "universe equation" in the next published volume.  Right now it is in pieces and words and is not totally satisfying.  All the parts are there, but exactly how they fit together and the formulas that have to substitute for the words remain unclear.
The biggest impediment  might be problems with using a base 10 system which complicates the solutions unnecessarily and is inherent in a coordinate based system.  Another problem is scale.  Quantum scales to observable so slowly that it is difficult to test anything past the bulk changes.
The concept remains so reliable, despite these problems, so predictive and descriptive of so many different concepts that it has to be right as much as anything according to the scientific method is right and perhaps I'll have the time for this in the near future.

Aut-consolidating issues Part 1

I hung my dry erase board next to my smaller board and immediately filled it up today. I realize I need a bigger room.
Still, I made some progress in organizing my thoughts for the next big problem solving issue which is the effort to address more fundamentally the equations driving NLC.  Unfortunately, issues like deriving pi and coming up with the reason why and how pi is derived (see the earlier posts for the general formulation as x changed) is complicated.  It is not enough to know that the universe is driven by a single variable universe, it is also critical to understand the mechanism driving it.
If I tried to put down all of the variables this would be a very long blog, but let me go into a few of them.
History is preserved through (at least two) prior ct states forming the third which is inherent in the F-series model.  But remembering the F-series is just a suggested model, it is possible to look at other ways that both dimension and history can be preserved.
The multiple ct coordinate changes can be a function of the 1, 11, 111, 1111 type of series or it could be some other way of coordinating time state.
The interaction of time states can result from shared F-series.  For example, photonic ct states having 1,1,2 as the primary derivative may interact with matter according to the portion of matter deriving from 1,1,2,3,5,7 where the numbers match which may change as matter moves through its paces.  By way of example using () to designate the photonic you may have something like this:
(1)111,(1)111,(2)222,3333,5555,7777 so that there is a sharing of information which is fleeting because of the changing structure.  If the photonic state cannot get past 1,1,2 then it would have a more fleeting interaction than wave energy which, following the same logic might look like this:
(1)(1)11,(1)(1)11,(2)(2)22,(3)(3)33,5555,7777 and it can also be seen that (1)111 with two separate ct4 states would be possible.
Just working through these formulations is incredibly complex, but it is the first steps in defining the interaction of different time states to get the "effects" of force as they are experienced which includes such diverse concepts of time dilation.  For example (1)1(1)1 may reflect two "space" states interacting with one ct4 state to give the effect of increased speed or gravity giving rise to the illusion of time dilation.
Even space with its 0,1,1 designation is complicated because this suggests that space goes in and out of a dimensionless mathematical state.  This is relatively easy, of course, since dimension is an illusion and it also suggests a mechanism for the peculiarities of spatial perception.

to be continued...

AuT Confusion, the wizard of oz and floating cars

The physicist scarecrow  approached the wizard of oz and asked "What do you have in that bag for me?"
And the wizard responded, "Why Physicists have been solving the problems of the universe for years and with no more brains than you have scarecrow.  But they have something you haven't got!"
"What is that?" Dorothy asks.
" A 72 inch by 46inch chalk board, of course." And with that the wizard of oz pulled a gift certificate out for a large sized dry erase board because that seems like it will work better.

While AuT is solid conceptually, some of the equations I have been working on need some work.
This isn't because the concept is wrong, it is only because I can write these out better now that I know what is going on but I've run out of space.
I need a bigger chalk board.

The reason is to clarify, primarily, this very rough equation:

P1=gsin(pi/2x)(xFsereiesFunction)^2^x + (neg)P1 

and this very rough equation:

(base Fseries function)^2^number of the clock time state) 

What this equation has to do is the following:

1) Control Inflection point  changes (hence (FsF)pi/2x) according to F series.  That is, there has to be inflection point changes at 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, etc).  In other words, x changes from 2 to 3, 3 to 5, 5 to 8, 8 to 13, etc before there is an inflection of pi/2. The suggestion here is that space goes from 0,1,1 and then back to 0 this transition back to zero presumably giving rise to the appearance of quantum gravity.  

Another great feature is that since both photons and wave energy share the common 1 state (something unique to this transition as far as the higher states go) there is a mechanism for photons and waves to share a common state which is observed.

Photons would go from 1,1,2 and then back to 1, wave energy from 1,2,3 and then back to 1, etc.  Another suggestion of the math of Fibrucci series is that space is 0,1,1, photons 11,11,22, energy 111,222,333, matter 2222,3333,5555 which is not a totally satisfying result even though the exponential nature of compression is preserved.  

This means that the F-series never, in our universe goes out very far.  This is a troubling concept for me.  A very large solution to the F-series is more satisfying because the larger numbers of the F-series suggests a longer period of stability.  The other problem is one of "over-stability" where the ct4 states, for example, that we experience stay at 2,3,5 and back to 2 which doesn't immediately suggest a mechanism for breaking down as is observed.  The argument is that there is too much or too little symmetry which is broken up if the F-series is allowed to grow.  The "life-span" F-series works better if each state continues to increase and where the highest F-series number for the first spiral is x which would given that spiral extremely long periods of stability, such is observed in space and smaller spirals have much shorter life spans.  While such a model works well for space, matter and energy in a gross state universe, it might or might not work as well with black holes which would have the shortest spirals.  However, if we look at quasar type radiation as the break down of black holes, then maybe we do observe this phenomena.  These two ways of approach stability have to solved separately to see which one works the best.

Hence, an unresolved problem is that the universe has photons and waves going back and forth, matter and energy going back and forth and even black holes and matter going back and forth.  Since these inflection changes do not happen except at sufficiently high concentration, The Equation must also:

2) Control F-series definitions for each quantum point so that the point does not change states except in concentrations sufficient to take it to the next higher state.

                Ct1=space=2^2^1  (This suggests that space arises from 0,1,1 which is the first possible "base" solution.  There is a prior solution state that exists in the absence of pi offsets.  The prior base state is a state defined with the base  -1,0,1 which is 0^2^0 or 0^1 which is still zero.  This bizarre proof is actually the proof in the mathematical pudding for the entire compression state phenomena, once you get below the information state for space, you have a singularity, just as predicted.  Anyone who doesn't see this as genius, has completely missed the balloon to oz.

                Ct2=photonic energy=3^2^2

                Ct3=wave energy=5^2^3

                Ct4=matter=10^2^4 (e=mc^2)

                Ct5=black hole=16^2^5

Or, put another way, (base Fseries function)^2^number of the clock time state) for compression from one state to the next.  That is the scale is based on the prior ct state and not on the original ct state.  Put another way for wave energy there are 5^2^3 photons per quantum state of wave energy in terms of scale.

In this way, you want see even the possibility of ct2 until you have x=3^4.  Likewise you won't have the possibility of wave energy until you have 5^8 photons each of which requires 3^4 space informational states so that x=390625^81=a very large number and that number would only allow for a single wave to form in a stable format and it would instantly begin to break down.  Or maybe it's 390625*81, I'll figure it out if I ever get a chalkboard.

3) It must also be remembered that as x increase this equation must allow for the changes in the value of pi (see the earlier post on this) to allow for the offset of information so negative and positive information don't cancel each other out..  Of course by the time you get to even a single photon you are going out 3^4 or 81 places, the curvature when a single wave is possible is enormous, but any one spiral remains linear since all of these turns are essentially at right angles relatively quickly.

Even without getting to the other features of the universe, it can be seen that this is a fairly simple equation with complex undertones, hence the need for a fairly large chalkboard to write it out.

4) The equation has to define a single point by both a positive and a negative aspect so that it can be defined as being solved away from its partner (entropy generated as a solution) or towards its partner (gravity generated).  Note that in this case, entropy is anti-gravity, nothing more.  While this does not mean that we can have floating cars, it also doesn't mean that we cannot.  To do this, we merely need to have at the location of the vehicle an isolated average inflection point.

5) The equation has to define how the universe builds with different solutions to pi for each point but still allowing for history to be preserved by adding two prior states to the current state while at the same time providing for at least 3 dimensions.  Time isn't a problem since time is nothing more than the changing value of the single variable and the perception of time nothing more than having the prior two states incorporated in the current state.
6) It must provide a mechanism for perceived separation of quantum points, why some seem to be close together and others seem to be far apart and
7) It must explain why adjacent quantum points of different states give rise to the illusion of force when perceived as adjacent based on the historical 2 prior states forming the current state as the basis for perceived change.

I am confused by my own equations, I see where they are going, but I forget the point I made.  Mr Wizard, is there a larger dry erase board in my future?

AuT vs The Big Bounce

http://www.wired.co.uk/article/big-bang-big-bounce-universe
Geilen and Turok  came up with a very similar model whch included a pass through the singularity for supporting the 1922 model of a steady state universe of contracting and expansion.
This is AuT to a large extent.
The main difference between the two models is one of depth rather than substance.
The two are not, however, the same although Geilen and Turok are the two physicists that are 3 years behind (as opposed to the five years) everyone else is.
Why?
Their methodology for collapse relies on space which is an effect.  They are looking at a quantum gravity collapse of everything in the universe (conceivably not space,  although I would concede that if the rest of AuT was taken for granted, space would collapse like everything else).  They correctly model on quantum gravity, but their collapse is rather more complete than the collapse required by AuT but both are "smooth" transitions, AuT is a less smooth transition at the quantum level however, and only achieves smoothness due to averaging of inflection points.
They do not explain curvature, but take it for granted.
Essentially their smoothness is not based on averaged inflection points, but space-time phenomena.  The fact that the two models arive at the same place is because space-time phenomena reflect Algorithm based solutions.
Because of this, they don't get the the issue of why each successive universe is so different from the one before and, in truth, it took me 3 years working with the right model to get there.
The mathematics are certainly better because they solve a single variable algorithm for multiple variables, but that is a mistake rather than a triumph.   What is more telling, however, is that they correctly identify quantum gravity while failing to have a model explaining how historical references can exist in a quantum environment.
Still, they are trying to explain the right concepts and if they work hard (or read my book) they'll be in the right place in 3 - 5 years and in the interim, I have a place to submit my book proposal.
The problem is that there is just too much of a transition and too much of it is just in words.  The underlying model is there, but to shorten this from a book to a paper is a challenge of time as well as mathematics and time does not take kindly to being an illusion.

http://www.vevo.com/watch/GBH481500074?syndicationid=bb8a16ab-1279-4f17-969b-1dba5eb60eda&shortlink=jzAuJ1&utm_campaign=ing&country=US

AuT, the mob, the evolving book proposal edited to correct, not for the mob, but for compression

The mob is not a race or group or cause.  It is the willingness of people to follow a cause for emotional reasons.  IT is a feature of human nature that allows us to work together without the interference of the individual.  It appears necessary to civilization.  It allows us to stay together.  It is also the thing that largely brought the Roman empire down.  The mob is the reason we have freedom in the United States, the constitution, and much else.  They fill both sides of the race spectrum.  Oddly enough this is something the Ben Carson and I agree on.  I'm always concerned when I agree with Ben Carson, but he understands the mob it appears.
That isn't to say the particular mob here doesn't make a good point.  Only that joining the mob is, to some extent, a surrender of individuality.   Individuality can be good or bad (see the dallas police shooter), and the balance of individuality and mob personalities define where the mob goes.
Can the mob overcome police?  The answer is that they can.  It's not really much of a challenge.  The mob keeps the mob at bay, it isn't the guns or the courts.
This doesn't mean that the mob doesn't have a point whenever they turn out in force.  It just means they are the mob.
A split mob, however, is uniquely a AuT process and such a mob must, according to AuT eventually come together for some sort of compression which appears violent but is actually just a mathematical process.
I don't mean to say that all of your suffering and mistreatment are not important in a relativistic but only that these things are a reflection of an underlying system which is mathematically grounded, not something more noble.  These reflections are why nature provides, mathematically, a reflection of what goes on behind the scenes and allows us to theorize what is going on in the background.
But on to AuT:

SIA is about AuT which is a mathematical theory which explains dark matter, universal expansion and contraction, the big bang, the relationship of space, energy, matter and black holes and other ‘mysteries’ of science; which turn out to not be all that mysterious.

Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) explains the origin of quantum theory and is specifically the study of fixed quantum coordinates as the origin of all space-time phenomena.

The pre Non-linear coordinate concepts include space time, primarily relativity developed in the 1930’s and hologram theory suggested in 1995.  AuT eradicates the need for space.  While we “experience” space time, we do so according to a specific set of rules, physics.  The existence of those rules results from a non-linear, Algorithm based universe reacting to the change in a single variable.

AuT assumes nothing, and therefore arrives mathematically at a solution where we are not a projection at all.  Instead, we exist as quantum solutions to an algorithm in a non-linear environment.  The absence of movement or even dimension means that the passage of time is not a passage at all. The illusion of time and dimension comes from the process by which the universe at any quantum instant arises from the sum of (two) prior quantum instants.  The sum (of the prior two) quantum moments preserves historical perspective while allowing variation by a single variable.

Variation, as observed derives from the offset of each successive spiral algorithm.  This offset can be seen in the derivation of pi and allows for pi to be solved with specificity as to any quantum moment notwithstanding its perception as an infinite series.

The universe requires the offset of positive and negative spirals for any quantum of information to obtain stability, to prevent them from merging back into a non-linear universe.

P1=gsin(pi/2x)(xFsereiesFunction)^2^x + (neg)P1 where g is a function of x that defines the intersection at any point which is a function of all spirals for that point according to the solution of the F-series function for the given spiral and FsF=sum(n,n-1,n-2).  This solution must be given for all points together and summed in the same fashion FsF(all points).  P1 is the negative spiral defined for the same value of x.

Pi in this equation changes along with the value of x, so that effective intersection of points occurs only as x increases to the point where compression occurs.

P1 and P2 have unusual features as primary non-linearity derivations but P3 is P1+P2 but pi has changed along with the location of the intersection as a function of x.  P1 and P2 are offset from each other and from the new P3 state.  P4=p3+P2=P3+P2+p1 but offset by the changing value of pi.  This process continues as x increase for p(x). Hence the amount of information in the universe as we perceive it changes with the value of x and the offset of two points, each point being a positive and negative solution to an algorithm, changes with each change in the value of x.

pi for any point is defined by the sum(from x=1 to n) for 4/x-4/x+2. In this way for the first two spirals (one positive, one negative), pi allows for some offset in what is essentially a linear function (4/1-4/3).  Where x=2 it is, of course, 4/1-4/3+4/5-4/7 and so on.  In this way all points are offset slightly although the positive and negative spirals are essentially the same otherwise.

pi for any point is defined by the sum(from x=1 to n) for 4/x-4/x+2. In this way for the first two spirals (one positive, one negative), pi allows for some offset in what is essentially a linear function (4/1-4/3).  Where x=2 it is, of course, 4/1-4/3+4/5-4/7 and so on.  In this way all points are offset slightly although the positive and negative spirals are essentially the same otherwise. One suggestion of compression is that pi changes from 1/1-1/1+2+1/5 or pi=sum(from x=1 to n) for ct/x-4/x-4/x+2 so that depending on the ct state the value of pi changes even for the same value of x.

 As x becomes very large (as in our current state of the universe where the number of points from this original size is extremely large, pi effectively goes out towards infinity, but each point is slightly offset and the summation of the prior (two) states to get to the current state has a great deal of offset.

Given the very high value of x, curvature exists for all intents and purposes.

There is in this pattern of offsets sufficient variety to allow for the diverse universe we experience notwithstanding the simple origin and the similarity of all points.

AuT is a mathematically more balanced "rediscovery" of what Parmenides realized 2500 years ago.  The quantum shift 2500 years ago was the recognition that the universe of space time had logical inconsistencies that could not be resolved as long as one insisted on viewing space-time as a prerequisite.  Space time in AuT is a phenomena generated by fixed non-linear features, the “everything happening at once” envisioned by Einstein.  The rules of physics are not background rules, but instead reflect the fixed mathematical solutions to a single algorithm.  Even space-time does not exist independently and linear characteristics can only be understood by solving them for non-linear equations.  

Dark times vs dark matter and the derivation of pi

Without diversity we are boring.  Without police, everything falls apart.
It is sad to think that I should be writing about dark matter, but instead I'm writing about dark times.
But your times are drops of water in the ocean of the universe, important to us, but irrelevant to the universe, let's move on.
I'm too distracted by events to give the rather deep and lengthy discussion of dark matter as spatial compression, but we can discuss one of the predecessor points.
Pi, what is it?
It isn't what YOU think, of course, but it is something.  I'm going to tell you exactly what and why it is now.  Sorry to keep you waiting.  Not 100% exact, but 3-5 years ahead of everyone else.  Aren't you special.
Anyway, the universe needs enough of that diversity to keep from collapsing.  If we look at g-space as the mind of god, he thinks in terms of equations that collapse on themselves accomplish nothing.  To be stable the two sides, the positive and negative spiral equations must be offset.  This is where pi comes in.
The derivation of pi for any quantum point yields a stable quantum universe with positive and negative stacked lines that curve with the average of the total number according to a changing value of pi for triplets of f series equations and those can be defined with some exactitude.   Turn to page 9 in your reader (spirals in amber)
Let's break it down.
P1=gsin(pi/2x)(xFsereiesFunction)^2^x where g is a constant and FsF=sum(n,n-1,n-2).  This solution must be given for all points together and summed in the same fashion FsF(all points).
Here is where the variety comes in.  Pre Aut mistakenly thought you knew what pi is, but pi changes as we've discussed before. Turn to page 149
pi for any point is defined by the sum(from x=1 to n) for 4/x-4/x+2. In this way for the first two spirals, pi allows for some offset in what is essentially a linear function (4/1-4/3).  Where x=2 it is, of course, 4/1-4/3+4/5-4/7 and so on.  In this way all points are offset slightly although the positive and negative spirals are essentially the same  As x becomes very large (as in our current universe where the number of points from this original size is unfathomably large (well, unfathomably large for you anyway) pi effectively goes out towards infinity, but each point is slightly offset.
If you look to the figure (in your book) on page 129 you can see how these slightly offset spirals average together, but this provides more of the detail how the result is obtained and given the very high value of x, curvature exists for all intents and purposes.
There is in this pattern of offsets sufficient variety to allow for the diverse universe we experience notwithstanding the simple origin and the similarity of all points.
Moreover, for any quantum of time of the universe, you have another offset represented by the current point being the sum of the prior two states of the universe.
Enough for tonight, I have to get out of here before I'm driven insane.  I am falling apart, not sure if I'll live to finish the next edition, so don't lose your notes.

Aut Trumps Einstein

Yes, I'm going to say that I'm pretty far ahead of Einstein.  Not his fault really, I had the benefit of his information and a lot that came after him.  Plus, I was shown the universe, as you well know and how that came to pass and whenever, the more painfully, the more intensely, I am reminded of that, the suffering is accompanied by a renewed vision.  It is perhaps punishment for looking where man was not meant to look, but I was tricked to some extent and forced to look, by passions that were used against me.  So I have seen things no other man has seen because I was shown what no man should see, heaven and hell, but it allowed me to look beyond all your mortal science.
But you disagree, perhaps.  If so, and if you've read the book, you'll know this:
Einstein said space was curved, AuT explained why it was curved.
Einstein determined e-mc^2, Aut Explained why and showed how this equation fit in with other phenomena
Einstein didn't really see the big bang, but he wrestled with finding a uniform field theory and while AuT describes all the forces and their inter-relationship, but we're about to go into that more deeply still.
AuT is clearly a superior method for study, but let's go one step further.
You  should review the prior two posts because we're going to begin here putting them together.
First, however, we're going to give the basic concept for the building of forces  using pure algorithm theory.
1,1,1 to 2222,3333,5555 involves a scale of combination of space to matter on the scale of 10^16 at least.  A middle range, not the most, it is 2^3^5^10^16.  We'll come back to that.
The number of possible overlaps gives rise a a huge number of different scales of force and types of forces that we experience.
We're going to begin the analysis using the larger number because what we're looking at is the amount of space involved in compression, the decompression that we see (10^16 in scale terms) is only the breakdown from matter to energy, but it is almost certainly also a part of other conversions, not because it has to be, but because the spiral methodology suggests that result in an unstable environment.
But interactions occur between different ct states in stable environments and these interactions result in vibrational, energy, molecular and gravitational forces and this is only possible in a quantum universe by having the AuT model where different prior time states are the foundation for subsequent time states as we've already shown (you can see the book for this)
This is what we're going to examine because "the interaction of different states gives rise to what we call forces and these interactions involve the different ways that different states interact over three different quantum time periods."
This last statement is the beginnings of the discussion of how forces arise from the AuT model of history and stable state comperssion and decompression and is where this will end for tonight.

And why do I see more than anyone else, you know why, it is because of a cruelty that I need someone else to express better than me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxA3YRCnbao

AuT-The F-series chart

The changes in information represented by AuT can be charted out with some certainty.  By examining these the interaction and equations defining the universe can be defined with relative certainty:

1 F-series 0,1,1 or 1,1,1            Base 0,1,1   Exp 2^1 c-scale Equation 2^2^1 (2^2)
2 F-series 11,11,22                    Base 1,1,2   Exp 2^2 c-scale Equation 4^2^2 (4^4)
3 F-series 111,222,333              Base 1,2,3   Exp 2^3 c-scale Equation 6^2^3 (6^8)
4 F-series 2222,3333,5555         Base 2,3,5  Exp 2^4 c-scale equation 10^2^4 (10^16) e=mc^2
5 F-series 33333,5555,8888    Base 3,5,8  Exp 2^5 c-scale equation 16^2^5 (16^32) (bh scale)

This shows the relationship between the type of F-series acting together, the base (a direct function of the number of F-series units associated with a given F-state, the exponential directly related to the number of coordinates changing together.
This is written to suggest that the larger the information state base, that is the larger the stable compression state, the higher the originating F-series.   This suggests an interaction between compression and the historical building block of the prior two state which is observed.  As is discussed later, the historical movement from 0 to 1 embodying the gravitational element (this is NOT a boson, it is a mathematical construct based on the expression of information) remains in higher compression states.
The suggestion is that space doesn't compress in the same way as other information states because it starts from non-linearity  The spatial spirals are stuck in the initial transition.  The exact forces that allow for the compression of any states are imperfectly set out, they are observed and subject to calculation.  It is observed, from the existence of gravity, that all states have a transition from zero built into them which is carried as they are combined with prior information states in order to reflect the compression we observe.
If one accepts the model of positive and negative spirals having negative results (relative to one another) it suggests that gravity (linearity to non-linearity) and entropy (the solution to approaching and receding spirals) are independent, one being related to the 0,1 transition shown in item 1 and the other being reflected in the "direction" of location of the spiral solution.  We see entropy increasing and expansion against gravity during net expansion solutions (predominately receding spirals) and increased order with a greater concentration of gravity during net compression solutions (predominately approaching spirals).
One suggestion in the model above is that "space" is added to the highest series to get to the next higher series during compression events, but this also appears to be more of a graphic determination than one supported by any modeling.  The amount of space necessary to achieve this transition would be very high.  On the other hand, the value of x (the single variable defining the universe at any quantum moment) would necessarily have to be extremely high for there to be sufficient space to achieve this result, even at the black hole (bh) level we find ourselves at.  This might be the limiting factor to higher compression states after any particular big bang.  There just isn't enough 1,1,1 to add to 33333 to get to the 5,8,13 transition that we can be fairly certain forms the next base for the exponential 26^2^6 or 26^64th for the next most massive informational state (unless this number corresponds in mass to an observed supermassive black hole).
The idea that there is a single equation for our "universe" doesn't discount the possibility of other universes based on multiples of different series, that is, the center of our universe may be one in a series of underlying F'series, but that is for another blog.

AuT-the book proposal

While I know you're interested in me finishing the changing face series, and I am interested also, having just nearly died (metaphorically) last night I was only up to working on the book proposal this morning.

OVERVIEW

SIA is about a mathematical theory which explains dark matter, universal expansion and contraction, the big bang, the relationship of space, energy, matter and black holes and other ‘mysteries’ of science; which turn out to not be all that mysterious.

Algorithm Universe Theory explains the origin of quantum theory and is specifically the study of fixed quantum coordinates as the origin of all space-time phenomena.

The pre Non-linear coordinate concepts include space time, primarily relativity developed in the 1930’s and hologram theory suggested in 1995.  AuT eradicates the need for space.  While we “experience” space time, we do so according to a specific set of rules, physics.  The existence of those rules results from a non-linear, Algorithm based universe reacting to the change in a single variable.

AuT assumes nothing, and therefore arrives mathematically at a solution where we are not a projection at all.  Instead, we exist as quantum solutions to an algorithm in a non-linear environment.  The absence of movement or even dimension means that the passage of time is not a passage at all. The illusion of time and dimension comes from the process by which the universe at any quantum instant builds on the two prior quantum instants, that is each quantum moment is the sum of the prior two quantum moments and this process continues as the single variable changes.