In order to get to the proper math model it is necessary to make determinations what don't come easy.
The first one is: what is the "right" base model. The F-series or Fibonacci series appears logical and gives good results when studying compression states. It actually works perfectly within the observational parameters we have, although those are far from perfect.
2) After the F series, the next question is how is the model developed. Space curvature suggests spirals, the vibrational nature of things, compression phenomena, and the formula derivation of the infinite series of pi suggests postive and negative intersecting spirals.
3) The degree of curvature suggests that curvature and the number of spirals (in a given solution zone or in the entire universe) suggests that pi is derived from the increase in the single variable defining the universe.
4) Dilation, the illusion of speed, suggests an interaction with lower clock time states creates the illusion of movement and higher gravity of higher clock time states.
Model choices however, are large and mean that different paths lead to different results.
1) Do CT states increase with the value of x or do ct states stay within a narrow range, does this range include lower states or just higher states, what model allows for spirals to stay within a range if they do. The return is suggested by space. That is for space you have 0-1-1-0. This means that space returns to non-linearity every two changes in x. For photonic this would translate to 1,1,2,1 as opposed to 1,1,2,3,1 for example which could be equally likely. And then there is 0,1,1,2,1 or 0,1,1,2,0. All of these various models have the strengths, the 01120 would provide for gravity. Then you get to wave energy which 235 or 12351, 112351,0112350 and another version of the model gets to 223355 or 1122335511 and even these have permutations such as 233452 where the two "coordinates" changing together are offset. This looks at one single element and shows how many different paths are suggested.
2) Then there is the interaction equation. The interaction, for example, between space and photons might look like 01,11,12,01 or even 001,111,112,001 for example which would provide for diferent dimensional element and speed. For example 001 might be faster than 01 as a solution but 011 and 012 might be the same speed or one may be faster.
3) Note that this formulation doesn't even begin to address an interaction with a negative ct state if such exists even. for example a 0-1,2 interaction would presumably be very different from a 1,-1,2 interaction or a 0,1,2 interaction. The ability to solve interactions without resulting to negative numbers as well as suggested interactions with negative numbers raises significant questions.
4) Spirals growing in size are suggested by observed stabilities (things stay together longer as we move away from the latests big bang, for example) which raises a number of questions as well as suggesting that either (1 states stay the same longer which is contraindicated by the single algorithm changing all coordinates togetehr or that a single ct state stays the same along a long spiral arm and that compression occurs along a growing spiral arm even though the individual states along that arm change according to their ct state. for example one "spiral arm" may have a spiral solution at 1.251x10^100 in length but during that incredible length at each change a photon would be changing along a simple 1,1,2,1 type progression. How other time states would interact between spiral arms is raised by this type of model.
The reason why this is important is that it shows how many different models there are that need to be investigated to get to the proper model suggested by observations. Up till now, using words we have jumped between models to get where we need to be, but eventually choices need to be made..
There are certain "results" that the theory gives, certain misconceptions that are ruled out, but coming up with the right fundamental elements of the algorithm remains complicated and the transition between simple spiral theory and compression models are difficult.
Carrying and secondary spirals works well with the type of "building" you see with F-series progressions which embody a basis for history, but how these would be expressed mathematically is a yet another offshoot to be explored. Unfortunately, the raw data from the super-colliders is still being examined using "hack" mathematics, everyone looking for the wrong thing, since some of the answers might be suggested by what is hidden in that data, but it remains possible to look at.
As has been mentioned in a recent post, base 10 mathematics and the extremely rapid increases in scale (how must space is incorporated even in a single quantum of wave energy for example) adds to the complexity of looking for patterns in the solution and, of course, I'm the only one making a comprehensive study of the phenomena although you could help at least indirectly.
Some "changes" are not so much changes in concept as changes in perspective.
Originally, the very first model, was Einsteinian-using "the only reason for time" led to "in the absence of time everything happens at once." A corollary as opposed to an entirely new rule. Next came the idea that there was an algorithm powered universe, the single variable model, but even that is less than perfect because while it does provide a model where any point can be solved with a value of x, the "building of time states" one state following the F-series model being the result of "at least 2" prior states means that there is an element of linearity raising questions about whether there is true non-linearity. While there is limited support for the idea that any point may be solved, instead of "everything happening at once" it appears that there is a single variable algorithm that gives rise to every solution of time, but there is still a hidden element of linearity to the system raising questions as to whether anything that Einstein said has an element of fundamental truth.
Still, having the ideas of randomness, the types of divisions we see on the quantum, even the human evolution (political and genetic) level does nothing but strengthen the conviction the theory works and the if it is broken in places, it is broken no worse than we are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yZ1uI5yPbY
No comments:
Post a Comment