AuT specifics of the inquiry

Every once in a while something werid happens, like today, the majority of the views by far was from South Korea.  Imagine that.
I want to spend a few minutes talking about the various parts of AuT that manifest themselves via quantum moments (i.e. each value of x).
The 32/27 for example is a ratio for quantum change between sin(pi0) and sin(pi1).  Since both sin(pi0) and sin(pi1) exist independent of one another, there are three parts to this, sp1, sp2 and the ratio between the two that gives rise to the [2times(f(x))]^(2^x) equation that defines the remainder of the universe.
The ratio representing the carrier difference between ct states and at this level represents the linearity that gives rise to separation (solution order) and at the ct1-ct2 interface it provides the linearity that leads to gravitational phenomena.
Before I get to the "post of the day" I've written you a poem:

As I walked this evening
thinking of you
imagining that you could not see
the sacrifices that I made for you
and my certainty of my folly
in that regard

I tried to read tonight
to lose myself for a few hours
but my failing eyes
could not focus on the words
so I gave up the attempt
and I set out to walk

As I walked into the dusk
flakes of my destoryed retina
floated like hungry crows
taunting evil phantoms
mocking denied pleasure
the last thing I'd see is you

I cried for the lost opportunity
of vision and love
you know nothing of the fear
you accuse me of
as i distract myself with sight
afraid when i'm blind
i'll only see you

And now that's out of the way, here is the portion of the day:

Some specifics of Inquiry in Light of work developed to date and in context (part 1)

I.                   The basics of Algorithm Universe theory, and of this inquiry, are (1) All linearity is the result of conserved time coordinates changing in a time free, dimensionless state, (2) that this state can be represented by a single variable algorithm, and (3) that space and time occur because of the relative changes between different concentrations of information, the results of sequential solutions to that algorithm.

II.                A corollary is that dimensional aspects of the universe and forces (dimension, energy, gravity, clock time) are created in (a) conserved, (b) consecutive, (c) exponentially separate quantum state groupings based on the accumulated solutions of prior time states and an evolving definition of curvature.

A)   The Basic Equations have been completed.  They need to be refined.

B)   As part of refining, specific Models for the early universe for relatively low values of x need to be made, graphed and discussed

Buy more books:

not physics

So somehow I got a little ahead of myself and have nothing to write on physics tonight.
I ate badly, had a desert item, not sure what brought that on, we'll chalk it up to depression although I think that's a lame excuse.  Could have eaten an apple and been all, look how healthy I am, especially after swimming 2000 yards, but no, I had to eat junk.  Might as well go out and shoot myself...with a cake gun.
After a whirlwind what the fuck are you doing tour last weekend, I'm not even trying to get my life in order.  I left so many loose ends that Monday was like, why not just crawl back in the womb and start all over again.  On top of that one of my friends died, an older friend, but still, wtf?
So anyway, today spent most of the day trying to get relief supplies to puerto rico and may have had some success.  That's a pretty crazy charitable thing to do allthough there's a little profit involved, but eveyone has to make a living and I don't know how much of that (if any) will be paid and its not part of my gig.
So the idea is that everything is going the way that I want it go, before the weekend starts, but not that way that it should have gone.  That sounds confusing, but imagine you're getting everything you want, but you have to harm someone else to get it.  Not cool, right?
So what do you do?  There is no right answer at that point in time because of an imbalance between duty, love and charity which is caused by selfishness.  How is this possible in a pre-determined universe?  Let me address this issue, if for no other reason, than to give me a why the fuck did I do what I did frame of reference.
Now you can argue that in a physics based environment, its the results that matter.  I say, probably not and I understand the universe better than anyone else alive.  And you say, in an absolute universe, it should be all for gain, right?
That seems right, but maybe its not.  Let's talk about that.
In a unvierse where instant gratification is the key you do what you need to get what you want and consequences are secondary, if that.  A quantum universe and a universe absent true good will both point towards this outcome.  So let's come up with a quantum universe reason why not.
First, I don't think you'll find it in the physics, at least not at first blush.
We exist by virtue of a single variable universe where all events are predetermined and self awareness is an illusion, albeit a strong one.
So where do duty, love, charity fit it to this analysis.
First duty, the easy one.  The illusion suggests that we are free to act, but that our actions have already been determined.  Hence, according to the rules of our life we are free.  The idea that we have to act according to some solution does not change our right, it merely says that absolute right and mathematical obligation are separated by virtue of perception.  Our time in control of our own actions exists within a very narrow timeframe, and while the value of x is very high in terms of what we consider large numbers, in terms of the age of the universe, it is virtually insignificant.  Indeed, the very abasence of any lasting effect in terms of area and duration is part of the reason that the illusion is so strong, it has no significant effect on the universe.  Indeed, you could have a self determining civilization in reality on any individual planet and the odds of it having any real impact on the universe as a whole would be zero.  That is true of an entire solar system since even the destruction of that system within the universe would have a negligible overall effect of information beyond the regional level which would level out over distance and be insignificant over time altough gravitational fluctuations might be created which would have insignificant impacts at any distance, galactic distances for example.  It would have an impact at compression events, but it cannot happen in the AuT universe.
What this all means, however, is that within our absurdly short and absurdly close zone of influence we have the exact same choices in an AuT universe, with the same results as in a faith based universe.
The universe is based on order.  We reflect that just as our foot-lower leg-upper leg-body ratios reflect Fibonacci series, at least after a fashion.  If it were not for this internal order, even during compressive changes, the idea of organized organisms would not exist.  We owe our illusory self determination to the underlying order that forces us towards a form of order and imposes a sense of duty on us that we are free to ignore, but which are predisposed towards.
Let's then turn our minds to charity and love which I will argue briefly are two sides of the same coin.  Charity without love is another name for duty and we've addressed that at least in one superficial manner.  Love doesn't require charity, but if you do not love with good intentions, then it is something selfish, say sexual gratification, self protection and all the other things which are not love at all.
Hence if I give up love for some charitable reason, I am neither moving towards or away from love, but merely exchanging one form of love currency for another.  To the extent any selfish motive interferes, that reduces the love, but in the absence of any other motive, love and charity are interchangeable just like energy and mass; or according AuT space and photons, whatever.
But the question here has to do more with the obligation imposed by the ordered system, duty; and love.
The argument that I will make is that the two are interchangeable with the same exact difference, to the extent the actions are based on some selfish outcome, they are differentiated, but otherwise duty is interchangeable with love and charity.
It is an odd thing, love suggests one outcome, it jives perfectly with charity and duty.  And yet...every time selfishness is interjected, it unbalances the result.  You have to give up something, in order to be selfish, the duty/love/charity aspect is corrupted.
So, if I have some issue, it results from a selfish intent all other things being equal.  All other things are not equal, of courrse, the underying matrix imposes conditions of its own.
But next time you say I am not fulfilling my duty/love/charity obligation ask yourself, am I?  Or don't .

AuT-Principle Research Problems:

There's a lot to cover here, but first the next part of  proposal, normally at the end.

Principle Research Problems:

          What needs to be done is to reconcile the different possible ways in which the theory can pursue the solutions and to refine the equations to see whether the interpretations are accurate.

          The work continues but slowly.  There are pages of corrections that haven’t been typed.

          This process has been carried very far forward so that the theory can be show to be predictive.  Now it can use additional programming, discussion, application to information as well as continuing the past methodology which has been so effective.

And now the dark poem of the night

Ah, the dark side of love
it is the only side I know
when two people are in love
you look up
and see rainbows, butterflies, clounds and flowers
but when you walk alone
when you know only love for its darkness
you see centipedes the size of snakes
roaches the size of squirles
you see the stains on the sidewalks and roads
and you feel like you are one with them
The snakes and grumpkins in the forests
are not feared
for what can they do to you
you haven't done for yourself
no one understands those who love
only in the dark ways
self sacrifice and emolation
all my lovers hate me
i don't fault them
i admire their judgement
what lover is worthy of me
having such faults
to justify suffering my attentions
what person has suffered
such depravity of spirit and body
that they woudl deserve me
I know it not

new post
Now that I have that out of my system, let's talke about this article or we can skip the bull sh-- and get right to the science.
AuT solutions indicate that the positive and negative carriers are preservations according to the logarithmic function of 32/27 which solves for 2f(n)^2^n for the ratio difference where n=1 and n=0.  This function is pre-curvature, but uses the same derivation as the sin (or cos) function to obtain the ratio where pi is solved for pi(0) and p(1) respectively as shown in the book.
Once the ratio is established, in order to have it maintained for higher states it first my "vibrate" and the vibrational form at this level is suggested to be the logarithmic and anti-log functions which freeze the sin and pi functions as part of the equation using the ratio for the anti-log function and the resulting solution is the carrier which solves for the logarithmic values in the form of carriers which survive according to the f(series) function 2(f(n)) for succeeding states to allow, for example 2(f(4))^(2^4) to give scale to the mass energy ration e=mc^2.  The complete derivation of that equation takes into account acceleration, but for quantum states, mass has no velocity component and hence the problems associated with integration of the equation over time is absent.

http://www.sciencealert.com/quantum-flashes-could-be-what-finally-links-relativity-and-quantum-theory

Let's get to the article.  A particle state is defined by its wave function, pre-aut nonsense, nevertheless with enough accuracy for the smaller minds of physics.  I am a smaller mind of physics, but I am angry and full of disappointment at everyone else as well as myself, so I will take my superior understanding of things and throw it in the face of science tonight and you can pay attention or ignore it at your peril.  I do not care.
Since the ratios are functions of equations for curvature, there is, of course, especially at very dense concentrations a close correlation between quantum states and comparative values of curvature.  It is critical to understand that pre-aut physics ignores the interplay between the different levels of compression, although these articles begin to recognize that waves and matter are part of the same thing.  The failure is not is the analysis, instead it is the failure to see quantum states and the failure to see that the values observed result from transitions in quantum increments between 5 or 6 (or possibly more) compression states.
Gravity remains consistent at the ct0-ct1 level, but because it compresses at exponential levels and transitions between levels, you get the curvature we observe, but because of the positive and negative carriers, it is conceivable, if not requried that you have positive and negative forms of gravity which is theorized in AuT.
I have many reasons to be hateful today, none of them valid, all of them mine, but I cannot help but be disappointed to look at the unified field nonsense, when the supersymmetry of AuT has such greater depth.
Stay tuned for steadily darker poetry and mor physics.

This seems to be available on kindle, the non-kindle version should be out shortly.  There were formatting problems which originate with the contankerous word preservation functions which required a near act of god to correct.
The end of african colonialism is the sub-name of the new version, should be ready just in time for my book signing and I'm 1/2 way through Notes from Venus' 3rd edition

You should read this anyway...
In a northern desert in Africa lies an oasis. A few trees grow there, a few spiny, stunted desert plants and a well surrounded by sand in as an isolated a place as exists on dry land. A conflict which was to consume the globe started there. 
It could be said the first battlefield of World War II was the first battlefield of World War I or the last battlefield of World War I. But World war I ended. World War II must have begun afterwards. 
This book is a work of fiction, but if it has a historical thesis, then the thesis of this book is this; World War II started with a battle around the time of American Thanksgiving in 1934 at this desert oasis. Like the events which started WWI, the participants were quickly marginalized by subsequent events. But for a short period of time, one of the combatants on the winning side of World War I, engaged in a horrible war history largely chose to forget. 
The war began in Ethiopia. The war began many years before, the war of colonialism. 
The result of the war, as with many wars, was that combatants both lost heavily. The horrors of World War II harmed other also, but many of those harmed were involved in collusion, tacit or otherwise, allowed the belligerent to act. This is not speculation this is history. 
But little of this appears in popular history. Most histories, at most, show one or two photographs, which shows none of the horrors of the war. There is little if anything about this battle resulting in World War II except in scholarly texts. 
This story is a work of fiction, but the battlefield which is described in this book existed and the battles took place, much as it is laid out, although historical records differ somewhat and fictional elements are added for effect.

AuT Methodology and the argument that trump is a genius

is trump a genius? I know you're asking yourself, if I am an idiot and if you read my physics you already know the answer or perhaps you don't.  And I will  add, I am no fan of trump.  That we can only put up flawed candidates is perhaps something we should take in biblical context, let he who is without sin...but the question remains is trump really an idiot, really a bigot, really someone who determines whether north korea launched a missle or not from watch tv?
Let me argue the more unlikely side.
First, let's look at the election.  I never believed he expected to win or even wanted to win, although his post election meglamania presents a compelling case to the contrary.  Everything he did was like, I'll throw this election to the competent person and the country will be saved, for however flawed clinton was, and she was plenty flawed, she was the only real candidate.  The lesser of two weavels, as it were.
But he failed ot realize how stupid the american public was.  Idiocracy is the movie the explained this in evolutionary terms, but I don't buy that.  I just think we're stupid in america and if you disagree, explain the election to me.  Yeah, I get and agree with the drain the swamp and watch out for china stuff, hell I wrote books about that (world war c and china's weaponized economy) years ago

and even included in those books a manifesto for congressional term limits!  But this is about Trump, a pathelogical liar...or a genius.  I know it's far fetched, but let's make the case for genius.
First, the health care debacle.  He allow Mitch, bless his reptillian sole, to push through several bills which 70% of the public disapproved of.  During the run up on the latest piece of, let's face it, crap; the republicans said, right on the news, if this doesn't pass we'll end up with single payer...which is what we need, medicade for all, including the crooks in congress!  Trump basically forced this issue with his I'll sign whatever the send me nonsense.  Now, yes he would have done that, but remember this post argues he's  a genius, not the more obvious choice.
Let's talk about this nonsense about the flag and professional sports.  Everyone disagrees with him except that part of the population that doesn't know what the first amendment means.  Everyone has "come together" to tell him he's an idiot, but he doubles down.   And everyone, white, black, veteran, old, young comes together an joins in unitity to condemn him...and support the very first amendment he promised to destroy.
And tax reform is coming, what will that be?  Has he shamed everyone into believing that it has to benefit the middle class?  Will we maybe get real tax reform and not just trickle down bull shit?
And what of this cabinette of billionaire idiots?  What of North Korea and "the wall"?
Trump has come to the world and said, "grow up, there's no parent to take care of you, just a petulant child armed  with Nukes."  North Korea, the perenial petulant child reacts to being upstaged.  China finally realizes that the US is more valuable to it (since they're stealing all of our manufacturing and money) and that their southern neighbor will probably blow everyone up given an chance and begins to help.  Mexico gets a well needed ego boost, I seeing that they are the smartest ones (at least south of Canada) and 'grow up.'
The EPA stopped our rivers from burning.  Now there's an idiot in charge, climate deniers monitoring the environment.  A school voucher nut in charge of public education.  The public finally realizes how important education is, is reminded that our environment is the only one we have.  Who knows, maybe teachers will be respected again, be paid enough for the rediculous hours they have to put in.
What if, just what if at the end of 4 years, he comes out and says, I brought you single payer health care, finishing the job obama couldn't; what if he says, the first amendment is stornger than ever and look i brought everyone together.  What if he says, you hated the policies of the republican incumbants so much you voted them out, cleaning out the swamp.
What if he asks, "Did not the beatles say it right?  come together, right now, over me."
Will we have to recut Mt Rushmore?

AuT was developed from intrinsic features of the universe.  F(x) a critically confirmed part of the undertaking was selected as one of several curve functions with quantum elements, for example.  Curvature was seen as an integral part of the universe and the spiral curvature of gravity led to this model which proved so valuable.

Another mechanism was reviewing articles for consistency with the theory.

http://www.sciencealert.com/quantum-flashes-could-be-what-finally-links-relativity-and-quantum-theory

I can't concentrate on that tonight so I'll save it for tomorrow.

Methodology: This undertaking began by looking for relationships between different observed phenomena and then locating flaws in poorly explained phenomena.  Models were developed from observed phenomena on gross (universal) scales and micro (quantum) scales.  The result was the determination that the universe is made up of offsetting expanding and contracting infinite series algorithms built on prior solutions to give the impression of linearity in a quantum system.

AuT the allows specific formula to be derived by solving equations in mathematics for a non-linear time environment and eliminating any resulting inconsistencies.  

Lastly, this could be better, but the second edition is finally done and at least available on Kindle.

AuT Framework of the Investigation

The first human structures surviving date from 10,000 bc, roughly 12,000 years ago.  The first agricultural city from around 7,000 bc.
The first to leave writing (including the sumarians) dates from 5300 bc, predecessors to the Babylonians who educated Moses in 1300 BC.
All of these are roughly from the middle east (turkey, then mesopotamia)
In 1700 the chinese began to leave a more permanent written record although by then the basics of calculus were given by the sumarians and the historical record of the bible dating to, perhap 2800 years after the sumarians fell from prominance and taking perhaps most of their early ideas and history from the sumarians has been at least loosely maintained as an oral history.
One must ask if the story of leaving eden might have come from whatever facts led to the abandonment of Catalhoyuk, a city of 9000 adams and eves, whose history ended around 5700 bc, shortly before the Sumarians arose and no so far, during a period where at the end of the ice age, 12,000 years ago, meant that the environment of the area was transitioning between the ice age and the current period of moderate temperatures and when the middle east went from a rich agriculturally diverse area to the desert we see today.
http://historylists.org/other/10-of-the-worlds-oldest-known-civilizations.html

Mankind has not made  much of a mark in time.  One has to belive that civilizations came and went long before these, fire being controlled 600,000 years ago at least and made with flint 300,000 years ago..
What thoughts must have taken place in the minds of these people for whom food was at times scarce and at other times plentiful.
The history indicates that the last ice age ended only 12,000 years ago, so civilization in modern terms dates from that point, although the pressures of surviving in those conditions had already honed the minds of the erect apes so that thought was modern and the groundwork laid.
Moreover, aggrarian is a matter of definition.  Certainly the hunter gatherers of the ice age knew a great deal about food and climatic survival and lived in groups and hunted in groups.  Certainly their activity in the harvest, while relying greatly on nature, must have had aspects of modern cultivation and storage long beffore row crops because the plants themselves were designed to work with even the less intelligent animals, grains being digestible to support the animals that would fertilize and move them.  To think that this was done with no recognition for 600,000 years seems unlikely for a species that has since then bent metals and energies to its will.

It's time to rocket forward to my theories, currently surviving a period of great turmoil, but surviving none-the-less;  at least for the moment, which define supersymmetry in a way that tears apart the fabric of thermodynamics by peeling back apparent reality to display actual reality.

This is a very short series of posts.  I would put them all out there at once, but to what purpose when for 3.00 you can get this entire thing, instantly, on Kindle in the second edition of Book 2?  This is not about publishing those books online, this is about the love that drives this work forward.  It is about inexplicable conflicts and conflicts that can be easily explained but cannot be understood.  Perhaps it is about coming up with an excuse for actions which I cannot otherwise explain over a period of so many years that many are forgotten but which continue right up to the typing of these words.

I.            FRAMEWORK OF THE INVESTIGATION: INTRODUCTION to the Investigation Theory

            Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) was developed empirically.  It is based in two broad ways: 1) Mathematical Modeling and (2) Tying the Model to observations.

          The more detailed the models, the more the math modeling can be developed.  The more detailed the math modeling the easier it is to determine who the observations are showing.

          I cannot look at everything and hence working with and lecturing to other physicists is critical to continued development.

And last, my quote of the day from Out of Doors in The holy Land, something from the New Testament about the transformation of the unholy, something which I cannot  accept, no matter how old or how beautifully written.

For confidence and calm joy He tells us to turn to Nature. For love and sacrifice He bids us live close to our fellowmen. For comfort and immortal hope He asks us to believe in Him and in our Father, G
od. That is all. But the bringing of that heavenly message made the country to which it came the Holy Land. And the believing of that message, to-day, will lead any child of man into the kingdom of heaven. And the keeping of that faith, the following of that Life, will transfigure any country beneath the blue sky into a holy land.

aut broader impacts

i spoke to a parson and an engineer about my universe model.  the parson wanted to discuss intelligent design and god.  i told him an algorithm free of randomness, entropy and full of supersymmetry was a definitive design and the environtment that holds the universe as a thought is more godlike than anything people imagine, but that faith was an issue since man's self determination is illusory.
i had troubles explaining love and self sacrifice to myself.  I wonder if my theory is making me a worse person.  i had another argument based on the fact that i believe my ramblings.  how to explain what happens when you disprove asymetric outcomes.  or perhaps that word is too confusing in context.
The universe appears curved, but is jerky because of averaging.
Are electrons representative of anti-matter and the positron matter?  Is the orbit a step in the decompression of black hole transitional states?   Can it be steps in either direction with chainging its state?
How do these rules corresond with waves, other than that the electron wave is actually the underlying waves transitioning to the next higher ct state?
There are more questions than lovers on the beach in the universe.
The universe should not exist,that is what i told the parson.  everything out there, is just shouldn't exist.  it is too impossible, and yet we accept it.  my theory explains what it is, but not why.
So how can i explain my shortcomings in a way that makes sense to you or to me?  If i have inflection points where my direction seems to change at random, is that not some part of who we are?  It is not a good night, I am at war with everyone around me.  I should  have asked the parson how does one find peace amidst the stormy seas of existence, the huge waves that threaten to drown us being of our own making?
I didn't ask, and now I cannot.

Broader Impacts :

The narrow and immediate impact of the grant is to continue to define the fundamental structure of the universe in more detail to show in broader mathematical terms what we observe.  It has far reaching impacts in our ability to manipulate time and space.

Societal relevant outcomes include improved national security, increased economic competitiveness of the United States and enhanced understanding of fundamental physics and possibly opening up new frontiers for practical application of fundamental structure of the universe to observed phenomena.

The grant is being sought not only to further develop the theory and to get access to more data to develop the theory, but also to present Algorithm Universe Theory to other physicists to encourage looking at information for correct results instead of the shadow results being examined currently.

The promise of AuT is not only theoretical, but suggest practical applications. While it holds the more fanciful promise that it could change matter to energy, light or even space, it will allow a better understanding of gravity and thermodynamics.  AuT could provide a path to change the gravitational features leading to attraction and making them repulsive instead.  At the very least it is a quantum leap ahead in the understanding of gravity and other forces

And not the excerpt of the day, about speaking the right things when I speak only the wronge ones, doing right when i only do wrong.  Perhaps his words give peace when mine only increase anxiety, fear, anger and turmoil.

 He spoke of the wisdom whose fruit is not pride but humility, of the honour whose crown is not authority but service, of the purity which is not outward but inward, and of the joy which lasts forever.He spoke of forgiveness for the guilty, of compassion for the weak, of hope for the desperate.

Intellectual Merit : a summary of nearbyconcepts

Why do you want to have me present this to your institution?
Space appears curved, but why?  AuT answers this and the answer is both simple, relativistic and surprising.  You can get the infrmation from books1-4, the summary in book2, bu tit is a fraction of the information and there is so much that can be added by hearing someone whose name will one day be up there with...who?  I don't know  That is up to someone else, but I dont have that many years left so it's that time.
Or you can be one of those people who just copyies hundreds of posts when you could get better information for 2.99 by downloading the books from Kindle (better still a hard copy you can get me to sign!  Imagine if you had one of the first editions of book 2 before it was fixed.)
I will get back to it, but I need time.

What is intellectual merit?  Understanding, is that enough?  Does the explanation of all phenomena and the source of dimension enough to give merit to the undertaking?  I cant say.   Let's ask some other questions.
What is love in an illusory universe that has so much power?  In a universe driven by irony, why does love give power to observation?
Life is not what we have and think it is, we are a reflection of the underlying, curvature an accident of relative compression and transitional features of mathematics, yet merit is what we do because we have no choice.  Where do you find merit in that?
  But we don't do in quantum, we only do in ct4-5 environments, we only do in 4-5 places at once with all the density and complexity of the overlap inherent in such a comparision and while we see at the ct0-ct1 state a singular solution, but we also know that the value of x affects solutions at higher ct states, the reason who the exaimination is so complicated at any state over ct1..
There is a story of Niels Bohr coming up with the complimenary principle relatied to the impossibility of thinking simultaneously about position and velocity of a particle (eliminated in a quntum universe as an issue) because of his son's act of theft simultaneously see in terms of love or justice.
And darkly in these posts, there is the effect of love on this undertaking, very dark, much darker than is shown here.
Why can't science accept what I have seen so clearly?  It isn't the reasons you imagine, because the algorithm makes the determination.  It is not mine or theirs to determine things.  It may be because science doesn't love as deep, but that ignores the question of how irony plays into the derivation of mathematical outcomes or more particularly how mathematical outcomes give rise to irony, something already addressed as embedded within converging and diverging infinite series.
Another question that AuT answered is why, when we write out the derivation of pi, we ask about the constants.  Why 4?  The answer is that 4 is only one in a succession of numbers representing place.  All of the other aspects have to do with the vibration relationship of -1^x to single place from which the infinite series are drawn.  Indeed in writing out the equations for pi, this is the first portion of the equation for pi in all of its forms, from 0 to whatever.
In the article under discussion, there is teh question of hidden anti-matter within the proton.  While we now know, from AuT that antimatter and matter do not balance but change throughtout the solution for an universe based on whether the universe is expanding or contracting, the amount of anti-matter, is relevant to any inquiry.
The concentration of electrons in the nucleus might suggest that either electrons or neutrons were anti-matter.  The idea behind this concept is that we have much more anti-matter than what is disclosed by an examination of the rmainder of the universe but that it is in a transition from ct5 to ct4.  his makes a frightening amount of sense.  First, we know the forces involved make the strong force appear like a ct5 phenomena.  Second we know that there is a strong breakdown effect in thermodynamics, entropy.  While we know that entropy is illusory from AuT, its presence indicates that there is a breeakdown of this proton state, what you would expect during an expanding universe.  Why not a breakdown from a ct5 quantum state (black hole) towards a ct4 state causing the expansion?  It fits very well within the model, gives a basis for the positive vs electron negative result and provides a basis for the strong presence of entropy within the model.  Stars represent the opposite effect in balance and have a different force effect.  Stars have traditional energy, the breakdown of matter, the movmeent towards fission instead of fusion, reflected in entropy or expansion of the universe. 
This requires a mathematical analysis which has to come later.  There is the question in such a case of what is "pure" anti-matter.  What differentiates anti-matter in its form that anihilates (converts to energy and space) matter from degrading black hole stuff?  Is it direction along the transitions of 2^n compression arms?
There are seductive reasons to pursue this.  Orbits might represent teh gradual disentegration of the ct5 state reflected in the release of ct4 phenomena.  The whole idea of electon or matter waves indicates that the existence of matter in its positive and negative forms is little more than transition from higher to lower state solutions.
Why all electrons are the same?  This is an easier question to answer, electrons are quantum state changes where the information arms are full.  This indicates that transitional states do not have multiple different ways they can go together. The transitional states appear as forces (gravitational, magnetic/electro, strong and weak).  The state itself remains the same but merely appears with a force characteristic between states.  So these electrons are the same but appear with the strong and weak force and the various levels give rise to the illusions of quark type particles when instead they are merely transitional breakdowns under circumstances.
This, however, raises the question, why are all protons the same?  Black holes transition just like electrons do, but the intermediary results between quantum electrons and quantum black holes might appear anywhere along a transition state spectrum.   The initial concept is that they do, the different forms of matter reflect different combinations of transition state effects and vary because there are so many information arm states from which a molecule can derive its base mathematical solutions.  But why not at the proton level?  Why shouldn't the proton be equally confused?  Why should a proton be a plus one all of the time even while the nucleus transitions more consistently with the 32 information arm states?   The initial best answer is that protons represent a solution in proximity to electrons.  Their size represents a matrix based solution perhaps tied to the stepped result (i.e. each step is 2^1 greater than the prior step or less than the prior step).  Likewise the proton result could be tied to the 2(f(n)) solution which is constant no matter where it appears along an information arm.
The bottom line is that while the model remains accurate, to use it predictively requires a better idea of what is happening about the quantum state within the matrix of solutions.
Under this analysis matter is a ct4 state transitioning away from ct5, anti-matter is ct4 states transitioning towards ct5.  When combined, they stop transitioning merely because they break down.
Why the stunning difference if they are just moving different directions in terms of solution?  Why a difference between addition and subtraction, multiplication and division?  This are necessarily inflection point events.  You don't have "half division" although you can have division along with multiplication, at the point of solution you don't do this in halves. 

Let us stop this discussion for the moment, secure in the idea that the brilliance of AuT has not solved all of mathematical-physics inquiry...yet.

As I write this, Puerto Rico is being savaged as have many of the islands.  Victims of non-existent climate changen necessarily part of a non-steady state universe.  Let us think the same about Mexico's earthquakes and the world wide victims of other people.  Let us think for a moment of the human victims, that we will need to help them and end with a quote from out of doors in the holy land:

"we find here far less of human squalor and misery to sadden us with thoughts of "What man has made of man."
"Is not this Christ's work that is still doing in Christ's town, this teaching of the children, this helping of the sick and wounded, for His sake, and in His name? Yet there are silly folk who say they do not believe in missions."

Intellectual Merit :

There are extensive practical and theoretical aspects of AuT. AuT provides a pre-expansion model of (1) the origin of space time, (2) the origin of quantum phenomena, (3) quantum length as information giving rise to perceived time and quantum gravity, (4) the relationship of gravity to other forces, (5) the origin and reason for force, (6) the transitions of dimensional coordinates to the different time, force and dimensional states we experience, (7) how we experience clock time, and history in a quantum environment (8) The relationship of velocity, gravity, and time dilation, (9) The reasons for the perception of change (speed) in a non-linear environment, (10) The exponential growth of clock time concentration giving rise to a converging series of compressed information states going from  space to energy to matter to black hole states and beyond, (12) wave-particle duality, (13) an understanding that all phenomena  and not just time move in a single direction and that all change is at the same speed, (14) the origins of what we have previously thought of as dark matter gravitational forces by way of example. NLT (the predecessor of NLC) correctly predicted that the alleged reports finding a Higgs Boson was inaccurate, (15) AuT takes us far back before the first big bang (traveling backwards) explaining what the latest big bang was and what happened trillions of years before it, (16) how complex interactions, including perceived human self-determination are tied to fairly simple phenomena.

It has practical applications to understanding what we observe, how we can manipulate movement, aging, gravity and time.  AuT also provides an explanation of phenomena that we observe but don’t understand that has a direct effect on us. 

Do we observe, for example, inflection points without realizing we are looking at them?  I think the answer may well be yes and the observation of these localized inflection point phenomena are important and provide information which will be critical in the future. One possible example is the changing earth’s magnetic field.  We do not know when this will occur even though we have a historic record.  The reason for the confusion in the record is because each cycle would be off slightly based on the converging nature of the infinite series represented in the localized inflection point which would, otherwise reflect the plan of the overall universe. The expressed goal includes meeting with the scientists who study this data to help refine the converging series models that will help predict those phenomena and better explain the compression and decompression phenomena of AuT.

From a predictive standpoint, this theory is far better than other theories.   This allows us to make predictions on a gross scale of coming events based on inflection points.  It allows us to better determine the exact nature of the inflection points once we have enough information from which to derive them, something presumably largely in place from geologic records for the localized inflection points of magnetism of the earth for the earth’s magnetic field.  But this is only one, relatively minor element of a much broader, more inclusive predictive theory.

Finally, please order the books since they not only provide more information, but the sales inspire me.  Thanks to those who have ordered.  A positive review, understanding these are not works of entertainment, but scientific inquiry would not be amiss perhaps?  And given the level of genius inherent within the theory, if any, why not arrange for me to speak at your institution before it is too late, which it could well be too late already since you read this in arrears.

AuT-the one electron universe revisited, relativistic fetures

The most logical and most difficult aspect of AuT to accept is the complete elmination of randomness in favor of a fairl simple algorithm.  There is little question that this is accurate, however.
The evidence for this is overwhelming mathematically and only emotional outrage stands in the way.  Even I am emotionally outraged to think that a single variable defines our universe and that if you started it all ower again it would turn out exactly the same way, every blade of grass, star, cloud and thought coming out in exactly the same way.  But what of randomness, some cosmic dice that works in some inscrutable way?  Logically, impossible.  AuT provides for illusory randomness, it i sthe most we can hope for, which means all we have is illusory self determination, illusory love.
While the single variable algorithm for generating successive quantum states universe is an extreme idea, it actual is predicted by many earlier theories which were only limited becasue they failed to accept a dimensionless universe followed by successively more dense dimensional universes.  Most importantly, they failed to understand just how insignificant dimensions are, being nothing that is as magical as we experience them, but instead just the number of places solved at once in a fairly simple math model.
It is bizarre to think that most are dazzled by what we think we are seeing when the reality is so much more logical and elegant, if less romantic.
One such close call was...
https://youtu.be/9dqtW9MslFk the one electron universe.  This is on point while sadly primitive and one wonders how someone could get this close to the truth without seeing it.   The culprits, dimension and prejudice of perspective.  Teh vibrtional aspect is there, teh positive and negative, but it is locked in with a very high information state and time is an element, as well as a steady state universe, all things which lead in the wrong direction.  The idea of durable information is not new, but the idea that information is constantly changing is absent, the idea that dimension is not something tangible, bur merely the result of mathematics that are so obvious that they are thrown in the face of every high school student, but our prejudices prevent us from realizing how insignficant our observations are, in the face of the obvious we create false gods that care about our faith, emotions, economical and political degredations that estabilish our relevance relative to one another.  All illusions and yet we all blindly follow it, we all blindly accept we are, when we might not, are not.
So I submitted a paper (32 pages long) to physics today.  That isn't Physics today its...oh never mind,
I am wondering what to do next today, there being dozens of things to do and only one that I want to do normally.  But it is early and my body has not yet begun to believe in its relevance.

RELATIVISTIC FEATURES.

Since aging is shown in AuT to be a relativistic and not absolute feature, materials science can be changed significantly.  These are just some of the more extreme promises of a better understanding of AuT.

But it also explains phenomena for which there is no explanation, black holes, universal expansion and contraction, big bangs and the like.

In addition to providing the resources to review more data, the grant also seeks money to help pay for travel to go over what to look for in other physic data and lecture on subject (underwrite, some costs will be collected from schools for lecture fees if possible)

Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) is not a minor theory.  It defines not only the source and effects of Quantum Mechanics, but the origin of space time itself.  This latter explanation was not available when the initial grant application was made in 2015 although the factors leading up to it were inherent in the disclosure.  This paper summarizes a published book on the subject which is almost 300 pages long (Spirals in Amber 2nd Edition 2017).  A summary of the findings from that longer paper is provided below.

  The results have been relatively astounding already.  On a quantum level, the fundamental structure of space time which includes the various forms of energy and matter and higher states (black hole material for example) are defined along with the inter-relation of forces and those structures.  On a larger scale, the expansion and contraction features of the universe have been identified, The nature and length of the expansion phase of the latest “big bang” was defined and the predecessor events back trillions of years identified with relative certainty.  On a more esoteric level explanations are provided for how history exists within a quantum event environment and an explanation of what light speed is and why it is limited.

While the basic formula for this are set out, a part of the grant would be directed to refining those formulae.

Einstein said space was curved, AuT explains why a non-dimensional universe appears curved.

Einstein determined e-mc^2, Aut Explained why.  AuT shows how this equation fits in with other phenomena.

AUT black hole bs and the status of AuT

I'm going to talk about the nonsense of black holes, but I"m also going to go over my own nonsense.

http://www.neatorama.com/2017/08/24/Why-Black-Holes-Could-Delete-The-Universe/

AuT derives from this theory so if you watch this film you will see a convergence towards AuT. Where they stop, somewhat after EHT, is where they look at dimension and information.  AuT correctly predicts that black holes only represent a new information state which can be represented by 5 places instead of the 4 that we're used to.
There is a further misunderstanding of what the event horizon is.  In AuT it is merely the transitional state where information beginning as space transfers in successive stages toward the fully compressed state along different carrier arms from space to the black hole information arms.
There is the whole idea of flat "surfaces" which misses the point entirely that we are not on any surface but ultimately exist in a time free and dimension free environment made to look dimensional as a result of various solutions to a single variable algorithm.  This rather bizarre result is necessary lest Einstein's "without time everything happens at once" be proved incorrect.  In fact, this is the other building block of the very first version of this theory EHT which was published here in 2011-2013, you can go back and read those posts if you want, but the Einstein Hologram universe remains available for purchase if you like reading out of date theory, like the link which I'm referring to.

Here is the current book set.  Amusingly, I do not have copies of book 2 second edition which I will not have till October. If you want to order a complete set, fear not, because the second edition is available.  I include the second edition of spirals in amber because the 4 books shown only cover the first 88 pages of Spirals in Amber 2nd.
Today, I set up the second 500 pages as "book 5" which covers the remaining 400 pages.  Its completion has to wait till after the second edition of book 4 which has not even been started yet.  The second edition of book 4 is merely book 4 with the last 70 pages edited to make it consistent with the revised theory.
The first 4 AUT books only cover the first 100 pages of the 500 page spirals second shown above.  Moreover, the first 4 books includes 70 pages of the first 100 pages which have just not been edited yet.  I know what you're thinking.  What the hell is he talking about?  Are the first 4 books a rewrite of only 30 pages of Spirals in Amber, 2nd edition?
This is both true and not true, but sadly, it is mostly true.

Nevertheless, the 4 books on Algorithm Universe theory take the spirals series as far forward technically as spirals did with NLT and as NLT did with EHT.  One quantum leap after another and at this point, not only the conceptual basis but the actual mathematical derivations have been completed.  The latest quantum leap is going from a very rough and inaccurate model where spirals are used to explain phenomena and eliminating the dimensional aspects in favor of a pure non-dimensional framework built on 0' which we know as -1^x kept alive through f-series type addition of successive states allowing the transitions between the positive and negative features to have exponentially longer lives allowing for the universe which we experience.

There is a summary of those first 4 books in book 2 (the second edition).
Put another way:   The editing of Spirals 2^nd can be summarized as follows: The 4 books of AuT cover only the first 100 pages of Spirals 2^nd, the remaining 400 pages have not been edited.  Moreover, there are 70 pages in the rewrite of the first 100 pages that have not been edited.  This is extraordinary and indicates that there are 470 pages which require re-writing to perfect the portion of the theory already published.  

So what remains to be done?
First, perhaps, I need to edit the last 70 pages of book 4, using a printed edition.  Next I have to take the now 225 pages (print formatting takes it up to 400 pages) remaining in Spirals 2nd and rewrite those to take into account the new information in books 1-4.
I must pause for breath.

Today's lesson from the proposal is, perhaps, the one that will prove most in need of a rewrite.

INFORMATION GROWTH

1.     We are in a universe of points, all growing from just the “center” represented by 0’ which exists geometrically free, but at one edge of the solution matrix. 

2.     Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT)- provides a mechanism for the creation of space time from a non-dimensional (including time free) framework which is predictive of large and small scale observations.  This non-dimensional frame work is referred to as a single variable algorithm where quantum changes in this single variable allow for the creation of space and time as we experience them.  It is the most fundamental model of the Universe written.  It accurately predicts observed phenomena, it predates numerous “observations” and it allows for a better understanding of phenomena that are unexplained by other theories.

3.     AuT gives a better understanding of the universe and provides guidance in what to look for in sub-atomic and astronomical observations.  It explains minimum size, force (without false leads like bozons) black holes, expansion and contraction of the universe and time dilation by way of example.  Being accurate, it provides accurate explanations.  The universe being complex, it requires the analysis of additional data to be complete.

4.     AuT Provides new avenues for advanced manipulation of quantum phenomena

5.     AuT Saves money being spent on incorrect assumptions, but targeting investigations that are looking for things that don’t exist.

6.     AuT Allows a better understanding of information coming from quantum studies and astronomical studies.

AuT-the fastest spaceship in the universe

So the actual post is farily short so I'm going to give a longer preamble addressing time travel and faster than light travel.
Faster than light travel is not exactly impossible in AuT and even time travel could be a warped possibility.  Unfortunately, AuT is, in its accuracy, devoid of romance.  I am not devoid of romance, I love more deeply than you do for my love drove me to solve the basic underpinnings of the universe and that is saying something, even though it isn't that complicated once you get past the details.  Took me 4 or 5 years, but I left everyone else in my dust and if they don't like it they can ignore me.  Their successors will throw laurels on my grave, for all the good it will do me.
But let me not be too pompous.
Let's address the silliest of this first.   If you warped the math of a current person into the math of a lower value of x, that would be time travel.  It would change the universe of the time, but conceptually, the new universe formed in this way could absorb the information, if the math still applied. It would be like re-writing the algorithm from the middle instead of building it from the beginning.  There are two ways this happens, one, the Einstein method, that everything happens at once would be foiled by a perturbation in the middle that could unravel the equation.  But the other is a step wise function.  Further, we can clearly manipulate some of what occurs in the universe, in fact the universe requires that we do it.  An algorithm with a feedback loop is not unheard of.  So if the algorithm can be altered to allow us to loop back and change it, the concept of supplying information to the past or the future is possible.  Indeed all prediction, including that on the sub-atomic level, is a type of getting information time-traveled from the future.
Since lost love is the only force powerful enough to create AuT conceptually, perhaps it will be enough to build that machine.
But the truth is in a universe defined the way ours is, whatever we do is what we're supposed to do anyway, there is not enough actual self determination to do anything that is not already written into the algorithm which means the feedback loop would be a part of the mathematics to begin with.  It creates a paradox because the consistency of the universe would be defeating itself, something there is no room for in AuT.  A force from outside the universe would have to take effect and that seems unlikely or the time travel would have to be built into what is already a very dense universe capable of such a solution at least on a limited scale, but what would that be, a separate universe within the universe or a photostatic copy of a past universe on which the perturbation would be built?
The idea for faster than light travel is a little easier, although conceptually similar.  First, we have faster than light changes, every change in ct1 is faster than light.  So we see a faster expansion of the universe when high ct compression is turning into space, that is why the universe was expanding faster after the latest big bang.  As the universal expansion decreases, compression will begin to increase and the universe will sharing from the absence of space.  This reversal has two different aspects, 1) the creation of antimatter and 2) the elimination of space in favor of more compressed states of information.  Reconciling these is one of the remaining issues for AuT.
So how do we have a faster than light vehicle?  The idea of creating more space behind it is attractive, but unless the space in front of it was decreased, this speed would only be a speed away and not a speed toward.  So the method, which is the creation of momentum, is to eliminate the space before the vehicle.  This can be done in a time free environment and would allow you to move at any speed.  How would this occur?  The first step in the process would be to take the space before the vehicle and either move it or compress it.  The "moving" of space means changing the solution order and is conceptually difficult for the same reason that time travel is contraindicated.  You have to change the algorithm too much.  If you compress the space, you take on energy, for example, and increase the mass of the spaceship which is a problem.  But if you could move the energy to the rear of the vehicle it could, theoretically, be unloaded since the idea is to eliminate space at the ct1 level.
While this requires a bit of consideration, it is closely tied to the creation of anti-matter and since anti-gravity is one of many goals, as well as the creation of the powerhouse of anti-matter, this is actually a  fertile area for examination and it will, in due time, given enough money and time, be addressed.

That is, there is no outright prohibition of taking in space and exiting it at speeds faster than light although there is a suggestion  that the process would be different than normal substitution type acceleration.

Here is the quote from the book which is going into my second edition, absynthia, the first battlefield of wwii which I hope to publish this month (slightly over 1/2 way through the most recent edit).

He that turneth from the road to rescue another, Turneth toward his goal: He shall arrive in due time by the foot-path of mercy, God will be his guide. He that taketh up the burden of the fainting, Lighteneth his own load: The Almighty will put his arms underneath him, He shall lean upon the Lord. He that speaketh comfortable words to mourners, Healeth his own heart: In his time of grief they will return to remembrance, God will use them for balm. He that careth for the sick and wounded, Watcheth not alone: There are three in the darkness together, And the third is the Lord.

THE YOUNG MODEL

            AuT is a young model.  While it represents 4 years of development; less than a year ago AuT still was working with very rough versions of the details.  A year ago, it said the models were like intersecting spirals instead of the -1^x driver and its progeny; looking at effects, such as capacitance equations to attempt to find expansion and contraction characteristics.  Reading this paper, it’s easy to say, the numbers for derivation of pi and sin functions were there all along, why not just apply them?  It’s a valid criticism, but when you are working completely unfunded it’s hard to drop your day job and start making spreadsheets.  Even so, the basic parameters were there, and still are there, and the theory only requires times to fulfil its predictive and exploitive ends.  Book 2 was a very rough attempt at determining force and range from information arm and it is extensively rewritten, but without a secretary to make the changes, it remains obscure to the public.  Millions, if not billions, are begin spent looking for evidence of particles that don’t even exist except as manifestations of information change which can be examined from information obtained, but more importantly, can be determined from a more fully developed model of AuT.

Coming in October

Aut-Time travel not

The form of entanglement would mean a single change would effect huge numbers of other solutions at every stage of compression.
The post which follows is just a bit of nonsense, but its is important.  So too is the idea of quantum analysis of movement which gives a much better view of force than the traditional models, despite their importance in everyday life.
So here's the question of the day:
Am I mad or am i not?
I have this theory which flies so far in the face of all physics, but it is internally consistent and explains everything that is unexplained by other physics, at least going back to g-space and even then it offers some suggestions.
It is read all over the world.
And yet...and yet.  There is no "grand recognition."  Worse still, it is a theory which renders everything, even my whining about sanity, irrelevant.  Of course, everything suggests a lack of relevance. There are beautiful songs out that and books that inspire.  There is the beauty of a late summer evening.  But that is another issue.
The only question that matters is whether this theory is correct or not and the related question of my sanity.
So I am having an existential crisis.

Time Travel:

            Time Travel is fanciful, but it makes a good example as to why AuT is descriptive and, of course, AuT has an answer and it says time travel is impossible, at least in the science fiction sense.

          You can look at x-1, but making that change would require changing back the entire universe.  If you could go to x-1; you would be back in time ignorant of the fact you had gotten there because all the features of that time would have to be returned including your memory or it would be an altered history.  Ideas of “folding time” are eliminated in AuT since high gravitational states only reflect greater concentration of state changes through an increase in the places changing in the f-series.

          Even preAuT math, if it were honest, would recognize the infinite reach of gravity necessarily means there is no time-based symmetry other than AuT supersymmetry.  Pre-AuT math, like pre-Aut religion is jealous of its fantasies, and time travel is seductive if impossible.

          Even if you could reverse speed and position, you cannot reset the position of the rest of the universe.  All symmetry in pre AuT physics is, according to its own rules, approximation which can be called randomness only when you don't have enough data or processing power to deal with the underlying symmetry.  Mathematically, there is no reason to blame the universe for technical inadequacies.  Put another way, you cannot go back and keep your present, because the matrix would be different even if you could take into account relative position.

AuT Quantum Entanglement

QE is one of those areas where a great deal more work can be done.  The basic model has been there since F-series preservation was begun, but its application is more complex than has been fully developed, even though the basic idea is covered.  The idea suggested, but not proven, is that positive and negative results are preserved through f-series time extension.  Every change in x results in a longer lifespan for already created information states as either positive or negative.  The exact mechanism is not given so it is possible that the later created information states have the longer lifespans.
Let's look at an example:
x=1 the ct1 state would switch back and forth between positive and negative with every change in x.  It would be very unstable.
x=10 the ct1 state would switch back and forth between positive and negative with either (1) every 10 changes in x or (2) every 34 changes in x (34 is the f-series number for 10)
If x=170 the change would be 1) every 170 changes in x or 2) every 3.56x10^34 changes in x.  As can be seen where f-series changes are used, a very stable universe is created even at low values of x although there are 1.07x10^37 changes per second once time is introduced.

Quote of the day, applicable to the universe and how it addresses the physicist:

... the Jordan. It is in a hurry and a secret rage. Yet there is something powerful, self-reliant, inevitable about it. In thousands of years it has changed less than any river in the world. It is a flowing, everlasting symbol of division, of separation: a river of solemn meetings and partings like that of Elijah and Elisha, of Jesus and John the Baptist: a type of the narrow stream of death. It seems to say to man, "Cross me if you will, if you can; and then go your way."

Quantum Entanglement:

Quantum entanglement has a slightly different origin and explanation which we can revisit from a prior diagrams that have been part of AuT since the beginning.  F-series building, and since book 1 was published first showing information arms.

          In this diagram, it can be seen that F-series building necessarily results in some entanglement with other states.

That picture above shows how states are necessarily entangled, but what happens to cause them to separate.  To see this, you may look at velocity and higher state compression.

          AA2 shows one of these bundles of otherwise entangled solutions being booted out.  At the ct2 level it is easy to visualize, but at higher states the degree of entanglement and the amount of history included are much greater.

The idea is that like almost all accurate observations, AuT presupposes the result and explains it.  However, observations have to be taken with a grain of salt because they reflect incompletely what is happening at a quantum level.

http://gizmodo.com/scientists-finally-prove-strange-quantum-physics-idea-e-1798433666