Durable Time bubbles, ghosts and reincarnation

AuT separated time from change.
It also showed how time exists as bubbles of information which are wavelike and durable over long values of x (fractal bundles at any fixed value of x) and which can be incorporated in more or less whole cloth into other compression states and the cycling of regional compression states would necessarily be the case.
Since these bubbles of information exist for individuals and even for sub-parts like brains they can survive after death, in principle, and to some extent, carrying the human memory not just in a ghostly form but also from one mind compression state to another, reincarnation.
The concept is that a particular bubble (or much of it) would be in a stable form with relativly long fpix fuses relative to the surrounding higher ct state fractal structure (e.g. brain) so that it would continue in form while the surrounding shorter fuse states deteriorated, protected somewhat by the fact that it would be a less dimensionally restricted form compared to the dense state.
A related brain might intersect this as it was purshed by ct1 states into proximity, a coincidentally rare, but foreseeable event.
This is discussed technically below:

 Time becomes a ratio of change between wave type ct concentrations within adjoining regional matrix of information within a ratio of ct3-ct4-c5 compression.  We can observe and affect our environment and we have self-determination, because of our ability to observe and manipulate the overall dimensional matrix from the perspective of this bubble of internalized sub-matrix or sub-ratio of changed ct3-4-5 wave dimensions compared to unchanged ct3-4-5 wave dimensions.
Referring to Figure 69 we see a ct5 matrix, the outer (lower compression) arms of which include a regional matrix 126 of ct3-4-5 wave forms which we view as a bundle of time within that regional matrix around one or more neutrons 120.  Around the ct5 state neutron 125 is a ct4 state 128 within a ct3 state 127.  As shown in Figure 9, portions outside of the ct3 state penetrate byway of absorption line 125 to the time bubble 126 and from the ct3 state to the bubble 126 by way of absorption line 122 which allow us to observe what goes on beyond.  Likewise, we can take bits of information 124 and 121 from within the time bubble 126 and fire them outward along trajectories 123 into the matrix outside of the time bubble 126.  Our ability to fire them within the more compressed matrix is limited by our ability to reach it since we have to go through compressed neutrons to reach ct5.
Within 127 there is lesser time, outside of 127 there is only ct2 which is not sufficiently organized to have time.  The greater time we experience begins within 128 where there are mostly ct4 compression, but until it expands along the ct5 information arms within the bubble 126 it would be difficult to apprehend it.  Since all information shares the same x change value, any bubble 126 even outside of 127 would move at the same rate as that within bubble 126 if velocity and gravitational features were the same.

While the bubble shape is shown, it would be a collection of trapped fractal shapes within larger fractal structures comprised of more dense higher ct states with less dimension individually but forming a matrix.

There is a picture of the time bubble in AuM and I intend to make a physics ghost and reincarnate in the coming days or weeks depending on time constraints.

Indeed I wrote a book on the subject.

That happens to be fictional in nature and is also something that will be edited into a next edition, but there it is.

This is one of a few issues which are coming up for discussion which intersect science and coincidence.  Let me mention another.
We live in a base 10 science which is based on our having 10 fingers, the better to count you with my dear.
That 10 finger set is unlikely to be a coincidence.
AuT indicates that the 5.4 t12 states that make up the electron likely appear as the arms of a spiral galaxy tightened or loosened into or away from the appearance as one arm by features of energy input.
Indeed AuT almost requires that the reason for the stability of H2 over ionic H1 is due to the completion of the t13 approximation by two thick spiral electron 5xt12 arms balancing the h2 fractal.
Just as spirals occur coincident to the winding and unwinding of higher and lower ct states, so do the number of fingers and toes correspond to the 2f(4) base of ct4 compression.
This is part of the great cammoflage act that so confused pre-aut physics.  Our resulting base numbering system matched too well the narrow focus of our perception of post time ct3-4 states based on base 10 compression and decompression.
The impressive precision of the fractal form to the Vitruvian man is worth considering, being even greater than the squaring of the circle in the Davinci artwork as shown below where the size of the face matches more or less precisely the offset of the intersecting spirals.

APS slide 2

It is early and dark outside.  It is hard to see this post, even enlarged.  But time grows short.

I previously mentioned, there is also the newest summary published article.
https://innovationinfo.org/Scholar-Journal-of-Applied-Sciences-and-Research/article/Space-as-the-Building-Block-of-Dimension-An-Applied-Overview
There are links to that in prior posts.  I have put the other articles on hold for many reasons.  The best one is to get an article in APS after the speech.  I have plenty of ammunition there and in additon to the rules I set out in the prior video, I have rules related to the articles.
I am happy to say, I now have hundreds (not many but still...) of views of my youtube videos.

Yesterday.
I finished the third day in a row of heavy exercise.  After a pleasant walk, I swam 2500 yards.
I was very stiff after the weights.  A warm up turned hard as there were first someone I was able to lap and at the end of my workout in the middle of the im which were not supposed to reach 1000, someone who was faster than me.  Thankfully, I was able to catch up at the very end after somehow getting to 2500 yards.

A much better version of this appears in the article which is a much longer presentation.  I am thankful for the views, but the speech is being posted for feedback.   Comments are welcome.  But how can I expect comments until the entire presentation is set out?  Oh what a tangled web.

I want to prepare a handout, a one pager, the front page the most recent abstract, the back page links.  That allows me to present my abstract with links to what is important.  It will likely primier here.

This is the second slide.  This is a tough one.  Do I put the equations down?  Do I tell these people who cannot accept it that a single count runs the universe.  That it functions merely by remembering the number of -1 solutions to that count?  Do I fudge that, skipping to the 3 iterated equations?

(2. equation slide)
(This is a simplification, but not an oversimplification)

There are 3 iterated equations which give rise to dimensions and all dimensional features like force and time.

The first, foundational solution is fpix, better known as the denominator of pi.

(this generates data in response to a quantum count)
The other two are 2 times the Fibonacci number of n (generating a base numbering system for each dimension; and 2^n stating how many times each dimension folds to get to the next one).

The second two derive from the first and all other equations result from these three.

That is it, again.  Very short.
This is troubling, because it is very dry.
And it is troubling for what is missing.
Nothing about the count, nothing about the interaction of the equations.
How to represent it. Here are some choices.

The updated version of this one, with Mr. Fuse in it is probably the best choice.  It shows the interaction, the generation of data, compression and decompression, the different compression states.  It is not the only choice.
One is the fractal equations in some boring way

This is contraindicated.
There are those that give representative results.
The best one is the sequential string.

This shows the compression of information along dimensional lines from space to ct2, ct3, ct4, and ct5.  But it is hard to see the scale.  Even so, it is a good representation of how the universe looks, except it lacks for being the same on either side with the ct5 post black hole transitional states we observed being in the middle.  I can be redrawn...

There are other, modern versions of this:

There is also this one, something showing the resulting fractal structures.
It is weird to say it, but these two drawings show the same thing.

And of course the interface between the first iterated equation and the second two.  There is a reason why this one might make sense...

The reason?  At the end I will discuss how we end up coming from this drawing to:

The tearing apart of the spiral structues.  It sends chills up your spine

And then we end showing the existence of man as a creation of the spiral universe, the Vitruvean man as a function, not of a squared circle, but of Fibonacci series spirals.

But I am getting ahead of myself.
How do you do a one hour lectue in 12 minutes?  You leave details out.
To include or not include the quantum count, the fundamental features of the entire universe; but the hardest to accept if you have lived your whole life stuck in a time bubble.  We are like goldfish swiming in our bowl.  It would be cruel to flush the fish into the toilet, sending it to a world it could never understand.  And yet, the gold fish came from that environment at one time, deep down inside it has the equipment to handle a universe of other fish and to even become an invasive species.  So too, we have the ability to absorb this and perhaps it can help us move from being an invasive species to being responsible.
Not under the current administration, certainly, but still...

APS Slide one-aps speaker guidelines*

So I am presenting my speech in a two weeks!!!
This is the fourth speech and perhaps the third major speech so it is not a rough draft, but all the other presentations were much longer.

I did a very hard stair and weight workout behind the swimming workout which was at least passable the day before.  i am now sitting in the early morning dark and cold, under-dressed but needing to seize the quiet for this work so badly that I cannot take time to find something warm to put on or to talk about it.

I am going to give the guidelines and then present the speech in several sections, the first of them below.  It is 12 minutes, but 12 minutes can be a long time...

The guidelines for present are as follows, my comments in parenthesis.

Speaker Tips & Guidelines
Organize Your Talk
Step back from the details of your research and think about what your audience might like to learn from your work. (my audience tends to shy away from the radical nature of my work, to close their minds, not to learn it but to discount it without attempting to understand it)  Keep it simple - remember, less is more (this sounds like something I would write from AuT, something true in context but also false).

State the hypothesis and purpose of your research. (I suppose this is the most critical of the things which I have not done yet.  The hypothesis is that the universe derives from a single iterated function giving rise to two more which define together all dimensional features of the universe-although some other iterated functions come into play, apparently.  The subset in one of the slides discussed below of three primary results could be a hypothesis, but it is a sub-hypothesis.) (The purpose of my work is to define the specifics of the operation of these equations and to describe how to use them).

Describe your methods of investigation. (This is an interesting one.  My methods were to find math models that fit the maximum number of observed features, refining the math so that additional features were explained.  A five year process that only in the last few months (August of 2018?) became clear enough to define time.

Include data collected and what was learned. (There is not a lot of data from the study, the data existed before, but the three item slide is the core of what was learned, charts of how compression affects the various featuers of the universe)

Give conclusions based on the collected data. (This is back to the summary slides, indeed 12 minutes could be spent on what conclusions were reached.  I will come back to this with a cut and paste in this series.)

Emphasize the significance and highlights of the research. (Unlimited energy, unlimited speed, unlimited time (tm))
Your Presentation
Prepare notes that highlight the salient points of your talk.

Practice the delivery of your talk several times prior to your presentation along with your slide or transparency sequence being sure to fit your talk into the time allocated to you.

Use simple sentences; avoid jargon, highly specialized vocabulary and unfamiliar abbreviations.

Think about questions you might be asked about your work and be prepared with well-thought out answers, being mindful of the limited time for Q and A.
Audiovisuals
Gray arrow Audiovisual Policy and Tips

Audio-visuals should amplify your talk, not duplicate it.

Choose the medium that will optimally display your information - don't use words if a picture will convey it more clearly (graphs, tables, charts, etc.).

Use line graphs to show trends; bar graphs to compare magnitudes; pie graphs to demonstrate relative portions of a whole.

Make sure your supporting audio-visuals are concise, uncluttered, and easily read from a distance.

Read Audiovisual Policy and Tips for a list of provided AV equipment and its use.

Request special AV early or it may not be available. You will have to pay for special special audio-visual equipment.
At the Meeting
Check the online program on the APS website to see if there are any changes in your session.

Using a laptop and projector? Read Audiovisual Policy and Tips to know what to expect in your session and use the Speaker Ready room. Note: APS April Meeting Attendees use a different presentation system. Please see April Presenter Information for details.

Check the "program changes board" at the APS Registration Desk to determine if there are any changes to the program related to your presentation.

If possible, arrive at your session 10 minutes early to setup and introduce yourself to the Session Chair.

Please stop when signaled by the Chair to do so.

Retrieve your presentation audiovisuals at the end of your talk.

And Now the first part of the speech.

(intro slide)
Algorithm Universe Model: The underlying math of dimensional features (dimension, force, time)

Zeno's Paradox

Parmenides

Zeno

These guys look happy

The first and most important observation of quantum mechanics was made 2500 years ago by Parmenides and Zeno.  It is a paradox and it is answered by this model. -type algorithm universe theory into your web browser for more details.

If your theory is refined enough and right enough you should be able to describe the entire universe in 12 minutes.

So here goes

That's the first part.  It humanizes the presentation, I'd say.
I had a number of other slides to start with and this one may have some other features.
Most of them are too complex.
For example:

This one summarizes the model and includes some nice pics of the books.
I may use the two pictues in this one in place of the pictitures of book covers, but I think the less is more argument applies and it is important to consider the importance of zeno's paradox even though I am not presenting it.

I updated this one a lot for the speech-it has mr fuse in it whch is cute.  Too much information to start with, I think.  Indeed I will probably not use this at all because it is just too much, it is the whole theory in some ways; only scratching the surface fur in others.

Thisis a whole compression series.  Pretty out of date, but you can see there is a lot of information available.

This one is not terrible, short and sweet.  But it is a little bland, look at how plain and sad the two original physicists were.  They are like me to some extent.  In a backwater seaside town, largely ignored by the world, insulted as their genius is passed over for someone who has the next big marketing idea, perhaps a hailing app where cart drivers yell, "passengers?  anyone want to pay to ride in my wagon?"

The simple compression slide.  When I gave the first presentation, I did not realize the richness of the model, and yet in its simplicity there is so much information.

This type of slide violates the rules, emphasis, don't tell.  Maybe to some extent the simple compression slide does the same thing.

This one will be incorporated to the speech and may appear in them all followed by its incorporation into the vetruvian man picture.  It is simple and it is mysterious.  What do you say, include it between the two old physicists?
 It shows the relationship mathematically of fibonacci series to the denominator of pi.  I need to upload the newest drawing, it shows that the hypothenuse allos you to define this in terms of right angles, of course.  It is all very interesting.
I am using the term Auman (tm) as opposed to Human, the next step, man freed from the limits of time.

So there you have it, the first slide and a discussion which has left you wondering why you did not just have coffee and watch cartoons.

I want to remind you that you can see a detailed slide presentation (all the slides in a one hour presenation along with audio for the first 8) at youtube by typing algorithm universe theory or you can go through www.gmfpc.com which has links now directly to the technology stuff.  I'd say it was the most recent one, but I'm not sure that's true, but you can figure it out from the description or you can write me in the comments to this post and I'll tell you where it is.

If you are interested in delving deeper there are the advertised books and the audio book all avaiable through amazon and the audio book also being available via itune and other places, just type algorithm universe theory or algorithm universe model or...even my name.

On the physics of ghosts and reincarnation

A nice 2200 yards last night.
I woke up a little tired
I have been going 90 to nothing.

An updated Audio Book is available

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PT9M459

The updated summary article is also available and I have a link.  This has all of the basic information on the model and therefore on the universe.

Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research (3/13/19) (2:3) Space as the building block of dimension-an applied approach.

https://innovationinfo.org/Scholar-Journal-of-Applied-Sciences-and-Research/article/Space-as-the-Building-Block-of-Dimension-An-Applied-Overview#pdf

There is so much folding, but it falls into the categories that are set out above and it is strangely logical, these folds in one direction (creating that direction by the folding) followed by another and then by way of compression equalizing the lower compression with the higher and giving energy to the universe by the constant underlying ct1 fpix equation changes.
This is ct compression (1-4) in different directions by subsequent folding and where the increase of ct1 externally relative to internal between points reflects the unwinding, each one effectively pulling the ctbundle apart in directions defined by the perception of definition defined by which folds predominate in the folding/unfolding.

The time and energy features are all effects of the net change either towards or away from compression.

There are several other articles that have been accepted for publication, but those are ready both in the summaries and in the broader books and additional and exciting books are being written including "A short paper on time," which collects these articles.

Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.de/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.es/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.com.mx/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B07MS9HNX6 https://www.amazon.in/dp/B07MS9HNX6

The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel: The Big Bang Signal –“That Could Kill the Theory”. https://dailygalaxy.com/2019/03/detectable-the-cosmic-signal-that-could-kill-the-big-bang/

AuT killed the big bang some time ago, perhaps in 2012, when it was still EHU.

There is one weird thing about bundled information and the recycling through compression and decompression within a regional system and that is the possibility, mathematically, of bundles which remain in tact through conversions from compressed to decompressed and that is both ghosts and reincarnation, two sides of the same thing; but different because the ghost quality has less comrpessed information than the amount of information involved in memories; but they are both the same, one merely being incorporated into something solid, the other being every bit as solid in the ct1-5 arena, but unassociated with a ct4-5 compression state of humanity.

I will die, everyone will die, can AuT change that and is the math there to do it?  I believe that the answer is not so much yes or no, but that the physics is included within the transitions that lead to net regional features.

A unified field theory without any damn campos*

My friend E told me that books need a curse word in the title these days, so this is a corresponding blog post.  I don't necessarily agree, but I am in a foul mood, not to be confused with a fowl mood which might mean you are flying or hungry for chicken.
But this is an important post and I need to limit the digressions.
I weighed in at 177.2, 2.2 pounds under the target weight, not quite my lowest which came a few days ago, but something of a trend at this point.
That is point one, mass as ct1 absorption.
There are two ways where black holes can spin faster than their corresponding galaxies.  One is that when it fully compresses from transitional ct5 to ct5 it cuts loose and can absorb ct1 directly and therefore move independent of the lines connecting it to the transitional ct4-5 and lower ct states making up the galactic shell, it disengages from the ct4 states.  The other way is that it doesn't spin faster, but merely looks to be spinning faster because of a fast spinning outer shell of low ct states.
It is important to note that lower ct states "appear" to move or change faster only because they have more pre-time elements and some mechanism has to exist to explain ct5 (black hole) spinning.
This might indicate that in an atom, the inner ct4 core of neutrons can appear to spin faster or actually spin faster than the ct4t protons shell around it for the same reason(s).
That is point two or duo or dos even though I am angry at the spanish right now for their ignorance which is stupid since how can you be angry at someone for what they do not know, it is like kicking the cat.  I metaphorically kick the spanish gato.
Folding in one direction followed by folding in a second, followed by folding in a third gives space the 3 dimensional features we experience as ct4-5 transition states.  The fold in the fourth direction (you can envision the first three folds merely by folding a piece of paper along the length and then along the width although the exponential 2^n iterated folding changes the effect somewhat unless you are one of the spanish who haven't figured this out yet) gets you to the place where black holes live.
This is point three.
Point four is the topic point for this post (or in spanish el posto-now I'm just being bitter) is that AuT provides a unified field theory without any fields, fields being an effect of looking a changes in folding and unfolding viewed along a single dimensional line from the vantage of the effect of time, all real (we can call them non-spanish today) changes being quantum, at the lowest quantum state at the same speed, and being tied to change, they are not time related at all.
The final point is that the spanish like everyone else are governed by predefined quantum background changes so I have to forgive them.  When nothing else can do it, science absolves them of this espanol transgresión.
The new auido book is proving popular, dulce.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PT9M459

It is now just over two weeks until I present the theory live to the APS.

http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/APR19/Session/Z08.3

A cool morning

It is still cool although it was cold this morning.  The sun is doing what it does.
I am working on some complex mathematical posts.
For example, the significance of the Aut version of the Vitruvean man came to me and I have set out the parameters of the math and lack only a spreadsheet to set up and solve the integrals that materialized from the application.
I believe it solves the last puzzle of the compression model by showning how the compression states change, both from a common central point and from the point where each new compression state Fibonacci number comes off of the prior.

You can easily see this by imagining the two hypothenuse in the drawings above, one being the radius from the center and the other coming off of the prior adjacent leg from the more central arm.
The only thing that is complicated is the sheer number of solutions provided, the origin of odd and even exponent results, the transitions between compression states, the relative angles and the corresponding circles and points of orign that exist for these circles to tie the denominator of pi to the fibonacci series, something we knew intuitively from the beginning, something which we solved using memorized solutions and something which is derived for the different circles for quantum increases in information and compression state reflected by thte AuT man.
The keys to the back door of the universe are set out.

Another Friday

After a weight workout two days ago, the 2200 yards yesterday was awful.
The form was terrible
The speed was terrible
I did not feel like anything was coming together.
But I swam 2200 yards, 1000 im when I had told myself, be happy if you do 1500.
I loosened up and that was what I wanted to do.

So where am I?
I'm writing yet another book,
this one is a summary of the articles
I've zeroed in on time
I have a sample application
the schrodinger equation
It's 120 pages, but I'm hoping it'll be down to 100 or less when I am done
it is for a specific publisher
I have to check out the publisher, but they have an audience

right now it is called a short article on time
i don't know what it will be called when i am done
the signature article is a short article on time
I know what time is now, pretty well, with numbers
which are based on the prior numbers
but a little better
a little closer
more talk about change
more talk about time
more talk about the relationship.

Lets talk about relationships
Right now I have a pretty mediocre one with the VC community
They will come around
All the articles are headed in my direction, I have a new group that show I have to be right
Maybe I will sell my patents to a patent troll in years to come
Maybe that is what coming around would mean
Perhaps the patent troll is my future VC relationship
I don't think so
That would be a million years in the future
I don't really care about the patents
They are just a tool for me
A way of focusing my thoughts on the practical
A way of moving forward
Like the books and speeches
And they are ok, not perfect, but ok until June or July
I will work on those again in April

How about my relationship with you
The hikes in the rocky mountains
The greek islands
All of those things
That one seems as rocky as the VC one
Everything that has not happened seems far away
But figuring out the universe
Solving all the problems of physics
That took five whole years!
Imagine that you'd take longer.
Well, what is more important
Solving all the physical and psychic problems of man
or having a warm relationship to sleep next to?

The school of Mad Scientist of England

Here is the essay portion of my application to the school of mad scientists in England.

Item 1: You cannot do quantum computing if you do not know what quantum is.  I explain that. For example, the electron looks more like 5 arms of a spiral galaxy than a spinning negative charge and the reason you have stability with H2 instead of H1 is because 10 of these spiral arms equals a t13 stable fractal where 5 of these t12 fractals is not.  The point is, that if you do not know where the errors come from in quantum state changes, how to correct them by averaging them out.  If you don’t know what particles you are working with you cannot do good quantum computing.  The icing on the cake is that some of the QC can be done in a pre-time environment.

Item 2:  Because no one understood before how molecular and atomic reactions occurred, they were done in a haphazard way.  My model shows intervening compression states must be eliminated or added and how that happens to get fusion, fission or just your work-a-day molecular reactions.

Item 3.  What is bigger? How about the force that pushes the entire planet around at 790,000 mph?  I explain that one in detail, anti-gravity, dark energy or its more accurate name, the "net" unfolding of ct2 into space.  Now you may want to ask, 'if that is the case, Mr. Science, how come no one has seen it before?'  The reason is the same as the reason why fusion was not seen until the late 1800s even though it lit the earth and provided all the energy to keep it alive; the math was not there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8Xb_7YDroQ

https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

the problem with gravity waves*

Hooray, the Audio Book is live!

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PT9M459

The audio version is also available on I-tunes and audible

This is a biggish day since this is the first uptodate audio book, the prior one being dated to the point where I could not recommend it.
This is a good copy, 7 hours of theoretical physics.  Who could say no to that?

String can vibrate, it necessarily vibrates
Once folded, distant changes can also be close
But time is just an effect
Space time is an error in Einstein's thinking
Well, an error in everyone's thinking
Except me, of course.
I knew about the whole change vs time problem
long before I could put it in words.

Gravity and anti-gravity in the whole absorption and spew thing is a part of what I want to talk about in connection with this whole silly gravity wave thing.

The idea is that gravity comes out in several ways, one is the movement of the universe.  Since velocity is an increase (or decrease) in space between points and since this can be accomplished in two ways (unfolding and insertion of ct1) anti-gravity hides in the net movement at 790,000 mph of our little solar system through the galaxy.
This will be important later.

Why AuT-quantum computing*

You cannot perfect quantum computing until you know what qunatum is.

Business Insider: Quantum computing could change everything, and IBM is racing with Microsoft, Intel, and Google to conquer it. Here's what you need to know. https://www.businessinsider.com/ibm-google-microsoft-intel-quantum-computing-2019-3

I am sitting here in my sweatpants (the me of the future will only wear sweatpants).
I redid two of my accelerator applications today.

I need to add to the one about accmoplishments reopening the closed day center and maybe the art project as the also ran project for one of them where I can edit it for 5 more days.

I am tired as I often am, especially after a day without any significant exercise past walking the dog.
My digestion was not at its best although I feel that most of that is out of my system by now.  My stomach is calm after a quiet walk and a now quiet evening.

I am not paying attention to Bells paradox or matrix theory even though I know I should.  The transitions being one at a time mean that it is possible to look at this as two sets of two dimensional matrix solutions which makes it easier, one advantage of a universe of quantum steps.

That is what I did in those applications, less about science, more about results.

The goofs in charge are only looking for the next unicorn, money over madness.
I do blame them, but I understand it.
It's the same mentality that leads to mining coal even in the face of global warming and carbon poisoning more in particular.  Yes, it does not advance mankind, but it makes a dollar.

Eventually someone will pick up the technology.  Maybe that is a justification for ignoring it, the hope that someone smarter, younger, less irritable than me will be there one day.

I am doing the speech in the mean time, I just started the heavy preparation today, publishing another article so that it will have a public face summary, making notes on the power point presentation, re-reading the latest books.

There is more work than I can do, but I am feeling better about the patents as the stand and right now I don't plan on filing additional patents until June or July when the foreign and local patents are due.  Editing those, however, may well be part of the process of preparation.

Radio Shows

Every time I got in a car yesterday (before I swam 2500 yards) I heard something interesting.
So I thought I would share these with you.

I think you will tell that story about the line when you talk to people.  It is a beautiful story.

The summary is that a teacher too time to teach about friendship with a line drawn in the dirt with the begining with talking or mumbling and maybe eye contact, to the middle where there is friendship where you talk, do stuff together, support each other;
and where we are at the end where no one wants to hear about it. Jackie Cation

But these are two radio shows I listened to on Sunday.

https://themoth.org/radio-hour/occasional-magic

at 33 minutes
https://www.livefromhere.org/watch/kWSnd4mng3I

I was going to do a story of the line graph applied to physics discoveries, but perhaps that can wait for another day.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PQX9GH7

I am still hoping that one day soon the audio book will be out any day, but not yet...