AuT Building an algorithm 12-the changing face of gravity

I seem to have survived the worst of my recent illness, although I'm not exactly out of the woods yet.  Apparently the universe wants at least one more blog post out of me, so I will accommodate it.  It would have been nice if you'd shown you cared a little, I say while coughing slightly.  You wouldn't want to be around me.
This is one of a series of posts so it won't be finished, but some things have to be laid out.
The exact point where gravity is created is discussed here.  No bozos or bozons will me mentioned except in jest.
Before we look at these heavily expanded diagrams, it is critical to understand that the distance between two points is a solution.  Since the algorithm is solved in g-space, there is no distance between points. This is why stacked solutions are necessary to give the impression of separation.  Without adding each two preceding universes to the next, there would be no distance generated.
Hence, merely by varying the angle very slightly, and below we will discuss how slight those variations are, you are assured that no overlap occurs except where mandated by the solution.
To put this in perspective, take a separation defined by the difference of 1/(10^100).  This is a very, very small separation to us, but in a non-linear environment, there is no "actual" separation, only a difference in solution.  Proximity is effective only to the extent that it mandates a specific change in the subsequent universe that is relevant.
It is also critical to not that it is not driven by the addition of universes, that is merely a result.  All change in the universe from one constant quantum point to the next is driven by the quantum change of a single variable.
In one of the next posts we are going to look at the "wrong turn tree" which I've begun and which will steadily grow as we move towards the publication date for the second edition of Spirals in Amber slated for say December.  The perfect Christmas gift (since it basically undermines any man made religion).
Two diagrams are going to be used for gravity and then a third will be used for acceleration and finally an examination of the derivation of pi using something other than distances or the base 10 numbering system to give some perspective.
The problem with the acceleration diagram is that the amount of compression to get from space which has no observed velocity and no acceleration to photons which have a great deal of velocity but no acceleration is very great.  Fortunately, it is not so great as the amount of compression needed to get to matter.  For photons it is (1+1+2)2^2 or 4^2^2 or 256.  That is if you were able to break a photon down (or the basic unit of a photon), and it certainly seems likely you could, then a single photon would yield 256 units of space.
Once you get to matter where "acceleration" comes into the picture, you have 10^16 scale of energy which is a 6^2^3 or 6^8 scale of photon compression you end up with a surface (for basic units) which compression limits the amount of space which can contact the matter at any point in time (for any solution in x (or, more specifically, for any solution of x,x-1,x-2))  This severe impact of the "different" space that can impact the quantum element of matter over a period of time severely limits what we would otherwise observe as speed over that time period.  This is logical because you earthlings equate speed with movement through space so the more space contacted over several values of x by a quantum of anything, the faster it seems to move even though it is not moving at all in any quantum moment and even though all quantum are changing at the exact same rate so that what you call speed is just common solutions for space with whatever is moving.  Photons being less compressed can contact more space during any quantum sets of events.
If we assume that at the quantum level space has a surface like black hole material has in black holes (theorized even by people like Hawking who don't know what black holes are) then the amount of different space that can contact that surface at a given point in time is limited by the surface area which, in this case, ensures the "observed acceleration" to be limited to the change in space.
The movement between values of x generates gravity and this is what was more or less mistakenly called previously the change from non-linearity to linearity.  While it is the movement for linearity that generates gravity, it's not exactly the same thing.

The "gravity options" diagram shows how the "push" from one position to the next can generate gravity at one or more locations between a-f and combinations thereof.  Each will be mentioned briefly here and then discussed in more detail in subsequent posts:

a: This is the separation of opposite results which are offset by a single value change of pi and one is the negative of the other except for this offset.

b: This is the movement within the same spiral arm of positive and negative elements within that arm about a common solution point

c and d are opposite changes around a single quantum of space.  This is the movement of 0,1,1,0 or 0,-1,-1,0 for c and d respectively.  The combination of these two for a single point (e.g. about B) is an example of two separate changes yielding a gravitational event.

f shows the movement between solution where the initial solution (x=1 or 2 depending on how you look at it) to the stacked location for x-4 (the maximum shown in the diagram) yields gravity, that is gravity exists only from the stacking from a common point.

The second diagram above shown how inflection points are generated by the overlap over time of the universes generated by the stacking of separate universe (positive and negative).  This creates expansion or compression for the universe as a whole (around the average solution inflection points) as the universe approached (without ever reaching) equal amounts of positive and negative matter.  During this cycle shown by these offset lines, the universe goes through periods where it expands and contracts without regard to the amount of gravity within the system, but instead as a result of the underlying sum or combined sub-universes some of which are expanding and some of which are contracting at any point in time while approaching in a pi like infinite converging series a solution where the total amount of plus and negative information are equal at the point of compression.  Note that this diagram does not show the changing converging angle changes which are imperfectly reflected in the top drawing but if it were properly drawn (and you can see this in even the first volume of Spirals in Amber) these lines appear curved at high values of x and pi or even relatively low values of x.

Speed

The amount of compression shown here is not even close to the exponential amount required for photons to form in quantity, but this gives an impression of how the solution to a one variable algorithm gives the impression of speed merely based on the amount of space in the proximity of a higher state.

Where compression is high enough for photons to exist, massive amounts of space solutions are present to interact and give the photon speed.  This process is even greater for other forms but instead of the smaller spiral solution, you have a longer spiral solution corresponding to the number of states through which the higher compression states may pass.

pi derivation and angles.  This final diagram is to show that when we talk about fractions, we are also talking about changing geometries  Hence for this early formation of pi you have 4+4/3-4/5+4/7-4/9+4/11-4/13+4/15th.  The difference is that the original solution (pi=4) uses a non sided geometry which has no counterpart in space.  The second part of the solution, the second "stacked" universe is 4/3 which is also an irregular structure based on our perceptions of space.  Only at 4/5 do we begin to recognize a dimensional structure which we can understand and which remains for the balance of the solution for the curvature of space.  As can be seen, however, you are using exponentially less information from an state during these subsequent states because you are returning to an initial point with each change from a higher number of potential states after only 4 movements no matter how many potential points are available for the state in question.

Thus endith part the 12th.

AuT Building an algorithm 11-the changing face of gravity

The way that gravity works is coming out quite differently in AuT from NLC.
AuT suggests that a change in a positive spiral solution relative to a negative spiral solution might be required.
In NLC gravity resulted from this occasion: 0 to 1.  In AuT, as x changes this cycle looks more like 0-1-1-0-1 so there is one non-linear to linear solution for one linear to linear and one linear back to non-linear.  This would suggest that in space gravity exists and then anti-gravity exists and for a middle ground there is a linearity that is from one linear state to an identical linear state.
Likewise, offset by the changing value of pi there is a 0-(-1)-(-1)-0 spiral which changes at either the same rate of offset by 1 (e.g. 0-1 would correspond to just 0 and 0-1-1 would correspond to just 0-(-1) the negative spiral always one step behind the positive one.
However there is another factor giving rise to forces in AuT and this is the change from one state to the next.  Looking at the simplist universes:

While the exact mechanism for determining how these "space spirals" sum together is uncertain and while the offset mechanism is defined by a changing value of pi but imperfectly defined until the point of intersection where they are summed is defined gravity is suggested as either: (1) the change of the positive spiral relative to the offset negative spiral or (2) the change in position from x=2 to the new position represented by x=3.  While there are two different ways that these are shown, there are actually several graphic representations but the "shifting origin" suggests that the shift may result in gravity.  Note that while while the negative spiral in the shifting origin model remains in place, there is no reason to believe this is a necessary outcome and how the solution is defined is not a result of distance, but only the change in the information state.  Further this model assumes a 0-1-1-0 (or the negative) solution but there is no reason to assume that some other spiral result comes about other than the peculiar nature of "space information" suggests that a non-linear to linear result might offer an explanation for that strange behavior.

Thus endith part 11.

Building an algorithm 9

To fully prepare this work, eventually someone needs to prepare a chart showing all the abandoned twists and turns of the theory, a tree of the universe.   Perhaps preparing it backwards would be easier, but there have been so many choices that had to be made to get to a place where a concise and consistent theory arose.
As I edit the latest version for the new steps in it I am making huge slashes in the information provided as I abandon what I consider to be one dead end after another.
Today I did almost nothing on the book and that is after a weekend where death faced me at one turn or another.
The theory took a quantum shift when I left behind the last vestiges of Einstein and Hawking, respectively a singularity where everything happens at once (now replaced with an algorithm that can solve for any x) and any specific tie to what has heretofore been called space/time theory.
I have replace predestination with a super-predestination.  They both amount to the same thing, physics governing our actions, but sp holds that the solution to the alorithm drag events to a conclusion giving rise to forces rather than having any independent background forces.
These are small things but taken with the results that are previously identified, the improperly based being eliminated, gives a much more lucid explanation of why the converging infinite series and diverging infinite series give rise to what you call reality and I call the shadow existence of mankind.
Nor despite having both ends laid out, ignition of the space time quantum universe and compression towards its final conclusion, do I believe even the next edit will be a magnum opus.  Yes it will be nobel prize worthy, although it does render such a prize rather mundane, like one big bang against the millions suggested by the theory as inflection points, as inevitable as yesterday since tomorrow is anyone's guess.  But despite having the fundamentals of both ends it will still fall short of the final mathematica.
The building of one solution on top of another suggests a commonality of solution, perhaps even an overlap of solution which I think might be contrary to a theory where things do  not overlaps so much as they converge even as they diverge, a discrepancy which is nevertheless inherent in the solution which says the larger x the closer to the fully compressed state though neither pi nor full compression are expected of the theory.
In fact the pefectly alligned F-series spirals have had to give way to F-series spirals defined by an evolving pi curved universe and just as pi by definition could only be solved by a finite universe in the theory of NLC which preceded AuT so must an infinite solution be the result of converging series universe.
I had hoped for a finite series universe where spirals would meet, but I now see they will always be offset, the universe will never finally collapse in on itself with two equal but opposite types of informtion cancelling each other out.
And yet, there may be an end, because since time and space don't exists in the singularity, it is possible in that environment even if not in ours that infinity may  be a finite number.  That is also, rejected by AuT which replaces infinity with nothing other than an algorithm which for any imaginable x can be solved, although from our perspective, the algorithm appears to build with an ever increasing value of x.
However, despite the shortcomings, I have a more clear picture of the universe than anyone else, you don't have to like it or agree, at least not yet..  Eventually you will, perhaps when someone with less modesty comes up with details which remain hidden even from me this afternoon.

old-satisfying but inaccurate

Newer, less satisfying but closer to observed phenomena

second edition coming sooner or later

Building an algorithm-10 article review -

While technically right, since Hawking was right for all the wrong reasons I have to rate this relatively low.
CT5 is defined, these complex theoretical manipulations toget to a relatively simple solution are tiring.
http://www.aol.com/article/2016/08/15/stephen-hawking-s-famous-prediction-about-black-holes-was-just-o/21451969/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl28%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D777203068_htmlws-main-bb
So we can say that Hawking is right, but only to the extent that we accept a surface which doesn't exist.  Eventually the general physicists will give away their conceit perhaps when someone they know of comes out with exactly the same findings as AuT but calls it something else, plagarized but with a fancy name to it.  It is bothersome, but what AuT says is that all vanity is foolishness so allow me, the stripper of vanity, to also be your biggest fool.
The problem is that classical physicists continue to ignore AuT at their peril since eventually it will be determined they were wasting their time ignoring the facts.
So let's get to the facts.
What does AuT say about space.   If we accept that there is a cycle (0,1,1,0) then once every three transitions space disappears from our perception.  We don't notice it because from our perspective this occurs for 1x10-39ths of a second and it appears for twice that long giving it the shadowing appearance that misleads people like Hawking into believing it is nothing, the same reason that it makes up dark matter but non-AuT scientists don't see it.
Why are photons so much more visible.  It helps to think about these as bits of film moving more slowly than 10^39 per second.  Two slides then one empty, you'd get a pretty good picture from that.
With photons, not only do you have a longer "burn rate" 0,1,1,2,0 but the "2" might take twice as long to fade away.  Now you have 4 out of 5 slides to one empty, 1,1,2,2,0.   However, given the known  building out you also have the F-series base and exponential function so for every photon you have 4^2^2 space particles so that you effectively have 4^2^2 (to 1^2^2?) slides for a like number of empties.   The exponentially larger sizes you see for wave energy and matter and finally black holes makes them look more and more dense although in reality they are just larger information-alignment states.
So what Hawking would say if he were paying attention is, of course black holes are just more compressed information states, obviously based on the F series 3,5,8 or 16^2^5 for ct5 which makes them to appear less changeable even though their information states change at the same rate.
What this means if you look at the drawing is that each of the triangles "turns" just as each of the larger information state shapes turn with each change in x and all the turns are made at the same rate whether as part of a higher concentration state or not.

Representations for triangles from x-1 to 4

article review - we're all still bozos on this bus

Still looking for bozos?
http://www.universetoday.com/130333/physicists-maybe-just-maybe-confirm-possible-discovery-5th-force-nature/

Yes, I know they are bozons, but what a load of crap.  You'd think physicists could do better.

It's hard to believe the key to physics was disclosed 2600 years ago on the quantum level and that scientists were confusing the solution for the next two millennia (until me of course...and you who pointed this out to me).
The crazy thing is that AuT explains reality in a way that ties all the minutia of life to a very simple starting ppoint, but equally important to a fairly simple ending point.  It allows you to look at where you'll be in six week or six millenia and to understand that the physics which ties this day to that one is nothing more complicated that getting from one answer to another where each step is directly related to next.
All the old fashioned pre-AuT physics geniuses are looking a shadows and trying to breath life into them because they cannot accept that the genius that is within each of us, is also a part of that solution.
The idea comes to mind that given the need for a crazy solution at the far end, it is possible for us to come up with a sane set of steps to get there. And yet, because AuT is not taught, people bumble along more or less randomly.  Of course, sticking man-made religions which are absolute nonsense in AuT even if god isn't mucks up the work, but monkeys are a superstitious lot and the rubber bands and pins that hold the universe together and which are stacked together to get to the next universe don't easily release us to logic, apparentlyrequiring stupidity, hatred and superstition to get the windings and unwindings required to get from one spot to the next.
As long as I'm not with you, I can hardly complain about the stupidity of everyone else.

The boy in the ambulance

The need for term limits and more particularly a state constitutional convention is rendered obvious by the realities of what I'll call the "bush legacy" even though it could be blamed on a series of failed policies some of which date back to Nixon and which have been embraced by republican and democrat alike.  Ok, you could go back to Kennedy or anyone after Grant.
And yet, despite the lessons of history, the best we can do in the current presidential election is no better than the worst selection for congress and congress as a whole is filled with a retch worthy group that even condemns itself.
Our enemies are assisted by our government because it is all about their own personal agrandisement.

Perhaps when this shows our children, although  in truth these are all our children.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/syria-boy-ambulance_us_57b55e68e4b095b2f5429032?ir=WorldPost&utm_hp_ref=world

building an algorithm 8

AuT is better at providing a complete explanation  for quantum phenomena because it is worked out in both directions.  That being said, it continues to be a moving target.  Changes have been made to issues as fundamental as everything happening at once to the potential for any point by virtue of an algorithm durably held in whatever is the singularity.
It remains possible in the signularity that the infinity that equal parts positive and negative states at the final turn of the ingoing F-series spiral would exist.   While we scoff initially at the idea of the infinite being in existence, that is only becauase in our universe of false space time it is impossible.  Of course, if it's possible in g-space than the religious crowd have another argument in their arsenal for some type of god, although I remain convinced that a "caring god" one that gives a god-damn one way or the other is an oxymorn in the present universe.
Terse little summaries keep coming out of this work in progress.  Here is one.  Force is merely the result of requiring a certain next state solution as x increases leading to very long chains of events to achieve simle compression or expansion results.  This summarizes the earlier discussion that a million people acting together to create an event, say a nuclear device, are only acting in that way because the decompression of the fissionable material was destined by the solution of x at that later point.
I want to focus on the quantum states at the beginning for a moment.
There is no reason why, within each triangle, there isn't a change with every change in the value of x.  Indeed the constant change requirement almost ensures this is the case.  This means it isn't a straight F-series building, but it is an F-series building of quantum points which change within their own features at each change in the value of x.  It also takes us back a step to time dilation by virtue of state changes since matter changing from 0 to 5 along the F series would take twice as long as space to cover the same type of circuit (0,1,1,0 vs 0,1,1,2,3,5,0).  While this alone doesn't explain time dilation, it might play a role.
The drawings themselves while instructive are mileading because they are only an initial model of how two time states would add together.  How this shifts the "nodes" at which connections are made and which node or nodes are points of attachment are the next area of inquiry.
While the changing angles indicate that only a single node would be the point of attachment for each two states to make the next state, the possibility for some sort of overlap might result from the shifting of angles and may be responsible for many of the features of compressed states (ct2, 3, etc).
An attachment at a node is necessary because there is no actual line or space between the notes so only nodes are locations where anything can join.  The distances are illusory but show how dimensions are generated by the formula.
Each point will exist in a spiral defined by it's position in the f-series, but no spirals actually exist..
So one triangle in the drawing lasts in its current state, permanently kept in state for as long as the sprial in which it appeared lasts  Where two points exist in a spiral building block, they both live the same length or more correctly with no length at all other than one which is a solution to a mathematical algorithm..
Compression indicates and expansion of the univeerse indicates that some space will cycle quickly, some will cycle for a very long period of time which argues that the subsummed solutions remain and continue to change along with the individual building blocks in each one so that the converging infinite series of a positive and negative cancelling each other when x=infinity remains viable.
The suggestion is that adding spirals means that states never change, but it appears that they do change for each subsequent arm of the spiral even if preserved in the original less gravity be lost and less all be fixed.
I am not pleased with your silence.

building an algorithm 7 xx

The hard part for us to accept is that when an atomic bomb is exploded, it is based on this same simple algorithm, albeit with whatever permutations allow for compression and the like.  The rough drawings that were done earlier showing how the spirals can build and interact is only half of a very large, but not overly complex puzzle of how interaction occurs.
So let's pick an obvious example of expansion from a compressed state to an uncompressed state.  We could look at the sun instead for the opposite, but it's too easy.
When the physicist using pre-AuT math figures out how fission works, that is part of a long spiral process.  In following stages, other physicists join in the planning, chemists and engineers also begin working on the problem, then miners and prospectors get involved, military leaders ask for funds, politicians grant them, carpenters build buildings and on and on.  All of this effort is directed towards the ultimate process of exploding the bomb (assuming it is exploded) which is not so much of a 'goal' as a natural effect of the process which appears to have enormous amounts of self determination and discovery, but which is actually just a reflection of what is shown to be a fairly complex formula.
As the sketches show (I'll copy one here) even with a tiny, tiny value of x, one so small that it has no significance in our universe, something that includes only a hand full of space quanta of information, is so rich and complex that it appears that a very high value of x would be unimaginably complex and, indeed, that is what we see when we look at examples of how the process works in our univese.
We, well technically all the physicists before me, lose track of the math trail and fail to see that every movement we make is part of this integrated process based on a very simple algorithm.

What we're looking at may be only half of 4 to 5 quantum of space.  If you can imagine that complexity times 4^4^6^8^10^16 then you get to but a single quantum of matter, perhaps what we call a single quark.  Once you see this scale you begin to understand how these states may interweave to give the appearance of self determination and randomness which seduces even relatively intelligent people into the belief in something more complicated, like classical physics.
Lower states continue, in this model, to exist with a higher state.  The how is that it builds just like others do.
We know that the exponential stacking is of the next lower state, not from the lowest state.
The 10^16 for matter is 10^16 wave energies, not 10^16 space or photons.
0,1,1,2,3,5 means that wave energies are 6^8 photons and photons are 4^4 spaces.
This suggests the building looks like this:
0,1,1 space
1,1,2 photon
1,2,3 wave energy
2,3,5 matter
3,5,8 black hole
Just looking at this it can be seen that each higher state is literally the addition of the two preceding lower states so that the historical maintenance of states exists, but fades just as history fades in this
history 1
history 2
history 3=history 2 plus 1
history 4=history 2 plus 3 but 3 is 2 plus 1
etc.
Hence, the gravitational element is preserved notwithstanding the change in state and the relative slowing because of the number of changes inherent in the solution (they are spirals if you draw them out but they are just solutions to a math equation if you don't) last longer (3 movements take 3 times as long as 1 movement).  And, yes, the 0 transition you see in space has some weird effect.  It is not a plus or minus type of solution and for this reason gravity appears separate from other energies reflected in these relative movements since it is the change from this place of non-linearity to a linear solution.
The reappearance of the F-series is not coincidental and while it is dictated by math once you accept the model, I didn't go looking for it even though I knew it would be there (you did too if you've been reading my work) because the algorithm can only grow more complicated by building on itself, new mathematics cannot come into play spontaneously because that isn't how our universe works.  We have a simple universe based on a single algorithm changing in response to a single variable.
The number of changes thereafter can be counted understanding that only one change happens at a time for any quantum of information which is a major leap from classical physics, perhaps the most important, understanding that what we call speed is an illusion, as is time dilation.  This doesn't mean they do not exist for us, only that we don't know...well we didn't know, what we were looking at till now.
This is hard for you to understand and you'll reject it just as religious fanatics cling to their ideas of god in the face of circumstances that indicate how pedantic that is.  However, it is the interconnectivity of things that creates all of the forces that pre AuT physicists see as driving the universe and which they rely on to allege there is no true randomness  The problem is that those classical physicists think their "forces" are the driving elements, all operating separately with some "oooohhh mysterious" connection between them and between them and gravity.  AuT shows the connection to be relatively mundane and easily explainable and shows how all these different forces acting across the illusory vast differences can yield a very complex interwoven series of events to accomplish individual acts of compression or expansion which are pre-ordained to happen as x changes.
The rejection of the insights of AuT are the result of little more than superstition.  I have the same problem, but for some reason my spirals are a bit more on the receiving end of intelligence rather than superstition.  Still, if you go back a dozen or two posts, you'll see my enumeration of things I accepted as part of this theory and then had to reject in the face of overwhelming math to the contrary and others will come and go as the model is perfected if I don't abandon this line of inquiry or die but that solution is also given.

building an algorithm 6

http://phys.org/news/2016-08-nasa-fermi-mission-dark.html
Here's a wasted billion.  I figured out why they'd never find the higgs boson.  Don't believe me?  Read back in the old  posts, you'll not only see the prediction and the reason but you'll see me cry "bullshit" when they said they'd found it before they admitted they didn't.
Same with dark matter.  Idiots spending a billion dollars to find something I already told them what was.  Incredibly stupid.
Anyway, the big bang is another issues that was explained away (albeit the route led to the big bounce type of methodology although I explained it whereas the big bounce theory is just more 3 dimensional idiocy.  But we see three dimensions.  Why the third dimension?  It is to prevent to types of information from occupying the same place at the same time. Because they close in (converging infinite series) there is no overlap in 3 dimensions although as the drawing shows there would be in two.
It has been shown that alignment and not overlap seems to work.  Why?  Because if you look at those triangular drawings you think in terms of space.  However, the triangles are only representations of non-linear environments, they are only yes/no or in the case of the triangles 0,1,1,0 drawings.
The drawings in the prior page show a single spiral which is interesting because it goes back and forth, but it isn't as inconsistent as it looks because the single spiral (each two prior states added to make the next one) include within them all the echos of those prior spirals states so you have both a single main spiral and as many sub-spirals as there are values of x!  Not surprising, but there it is.  This suggests that movement of each point or at least along each point 0to1, 1 to 1, 1 back to 0 and the negative for each point in space as each change is made is logically included, although this requires a great deal more discussion of those drawings and you'll have to wait for that.
The movement from 0 to 1 is the movement from non-linearity to linearity which is where gravity can be found (as opposed to the mythical particle they spend billions to find.  Likewise, mass necessarily comes from the same function which is why looking for dark matter is so inane when we're surrounded by it, it being the information in this half in/half out state.
Since everything has mass, we can also posit that other states maintain this so that, for example, photons are not just 1,1,2 but are instead 0,1,1,2; wave energy being not 1,2,3, but 0,1,1,2,3.  There are problems with this, because the sharing of the 1 state makes the wave/particle duality of energy attractive because of the shared state, but it's worthy of consideration both ways.
The other seductive quality is that this allows us to "slow" change.  For matter you have one change at a time so 0,1,1,2,3,5 would be slower to occur than 0,1,1,2,3 but this is probably a "red herring" in the universe.  Instead the 1,1,2, the 1,2,3 and the 2,3,5 exist individually just as other F-series functions do and the compression of states reducing the interaction with the lower states controls the dilation of time.  Again the sharing of the 1 state in all prior states (space, photon and wave) might keep them aligned better in terms of speed although the compression function of AuT almost has to control (you can find it ad nauseum in these posts or in the book).
Both need to be developed.
It's pathetic because if I had 1% of the funding for any of those projects where they're looking for something I've already told you how to find I could finish the several plots necessary to determine the exact mathematical derivation that best fits the observed universe just as I fairly handily with no money from anyone figured out how compression works, how that makes the big bang operate, what dark matter was, and the fundamental way in which the universe is built from a single variable universe, history included.

Building an Algorithm 5

How will we define g-space?  Quite simply we will define it by what it does and what it shows.  Matter and energy and time as we understand them have absolutely nothing to do with what it will be like.
On the physics front what we've been doing is working forwards (from non-linearity) to see if we can meet what we did working backwards from observation.  It is working surprisingly well so far, but there are snags, because going from a non-linear environment to one with dimensions has a number of variations which is what we'll discuss here.
The separation of phenomena must lie in the addition of separate phases which is also the thing which seems to connect past events together.  These are logical outcomes, but the strange one, history, seems to be no more of an issue than the one that seems so common, dimension.
So let's look at our math, which is a poor starting point, but it's what we have, and figure out how this works:
Pi*1 radian=180
so if pi is approx 3.14etc then 1 rad=57.30  approx
Now in AuT we have a changing, but precise pi.
In this case pi can be defined exactly for any value of x.
So from our perspective if pi =4-4/3=8/3 then 1 radian is equal to 180*3/8=67.5  This represents a circle which is not curved but which is made up of quantum lines at specific angles to one another and the quantum is not an actual length but is merely one yes/no relative to the next.
The next value is 4-4/3+4/5 which if you do the math yields a radian equal to a more complex number 51.923...
For purposes of this exercise, we're going to go out one more place even though we are looking at the very, very early AuT universe, nowhere near where we are today
The next value is 4-4/3+4/5-4/7 yielding 62.171...
This yields the drawing that we've looked at, but when they are added, the result is a little more peculiar.  Assumptions are made to get this drawing:
0,1,1,0 for example
Also there is a baseline so that the difference in the value of 1 radian shifts the angle from a common baseline which may not be the case.  The drawings are approximate also so the angles are not exact but the left opposite facing triangle is approximately 3 times as angled as the right and this will see saw back and forth as does the solution for pi.

If all of the points had a single origin, you'd get the result on the left (common origin).  But the points come up sequentially so you get the much more complicated version on the right.  However, this is an F-series variation so the actual x=3 shifting origin might look more like this:

We're going to use the bottom x=3 even though I can give you a good reason for using the other version of shifting origin for x=3, but the results are similar.

Unfortunately, the amount of potential variation in the solution depends on what is changing other than the value of pi so that the number of potential changes is growing rapidly and the complexity of the resulting universe is rapidly changing.  I is not immediately obvious, but the change in the positive or negative result along with the changing angle will quickly result in a drawing that is a mass of lines so complicated that the relatively simple universe that we experience is overwhelmed.  Worse still there is no reason why the point of differentiation has to shift around a single point.  Adding two states together to get a fourth can vary a great deal particularly since every other change includes positive and negative elements.

You don't want to give any feedback to speak of but you want to see everything, so I will show you this.  

The image below shows this for a shifting point of origin on the right based on the approximate center and the one on the left shows a common point of origin.  Again, many assumptions (like the node point of attachment and roughly drawing the angle and not having the angle origin shift) are made to make the drawing more simple.

These are not, however, the most complicated version of this formulation.  The series based on a shifting point of origin appears to yield the more spiral galaxy version, a more gravitation-ally centered result, so we can pick that one over the other common origin point which makes less sense for several reasons.

These images show how compression can occur based on common direction of the spirals, but it is far from complete.

We have to have more dimension, so if it satisfies you, and it certainly doesn't satisfy me, we can have the same angles come out of the page where there is overlap giving us an additional varying dimension and three dimensional space based on a two dimensional environment.  To envision this, just think that at every overlap, the same angle off the parallel to this line:_____ comes out of the page that same amount and in both directions to reflect the positive and negative alternating variations in pi.

Another break

Well, it's never enough for you but there it is
I've set out the fundamental equation for all time and space
I've laid out the basic principle and methodology for how things work
This along with compression, which I've yet to adequately address
and the unknowns of the fundamental from which springs these durable equations
and allows a new +/- equation and allows a solution to remain durable to the next
But those things will come in time to me because I am able to reach down into the hell
the one that I live in because I can't learn the lessons of my own brilliance
and as long as I can do that then I will remain 3-5 years ahead of everyone else
which is where I live.  It is 2016 to you, but it is 2019 to me
I control destiny, my own and perhaps yours
my sn project to bring tl to the world
but that isn't for you to understand, not yet
but it is coming and there is little that you can do about it
and all i can do is speed it or slow it down
and i understand as you are only beginning to understand
that no matter what I do, it is done and no matter how you believe you are there
you are nothing more than the inevitable
a solution to a single variable which I have laid bare, naked to the world
just as my soul lies bleeding from a mortal wound
my dying eyes, blind to all those things you take for granted
inviting being stripped of everything i own
so i can be free at last


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHhrZgojY1Q

building an algorithm 4-Bringing it all together.

The purpose of this series is to attempt to find the answers to the fundamentals by moving from the beginning outward just as the original took illusory but convincing existence and tried to move backwards.  Some of you are (stupidly) suggesting the methodology is too simple to reflect a rich universe like ours, but an opposite truth is shown by a even a cursory examination.  Even the cursory pre-AuT universe shows that energy and matter can be exchanged (e=mc^2) and while that equation has been shown to be nonsensical in many ways, what it means on a quantum level is that matter at whatever complexity is the same as the most simple form of energy, therefor there is nothing special about any type of matter.   Getting back a couple more steps to an information state is trivial and is handled very handily by AuT. Only a scientific moron would fail to see this.
The equations then are self solving.
The "Carrier" (0,1,1,2,3,5) is merely the straight addition of the individual states:
01,01,01-01,01-01-01 etc.  By adding each of the states together to get the next state you arrive automatically even according to earthly mathematics at the F-series function.  Curvature is given by the equation giving rise to separation without which you'd have a singularity with everything in it.
THE SIMPLE EQUATION, THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION HELD IN G-SPACE IS MERELY A VARIANT OF THIS:
CT1(x)=1(sin'(pi')/2x and pi' is defined as the special equation sum(1-x)[4/(2x-1)+/-] and Ct-1(x)=-1(sin'(pi')/2x so that each of these is separated by an evolving value of x which changes the function sin' and the value of pi to provide mechanical separation of pi.
For any quantum sum of points ct1(x) ct-1(x) the two will eventually be carried towards each other as x gets very large and the sum of ct(x) points based on adding the prior two to get the current grows very large.
The addition of time states almost ensures that there is a fading, but still present, multiple solutions and therefore changing curvature of space.  In fact, over time, there should be a measurable difference in space curvature for the universe that can be looked for.
In fact, the change in pi provides a basis for observed separation of points without any more complex algorithm since at every change in x there is a corresponding change in the amount that one curve exists relative to the next, but addition of states means that the change for an early less curved state becomes less and less effective in changing the current perception of the universe.
Compression states actually show a change in space curvature locally that has to be tied to this same phenomena at least indirectly, high compression means that you have a place where these changes are happening together so that there is an increase in the localized change of pi relative to uncompressed space so you'd necessarily see space compress without regard to some Einsteinian magic that pre AuT technology requires.
Compression occurs when alignment continues over a period of time beginning with when the states are aligned in the quantity necessary to achieve exponential compression and this requires that collections of spirals are solved for a common geometry over a long period which apparently results from intersection of positive and negative spirals with a continuing common solution.  The idea that the big bang started with no compressed states in it is refuted by this which requires compression occur within the big bang and decompression (on average at least) occurs after it which is discussed in detail.  The "single big bang fantasy" of pre AuT mathematics is clearly refuted, even though for the wrong reasons it was previously refuted with big bounce concepts.
it is possible, even likely, that until there is enough information to define pi, while there would be a type of separation of information states based on the changing value of pi possible, there would not be sufficient curvature of space to allow combinations or to allow for the type of solutions that we experience with a high solution of pi for the current relatively (relative to x=1 or 1 million anyway) infinitely high values of x that we experience (nothing that what I call relatively infinite is small compared to what x will grow to at ct7 states).
When x is very high then you have the combined states begin to spread out and achieve a magical separation where space is possibly defined and where they can combine and separate to compress and expand to give the pheonomena that AuT can define merely with compression and expansion which is defined in Spirals in Amber if you care to read it.
So what you have is the building algorithm and then it builds on itself.
The most satisfying method of arriving here is by using 4 (for pi) being derived as a factor of 2 (information theory) which may be a reflection of positive and negative information (even though normally this would be plus 2 and minus 2 the equation )+/- might allow for the addition of the two states for purposes of the algorithm for building pi.  I'll get to that later.
If you want something spiritual out of all of this consider that a significant number of spirals exiting one state and then coming back to that state could result in unusual phenomena, for example electrical impulses forming memories change state significantly upon death and do so in proximity, who is to say its impossible for those states to reconvene somewhere else, even in another mind altogether to give memories of that prior life.
Want something more spiritual?  This is the result of two minds coming together and then being torn apart..

The building of space and building an algorithm part 3

The purpose of this set of posts is to show one method that space can be built as an information based system according to an algorithm.
This method is considered the best so far, but is far from complete. Also, at 2.5 years into this project, there are places where choices have to be made, but not all of those choices have been made.
What we know is that quantum time states have to be built from multiple prior time states to protect historical perspective and dimension with change based on a single variable at quantum steps.
The assumption is that the universe has to build from an algorithm because there is nothing else for it to build from.  It also assumes that observed phenomena reflect the algorithm and it relies heavily on on observed phenomena to derive the equations.
The substrate on which this is built is the really important element but the process of developing AuT is the process by which we will determine the features of the substrate.

Preliminary

First Steps away from combination theory

Spiral methodology

The summation of ct states with carriers looks something like this to generate the F series.
What can be seen from this is that one builds from the other according to the f-series
x=x-1+x-2.  A negative version 0,-1,-1,- is being built simultaneously
0,1,1,0                    x=1 pi=4
    0,1,1,0                x=1 pi=4-4/3+4/5
       0,1,1,0          
       0,1,1,0             x=x-1+x-2=2 pi=4/-4/3+4/5-4/7+4/9 (note that even though two spirals exist, they
          0,1,1,0                            are not offset from one another and pi may ory not have changed
          0,1,1,0                            twice it's assumed only that only a single even occurred.
          0,1,1,0         x=x-1+x-2=3 pi=prior pi -4/11+4/13-again only a single change occurred so
             0,1,1,0                         pi may only have changed by one event
             0,1,1,0
             0,1,1,0
             0,1,1,0
             0,1,1,0
This continues but there is no reason to believe that each lower state ceases to exist and there is no reason to believe that it doesn't.   there may be different versions of pi or the highest solution of pi may apply to all time states.
sin(pi/2) would be for each
sin(4/2), sin((60-20+12)/2)=sin(52)
This is much more complicated that it looks because there is no dimension as we perceive it in these initial formulations because there is not enough curvature.
Put another way, if we assume that the number in the parenthetical is radians, you cannot get to a dimensional answer because you have to multiply by 180 and divide by pi and pi isn't something that makes any sense here to get to degrees.  Dimension is being built so the methods of defining space have to evolve with it.
There does not appear to be sufficient separation and sufficient complexity or staggering of states unless the earlier states remain in place and are offset although the offsets may be much more complicated for example where the f-series is 5 it appears that two are offset from the other 3 as they are added together.
The solution defines everything we experience so even though there is a very good reason to explore the large number of alternatives.
Presumably it will be some time before there is enough information and enough curvature to have compression states and the point at which our universe exists is far down the line.

Departing from preconceived notions of singularity

Religious Fundamentalism

I should stick to physics or just about anything else.
However, I have had enough.  I'm going to write a book or short story or something on this but I'm going to tell you first.
Any religion that believes in any man made activity being of consequence to god ignores physics, whether of mine or anyone else, but mine is more inflexible because it proves that an algorithm denies any ability of man to change events.  Likewise the insertion of god into the events of man is pre-ordained.  The only way to change anything is to change the base algorithm that defines the universe.
Therefore anyone who seeks to put their religion forward as a mechanism for political control is a anathema to me.
Who the f- are these idiots (yes, you can insert Rubio in place of idiot) who think reproductive control is a religious imperative?  It isn't even a prerogative.  To suggest that religion requires that Zika babies be born instead of aborted are as stupid as the Fundamentalist who believe that their religion allows them to control the day to day activities of their followers or condemn those who don't follow them.  Let these boobs say that non-believers will end up with some punishment in the afterlife, but how can they be this stupid as a practical matter.  Why would they saddle us with their fundamentalism, brainwashing, pain and expense for the sake of something that is un-provable and illogical?
The right wing religious boobs and the radical islamic fundamentalists are in the same crooked boat rowing against one another, not able to see their hypocrisy as they threaten one another with religious war.  Even the pope, who perhaps can be excused for being a boob since he is the head boob of a religion, understands overpopulation.  But he allows dogma to control his belief based on nothing other than the hallucinations or those who sought control of others, especially the more recent religious boops.
Religion is not wrong.  The belief that man can understand it may not even be wrong.  But to think that god dictates what we should or should not do is naive.  God "requires" what we do.  If we're boobs it's because the algorithm that defines the universe determines we are boobs.
Now, while you are right that I dislike the boobs for being boobs I don't put myself above you.  In fact, I am as big a boob as any of you.  I understand the ability to control my life in a way that no one else does and I have chosen, thus far, not to take advantage of the knowledge and I cannot blame that on anything other than my own superstitions; my 'internal' religious compass that keeps me from doing what I know to be the right thing for me and to some extent the right thing for society as a whole.
So let me reject the boobs, including myself, let me fight the idiots, including myself.
How I despise this fundamentalist nonsense and therefore myself for being a slave to my own stupid preconceptions.

Building an algorithm part 2

The original technique used to define the universe was based on observations.  This took us back quite a ways.  Recognizing force and space for what they are, a reflection of some background, allowed us to solve all mysteries by applying the new insights to existing phenomena.
Once defined, it become possible to take the background that was determined and attempt to figure out how it arises.

This is creation.  It isn't the false creation of "the big bang" which is proven by AuT to be nothing more that one in an extremely large series of  of inflection point averages.  
But it still is not creation in the senes of the absolute beginning.  It is a step towards that, but absolute creation requires the ability to understand the environment of non linear time which, by definition has neither a beginning nor an ending but which, instead the Einstein Hologram Universe (EHU) environment where everything happens at once. and is the reason why I don't take the Einstein Hologram Universe completely out of print despite it being incorrectly based on Hologram Theory and Einstein Theory which is impressive, but ultimately tied to working with the reflection invironment rather than the actual environment of AuT..

There is a series of points that from the second part of the Algorithm Building Exercise
BUILDING THROUGH ADDITION
There is a fundamental formula that describes how you get something from nothing.

F-Series: 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 so for any location along this series we can associate a number 0(1),(1)2,1,(3),2(4) or 1(1),1(2),2(3),3(4), etc and we can define an equation FsF where for any x FsF is that number plus the prior two numbers which helps us to understand the level of compression between stable clock time states.  

PI BUILDING

We observe pi building which AuT tells us is a reflection of how the algorithm is built.
pos  4/1  4/5  4/9           

neg   4/3  4/7  4/11          

There is a fixed numerator which has to have a source and it is offset by 2 which suggests that both 4 and odd numbers have to have a specific origin or must be built out of an algorithm based solution like the base number (FSF(x)) in compression.  Today, we are going to explore the former concept.      

CURVATURE-The Origin of 4  

The suggested explanation for the algorithm of curvature is that the four comes from the cycle.0,1,1,0 which is a four part cycle.  This compares unfavorably to the idea that the outermost spiral reflects space and requires, instead, that there is a carrier that controls the length of the spiral.  This suggests the length of spirals is based on how long they exist within the environment of linearity which grows for each.  X increases and you have the non-linear solution giving each successive quantum element being shorter while the earlier the time state the longer its carrier spiral.
DERIVATION OF THE PI EQUATION

The PI equation is a non-dimensional vibration equation which is discussed before, but we are here going to introduce a non-linear function based on the 0,1,1,0 feature:

Sum(From x=1 to n)(4/(2x-1)+/- where +/- reflection that every other answer in the sum changes from positive to negative.

Creation of space looks something like this:

0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0

CURVATURE-The origin of curve

In the very limited portion given above, pi would "begin" to look like this:

4/1,-4/3,4/5,-4/7 based on the formula [4 changes per unit]/(2x-1) where x starts as 1, then 2, then 3, then 4.

4 comes from the number of changes in any event

x comes from the number of events

2x-1 becomes the part where a solution needs to be determined based on the relationship.  There are several suggestions.  One is that there are two positive events followed by one negative event (1,1 followed by 0).  This flies in the face after a fashion of the 4 units per event, but it has to be understood that this is not just a selection of elements, this is the definition of information collected to form space and giving it curvature.
Another suggestion is that there is a positive mirror curvature that is being created.  This would mean there is something (y/2x)+/-.  If y is 4, for example, then the solution would be -4/2,4/4,-4/6,4/8.  While silly at first, this suggests the source of an uncurved solution which in turn brings our attention back to that uncurved solution, the F-series spiral from which the curved spiral arises (0,1,1,2,3,5,8) and which gives rises to compression (big bang predecessor) averages and expansion (where we live) averages.
In this case, the -4/2,4/4 is replaced with 0,1,0,-1,1,-1,2,-2,3,-3 although the actual expression of this result is different because these F-series spirals are solved separately, but added together to get a net result for any quantum moment.

While the spiral algorithm remains, it can be seen that the spiral algorithm is at most an extension of this more basic algorithm.
VIBRATION

Pi and Spiral type compression and expansion suggest that fundamentally space (and therefore the foundation of all other types of information) is comprised of positive and negative elements that are offset according to non-linearity (0,1,0,-1) giving rise to vibrationally offset elements given the designation herein of positive and negative although those designations are more of a reflection of first and second where features of first and features of second are expressed by us using a mathematical positive or negative, yes or no type of expression, but they are more rich than these designations just as zero doesn't fully express the inherent "maybe," "non-linearity," and related characteristics of what comes before linearity or algorithm.
So we call them positive and negative at our peril, just as we use base 10 numbers at our peril and confusion in looking at this process.
Why they are offset is probably a function of the fact that certain algorithms (which may exist alongside of the one that defines our universe) are too homogeneous or which otherwise cancel themselves out  Examples of a cancelling algorithm is x-x.  It is never truly non-linear.  Examples of a too homogeneous algorithm would be x/x.  There is no offset and while it grows, it changes in a flat line that is always 1, which would be a very one dimensional universe.  By introducing the F-series function (adding prior states to get the current state) you get multiple dimensions and preserved history.  Anything less than the F series would yield 0,1,1,1 (or 0,0,0,0) where only the first number is added instead of 0,1,1,2,3.  But it also suggests something like this: 0,1,1,2,4,7,13 which is adding the prior 3 instead of the prior 2 and would generate a universe which is poorly understandable but might for an interesting exercise for someone with more time.
Hence, our universe has vibration elements because if it didn't it wouldn't be offset and it is offset because if it didn't it would be too homogeneous to have the value and flavor that it has to give rise to the perception of self awareness.
This suggests an infinity of algorithms all of which can exist together in the non-linear environment of g-space because there is no reason for them not to exist together.
Offset, in this case, is a single complete event followed by a negative single complete event and they remain offset pairs because they happen sequentially and not at the same time, at least that is the suggestion of pi which is observed in the curvature of space.

Instead of a positive and negative being created together so they would cancel each other out, one positive solution happens and then offset but summed to define any given point (otherwise the 2x-1 number would never increase).

This summation is the same summation that gave rise to 0,1,1,2,3,5.  It looks like this:

0,1,1,0                                       4/1   4 yielding 1

0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0                            4/2   4 yielding 2

0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0,1,1,0                   4/3    4 yielding 3

0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0        4/4    4 yielding 4

Time and dimension are unrelated to these events but these events define curvature and the spirals themselves arise from the application of these equations and the changing value of x, the changing number of positive and negative elements related to the changing value of x, gives rise to the impression of dimension and space.

TRANSITIONS 

While it is important to understand the transition from this to the compressed states as is discussed below, this relationship gives rise to an understand of why pi occurs.

It is a type of formula that we don't see or if we see it we don't recognize it because it has a variable vibrating between a positive and a negative result. If we don't know exactly which phenomena of non-linear algorithm gives rise to 2 we know 2 is how many are added to get to next f-series state and how many are added to the denominator and it is likely the relationship for the two added to get to the next F-series (adding the two prior numbers to get to the current number) since that is the foundational building block of the suggested equation.  This defines a fixed relationship between pi and the changing f series and changes them for the same reason.

The numerator, d may have to do with the number of coordinates changing at once in space, it may have to with a constant base for our space only, but it is tied to some event, it exists for a reason in the Algorithm.               

x controls the exponential 2^x and they appear slower, but maybe not because of coordinates changing at once, instead it may be the process of how many changes occur in the spiral equation:
space 0,1,1,0
Photons 0,1,1,2,0
Wave 0,1,1,2,3,0
Matter 0,1,1,2,3,5,0
etc. and the 11, 111,1111 suggests it is just the number of coordinates changing together

COMPRESSION States

The suggestion of the F-series is 0,1,1,2,3,5.8 for our black holes, the first 3 representing space, the second three photons, the third three wave energy, the fourth matter and the last group of black holes with a return to zero at the end and.

So, the transition works in this fashion: 0,1,1,0 it remains space. 0,1,1,2,0 it remains photons with compression on the scale of 3^2^2.

0,1,1,2,3,0 is wave energy with a scale of 6^2^3

0,1,1,2,3,5,0 is matter with a scale of 10^2^4

0,1,1,2,3,5,8,0 is black hole material with a scale of 13^2^5

The actual appearance is:

0,1,1,0

00,11,11,22,00

000,111,111,222,333,000

0000,1111,1111,2222,3333,5555,0000

00000,11111,11111,22222,33333,55555,88888

The next set would use 1prime(13 units but not 13-111111111111)               

 Thus endith part 2

AuT Building an algorithm 1

In order to define the algorithm it is a good thought to see how the algorithm originates.
While logic will figure into this discussion, it is important to remember a couple of key elements
1) Time and distance are irrelevant
2) Our logic is irrelevant
3) The background environment is as amorphous as the mind of god but is critical because it allows for a durable algorithm and for a transition of the governing variable.
Steps
1) information creation:yes/no/non-linear; +/-/0
2) FsF-for each value in step 1 0,1,1; 0yes,0no,0nl;1yes,1no,1nl;1yes;1no;1nl;0yes,0no,0nl
3) pi creation-offset expansion:01,11,10 for example for each information state to create a compounding of information around offset information states
4) Solution of net information states from the positive, negative and non-linear aspects relative positions to create compression and expansion phases based on net solutions
5) compression through a f-series base raised to the incremental increase in n as the amount of information becomes sufficient during net compression phases
So endith part 1

AuT Assumptions and the Real world

Space is either the outer state of any spiral or it is a repeating 0,1,1,0.  To understand what this means, it means it is maybe, yes, yes, maybe.
This strange result is not nearly as strange as the results you get for photonic energy at 1,1,2 which would be yes,yes,yes/yes; yes,  yes/yes indicates why we must avoid using arabic number since the universe works with "sticks" and not mathematical ease of expression.  The yes/yes portion is why speed differences appear even though all changes occur at the same rate and is one of the "great" indicators that repeating spirals are a thing for stable states, although other solutions are discussed even in the first edition of spirals in amber.
This makes the assumption that the opposite states (no,no,maybe and no,no,no/no) do not interact directly with the positive solutions which opns the different question of how opposite spiral mathematics solves for itself.  True separation doesn't exist, yet the yes,yes, maybe solution (non-linearity as one state of the F-series) indicates that a solution periodically exists for combinations.
The other result eliminates the need for a "carrier" state, but either solution or a combination of the two gives the satisfying result and is not the source of this post.
One of the big non-mysteries of the theory has to do with life and spontaneous demolition.  For purposes of examining this we need to look at our solar system.
The sun represents a highly compressive oriented state.  Fusion is occurring so we know that we are looking at a solution of net intersecting spirals.  Any difference on a quantum level is invisible to us.
What we can "see" with our limited instruments is the net result.
Sterile planets reflect long term stable states and unstable planets, particularly with life like earth reflect net changes in both directions.  It's not a coincidence, it is mathematically an imperative.
We see this on a macro level and on a micro level.
For example, spontaneous combustion of a person can be seen as a conversion of solid state to energy or merely as a separation of a combined energy/matter composite into its component parts.  Both are observed daily (people being blown up) but this was not the case 10,000 years ago when any conversion was seen only on a microscopic level with the breakdown of organics by bacteria.
long term stability suggests that the solid elements of our world and the more tedious "rocks" especially those with no magma are "dead" but that isn't consistent with the theory and cannot be accurate.
Instead, the result of the applied mathematical formula is that concentrations (relatively rare in the grand scheme of things) of extremely stable states exist during different phases (net expansion and net compression) in the midst of the constant changes that we see both in comcentrated compression in the sun and in the compression/expansion interaction that reflects itself as life and the constatnt fission of compressed states.
One has to assume that in ct5 states (black holes) there is also a compression of the type observed in the sun where a steady compression occurrs over time to yield some result but on a scale that is very large, leading to ct6 compression as x (the single variable) gets large enough.
This conceptually appears hard to grasp at first.  That is the general with his drone blowing up the terrorist doesn't see himself as the tool of some mathematical algorithm solving for x.  He does, ironically, see himself as the tool of a number of different diverse forces including those electrical ones controlling his brain and those around him to the same effect.  The idiocy in the world is largely caused by the refusal of perfectly intellegent apes to realize that there is one underlying algorithm on which all the others are built which simplifies rather than complicates the analysis.
To understand how such a simple algorithm can give rise to such diverse results, see the prior post.

The changing face of AuT quatre

SIA is about AuT which is a mathematical theory which explains dark matter, universal expansion and contraction, the big bang, the relationship of space, energy, matter and black holes and other ‘mysteries’ of science; which turn out to not be all that mysterious.  It is more of a new way of looking at phenomena than a new theory, although it is a new theory.

Succinctly, AuT holds that the perceived universe, including forces, states of existence and events, may be explained as the result of a single algorithm changing in response to a single variable.  While this is initially counter-intuitive in a history based, space-time continuum, it turns out that given the algorithms ability to build from a simple model to a more complex model based on coordinates being out of sync and having each subsequent state being built from one or more prior states, the former giving rise to the variety we experience in the universe, the later giving rise to the perspective of history.

As the algorithm is disclosed in this paper, and in the book, it is suggested that the universe should appear largely homogenous, which is observed when looking at empty space.  On closer examination, however, it can be seen that very complex, very unhomogenous states of universe are the natural result as the amount of discordance of even simple states increases and the amount of information reflected by the size of the single variable grows to the phenomenal size we experience in quantum instances in our universe.

Put another way, the universe is designed in such a way that there are successive compression and expansion “averages”.  In this way, at any point in any solution to x there will be expanding and contracting solutions.  Indeed, the equation suggests that there is a diverging or (more likely) a converging infinite series like pi driving the universe to a state where all points would be contracting together, but the universe never reaches this state and instead just grows in size in terms of information based on a value of x that never decreases.

It is possible to suggest the most likely solution to this equation and that is done, but for purposes of understanding the general rule of construction, the universe is based on a converging series based on the Fibonacci series (referred to as F-series for simplicity).  Several permutations to this will be discussed, although it is certainly the case that only one will exist.  That is there will not be multiple or changing equations.  Instead there will only be one equation which the universe at any quantum point based on the solution to a single algorithm in response to a single changing variable.  This in turn seems to require that at the quantum level all points change at the same speed, the speed at which the single variable changes, but that relative concentrations of quantum states changing together gives the impression of speed differentials.

Clock time states are used to explain the differences in F series with the number of clock times changing together controlling the state of information from 1 for space to 5 for black hole material.  One permutation for state changes is reflected by the F-series solution derived from non-base 10 solutions to the F-series.  Here 1,11,111,1111,11111 for space, photons, wave energy, matter and black hole material respectively.  However, within this solution stacking allows for this type of result 1,12,122,2335,55555 etc.  This enormous potential diversity even within a single quantum clock time state gives rise to enormous diversity even within a fairly static F-series based universe and this reflects only one type of stacking in a universe where the stacking principle of the F-series is repeated over and over again.

F-series sprials One permutation is the change of spirals relative to a specific clock time state.  For example 0,1,1,0,1,1,0 being the series for space, 1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1,2 being the exclusive range for space, 1,2,3,1,2,3,1 being the exclusive range for photonic energy, etc.