Secret of healthy ageing discovered in ground-breaking 35-year study
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/11199403/Secret-of-healthy-ageing-discovered-in-ground-breaking-35-year-study.html
But of course, this is only part of the equation.
Friday, October 31, 2014
NLT - Time bits and tapping into the power of temporary black holes-three of two: a looping universe
If the universe did not loop, then numbers would have no relevance. You were "shocked" when you read "three of two" because you cannot have three of two. you can only have three or three or two of two. This requires a looping universe. Before this is explained in more detail I have to set out the justification for building me a cave laboratory (the offers from governments based on this blog to build me one have been surprisingly sparse).
When you finish reading my book (or this blog) you will know more about black holes than anyone at NASA even though your knowledge will be limited; you will know more about time and the interrelationship of the different forces to gravity than anyone at Roscosmos. You will know more about what gravity is.
You will understand why it is a waste of time to look for a "hologram" for the universe and why the money wasted on searching for a "hologram" from which the universe derives can be saved so that alone justifies NLT. Just by proving the money spent "looking" for something that doesn't exist is squandered would seem to justify the expenditure necessary to continue the nlt inquiry, if not to build a cave laboratory.
You will not know more about god. NLT does nothing to disprove god. EHT does provide some basis for a "type" of god that would be cognizant of our problems; but NLT defines a universe vastly larger than the observed universe in an environment which is totally devoid of dimension and linear time. One can only imagine what occupies that universe, or one can read this blog entry.
But you don't care do you? All you want is your anti-gravity car so you can lord it over everyone who doesn't have one; or your clock time bomb that you can lord over everyone who doesn't have one. Well, for that you will need some additional theory and that will answer some of the more "interesting" inquiries..
WHY CLOCK TIME STATES MUST EVENTUALLY LOOP BACK TO NLT
Clock time 4 is more "concentrated" more organized than clock time 3. Entropiest would have you believe that the universe is tending towards a dispersed state of equilibrium. That there was a big bang followed by increasing states of disorder as organized systems collapse one after the other. NLT questions that. The pre-NLT limit of CT4 was seen as an aberration, a quantum fluctuation, in this process. Systems could organize, but it took energy, primarily heat energy to do it. Energy, however, wears out or at least is dispersed. The "concentrated" big bang was the great hurrah of their universe. But, of course, they are all wrong and I am right.
The first clue came from the "discovery" or "intuit" of NLT. Next, within the moving universe CT5 was divined. It became obvious that our universe was a lot more than we thought it was. Then it became obvious that there were not three dimensions and time, instead there were 4 dimensions changing at once and anyone on one of more than one dimension sees a type of time in the change of the two relative to each other.
Standard watch time was nothing more than the perspective of 4 dimensions changing at once. Time existed independent of this perspective.
Now we know that CT5 is even more concentrated (exponentially); CT6 very predictable and if such is the case, the "universe" vs the "known universe" is of an order of magnitude greater such that the incomprehensible universe is but a photon in universe of universes.
From our limited perspective of only 4 dimensions, we barely see anything of the universe and we beat our heads against irrational numbers, equations without solutions, infinite series, half distances to the point of quantum changes and beyond. We look at the equation 1/(x-1) as x approaches 1 and say "there is no solution" but there is. We try to define why a circle is a circle and why it must be defined by an equation which has no apparent solution, but accept circles nonetheless, we use pi with impunity without fully understanding what it represents. It represents a universe which is circular. It represents a universe which is unaffected by entropy because its concentration states eventually loop back (in infinity) to NLT.
Think about this. We proved in the last entry that the "increased order" of the universe, the increased energy of the universe initially, were actually less ordered and less capable of energy than the NLT state where everything happens at once. The corrollary of this, of course, is that NLT is our environment and the CT environments are merely reflections of NLT, but that is a more fundamental question.
On the other hand, however, we see that CT states get fundamentally more "concentrated" as they increase from CT1 to CT5
One part of the observation of 4 d time (the time observed in CT4) is that all 4 dimensional changes must change together, that is there must be sufficient concentration in order to observe the time of the system.
If temporary black holes exist, they can be seen as 5 ct states changing simultaneously and in a compressed state but without the requesite total compression (10^32) necessary to remain stable. They are unstable black holes which could be made stable in sufficient concentration or by artificially maintaining their state. While the so called "di-litheum" cyrstall idea is just more malarky; the idea of making a stable source of ct5 which could be drawn upon for power is not totally unlikely. Imagine the weapons that could focus this power drawn down from a source which is exponentially greater than fusion!
Of course without some artificial system maintaining compression the energy stored would dissipate violently in all likelihood.
Likewise, warp drive is more or less nonsense, but changing time coordinates at an artificially high rate might be relatively easy if we knew how they changed.
This is separate from the observation of lesser clock time changes which occur when we see photons or waves from distant planets.
1 bit having 2 states (on/off; 1/0; a positive change in time/negative change in time; etc) represents the fundamental state of changing clock times. 2 such bits would be represented by the equation 2^n where n equals 2; 3 bits by 2^n where n equals 3 and so on. Hence each "changing coordinate" has two states possible which are represented; both of which presumably are linear; but possibly represent linear and non linear or positively or negatively linear, etc.
We can infer one n per "L-state switch" that is per linear state switch or coordinate.
Likewise we know that the number of switches isn't complete at CT4 because black holes are CT5 states.
CT4 standard clock time is vastly different from the goof ball definition in pre nlt physics. In the goof ball definition there are three coordinates and then "whooooooo" (its Halloween after all) the ghost-like time. NLT completely debunks this nonsensical approach. Instead, having 4 coordinated changes at once allows the observer location to watch the relative change. In such a case, it is entirely likely that the point of reference (standard clock time according to the goofs) is not a different coordinate, but a shifting point among the 4, probably shifting each time the four change.
But that, is only a very small of the story...
When you finish reading my book (or this blog) you will know more about black holes than anyone at NASA even though your knowledge will be limited; you will know more about time and the interrelationship of the different forces to gravity than anyone at Roscosmos. You will know more about what gravity is.
You will understand why it is a waste of time to look for a "hologram" for the universe and why the money wasted on searching for a "hologram" from which the universe derives can be saved so that alone justifies NLT. Just by proving the money spent "looking" for something that doesn't exist is squandered would seem to justify the expenditure necessary to continue the nlt inquiry, if not to build a cave laboratory.
You will not know more about god. NLT does nothing to disprove god. EHT does provide some basis for a "type" of god that would be cognizant of our problems; but NLT defines a universe vastly larger than the observed universe in an environment which is totally devoid of dimension and linear time. One can only imagine what occupies that universe, or one can read this blog entry.
But you don't care do you? All you want is your anti-gravity car so you can lord it over everyone who doesn't have one; or your clock time bomb that you can lord over everyone who doesn't have one. Well, for that you will need some additional theory and that will answer some of the more "interesting" inquiries..
WHY CLOCK TIME STATES MUST EVENTUALLY LOOP BACK TO NLT
Clock time 4 is more "concentrated" more organized than clock time 3. Entropiest would have you believe that the universe is tending towards a dispersed state of equilibrium. That there was a big bang followed by increasing states of disorder as organized systems collapse one after the other. NLT questions that. The pre-NLT limit of CT4 was seen as an aberration, a quantum fluctuation, in this process. Systems could organize, but it took energy, primarily heat energy to do it. Energy, however, wears out or at least is dispersed. The "concentrated" big bang was the great hurrah of their universe. But, of course, they are all wrong and I am right.
The first clue came from the "discovery" or "intuit" of NLT. Next, within the moving universe CT5 was divined. It became obvious that our universe was a lot more than we thought it was. Then it became obvious that there were not three dimensions and time, instead there were 4 dimensions changing at once and anyone on one of more than one dimension sees a type of time in the change of the two relative to each other.
Standard watch time was nothing more than the perspective of 4 dimensions changing at once. Time existed independent of this perspective.
Now we know that CT5 is even more concentrated (exponentially); CT6 very predictable and if such is the case, the "universe" vs the "known universe" is of an order of magnitude greater such that the incomprehensible universe is but a photon in universe of universes.
From our limited perspective of only 4 dimensions, we barely see anything of the universe and we beat our heads against irrational numbers, equations without solutions, infinite series, half distances to the point of quantum changes and beyond. We look at the equation 1/(x-1) as x approaches 1 and say "there is no solution" but there is. We try to define why a circle is a circle and why it must be defined by an equation which has no apparent solution, but accept circles nonetheless, we use pi with impunity without fully understanding what it represents. It represents a universe which is circular. It represents a universe which is unaffected by entropy because its concentration states eventually loop back (in infinity) to NLT.
Think about this. We proved in the last entry that the "increased order" of the universe, the increased energy of the universe initially, were actually less ordered and less capable of energy than the NLT state where everything happens at once. The corrollary of this, of course, is that NLT is our environment and the CT environments are merely reflections of NLT, but that is a more fundamental question.
On the other hand, however, we see that CT states get fundamentally more "concentrated" as they increase from CT1 to CT5
One part of the observation of 4 d time (the time observed in CT4) is that all 4 dimensional changes must change together, that is there must be sufficient concentration in order to observe the time of the system.
If temporary black holes exist, they can be seen as 5 ct states changing simultaneously and in a compressed state but without the requesite total compression (10^32) necessary to remain stable. They are unstable black holes which could be made stable in sufficient concentration or by artificially maintaining their state. While the so called "di-litheum" cyrstall idea is just more malarky; the idea of making a stable source of ct5 which could be drawn upon for power is not totally unlikely. Imagine the weapons that could focus this power drawn down from a source which is exponentially greater than fusion!
Of course without some artificial system maintaining compression the energy stored would dissipate violently in all likelihood.
Likewise, warp drive is more or less nonsense, but changing time coordinates at an artificially high rate might be relatively easy if we knew how they changed.
This is separate from the observation of lesser clock time changes which occur when we see photons or waves from distant planets.
1 bit having 2 states (on/off; 1/0; a positive change in time/negative change in time; etc) represents the fundamental state of changing clock times. 2 such bits would be represented by the equation 2^n where n equals 2; 3 bits by 2^n where n equals 3 and so on. Hence each "changing coordinate" has two states possible which are represented; both of which presumably are linear; but possibly represent linear and non linear or positively or negatively linear, etc.
We can infer one n per "L-state switch" that is per linear state switch or coordinate.
Likewise we know that the number of switches isn't complete at CT4 because black holes are CT5 states.
CT4 standard clock time is vastly different from the goof ball definition in pre nlt physics. In the goof ball definition there are three coordinates and then "whooooooo" (its Halloween after all) the ghost-like time. NLT completely debunks this nonsensical approach. Instead, having 4 coordinated changes at once allows the observer location to watch the relative change. In such a case, it is entirely likely that the point of reference (standard clock time according to the goofs) is not a different coordinate, but a shifting point among the 4, probably shifting each time the four change.
But that, is only a very small of the story...
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
NLT - Time bits and tapping into the power of temporary black holes-two of two-entropy de-bunk-ed
Let me apologize to everyone who reads this in advance and having done that continue. Perhaps if you don't like sarcasm matched with a better understanding of quantum mechanics you should stop reading now. Or go on, it doesn't really matter.
Sometimes I am astounded by how much smarter I am than everyone else. Then I remember that I am just regurgitating pieces that were fed to me. This entry, for example derives from Maxwell's demon of entropy and to some extent Sziliard's information based entropy, but both are hopelessly overshadowed. Well, let's not say I'm more smarter, instead let's say that I'm more conceited.
Anyway, what's the latest insight for me to distract you with. Well, this one comes from my ability to recognize my own errors.
You will recall that originally, it was thought that gravity was the tendency of time to go non-linear and that black holes were the triumph of that tendency (EHU). Then it was determined that black holes were more "organized" compressed matter, in effect CT5, the state where 5 coordinates can change together.
Well then, what is gravity? Now it's time to take a giant leap towards the floating car. Do you see it yet? If not, then prepare for the unexpected....it is Halloween after all!
Well, it's shocking enough to know that I was wrong, but perhaps true genius, to the extent not just a "plant" from the universe, is the ability to recognize when you're on the wrong path. Perhaps if I want that Nobel prize, for example, I could act a little more humble.
Well, don't worry, I am humble enough, even if I am smarter than everyone else. On to work
Entropy is the tendency of things to move from an ordered state, to a disordered state...BALDERDASH! Oh, I am sure the cabal is quaking in their bowler hated boots. No, they are saying, there is no way that our definition of entropy is wrong, our blessed Maxwellian, Leo(can I buy a consonant) Sziliard.
So let's debunk everything you thought you knew...again.
What is the pre-NLT vision of the triumph of entropy. It is a smoth, space, unpunctuated by matter or energy. Oh, the horror! And so obviously incorrect. We know already that black holes are a "more organized" element in the universe, so far removed from this empty space as to be invisible to us. Hardly looks less organized.
Oh, but you're so frigging slow. Think about the teachings of NLT.
What is the most "organized state". Is it CT5? CT6? CT7? CT(infinity?). Those are the states that show time changing in more compressed states. Oh, so you say (not having read the book or if you did you didn't understand it) those states are increasingly less disorganized. They are farther and father from entropy. Oh, alas, am I all alone in the universe? Is there no one I can speak with?
The most organized state is where everything happens at once! The most organized state is non-linearity! That is order. Space, that "triumph" of entropy is much more organized than CT4, CT3 or CT5. Space is much closer to everything happening at once! It is the higher state of order.
Things are not moving towards less order, they are moving towards greater order! And gravity is the tendency of things to return to non-linearity or it is the force that pushes things away form linearity? As matter collapses into black holes, that "triumph" of gravity, you do not end up at CT3, no, no, no. You are at CT5, the most disorganized of all the state from the standpoint of time. Instead of no changing coordinates (the entropist's lump of lead), you have 5 changing at once. And there is no known end to this process, our universe being nothing more than an molecule, perhaps an atom, in the true NLT environment. From the standpoint of NLT, the lump of lead is infinitely disorganized, being much further form non-linearity.
The cabal would have to bury its bowler in the sand to miss the implications.
Gravity is a movement not of order, but an act of disorder. The dispersal of matter and energy into space is not entropy, it is the movement towards order! What's more, it is no more likely to succeed than black holes would suddenly gush forth with their material cargo. Oh what fools we all were to listen to the teachings of the cabal! They were looking at the universe through a mirror, seeing everything backwards. We might as well have been listening to some fundamentalist preacher who was, with his god before everything (non-linearity before linearity) much closer to the truth. The physics of the bible is closer to the truth.
Our universe is not moving towards disorder. Even if were not moving to a more NLT state, we'd still have the increase in order represented by CT5. NLT does suggest that we might see time going to a highly ordered (space) state and a highly disordered (CT5 and beyond) state in some sort of balance, but that is probably naive. It is just as likely that we'd reach some random end to things and then there would be.......
Sometimes I am astounded by how much smarter I am than everyone else. Then I remember that I am just regurgitating pieces that were fed to me. This entry, for example derives from Maxwell's demon of entropy and to some extent Sziliard's information based entropy, but both are hopelessly overshadowed. Well, let's not say I'm more smarter, instead let's say that I'm more conceited.
Anyway, what's the latest insight for me to distract you with. Well, this one comes from my ability to recognize my own errors.
You will recall that originally, it was thought that gravity was the tendency of time to go non-linear and that black holes were the triumph of that tendency (EHU). Then it was determined that black holes were more "organized" compressed matter, in effect CT5, the state where 5 coordinates can change together.
Well then, what is gravity? Now it's time to take a giant leap towards the floating car. Do you see it yet? If not, then prepare for the unexpected....it is Halloween after all!
Well, it's shocking enough to know that I was wrong, but perhaps true genius, to the extent not just a "plant" from the universe, is the ability to recognize when you're on the wrong path. Perhaps if I want that Nobel prize, for example, I could act a little more humble.
Well, don't worry, I am humble enough, even if I am smarter than everyone else. On to work
Entropy is the tendency of things to move from an ordered state, to a disordered state...BALDERDASH! Oh, I am sure the cabal is quaking in their bowler hated boots. No, they are saying, there is no way that our definition of entropy is wrong, our blessed Maxwellian, Leo(can I buy a consonant) Sziliard.
So let's debunk everything you thought you knew...again.
What is the pre-NLT vision of the triumph of entropy. It is a smoth, space, unpunctuated by matter or energy. Oh, the horror! And so obviously incorrect. We know already that black holes are a "more organized" element in the universe, so far removed from this empty space as to be invisible to us. Hardly looks less organized.
Oh, but you're so frigging slow. Think about the teachings of NLT.
What is the most "organized state". Is it CT5? CT6? CT7? CT(infinity?). Those are the states that show time changing in more compressed states. Oh, so you say (not having read the book or if you did you didn't understand it) those states are increasingly less disorganized. They are farther and father from entropy. Oh, alas, am I all alone in the universe? Is there no one I can speak with?
The most organized state is where everything happens at once! The most organized state is non-linearity! That is order. Space, that "triumph" of entropy is much more organized than CT4, CT3 or CT5. Space is much closer to everything happening at once! It is the higher state of order.
Things are not moving towards less order, they are moving towards greater order! And gravity is the tendency of things to return to non-linearity or it is the force that pushes things away form linearity? As matter collapses into black holes, that "triumph" of gravity, you do not end up at CT3, no, no, no. You are at CT5, the most disorganized of all the state from the standpoint of time. Instead of no changing coordinates (the entropist's lump of lead), you have 5 changing at once. And there is no known end to this process, our universe being nothing more than an molecule, perhaps an atom, in the true NLT environment. From the standpoint of NLT, the lump of lead is infinitely disorganized, being much further form non-linearity.
The cabal would have to bury its bowler in the sand to miss the implications.
Gravity is a movement not of order, but an act of disorder. The dispersal of matter and energy into space is not entropy, it is the movement towards order! What's more, it is no more likely to succeed than black holes would suddenly gush forth with their material cargo. Oh what fools we all were to listen to the teachings of the cabal! They were looking at the universe through a mirror, seeing everything backwards. We might as well have been listening to some fundamentalist preacher who was, with his god before everything (non-linearity before linearity) much closer to the truth. The physics of the bible is closer to the truth.
Our universe is not moving towards disorder. Even if were not moving to a more NLT state, we'd still have the increase in order represented by CT5. NLT does suggest that we might see time going to a highly ordered (space) state and a highly disordered (CT5 and beyond) state in some sort of balance, but that is probably naive. It is just as likely that we'd reach some random end to things and then there would be.......
Monday, October 27, 2014
NLT - Time bits and tapping into the power of temporary black holes-one of two-entropy de-bunk-ed
Predecessor theories have a common diagram of lines in three dimensions and a more mysterious coordinate set called time. This is useful in dealing with a macro environment since we experience the effects of this type of analysis, but it is clearly incorrect. In order to understand why, a simple understanding of 4 and 5 coordinate time is useful.
First, let's talk about the math involved and to do that we have to discuss the fact that dimensional states include multiple dimensions changing, perhaps a non-limited number. That is, each "change" could represent a different time state without departing from the basic concepts of non-linear time.
Lets start then with the basic concept that each time coordinate changing at one time leads to an exponential change of 2^n where n is the number of time dimensional states that change at once. Let's also acknowledge tht coordinate changes can occur at the speed of light (even though that requires an acknowledgement of time which, as will be explained, requires that at least two clock times change at once.
Concentration is required in order to move between time states "permanently-reversably stable" but it appears through the appearance of "temporary black holes" that 10^32 concentrations can be absent but that 5 coordinates can change at once at high energies for a short period of time, but that these are too unstable to remain in place for most purposes.
Entropy is the increase in disorder of any system. We "observe" this change over time. But time is illusory. At any point you go to the amount of entropy is conserved in NLT.
We know that black holes are CT5 and that they represent an exponential increase in order, the opposite of entropy.
It has not be calculated, but the increase in negative entropy may offset the amount of positive entropy. But irregardless of what the overall result, we know that at any point in time that you go to the past and the future will be fixed. There is no entropy because the system is not truly changing.
First, let's talk about the math involved and to do that we have to discuss the fact that dimensional states include multiple dimensions changing, perhaps a non-limited number. That is, each "change" could represent a different time state without departing from the basic concepts of non-linear time.
Lets start then with the basic concept that each time coordinate changing at one time leads to an exponential change of 2^n where n is the number of time dimensional states that change at once. Let's also acknowledge tht coordinate changes can occur at the speed of light (even though that requires an acknowledgement of time which, as will be explained, requires that at least two clock times change at once.
Concentration is required in order to move between time states "permanently-reversably stable" but it appears through the appearance of "temporary black holes" that 10^32 concentrations can be absent but that 5 coordinates can change at once at high energies for a short period of time, but that these are too unstable to remain in place for most purposes.
Entropy is the increase in disorder of any system. We "observe" this change over time. But time is illusory. At any point you go to the amount of entropy is conserved in NLT.
We know that black holes are CT5 and that they represent an exponential increase in order, the opposite of entropy.
It has not be calculated, but the increase in negative entropy may offset the amount of positive entropy. But irregardless of what the overall result, we know that at any point in time that you go to the past and the future will be fixed. There is no entropy because the system is not truly changing.
Saturday, October 25, 2014
NLT-just how many time coordinates are there?
I'm in sort of my angry mood today (you probably couldn't tell) so you'll have to excuse the references to the physics cabal as a pod of walruses. In fact, I've already said everything that needs to be said on this issue (outside of the cave in some remote location); but since I know the walrus previously known as Gavin is hopping up and down on his overstuffed chair saying in his affected stuffy english accent "I got it right, I got it right with my multi-dimensional time, on please Huffington post call me" and while I'm sure the editors of the huffington post are dialing his number as we speak, that is not right, it's just another physics walrus, wrong turn.
Ok, so you ask, what is the problem with multi-dimensional time? The answer to that question lies in the question as to just how many coordinates are there, how many "time dimensions?" in the words of the bowler wearing walrus cabal.
Those of you who have read the book, already know the answer to this question. We know that we actually see at least 5 changing at once. "So there must be more than five." says the walrus with the effected English accent. Wrong again. Read the book.
In a "point universe," an "NLT universe," how many dimensions are there to change?" Well, there aren't any, because its a point universe. But if you have change, its only in the point, and there is just one point, so there is just one coordinate that can change.
And because this one coordinate, this one point, isn't worried about what the walrus is clinging to as time, it can change "simultaneously" as many times as it wants.
The more times that it changes simultaneous at once, the higher the concentration state.
Before CT5 (black holes) states were identified, it was possible that the universe had a defined size. CT5 indicates something different, it suggests all the black holes in the universe are CT5 states and together the entire universe may be as little as a single CT5 atom, or molecule and that, in high enough concentrations (10^64) there are CT6 states. To those, we would be nothing more that a quark or a force, perhaps a quark of a quark. We would be as nearly dimensionless as a photon is to us. And it remains possible, that there are clock times where even more coordinates are changing at once in ever higher concentrations, perhaps without number, all arising from a single point of dimensionless time.
And yet we sit here pondering on our mundane, walrus problems, worrying about what the other walruses are thinking, writing on our walrus blogs, chewing on our mustachios and wondering how we look in our bowlers.
Ok, so you ask, what is the problem with multi-dimensional time? The answer to that question lies in the question as to just how many coordinates are there, how many "time dimensions?" in the words of the bowler wearing walrus cabal.
Those of you who have read the book, already know the answer to this question. We know that we actually see at least 5 changing at once. "So there must be more than five." says the walrus with the effected English accent. Wrong again. Read the book.
In a "point universe," an "NLT universe," how many dimensions are there to change?" Well, there aren't any, because its a point universe. But if you have change, its only in the point, and there is just one point, so there is just one coordinate that can change.
And because this one coordinate, this one point, isn't worried about what the walrus is clinging to as time, it can change "simultaneously" as many times as it wants.
The more times that it changes simultaneous at once, the higher the concentration state.
Before CT5 (black holes) states were identified, it was possible that the universe had a defined size. CT5 indicates something different, it suggests all the black holes in the universe are CT5 states and together the entire universe may be as little as a single CT5 atom, or molecule and that, in high enough concentrations (10^64) there are CT6 states. To those, we would be nothing more that a quark or a force, perhaps a quark of a quark. We would be as nearly dimensionless as a photon is to us. And it remains possible, that there are clock times where even more coordinates are changing at once in ever higher concentrations, perhaps without number, all arising from a single point of dimensionless time.
And yet we sit here pondering on our mundane, walrus problems, worrying about what the other walruses are thinking, writing on our walrus blogs, chewing on our mustachios and wondering how we look in our bowlers.
NLT-everyone is wrong except me; multiple dimensional time in non-linear time, walruses and hiden cave laboratories
I am just kidding of course.
A recognition of the potential of Non linear time is very similar to the recognition that Apocalypse now is merely the film script for heart of darkness set in vietnam, not to be confused with Ebolapocolypse which is the recognition that the failure of viruses to kill enough of us is the real disaster. If you had both (Heart of Darkness and AN) before you, it is so blatently obvious (and Stanley C. meant it to be obvious) that you have to say, "even if I don't agree with you completely, you are right."
Still, no foreign country has offered me a laboratory cut into a mountain yet, so I'm assuming I have to make a movie with Martin Sheen and Marlon Brando to make this work.
As I have said before (and will say again) the number of "coordinates" which you can call dimensions if it makes you happy; it doesn't make me happy, but they are just words, are irrelevant. I'm assuming since this is my original theory that everyone else is "programmed" not to get it right off, and I am doomed to explain it and then read another stupid article by some "huffington post physicist" saying the same thing in a different way and claiming credit for some "earth shattering" discovery. The only thing that keeps me from going all "postal" on this issue is the realization that in NLT there are no "earth shattering" discoveries. It's all an illusion, I merely repeat what I have said throughout what we'd call eternity, the characters in a book, I play the role of narrator today, hey, I'm Martin Sheen! Or wait, perhaps Brando, the dark, dying prophet. We have the same hairstyle, me and Marlon.
Anyway, this is about time coordinates (P(t)(x,y,z,u,v,w, and on and on). In your "cave man" Einstein-Newton-Babbage (well Babbage may be closer to me in theory)-Hawking (if you've nothing to hide, where's the s?) physics cabal world you see x,y and z as "the only visible dimensions" and time as some super special thing, harrumphing along like a bunch of comic characters in bowler hats in an old disney movie. It's really almost too much for me to go on, it's like lecturing to walruses, harrumphing walruses in bowler hats at that. They think their opinions mean something, when in fact even my correct assessments are meaningless.
No, it doesn't matter which coordinates are changing, because they are NOT DIMENSIONAL.
You only pick up on change so a coordinate not "changing" is not visible, not relevant from our point of reference even though it exists in non-linearity and can be expected to change as infinity plays out. Their change does change the point of reference that we have, but the change is all that is relevant and therefore there is much more "variety" possible than we could possibly perceive in an x,y,z environment.
In CT5 you would see 4 dimensions because you were standing on the 5th looking out. We look at CT5 and it appears to "disappear" (as I originally thought, being a harrumphing walrus myself); but on the contrary, theory shows something entirely different. It doesn't disappear because it's dropping out of the universe (shame on my walrus self). No; it is more "in" than we are. It has 5 dimensions changing at once, the harrumphing walruses in CT5 have 4 dimensional bowlers (unless they are me). And yet, and this is what forced me to realize I was right, they remain "fixed" relative to our 3-D view of things because they don't drop out of the universe, but remain "right in place" because the coordinates are continuing to change (if four change at once, than 3 must also be changing)
You are now twisting your bowler in your flappers and chewing on your mustache, your stomach churning from Krill you ate this morning and whining to one another (don't whine to me) "but we still see the black holes in 3-d space, we don't see this 4th dimension. Well, my walrus friends, I too twirled my bowler and twirl it still although only because the answer is disturbing. The answer is that things, including your bowler, have more dimensions than we see. The number is irrelevant, as long as the number that change at one time does not vary. The second we take "energy" and change an additional coordinate at once, it sits down and turns into a bowler hat. If we take your bowler hat (don't worry, we'll give it back) and change another of its dimensions at once it will turn into a bowler hat black hole. And of course the amount of energy released if we take the bowler hat black hole and reduce its changing dimensions to 3, the amount of energy released is exponentially greater (10^32) than the energy from that puny nuclear weapon. So, a laboratory in a cave anyone?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBtEBj3UVto
A recognition of the potential of Non linear time is very similar to the recognition that Apocalypse now is merely the film script for heart of darkness set in vietnam, not to be confused with Ebolapocolypse which is the recognition that the failure of viruses to kill enough of us is the real disaster. If you had both (Heart of Darkness and AN) before you, it is so blatently obvious (and Stanley C. meant it to be obvious) that you have to say, "even if I don't agree with you completely, you are right."
Still, no foreign country has offered me a laboratory cut into a mountain yet, so I'm assuming I have to make a movie with Martin Sheen and Marlon Brando to make this work.
As I have said before (and will say again) the number of "coordinates" which you can call dimensions if it makes you happy; it doesn't make me happy, but they are just words, are irrelevant. I'm assuming since this is my original theory that everyone else is "programmed" not to get it right off, and I am doomed to explain it and then read another stupid article by some "huffington post physicist" saying the same thing in a different way and claiming credit for some "earth shattering" discovery. The only thing that keeps me from going all "postal" on this issue is the realization that in NLT there are no "earth shattering" discoveries. It's all an illusion, I merely repeat what I have said throughout what we'd call eternity, the characters in a book, I play the role of narrator today, hey, I'm Martin Sheen! Or wait, perhaps Brando, the dark, dying prophet. We have the same hairstyle, me and Marlon.
Anyway, this is about time coordinates (P(t)(x,y,z,u,v,w, and on and on). In your "cave man" Einstein-Newton-Babbage (well Babbage may be closer to me in theory)-Hawking (if you've nothing to hide, where's the s?) physics cabal world you see x,y and z as "the only visible dimensions" and time as some super special thing, harrumphing along like a bunch of comic characters in bowler hats in an old disney movie. It's really almost too much for me to go on, it's like lecturing to walruses, harrumphing walruses in bowler hats at that. They think their opinions mean something, when in fact even my correct assessments are meaningless.
No, it doesn't matter which coordinates are changing, because they are NOT DIMENSIONAL.
You only pick up on change so a coordinate not "changing" is not visible, not relevant from our point of reference even though it exists in non-linearity and can be expected to change as infinity plays out. Their change does change the point of reference that we have, but the change is all that is relevant and therefore there is much more "variety" possible than we could possibly perceive in an x,y,z environment.
In CT5 you would see 4 dimensions because you were standing on the 5th looking out. We look at CT5 and it appears to "disappear" (as I originally thought, being a harrumphing walrus myself); but on the contrary, theory shows something entirely different. It doesn't disappear because it's dropping out of the universe (shame on my walrus self). No; it is more "in" than we are. It has 5 dimensions changing at once, the harrumphing walruses in CT5 have 4 dimensional bowlers (unless they are me). And yet, and this is what forced me to realize I was right, they remain "fixed" relative to our 3-D view of things because they don't drop out of the universe, but remain "right in place" because the coordinates are continuing to change (if four change at once, than 3 must also be changing)
You are now twisting your bowler in your flappers and chewing on your mustache, your stomach churning from Krill you ate this morning and whining to one another (don't whine to me) "but we still see the black holes in 3-d space, we don't see this 4th dimension. Well, my walrus friends, I too twirled my bowler and twirl it still although only because the answer is disturbing. The answer is that things, including your bowler, have more dimensions than we see. The number is irrelevant, as long as the number that change at one time does not vary. The second we take "energy" and change an additional coordinate at once, it sits down and turns into a bowler hat. If we take your bowler hat (don't worry, we'll give it back) and change another of its dimensions at once it will turn into a bowler hat black hole. And of course the amount of energy released if we take the bowler hat black hole and reduce its changing dimensions to 3, the amount of energy released is exponentially greater (10^32) than the energy from that puny nuclear weapon. So, a laboratory in a cave anyone?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBtEBj3UVto
Friday, October 24, 2014
you can tell something
you can tell a lot
by what other people see
when we are together
other people are happy too
perhaps they see something
that is worthwhile
that is rare and valuable
and so we have to decide
do we do the things we want
or the ones we deserve
it is not about truth to others
we have betrayed too many
including each other
to begin worrying now
no, it is about being
and being honest
to who and what we are
apart and together
30 years of friendship
and 5 of affairs
we have survived both
surprising each other
testing our resilience
to its very limits
surviving despite
our lack of faith
in what we built
with time and caring
with love and cruelty
together and apart
so how is it
when we have earned
and stolen so much
that when we are together
other people
see only the beauty
is it possible
when we are together
that is all that's left
dinner is a metaphor
and what will we have
the one we need
or the one we desire
by what other people see
when we are together
other people are happy too
perhaps they see something
that is worthwhile
that is rare and valuable
and so we have to decide
do we do the things we want
or the ones we deserve
it is not about truth to others
we have betrayed too many
including each other
to begin worrying now
no, it is about being
and being honest
to who and what we are
apart and together
30 years of friendship
and 5 of affairs
we have survived both
surprising each other
testing our resilience
to its very limits
surviving despite
our lack of faith
in what we built
with time and caring
with love and cruelty
together and apart
so how is it
when we have earned
and stolen so much
that when we are together
other people
see only the beauty
is it possible
when we are together
that is all that's left
dinner is a metaphor
and what will we have
the one we need
or the one we desire
EQUATIONS: Why does CT4 Standard clock time begin to disappear as we approach the speed of light
EQUATIONS: Why does CT4 Standard clock
time begin to disappear as we approach the speed of light.
The last paragraph is perhaps the most important, but if you really care, read the whole thing. It needs some editing yet, but the first two and last paragraphs tell the whole, bizarre story.
This discussion comes primarily from Chapters of “The
Einstein Hologram Universe” by the same author as NLT, edited to fit in with the
more recent NLT. It provides an early,
but completely intuitive discussion of why we see CT4 slow as we approach the
speed of light, that is as we transition at greater speeds along one
dimensional coordinate to the detriment of the others.
First,
the short paragraph summary. If the
change in time coordinates is conserved, then as you increase the change along
one set of time coordinates, the other time coordinate changes must
decrease. Standard clock time is the
perceived change in three coordinates when observed by having a fourth time
coordinate from which to observe the other two.
Therefore, acceleration in three dimensional space decrease the ability
of the fourth coordinate to change, decreasing the amount of change perceivable
from this perspective.
Time
dilation (the Lorentz equation in NLT theory):
TD=1/sqr(1-v2/c2)).
The difficulty of measuring TD is a function of the large size of c^2.
Velocity is a
relative concept (the difference in speed between the two observers). In
e-hologram theory V^2 can be further reduced as
(t1(vector1)-t2(vector1))^2 which are the dimensional differences along one
vector of two different times to define the "times" (time 1 and time
2) attached to the different observational points.
This means that
time dilation can be defined in terms of two separate times with light being
defined in terms of time. The solution approaches infinity as V
approaches the speed of light and if it were to surpass the speed of light time
would run backwards which is where a lot of time travel stuff comes from and is
why I speak in terms of "apparent" rather than actual faster than
light travel.
The reason to
substitute t1 and t2 for velocity is because this allows us to cut out
impossible variations and it helps to explain the constancy of light and the
failure to be able to combine the speeds of matter with the speed of light to
get light to go faster. Light (without
mass) can be affected by gravity (relativistic-ally) because time attaches
discretely to all states that are non-linear beginning with CT1.
Linearity of Time
may be stripped from either (as seen at black holes) and hence both would show
gravity; the tendency to give up linearity in e-hologram theory.
Light
Speed is irrelevant because time controls dimension in e-hologram theory and
therefore speeds. For purposes of this
discussion, a slight diversion is appropriate.
Since dimension is a function of time, the speed of light is an
artificial construct tied to time and not to any other parameter.
Let’s
look at a simple equation for time and space:
dt=d/v
v=m/s
A
change in velocity, the relative speed (general relativity) is distance divided
by velocity and velocity is nothing more than distance divided by time
(miles/hour).
Where
the two objects start at the same point and move directly apart from one
another the movement yields the equation (based on the speed of light):
w=(v(a,x)-v(b,x)/((1)-v(a,x)*v(b,x)/c^2).
v(a,x)
is the velocity of matter "a" going in the x vector). We can
use a single vector by virtue of the movement directly away from one another.
The
problem you run into is that as the velocities approach the speed of light, the
formula goes to infinity and hence the artificial limitation on change in
velocity). 1-1=zero and w goes to infinity. We have already determined that as velocities
are based on time (m/s) the application of a limit (light speed) based upon
time is based on the application of the vector (three vectors in our 3
dimensional space) by time.
If
gravity is the tendency to give up the linearity of time (or for time to recoil
if you want to reject the separation of time from tendency), then any gravity
source (from a black hole where time has been given back to a single mass of
the smallest size) must have at its core a dimensionless quality and no linear time.
This
means that in the equation te=(t1+t2)/2 and dt=dt/sqr((1-(v^2/c^2)) [the
inverse equation of the velocity equation above) is also dependent on time and
light speed which are variable, being only a function of time.
Time
dilation (that change in time due to velocity) can be seen to be a function of
velocity distance along one or more vector and the artificial light limit (c)
along that same vector. Light is taken
as being the same along all vectors in order to get division by zero which is
the same thing as stripping time. That is, when you manipulate the vector
(irregardless of time) you can get to infinity the same as if you manipulate
time; that is if you go from the distance light travels per hour to 2 times
that vector in the same time period you accomplish the same acceleration as if
you halve the time in the determination of light's maximum speed.
The
limitation of light speed therefore is a function of how much dimension
can be added within time. This means any limit on light speed is
merely a definitional limit of time which in turn is not a constant of the
universe, but is instead a constant of the application of linear time to the
singularity.
This
means that we observe in the real universe (o-space) time being removed from CT4
at which point the time stops relative to time outside of the gravity or
velocity and it being returned without a loss of coordinates in space.
This failure to lose coordinates indicates that time and tendency are two sides
of the same coin and also that coordinates are resilient, at least to the point
that they are completely within the singularity. That is, because you can stop the 4th
coordinate change by accelerating the other three (changing the location by
accelerating towards the speed of light) the must be conservation of time, at
least for CT3 and CT4 transitions.
This
"locational memory" of time, at least when not completely stripped
from a tendency, give space the illusion of fabric (space time) but it is a
function of linear time since it can be removed and take you completely out of
space.
Standard
Clock time is one of 5 known dimensions.
I say known because we absolutely see them in NLT. As best as it can be explained by
observation, Standard clock time is the dimension reflecting when the 4
cardinal coordinates appear in a given location. Of necessity, there are 4 cardinal
coordinates because black holes appear at given points, but are also not present.
NLT
demands that the different stages of time (CT1-5) reflect the number of coordinates
that can change at once. It is “possible”
that only 4 can change before CT5 but there is no reason for such an
outcome. Instead it would appear that
whatever dimension is reflected by CT5’s position outside of space changes
along with the other dimensions. While we know that at least 5 dimensions
exist, that they change at a given rate, and that the number changing at once
gives rise to different perspectives, we do not know the total number of
possible dimensions that can exist and there is no reason to limit the number
to the 5 observed. Since we know that there
are dimensions that do not “appear” to be visible to us, there is no reason to
limit the number that can exist. We
incorrectly assume there are 3 cardinal dimensions and one time dimension in prior
theories which are incorrectly based on observation.
One
difficult concept, among many in NLT, is that the “4” observed dimensions may
be a reflection of more than just 4. It
may be a reflection of thousands. They
only appear to be 4 because only 4 change at once!
This discussion comes primarily from Chapters of “The
Einstein Hologram Universe” by the same author as NLT, edited to fit in with the
more recent NLT. It provides an early,
but completely intuitive discussion of why we see CT4 slow as we approach the
speed of light, that is as we transition at greater speeds along one
dimensional coordinate to the detriment of the others.
First,
the short paragraph summary. If the
change in time coordinates is conserved, then as you increase the change along
one set of time coordinates, the other time coordinate changes must
decrease. Standard clock time is the
perceived change in three coordinates when observed by having a fourth time
coordinate from which to observe the other two.
Therefore, acceleration in three dimensional space decrease the ability
of the fourth coordinate to change, decreasing the amount of change perceivable
from this perspective.
Time
dilation (the Lorentz equation in NLT theory):
TD=1/sqr(1-v2/c2)).
The difficulty of measuring TD is a function of the large size of c^2.
Velocity is a
relative concept (the difference in speed between the two observers). In
e-hologram theory V^2 can be further reduced as
(t1(vector1)-t2(vector1))^2 which are the dimensional differences along one
vector of two different times to define the "times" (time 1 and time
2) attached to the different observational points.
This means that
time dilation can be defined in terms of two separate times with light being
defined in terms of time. The solution approaches infinity as V
approaches the speed of light and if it were to surpass the speed of light time
would run backwards which is where a lot of time travel stuff comes from and is
why I speak in terms of "apparent" rather than actual faster than
light travel.
The reason to
substitute t1 and t2 for velocity is because this allows us to cut out
impossible variations and it helps to explain the constancy of light and the
failure to be able to combine the speeds of matter with the speed of light to
get light to go faster. Light (without
mass) can be affected by gravity (relativistic-ally) because time attaches
discretely to all states that are non-linear beginning with CT1.
Linearity of Time
may be stripped from either (as seen at black holes) and hence both would show
gravity; the tendency to give up linearity in e-hologram theory.
Light
Speed is irrelevant because time controls dimension in e-hologram theory and
therefore speeds. For purposes of this
discussion, a slight diversion is appropriate.
Since dimension is a function of time, the speed of light is an
artificial construct tied to time and not to any other parameter.
Let’s
look at a simple equation for time and space:
dt=d/v
v=m/s
A
change in velocity, the relative speed (general relativity) is distance divided
by velocity and velocity is nothing more than distance divided by time
(miles/hour).
Where
the two objects start at the same point and move directly apart from one
another the movement yields the equation (based on the speed of light):
w=(v(a,x)-v(b,x)/((1)-v(a,x)*v(b,x)/c^2).
v(a,x)
is the velocity of matter "a" going in the x vector). We can
use a single vector by virtue of the movement directly away from one another.
The
problem you run into is that as the velocities approach the speed of light, the
formula goes to infinity and hence the artificial limitation on change in
velocity). 1-1=zero and w goes to infinity. We have already determined that as velocities
are based on time (m/s) the application of a limit (light speed) based upon
time is based on the application of the vector (three vectors in our 3
dimensional space) by time.
If
gravity is the tendency to give up the linearity of time (or for time to recoil
if you want to reject the separation of time from tendency), then any gravity
source (from a black hole where time has been given back to a single mass of
the smallest size) must have at its core a dimensionless quality and no linear time.
This
means that in the equation te=(t1+t2)/2 and dt=dt/sqr((1-(v^2/c^2)) [the
inverse equation of the velocity equation above) is also dependent on time and
light speed which are variable, being only a function of time.
Time
dilation (that change in time due to velocity) can be seen to be a function of
velocity distance along one or more vector and the artificial light limit (c)
along that same vector. Light is taken
as being the same along all vectors in order to get division by zero which is
the same thing as stripping time. That is, when you manipulate the vector
(irregardless of time) you can get to infinity the same as if you manipulate
time; that is if you go from the distance light travels per hour to 2 times
that vector in the same time period you accomplish the same acceleration as if
you halve the time in the determination of light's maximum speed.
The
limitation of light speed therefore is a function of how much dimension
can be added within time. This means any limit on light speed is
merely a definitional limit of time which in turn is not a constant of the
universe, but is instead a constant of the application of linear time to the
singularity.
This
means that we observe in the real universe (o-space) time being removed from CT4
at which point the time stops relative to time outside of the gravity or
velocity and it being returned without a loss of coordinates in space.
This failure to lose coordinates indicates that time and tendency are two sides
of the same coin and also that coordinates are resilient, at least to the point
that they are completely within the singularity. That is, because you can stop the 4th
coordinate change by accelerating the other three (changing the location by
accelerating towards the speed of light) the must be conservation of time, at
least for CT3 and CT4 transitions.
This
"locational memory" of time, at least when not completely stripped
from a tendency, give space the illusion of fabric (space time) but it is a
function of linear time since it can be removed and take you completely out of
space.
Standard
Clock time is one of 5 known dimensions.
I say known because we absolutely see them in NLT. As best as it can be explained by
observation, Standard clock time is the dimension reflecting when the 4
cardinal coordinates appear in a given location. Of necessity, there are 4 cardinal
coordinates because black holes appear at given points, but are also not present.
NLT
demands that the different stages of time (CT1-5) reflect the number of coordinates
that can change at once. It is “possible”
that only 4 can change before CT5 but there is no reason for such an
outcome. Instead it would appear that
whatever dimension is reflected by CT5’s position outside of space changes
along with the other dimensions. While we know that at least 5 dimensions
exist, that they change at a given rate, and that the number changing at once
gives rise to different perspectives, we do not know the total number of
possible dimensions that can exist and there is no reason to limit the number
to the 5 observed. Since we know that there
are dimensions that do not “appear” to be visible to us, there is no reason to
limit the number that can exist. We
incorrectly assume there are 3 cardinal dimensions and one time dimension in prior
theories which are incorrectly based on observation.
One
difficult concept, among many in NLT, is that the “4” observed dimensions may
be a reflection of more than just 4. It
may be a reflection of thousands. They
only appear to be 4 because only 4 change at once!
The ebolapocalypse and the real threat
I could wax eloquent, but the only reason for this post is to use the word ebolapocalypse.
There are all the articles pointing out how many more people die of car accidents, the common cold, even a lack of exercise, not to mention old age.
This is not the plague. We don't live in plague times. We're only obsessed because its "hard to cure" since clearly it can be cured.
We have the resources to contain even an extended outbreak of ebola.
It is more viral than some would have us believe, but it is not airborne which is what you need for a real virapocalypse in these days of rat control.
Of course, what happens if a person with ebola gets bit by a mosquito? Oh no!
The real plague, however, is the lack of plague. The population of the world is growing at an unsustainable rate. it is the overpopulapocalypse that will kill us all; how ironic.
There are all the articles pointing out how many more people die of car accidents, the common cold, even a lack of exercise, not to mention old age.
This is not the plague. We don't live in plague times. We're only obsessed because its "hard to cure" since clearly it can be cured.
We have the resources to contain even an extended outbreak of ebola.
It is more viral than some would have us believe, but it is not airborne which is what you need for a real virapocalypse in these days of rat control.
Of course, what happens if a person with ebola gets bit by a mosquito? Oh no!
The real plague, however, is the lack of plague. The population of the world is growing at an unsustainable rate. it is the overpopulapocalypse that will kill us all; how ironic.
Thursday, October 23, 2014
I am unconvinced and speeches that are partially written
It appears to me that not all of my loyal readers have watched the u-tube video. http://youtu.be/YeLNch8FE8I
I can almost understand the strangely pervasive interest in the posts on "the zeno socrates dialog" and the apparent unwillingness to comment (for good or ill) on Amazon; but I cannot understand why anyone would not listen to a zombie love song this close to Halloween. It just doesn't make sense to me.
I have this speech to write and its already way overdue. Here are some notes
It's not exactly the pitch I want to make, but perhaps something worthwhile can come of it. I am going to discuss this in general terms and then I am going to disprove insight and genius entirely.
I can almost understand the strangely pervasive interest in the posts on "the zeno socrates dialog" and the apparent unwillingness to comment (for good or ill) on Amazon; but I cannot understand why anyone would not listen to a zombie love song this close to Halloween. It just doesn't make sense to me.
I have this speech to write and its already way overdue. Here are some notes
Flashes
of Genius: Improvisations That Move Human
Awareness to Higher Planes of Enlightenment and Creativity
Awareness to Higher Planes of Enlightenment and Creativity
New Orleans speech
When I was approached about speaking,
my original thought was to go over my newest physics text. It took a
largely conceptual work and turned it into a theoretical model of
quantum mechanics.
That,
was considered a little too mathematical for the theme
"The Art of Improvisation in Words, Music, and Life”.
So I then found a post from September
of this year where I discussed the moment when Non-Linear Time theory
crystalized in my mind, the Eureka moment. But it was not just a
moment, it had an origin in study before and required the breath of
life over the subsequent two years to make it into something
tangible.
I hate to disappoint you, but I am not
going to discuss the theory of quantum mechanics, however if someone
asks me about it in the question and answer period of this…I cannot
be held responsible for the consequences.
It's not exactly the pitch I want to make, but perhaps something worthwhile can come of it. I am going to discuss this in general terms and then I am going to disprove insight and genius entirely.
Point
of insight-3 that have to do with the creation of the universe,
reality itself:
- Parmenides-taken to land of gods- travels "beyond the beaten paths of mortal men" to receive a revelation from an unnamed goddess (generally thought to be Persephone or Dike) on the nature of reality:
- object is to find a unity of all things
- illusion vs reality
- Newton with apple falling on his head leading to the math of motion which would be so celebrated that it would hold England back for almost a generation from innovative math until the students rebelled under Babbage.
- And then there is Einstein and me. Well, let's ignore me for the moment and talk about Einstein. An insight of special theory of relativity came to Albert Einstein while talking to his friend Michele Besso: I started the conversation with him in the following way: "Recently I have been working on a difficult problem, today I come here to do battle against that problem with you" We discussed every aspect of this problem. Then suddenly I understood where the key to this problem lay. Next day I came back to him again and said to him without even saying hello, "thank you. I've completely solved the problem" However, Einstein also said that the whole idea of special relativity did not come to him as a sudden, single thought, like a eureka moment: "Actually, I was led to it by steps arising from the individual laws derived from experience.
While
only a madman would put himself in the same sphere as Einstein, I
understand perfectly, lm (laughing maniacally). I came up with ideas
through work, not just a single moment. And yet, when questioned by
others about my theories, some of my best insights came from trying
to put into words what I did or did not understand.
What
then, is the effect of human interaction, the right human
interaction?
NLT-Justification edited-black holes
It really is irritating that these stories don't include a reference to the solutions in NLT. Of course, to be irritated that you aren't included as a science reference in the huffington post is a bit inane to begin with.
http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/highlight/it-may-be-time-to-forget-everything-you-ever-learned-about-black-holes/542b402178c90ac92b0001ce?cn=tblahttp://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/highlight/it-may-be-time-to-forget-everything-you-ever-learned-about-black-holes/542b402178c90ac92b0001ce?cn=tbla
While Non Linear time suggests that anti-gravity is unlikely, I happen to be your best bet for building a floating car, faster than light time travel and freezing things in a suspended state. I have done all of this unfunded and in my spare time over 24 months. I'm not saying that I will produce a floating car or a transporter or that my math solutions will immediately change the world, but I am so far ahead of everyone else, that it makes sense to allow me to continue to move forward and if there are floating cars and transporters in the future, my work will be attached to them.
http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/highlight/it-may-be-time-to-forget-everything-you-ever-learned-about-black-holes/542b402178c90ac92b0001ce?cn=tblahttp://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/highlight/it-may-be-time-to-forget-everything-you-ever-learned-about-black-holes/542b402178c90ac92b0001ce?cn=tbla
JUSTIFICATION
FOR FUTURE INVESTMENT
Working
just in my free time, I deliver to you a conceptually complete theory
predictive of the 13 items above and more. I predicted not only the
compression of black holes on a specific scale (10^32) but what they
represented, namely a time with a fifth coordinate
changing simultaneously.
While Non Linear time suggests that anti-gravity is unlikely, I happen to be your best bet for building a floating car, faster than light time travel and freezing things in a suspended state. I have done all of this unfunded and in my spare time over 24 months. I'm not saying that I will produce a floating car or a transporter or that my math solutions will immediately change the world, but I am so far ahead of everyone else, that it makes sense to allow me to continue to move forward and if there are floating cars and transporters in the future, my work will be attached to them.
More
particularly, NLT is the study of solutions to math paradox. Equations that have no solution or that have
paradox solutions under CT4 should have solutions under CT5 or CT3. There are statements in math that cannot be
proved or disproved, the act of attempting to verify these proofs with discrete
steps fails, the attempt to get finite answer to equations fail. NLT provides a model for finding solutions.
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
the last girl in the world
The last girl-. as promised, before Halloween :)
http://youtu.be/YeLNch8FE8I
From the author of:
http://youtu.be/YeLNch8FE8I
From the author of:
Since you won't be able to understand the singing, here is an approximation of the words
the whole world died
When/you/left me
its an apocalypse
So I go down/town
and I walk around
all the people actin like zombies
the women and alcohol
want to eat my brain
but I'm all alone
and I finally see
your'te the final girl
in the world
I am trying to forget you
I surround my apocalyptic heart
with barb wire and steel
the end/ of the world/ keeps me up
And I go downtown
its so late at night
the people walk like zombies
I break the seal
and I drink it straight
but i'm all alone
and i finally see
you're the last girl
in the world
I try to move on
but the phones don't ring
so i take to the streets
and I look for someone else
|
And I go downtown
its so late at night
the people look like zombies
they walk so stiff
and I cannot live
and i'm all alone
send me a nickle when you play this
except maybe the first time
you can play that free
I try to find
something to live for
in the wasteland left
after you left me
And I go downtown
is so late at night
people look like zombies
they weave as they walk
and I cannot live
if I'm all alone
and I finally see
you're the only girl
in the world
the women and alcohol
want to eat my brain
I break the glass
and I drink it straight
The last girl in the world
you're the last girl
the last girl/ in the world/
(g-d-g) to me-e-e-e
|
NLT clock time states and infinite series 1 of 2
Unsolvable equations in CT4 should be capable of solution using multiple clock times.
This occurs to be as a result of the study of language and different levels of language solutions.
Just as math paradox exist, so do those in language and the parallels are significant.
Perhaps the most simple example is a statement like the liar's paradox: "This statement is a lie." The solution to this paradox is to call it "A statement about language rather than language alone. Another approach is to say that there are different levels of abstraction which can be a way of saying there is missing information or, in nlt language, there are dimensions which are not changing simultaneously and therefore it appears to the dimensions that are changing as a paradox.
Hence, irrational numbers may become rational at CT5, for example, or perhaps even at lower CT states, although the knee jerk reaction is that they would become less rational, perhaps ultimately achieving the state of irrationality that I function on.
This occurs to be as a result of the study of language and different levels of language solutions.
Just as math paradox exist, so do those in language and the parallels are significant.
Perhaps the most simple example is a statement like the liar's paradox: "This statement is a lie." The solution to this paradox is to call it "A statement about language rather than language alone. Another approach is to say that there are different levels of abstraction which can be a way of saying there is missing information or, in nlt language, there are dimensions which are not changing simultaneously and therefore it appears to the dimensions that are changing as a paradox.
Hence, irrational numbers may become rational at CT5, for example, or perhaps even at lower CT states, although the knee jerk reaction is that they would become less rational, perhaps ultimately achieving the state of irrationality that I function on.
Monday, October 20, 2014
You can all go away for a while
Yes, you can all go away for a while. I am dealing with my problems on my on and the result will be mine alone.
We come into this existence alone, at least after a fashion, except perhaps those who are multiple zygotes or born with multiple personality disorders.
And of course many are born from a parent, but the point remains. When you go, you're gone, when you come you're here, when you deal with your problems alone, the results are yours.
I have my own ideas as to what here and gone mean and I am here for now, but soon enough will be gone.
NLT is simple but rejects traditional notions of matter and energy. Energies are negative time states, dimensional elements are positive time states. Electricity, being a two dimensional force, is a negative CT2 state. It has no independent relevance. The theory is far from complete since it relies on changing clock time coordinates and a complete understanding of time is not available. Time as we perceive it (a function of CT4 changes) is no different from the other forms of time other than the number of coordinates changing simultaneously.
I am not happy about the theory because it rejects self determination except as an illusion, but I find it mathematically sound if morally repugnant. The closest mainstream theory is String Hologram theory. The primary difference is that Sting Hologram theory relies on space and time as being separate components and NLT says that time is a single element and that space and linearity are illusory and the result of perceived changes in different numbers of dimensional components of time. If you want to see something else that comes close you might want to look at Gavin Wince's videos on utube. Again he relies on dimensions, but he does recognize the possibility of time with different dimensions.
I will be presenting this theory in the near future to several audiences and I remain quite happy to get feedback or not according to the whims of the preset universe I seem to have proven exists.
If you wish to remain, the least you can do is comment on these thoughts of mine in whatever way you make yourself known to the universe.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
unilateral decisions and not relationships-part 1
In any romantic relationship by default deciding is not one person reaching a decision. Instead, unilateral action reflects a severing of the relationship. The extent of the sever is irrelevant.
Cooperative decisionmaking can take many forms.
One person may consentially yield to the other but that is different since the act of each defines the positions of the parties but not the mutuality. This must be distinguished from non-consential (xonsenital-a new work for the lexicon for scrabble players a thousand years from today) yielding which has nothing to do with relationships and everything to do with power.
Mutuality may be intentional, assumed (where mutuality is intended but potentially mistaken) or accidentally formed where it occurs after the act, acceptance.
Yielding may be an act of love, respect or surrender.
Yielding is perhaps the least relational decision making process. The other forms of compromise, mutuallity of position. and persuation are the true relational decision making processes of romantic relationships; but all of these and their various mixed varieties may be part of a romantic relationship and always are.
The end of a romantic relationship can be unilateral or consentual. It can be a mix of both.
Compromise can end a relationship more or less completely. So can unilateral action. However there is a subtle difference. To some extent each unilateral decision end the relationship as it is made, but cooperative decisions maintain the relationship until the act of complete or partial termination is carried out.
Likewise unilateral action may end or merely recognize the non existence of the relationship. If not an act of complete and final termination, defined only by the passage of time, the end may only last while the decision is being made or it may represent the end which is otherwise consentual or not, percieved or imagined.
Every relationship contains independent action, but all actions involving the relationship involved mutuality or acts in violence to the relationship. This argument suggests a relationship is not established by control but only by agreement which establishes a definition for romantic relationship which is not all encompassing; for enslavement may be emotional as well as violent. A relationship of enslavement, a xlationship (1000 years from now you'll thank me), is a matter of degree and not a binary form. To some extent we are all slaves to our emotions and the definition of a romantic relationship is one at least partially based on emotions.
Inaction creating or allowing the continuity of a situation is also an act of xonsent or mutuality depending on whether agreement (real or assumed) is included. It is as violent to the relationship as the act itself and as long as it is allowed, it is a termination of the relationship, even if the intent to end the relationship is absent.
Hence one person may unilaterally end a relationship by inaction while another ends it by resulting or responsive unilateral action.
An ultimatum is the setting for combining different positions based on a forced position where compromise is rejected. It holds on the points in question, that the relationship is terminated to an extent of a definition of one parameter of the relationship. The response to the ultimatum falls into the categories of resolution; agreement, compromise, yielding, inaction being the four that come to mind.
Thus endith part 1
Cooperative decisionmaking can take many forms.
One person may consentially yield to the other but that is different since the act of each defines the positions of the parties but not the mutuality. This must be distinguished from non-consential (xonsenital-a new work for the lexicon for scrabble players a thousand years from today) yielding which has nothing to do with relationships and everything to do with power.
Mutuality may be intentional, assumed (where mutuality is intended but potentially mistaken) or accidentally formed where it occurs after the act, acceptance.
Yielding may be an act of love, respect or surrender.
Yielding is perhaps the least relational decision making process. The other forms of compromise, mutuallity of position. and persuation are the true relational decision making processes of romantic relationships; but all of these and their various mixed varieties may be part of a romantic relationship and always are.
The end of a romantic relationship can be unilateral or consentual. It can be a mix of both.
Compromise can end a relationship more or less completely. So can unilateral action. However there is a subtle difference. To some extent each unilateral decision end the relationship as it is made, but cooperative decisions maintain the relationship until the act of complete or partial termination is carried out.
Likewise unilateral action may end or merely recognize the non existence of the relationship. If not an act of complete and final termination, defined only by the passage of time, the end may only last while the decision is being made or it may represent the end which is otherwise consentual or not, percieved or imagined.
Every relationship contains independent action, but all actions involving the relationship involved mutuality or acts in violence to the relationship. This argument suggests a relationship is not established by control but only by agreement which establishes a definition for romantic relationship which is not all encompassing; for enslavement may be emotional as well as violent. A relationship of enslavement, a xlationship (1000 years from now you'll thank me), is a matter of degree and not a binary form. To some extent we are all slaves to our emotions and the definition of a romantic relationship is one at least partially based on emotions.
Inaction creating or allowing the continuity of a situation is also an act of xonsent or mutuality depending on whether agreement (real or assumed) is included. It is as violent to the relationship as the act itself and as long as it is allowed, it is a termination of the relationship, even if the intent to end the relationship is absent.
Hence one person may unilaterally end a relationship by inaction while another ends it by resulting or responsive unilateral action.
An ultimatum is the setting for combining different positions based on a forced position where compromise is rejected. It holds on the points in question, that the relationship is terminated to an extent of a definition of one parameter of the relationship. The response to the ultimatum falls into the categories of resolution; agreement, compromise, yielding, inaction being the four that come to mind.
Thus endith part 1
Wednesday, October 15, 2014
What happened to the brilliant (?) mad (?) scientist behind non-linear time theory
A short time ago, around the anniversary date of the publication date of "The einstein hologram universe"
a groundbreaking theoretical piece around a new idea of gravity and matter, the author of that work, the eccentric apparent "smart guy," published the groundbreaking developed theory under the title "Non-linear time Theory" which promised a fuller definition of gravity, an intuitive unified field theory and an explanation of many other phenomena such as black holes and wave particle duality.
Then, a few weeks later, under pressure from a now mysteriously silent Ukranian fan club the author published the comic version of the historic predecessor under the tag line:"Zeno and Parmenides are two old, well established philosophers, living quietly in Elia in ancient Greece whose work is so ground breaking their names and some of their work will survive for 2500 years. Hilarity ensues when a young Socrates causes their work to be published and everyone is arrested for sedition against the gods. A rip roaring, laugh filled trial in ancient Athens seems to be inevitable to see which form of death the trio will face."
This book was known as "The Zeno-Socrates Dialogs".
This book was known as "The Zeno-Socrates Dialogs".
Mysteriously absent after perhaps 7 days of publication is any public comment by the Ukranians, the physics cabal or the ever inscrutable, but unavoidably pervasive Chinese. Two days have now transpired without a word from the author. Even stranger, the zombie love song, previously set out in this blog, has yet to be posted and there are only 15 days left in that self imposed deadline. What is happening?
Monday, October 13, 2014
chewing off a limb to save you
would you love me if I hadn't loved you
since the first time we met?
would you love me if I didn't have
the back story to prove it?
would you love me
if I didn't love you back
would you love me if it were easy
for me to reject my responsibilities?
would you love me
if i didn't always ask you
to ride my roller coaster with me
what are the things
for me to cut out of who i am
to be someone you don't love.
Animals will chew off a leg
in order to get out of a trap
if you were a part of me
would you have me chew you off
so that you wouldn't love me
so I would not love you back
since the first time we met?
would you love me if I didn't have
the back story to prove it?
would you love me
if I didn't love you back
would you love me if it were easy
for me to reject my responsibilities?
would you love me
if i didn't always ask you
to ride my roller coaster with me
what are the things
for me to cut out of who i am
to be someone you don't love.
Animals will chew off a leg
in order to get out of a trap
if you were a part of me
would you have me chew you off
so that you wouldn't love me
so I would not love you back
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)