General relativity makes the mistake of requiring space time. Its a big mistake, although hard to argue with. It exacerbates the problem by having spin states of matter. This spin is not to be confused with the use of the word "spin" to describe the dimension we experience in 4 dimension simultaneous change.
First let's talk about spin in a NLT environment. We're dealing with dimension changes in excess of 3 simultaneously. Note that we can't fall into the pre-NLT of assuming that you are building on dimensions. No, we're adding the number that change at one time. That 4th dimension changes with all of the other dimensions even for one dimension at a time photons and space. The 5th dimension which must exist also changes with all of the other dimensions.
Spin in NLT is the resulting force that we perceive as standard clock time. It is NOT a fourth dimension, but a force that is apparent when three dimensions at a time change negative or...a negative fourth dimension at a time change going negative that is perceived even while we exist in a fourth dimensional space which seems unlikely, but only a more detailed study of the interaction of these dimensions and a better understanding of how many simultaneous dimensional changes are possible and the theoretically similar study of the total number of possible dimensional changes (the number of dimensions) will fully answer that inquiry.
Now lets make strings work. Work? you say. Yes. All these theories while wrong, have traces of accuracy of course. So where is the connection? A set of linear changes in a dimension appears like a string.
String theory replaced "quantum point particles" with "one dimensional strings". They were so close, but only because all of these things are equivalent. A linear, one dimensional string is mathematically the same as a single time coordinate. How they change, how the interact, the speed with which they interact is where the differences can be found.
Imagine if the rate of change is the same for space (one dimension at a time) is the same rate (4 times the speed) as the rate of change that we experience. To put this in great perspective, let's consider a universe of coordinates that approaches infinity, but before we digress, remember that this is string theory. Sting theory has many, many artificial limitations, one is in the number of strings.
Nine space and one time dimension. How primitive and wrong. One time dimension, the scientists so conceited they imagine that the time they experience (standard clock time) is somehow relevant, special to the overall inquiry. Its such a fictional construct, that its hard to see why they made this separation, but someone had to leave room for the right approach.
And string theory didn't stop there, it continued to 11 dimensional supergravity. Again, they begin to approach the correct approach. High and low energy states required correspond to the number of dimensional states which change at one time.
How far off does this analysis get? Well, for one thing strings are given dimension (loops, open, closed) for another they are given movement (vibration). Rather than recognize that space time is an illusion, they take off on mathematical "flights of fancy" in order to try to get answers, creating gravitons in place of non-linearity. How can so many brilliant physicists, mathematicians and astronomers get so confused? I don't know, but they idea has to do with thinking in a box, the space time box. It should be noted that English Physics was held back by decades due to a hero worship of Newton. It took students to overthrow the torpid reliance of Newton and the recognition that the methods developed by Leibniz held the right path to advancing calculus. In other words, it took non-experts to make the discoveries where the experts were blinded.
Vibration cannot exist in NLT fundamentally, What can exist is the movement back and forth between one coordinate and the next for multiple coordinates. This is change, consistent, linear change which is perceptible in only one direction but, in theory, exists in no direction, even the linearity being an illusion.
So we both debunk and adopt string theory, now lets move on to loop quantum gravity.
No comments:
Post a Comment