Another perfect day ruined

It is a perfect day outside, but I am stuck inside although the work I am doing may not yield anything of value.

I'm up to 22,000 words in my christmas story and I now have the cover.

I am struggling through the last 100 pages of edits in volume 2 (vol 1 is ready)
Half way through what will be the first edition edits I am finding plenty of mistakes, but also pleny that I like about it.
None of that really ruins my day.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1726616800
Still editing on book 2 but it is ready in its current way.
I am a bit disappointed that nothing is happening.
That does not ruin my day either although I was hoping some damn would break.  At least my stake is in the ground, at last.

I read that 60% of the worlds animals have been wiped out since the 1970s.  That ruins my day.
I hate people.  Were it not for my physics which says we do these dumb things because we have to I would hate them even more.
I am putting together my platform
1) term limits
2) universal health care
3) Population control
4) Polution control
And a program that exports this and learning worldwide and just stops killing people.  Let the populations around the world where we have fucked everything up try to find some balance.  we can send them books and food.

Aljazeera.com: Hurricane Florence aftermath: Pollution spills into waterways. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/09/hurricane-florence-aftermath-pollution-spills-waterways-180921113722676.html

There will be no accountability for these things from this government, but for our children, they will pay whenthe only rhinos will be in museums.  How horrible we are.

swimming to death

Phys.org: The structure of the Milky Way. https://phys.org/news/2018-07-milky.html

sponsors, weapons and faster than light travel and Halloween

Here is the Halloween edition of my blog.
It is pretty scary, even to me.
Dont worry, I am not going to tell you a horror story
No  this is much worse
I will tell you the truth.

The mad scientist halloween edition of the blog

Now that my heart is broken I feel that I can turn to the darker aspects of AuT.
I was patriotic enough to offer this to my native country first, but as I have said, I will build a time machine in my garage before they figure out how important this is. 

I have filed four patents and am working on the fifth which will  describe a faster than light drive which does not leave you 50 years younger than everyone you left behind when you arrive at the  next star.  AuT makes this relatively trivial in principle.  There are mathematical hurdles, contraindications might be a better word, but the rubber band stretchiness of the universe does not rule this out.

But no one really cares about that do they?  Too useful, too...nice.
No, what everyone is looking for is a weapon that renders their cities (or at least their weapons facilities) invincible while at the same time giving them the ability to disentigrate any opposing force, or let us be Halloween, civilian center.  Dont get me wrong here, I am not altogether pleased to have developed the science behind such Vergeltungswaffen; but then all mad scientists run the same basic pattern dont they?  First they are mocked by other scientists, then their countries reject them and the final insult, the woman they love rejects them.   I presume the reason there are so few female mad scientists is because they get over the last of these better, who knows?  Oh yes, and then the final step in the mad scientist pattern, they build a monster or a weapon or do some other mad scientist thing.

Now all I need is an evil regime to give me the resources to fulfill my destiny.

You would think corporate/country sponsors would be breaking down the door here, but that would not be consistent with the model and after all I wrote a book  about why history repeats itself.

I am pretty sure the kindle version of book 2 is ready, but I have title fixing work to do.  Not exactly sure what the problem is there since I have not been monkeying around with the title, but its one more thing to deal with. 
I will attempt to fix that today.
Book 1 and the summary continue to be in good form.  I am getting a copy of book 1 which I will read through and it might get better; although it is just as likely to get worse at this point.
I am quickly approaching the 30 day mark for my speech which is interesting.
I have more than 30 days worth of work for that and need to dig my heels in on that and get to work.
But I will get my christmas story out soon too.
Ahhh the justaposition of horror and christmas; only in a universe governed by irony.

Hinge states and the creation of volume and Vol 2

Several days ago, I could not get rid of the tension I had so I swam 2000 yards.  The original plan was 1500, but it turned into 1000, 900im and another 100 with fins.  I swam hard and could not catch my breath and during the im thought it likely my heart would burst, but there it is, here I am.
It is weird when you cannot draw air, like a goldfish out of his bowl, but the opposite.

Yesterday, I limited myself to just a bike ride and not one that was too long, although the weather was perfect for it. Today I plan to cover the outdoor pool I use.  I wonder how much longer I will have that.  I wonder if I can monetize this thing I have created in time to bail myself our of what looming crisis seems to be arising from all of the other things which seem to be falling through one at a time.

A metaphorical fish gasping for lack of money.  It has been an expensive month.  I don't want to dwell on the more important things that are gone, what breaths life into every day, it is no small wonder that I find periods when I cannot breath.  But there is so much horror in the world right now it is hard to focus on my personal horror story.

I figured out how to fill in the 7,000 words on my christmast story which I'll eventually get to, its 21500 right now which is nice and I particularly like the way I added it..

I have in AuT a lengthy section on Higgs, comparing the rejected standard model with AuT.
This is a stupid thing to do.  First, the standard model is very different, although seas of gluons and space filled with either are close, closer still is ct1 and "space potential." but these are "tools" used to try to keep forces relevant at the quantum level where only math based dimensional aspects are important, at least in AuT.

There is some pretty awful stuff there where I just go off like I do in this blog, but hopefully that will all be deleted when the next edition is published.

It is torture editing the comparison and I am doing one chapter or maybe two at a time since it is such a slog.  I did, somehow, manage to get through at least most of it before this most recent publication, although not very clearly.

That leaves the book essentially fully edited, although there are around 70 or 80 pages that need some work still.  That will have to wait.

In the second volume of the compendium (and in the 4th patent) we discuss one place where the two theories approach one another, the "false" (according to AuT mind you) Mexican hat of AuT vrs the dimensionally relevant graphing of 2^n.  But there is another element that gives rotational significance and which makes this a very important post.

I published most of Vol 2 edited this evening with this information edited at some poiint in time today so if you want to see it, you could get book 1 now and when you finish reading it order book 2, probably ready by Tuesday with the edits.  I managed even with adding addition information to keep it around 320 pages, maybe 4 pages longer.  And it is the perfect christmas gift although I hope to have my christmas book published next week in one form or another.

Anyway, here is one of the key components added in Vol 2 just as a teaser for all that appears in it.

The exponent of on AuT is 2^x
so for x=3, this is f^2^3=f^8
Compare this to f^2)^3=f^2*3=f^6

Also look at the f-series portion
(2f(x))^n is 2^n*f(x)^n

Because 2^n is always a power of 2 (2,4,6,8,etc) the graph is always a parabala and even fractionals (1/x^2 for example) are symetric about an axis.

Any odd number would be in the form of a line about zero (or some other constant) intersecting at a -/- one one side of the zero (osoc) and atthe same +/+ opposite the coordinate of zero.  They are the so called point of origin symetric (e.g. symmetric around zero) which is mathematically a good reason for them to act as hinges even absent two dimensional geometry.  That is, an x^odd result for hinge states keeps associated y^even results symmetric around a point while the y^even points have a different, dimensional symmetry, defining volumes (2,3, 4, etc dimensional volumes).

You can see some simple examples below (left even, right odd) of the plots of the ratios (x to the function of x) and it is easy to understand the reason, even numbers cannot be negative, odd numbers can be either and must,therefore, meet in middle baring a break in the symmetry.

Hinge states can be thought of as the odd version and matched states as the parabala version of the matemtacs of AuT.

Now most of you are wondering when I will post another cat joke, but somewhere out there someone is reading that section and their skull has come unhinged and a small nuclear explosion is coming out of the top.

Something like this

Nightmares, reality and the peer review jpg

My eyes would not focus on the words on my phone this morning.
There was no  bad news other than the problems with vision.
Well none except for my personal life.
Death and blindness on so many scales

But no more waiting,I suppose
No news is good news as they say
I am watching the stock market correct.
I am invested for that, saddly not overly taking advantage of  it, timing, of course,
always tough to time these things perfectly.

What effect this has had on my ability to fund faster than light travel I do not know
Apparently I'm going to have to build a rocket in my garage to get the recognition I need
So the next thing is that I'll clean out the garage

Night terrors: what do anxiety dreams mean? http://flip.it/.OdQrd
I disagre with everything that says that dreams have less meaning than reality or that what we think doesn't have the same meaning as what we are doing.
Perhaps I can prove that, after I build a spaceship in my garage.
More on this later.

Anyway, I went all artistic for this one.
Peer review.

A short timing update

I swam 2,000 yards, not a particularly long swim, but hard; 1000 im.
It is difficult making the transition into the inside.
I needed to relax and while it has taken a while, I am now exhausted and largely relaxed.
I've passed the 100 page point in the edits of Vol 2.  There are portions of this which are ready to post but which will not be posted until edits are made to the patent.  It is time to get serious.

Publication of the Peer Review article is now a done deal, as of yesterday according to the proof but even if it is several days into the future, the underlying work will be published.  This weekend will be dedicated to finishing the edits to Vol 2 so it can be republished and to getting the next patent ready to file...first.

A great deal has been worked out, the most exciting part is some solid theory, at last, on the hinge states.  It does not, I fear, appear here yet, although a post is locked and loaded to some extent covering that issue and sometime next week I will get to that as well as providing links and other information related to the peer review publication.

It is a bit strange, the place I find myself.  I have no idea how it will be received but the reviewer was positive and the math is so solid that in time, perhaps not today or tomorrow, but in time the standard model will fall to my theory.  Perhaps an age of anti-gravity and limitless energy will follow.  It is a lot more likely than you might think if we can tap pre-time states.

It is all coming and you can get a jump on it in the first volumes although these will be updated eventually, but almost certainly after vol 2 is published.

It will be, it already is, astounding and I need to get vol 2 ready as soon as possible.

cat jokes

Yesterday I did my laundry, 25 minutes at a fairly hard level on the stair machine and 2.5 reps (couldn't get to all the machines) on weights.  The change in the weather eliminating swimming outside is going to put a large toll on my exercise routine; but not yesterday.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/10/beyond-weird-decoherence-quantum-weirdness-schrodingers-cat/573448/

That article has perhaps the best S-Cat joke.  There are some other jokes below, but Schrondinger was wrong.  Here is the AuT version:

Now you are thinking that I'm jus reacting to the article, but this figure appears much earlier (well earlier than the article, anyway) and is described in great detail in book 2 and in the latest edition of the summary article which you should all be buying instead of downloading hundreds of these blog posts and which is included at the end of book 1.

But all you care about are the jokes, so here they are:

A longer version of it is: Heisenberg and Shrodinger are driving down the highway when pulled over by a traffic cop. He walks up to the car and asks Heisenberg, do you know how fast you were going? He answers no, but I can tell you exactly where we were. The cop doesn't like the answer and thinks that it warrants a search of the car. He opens the trunk and immediately yells, do you know that there is a dead cat in here? On which Shrodinger replies, well now we do.

But here are a few others:
Dear Cat,
Schrodinger killed you. I was framed.
Love,
Curiosity

Why did the Chicken cross the road?  If a tree falls in the forest does anyone hear it?
ERWIN SCHROEDINGER:
The wording of the questions implies the absence of an observer.  Otherwise the fowl's motivation might easily be deduced and the sound determined with specificity.
It is evident that the chicken simultaneously did and did not cross the road and the tree both fell and remains standing.
In the face of this, any speculation as to the bird's purpose and tree's sound until rendered certain must be viewed as sophistry.

A lost pet sign on a telephone post says: "Lost cat; please return dead AND alive to Erwin Schrodinger.

Shcrödinger's cat goes into a bar, and doesn't.

A man walks into a library, and says to the Librarian, “I'm looking for a book that's been recommended to me… It's about Pavlov’s Dogs and Schrodinger’s Cat… Do you know it?”
The Librarian answers, “well, that rings a bell, but I'm not sure if it's here or not”

Schrödinger's Hamlet: To be, and not to be, that is the question—

Dark matter and Everyone is looking in the wrong direction and the wrong way but me

After the hard work out yesterday, I was forced inside for swimming and surpised myself by finishing 2500 yards.  It is always hard transitioning from a pure timed workout to one involving actual counting.   I don't mind telling you that the 10 i-ms were a challenge.
Afterwards I had to roll down the windows to get enough air to stay alive.

I'm working on a vc speech, not sure I like it.
Eventually I'll put it here, when I don't hate it as much as I hate it now.

For now, let's talk a bit about dark matter and AuT

Forbes: This Is The Real Reason We Haven't Directly Detected Dark Matter. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/10/05/this-is-the-real-reason-we-havent-directly-detected-dark-matter/

Let's pick apart a few things in this article:

1) This article says that we haven't detected dark matter.  AuT takes a different approach.  it sees dark matter, that is missing gravity, as being integral in the gravity we see and knowing that such gravity varies regionally and over time, we mistakingly look at a narrow time range and think that tells us what gravity should look like for the universe-Awnnnk! Wrong.

2) (Exptrapolating the laws of physics) we find that there was not only a time so early when the Universe was hot enough that neutral atoms couldn’t form, but there was a time where even nuclei couldn’t form-Awnnnk!  Pre-AuT physics doesn't understand a partially compressed universe which has plent of 'stuff' at the most compressed state, indeed there is more ct5 and ct5-6 transition states at the big bang than there are today.

3) Ratios (matter-radiation-darkmatter) from cosmic background radiation.  The problem here is that these ratios change over time according to a formula not recognized by the standard model.

4)  Dark matter doesn't interact with matter.  Awnnk!  This is the stupidist part of pre-AuT physics and I don't  intend to honor it with a discussion; but I would directly you to the first book of AuT if you do not already understand why it is redonkulous, too absurd to just be rediculous.

5) Colliding galaxies provides empirecal proof of dark matter.  Dark matter is seen to pass through matter.  Semi Awnnk? Here is the rub of all of this.  First the interaction of matter and anti matter should not affect gravity since the feature that gives rise to gravity is independent of the organization of the higher states.  However, when a compressing and decompressing ct1-ct2 matrix interact what you get is a net gravity.  We happen to live in a net positive interaction planet, but if our planet were to suddenly be net negative our planet would begin to break up and float into space.  What's more is coliding galaxies represent something more than gravity and net positive gravitational results.  It represents a unwinding of the universe pulling galactic bodies together as the knotted up ct1 states they represent come unwound.  Who can even discuss what is going on there without a careful application of AuT?  

6) Look for particles to explain it?  AWNNK (ALL CAPS)!  What AuT proves mathematically is that looking at particle physics is the physics equivalent of trying to communicate with aliens using african drums.  No, its worst than that, becuase that seems sort of cool and plausible.

Anyway, the answers are all here, in these books.  Fortunately, book 2 is going better than expected.  While book one was a mess even in the first 100 pages, book 2 seems to have more typos than outright mistakes.  The summary, of course, is intuitively brilliant if you buy into this whole Greg has figured out the universe thing.

Another gem on antimatter where a prior post was fixed*

I rode my bike to the gym, did three pretty hard sets of weights and rode back again.  On the final hill; the really big one, it started pouring down rain.  I figure if god wants to kill me I'll give him ample opportunity.  Between heart attacks, pneumonia, traffic and heart break I figure if god wanted me dead right now I'd be gone.

I have been doing a little work on my speech, but mainly I've been staring at book 2 wondering when I'll pick it up and read through it.
I have a number of things I'm working on, a few Im waiting on.
I am almost sure to have some version of my christmas story published this month, despite the dearth of days.
Cheating towards 20,000 words it is long enough, although it is 6,000 words less than the old man and the sea which is considered the minimum to claim a book and not quite long enough for the serious teacher in highschool to agree to a book report.  (Hint; I you need to come up with a theme just argue that the fish is youth, you can chase it but eventually it will get away from you).

When will someone combine Trämålning; by ‎Ingmar Bergman with Hemmingways book to have someone in a fishing contest with death or perhaps playing chess with a fish?  It is only a matter of time, if no one else does I I will write it, but Christmas comes first.

You can find anything on the internet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4fdFYIFPxY

or the long version.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3LDpCH3_eM

Here is the gem from book 1 (I suppose):

It is almost a certainty that all the black holes together are transitional ct6 states and this suggests that there are a large number of ct6 states and that we cannot see them but it would fit within the same pattern, that we cannot see beyond our transitional super-black hole-black hole transitional state to see the full ct6 states which are parts of ct7 transitional states.

We still need to deal with Anti-matter because it is observed.

The "destruction" of antimatter, appears to be nothing more than overwhelming it in regionally detectable amounts .

A.  Figures on Antimatter

     In the real-world environment, the anti-matter transition can be thought of as part of the transition between expanding and contracting states or related to the transitions of the hinge states.

1.          Antimatter "kicked out" of protons occurs a couple of ways that we visualize, 1) spontaneous decomposition and 2) violent destruction of the larger transitional state but both are the same thing under supersymmetry, the solutions of combined positive and negative making up a higher ct state separate into their component parts in the next lower state through the introduction of intermediate lower ct states, e.g. inserting intermediate ct1 solutions between ct2 solutions in a ct3 environment.

2.     To the extent we are in a net state environment where, of necessity given changes in ct1 states, we have unbalanced amounts of matter building hinge states and anti-matter hinge states, an even or series of events to be more precise that eliminate the amount of matter at a given point will change the balance and a temporary (or permanent) change between matter (built on matter hinges) vrs anti-matter (built on anti-matter hinges) present will occur which is what we observe and which also (along with the 256:27 or f(n)^n/(f(n)-1^n-1 sin solution) supports the 3 point hinge state analysis.

3.     A plume of antimatter coming from the black hole, is an AuT prediction as there is a massive change in states, possibly the incorporation of large amounts of matter (although the opposite can occur) freeing up the anti-matter which is not absorbed into the ct5 matrix.

4.      These might even escape propelled by anti-gravity characteristics, which are quickly absorbed into the next gravitational matrix of the galaxy to the extent they don’t become part of the overall net anti-gravity matrix of the universe at this value of x.

5.     Thunderstorm electric strike anti-matter results would be the same.  The electricity can be seen as a result in large scale ct2-ct3 changes leaving more anti-hinge state ct states than the alternative regionally where large amounts of ct3 has converted to non-dimensional ct2 and ct1.

BUY ME!

Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 from Facebook

Speaking engagements available. http://clean-water-inc.business.site

Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

(Although everything there is out of date).

Who thinks I should start posting chapters of the christmas story here?

Einstein and AuT

I shouldn't be having the types of personal problems and I should be better at this.
Of course, I bring all my problems on myself, unlike other people.
Here is something which I wrote to a friend of mine who asked why space did not go on forever.

I swam 2500 yards.  I'm not tired, I just confused as to why I am doing or not doing whatever it is that I am not or am doing.  Why can't you help me?
If I'm the smartest person in the world, in this one little place, why can't I help myself?

The problem is we are prejudiced by your perception.  A good understanding of this prejudice can be had by reading a book called flatlanders or by reading one of my books which I'll give you for free if you come by.

The question of what is at the edges of the universe (doesn't there have to be more universe? No is the answer) can be answered easily but only by rejecting one thing, dimension.

There is a non-dimensional environment where god lives.  Not the type of god that we think about and pray to, but a non-dimensional, time free goop of a god that can count and do addition and subtraction.  The goop also rmembers all the solutions to the simple math problems and given the scale of those (at least 10^100) that means a pretty good memory.  But there is no time there, no dimension.  Just a count and memorized solutions associated with that count to some very simple, grade school math.  Such is the kingdom of god and the sub-kingdom of man.  Alas Babylon, as they say.

So here's an interesting chapter from the books:

I dont' know for sure if its from book 1 or 2, but I think 1 which is now pretty finished and published although some of the section are not edited this go round.  I ordered some copies and I'll edit when I read through them.

Until then, I'm trying to look at Vol 2 which so far is not so terrible.

I finished my christmas story, the first 17,000 word draft, its 2/3 of the way to where it needs to be and maybe that will be enough, I do not know.

The author's Amazon page: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

ALGORITHM UNIVERSE THEORY into your youtube browser or going to this channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

First, here is something fun:

I think I'm the most like parminides.  Can you pick him out of this lineup?

1.      Einstein and AuT

Under AuT, Relativity is an effect, not an underlying feature of dimension.

There is an illusion AuT fails on a gross level because of the illusion of time.

          It is the twilight zone of physics theories and is almost irrefuably accurate.

1) All dimensions exist together

2) All change is quantum change in response to a single variable

3) Space is the same as all other states which are folded from space based on exponential compression/folding

4) Time and change are different; Time is an effect like force and dimension of the quantum change between states some of which occur without a time based reference giving rise to features like wave - particle false duality and the impression of charge among other features

6) Electrons and protons are transitional states between waves and neutrons, molecular states through neutron stars are transitional states between neutrons and black holes.

In a quantum state universe time doesn't exist.  Time is the comparison of changes between the snapshots.  There is no time, therefore no thermodynamics, within these snapshots.  Those things physics holds so dear it creates illogical systems to explain them.

          CT1 exchanges create velocity both internal and external to the matrix formed by the increasingly dense sharing regionally and overall.  Internal ct1 sharing changing the wave arrangement within a regional matrix is interpreted as time.  Since the universe is a giant matrix, there is actually a time for the universe as a whole.

          CT1 change is internal to one regional matrix and external to another of necessity.

          This is why in a larger matrix it is vibration an in a smaller it is velocity.

          Where it is velocity, it Is not time.

The universe exists as a series of "quantum snapshots" so everything happens at once only in a snapshot.

Einstein famously said "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." which was one of the foundations for this theory 5 years ago. It turns out that "everything happens at once" is different from "all histories happen together."

Everyone does not have their own time, since time is an effect, it is more accurate to say any matrix has an architecture that varies according to x which regionally is separate from other regional architectures.  

A matrix refers to a collection of adjoining compression states where, until they are separated by lower state ct changes, they share a common rate for each coordinate.

The increase in mass with velocity due to adding "energy" in the form of movement to the non-moving mass in Einstein reflects the relative changes between two Matrix states, one moving with ct1 changes, the other relatively fixed with respect to ct1 changes.

Updating Vol 1, an update

Today was exhausting, but managed to finish dimension, force and time with some satisfaction.
I'd say 60 or 70 percent of the repitition was eliminated and perhaps 80% of what really needed to be taken out.
Factually it was improved.
It is important to note that the fundaments are fairly fixed at this stage.  There are important edits, but "aha" type moments are eliminated in favor of improving slightly the selected math models and a better understanding of what happens outside of the fixed aspects of the system, e.g. hinge and entraped states.
The editing includes 200 of 330 pages that need to edited of 400 total pages; the last 70 pages being the summary which has been heavily edited already and has perhaps 80% of what it needs to fully describe the project.
Tomorrow, I need to tackle the last 130 pages which fall into diverse categories; prior art, questions answered by the theory, and the like.
These are much less important that it might sound because they have already been edited a couple of times and largely include things which are either (1) reptitious or (2) superfluous or (3) obvious in light of the rest of the theory; although there is enough material in each section as support for the rest of the book and the summary that deleting it would be counter productive.
However, it was so complete that I decided to republish the book in electronic form again.

Then realizing that any order of the hard copy would be inadequate given the number of edits, I did the same for the print copy.
The electronic copy is already available by tomorrow the paperback book will be ready with all the critical updates.  I would add that given the summary in earlier editions, the "critical" updates only prevent confusion and clean up the presentation.  This is important in advance of peer review as will the edits to the next 130 pages.
I'm happy to say the formatting required almost no modification despite the edits which include some new drawings or slight modifications of the old drawings (as well as eliminating a lot of the repetition in those drawings.

I will consider taking a short breather on this end.  Reviewing the130 pages will take some time and I have another book to finish.  I am mindful, however, that I am not ordering any hard copies and while the summary copies are adequate for using as examples, the older version of these books are essentially useless at this point.

What ho space

I have put out a 4th edition of the first vol of the compendium.  Perhaps by the end of the week I will have the 5th
The christmas story has lain fallow,  but I will get to that before the end of the week since it is written and only wants editing one last time.  It needs work too,  but there is only so much time and so much I can do right now.
I swam 2500 yards, the pool was cold, the cold seems to put my illnesses on hold.  Perhaps I should sail a small ship around the world.  It would be as good a way to die as any. But not yet, the universe says.
I am waiting, somewhat on pins and needles, to see what work remains to get formal peer review.  There are some things I would change now in the summary article, new aspects of the view of atomic arrangement after the most recent math analysisin book11.  I am now one or two days depending on how you count from expecting a publication date or some disasterish result.  I want to time the release of book 1 to that date which, already published, merely means getting the most up to date copy out there.
So far the second half of the book (vol 1 of the compendium) has not been as rough as the first part, although there are perhaps as much redundancy.  For those of you who ordered it and are panicky, the last 60 pages are the most updated information available to AuT and a summary of everything, well almost everything.  There is no summary of everything.  It is worth the price in its present form even though the last few hundred pages remain to be edited.  Imagine having one of these rare editions to show your great grandchildren proving you were indeed ahead of the curve.   I do not plan to get a hard copy of this version of book 1 preferring to wait for the completed read through.
One of the little gems is that as the universe gets more complex in terms of greater compression, the  number of abberrational states grows.
Because AuT is a system and not some witchcraft conglomeration of parts, we can look at the molecular world (between black holes and Hydrogen, essentially) and understand a little more of what lies between.
We have all kinds of stuff floating around from gas to neutron stars.  All of this represents transitional states.  What  we tend to focus on are planets, stars, neutron stars and black holes, but these different pieces of planets from a distance begin to disappear.
We can extrapolate that the pre-helium universe looks much the same, everything in wave lengths and quantum states, much less diverse but still pieces of this here and that there.
2/3 of the way to a maximum break down things are unravelled enough that we can exist like we do, right before the big bang this type of molecular diversity is probably harder to find and bathed in radiation.
But why diversity?
The reason is that as the system breaks down these increasingly dimensional elements, including the transitioning elements that we talk about in the broad range can exist transitionally as they break down.  Gas molecules are not equally spread, not because of gravity so much as they are localized from where they break down.  That being said, the intervening spatial break down ensures high levels of dispersion.
One has to imagine regions of dark matter where space spontaneously compresses to photons.  If those dont exist there has to be a reason that AuT does not supply yet.
But generally it appears accurate.
There are gems in all 3 books.  The summary for its brevity and overall accuracy.  That being said the molecular area was largely developed in Book 1 in these most recent edits and is therefore slightly advanced in specifics if  not in concept.

Book 2 advances the generalities from book1 in the first 100 or so pages to a level that is fairly unprecedented.  The last two hundred pages, however, are largely unedited, attempting  as they do to take the standard model to task it is an unsatisfying endeavor because it compares apples to fictitious and overly complex breadfruit.  Does breadfruit really exist, I ask you?

Book 1 is a work in progress.  Now, not before, it is fairly lucid.  It contains the summary at the end, but that is not its strength since the summary is self supporting.  The first 100 pages, being fully edited, are now fairly lucid and provide a texture for the summary.
The newest math modeling (operation,domain, etc) appears in it which includes some new slides which will go into the slideshow when I get to it.  It also discusses in more of a genial, old man in a rocking chair, way the details which are set out distinctly in the summary.  There are the requisite occcasional strong insights which are absent from the summary.  It vomits out what the summary carefully spitoons in distinct places.
The very end, perhaps the last 100 pages before the summary article, contains a general summary comparison to the other models, not as detailed as the unedited discussion in book 3, but probably adequate for all purposes given the limited value attached to the other models.

Waiting and Vol 1 ver 4 and questions about angular momentum*

Is all of this meaningless?

If it is why do I cry so much

What am I doing here?

I am 90 pages into these edits 

 there is so much that does not belong there.

There is a problem here 

I am not the one to be doing this

It is mine

but no one has given me the tools

But then I have done it

Now that I have done it

What comes next

It is not just about being right

it is not about peer review

it is not about speaking

Is it about capitalizing

Is it about a lifestyle

Is it a fame

Am I right 

Am I fooling myself

Where does this lead from here

It is a five year exercise

And now I am counting days

A countdown to what?

So I am waiting for news

 I have 3 more days

before  I should worry.

I have been editing Vol 1 which turned out a lot more than what I was expecting.  The last 50 pages is descriptive the first 90 pages are edited.  The middle part is still repetitious but I have no idea what they will read like other than there will be some repetition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZIM2OuXjjg

Trouble -orig

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1tRB7-aBr8

Remake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Y9aLNh5jIY

I saw this little gem as I was editing, looking for a home somewhere.

Angular momentum is only the break down of ct1 decompression along a given length of compressed information corresponding to the dimension of rotation in question relative to other breakdowns.

I also saw this part about ct2 to ct1 breakdowns having an element of pi type rotation versus the other forms of breakdown (higher ct states) which reflect F-series curvature

Looking at the drawing above you can see the f-series type of compression at ct3, the dimensional form of c2 and the flat form of ct1.

Does this mean that breakdowns of ct2 to ct1 are necessary for angular momentum?
It is things of this type that require a much more in depth view of a theory which seems to hold up fairly well when faced from a long distance, and very close up; but like all theories there is a range somewhere, in the third dimension where we have rotational symmetries, where the lines get blurred.

Why AuT cannot save you; addons to presentation from Volume 2

It is complicated trying to identify what is going on here.
AuT presents a theory of the world where god is not watching us.
We are controlled which explains all the inexplicable stupidity in the world.
It explains my stupidity, but not completely
I can do what I have to do
I am being weak
But this takes time
The publication, the speaking the carreer change
Moving too fast or not moving at all can be the same thing
If either one results in another crash
I am sensitive to my needs
when I need to just be sensitive to the needs of others
and hope for the best for myself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLPj2h0N3bU

A note on qualifications
History repeating itself,
A stock market crash in inevitable
The market is designed to only go one way
The brakes only work in one direction
Faster, ok
Slower, not ok
You Don't have to be a genius
But to know it is coming not becaues inevitable but because of these underlying reasons for behaviors; greed and envy are not inevitable, but they are built into the system
I have spent, in my training, 30 years of tearing things apart to their most basic elements and then putting them back together, making sure they are right
I have the basic courses, Advanced Calc, Physics, even engineering courses, but knowing how to apply knowledge and having the very basic training in how to piece together information
And being open to the flow of the universe.

Here are a few things to be added to presentation and summary

1. How dimensions arise
2. How hinge states work and
3. How antimatter forms from hinge states
4. Waves as transitional ct4 states (like matter)

Here is something very specific.

When we look at this equation for gravitational attraction: m1*m2/d^2 and we apply it to AuT we get something very specific which is not exactly in any of the books, although I have spoken around it before now.

M1 and M2 can be substituted with act4(1) and bct4(2).  That is the easy part.

The part that is equally obvious is how ct1 changes apply.

For purposes of AuT gravitational attraction can be thought of as the change of a system over values of x.

The system can be represented as ct4dx/ct1dx.

Note that it is possible in determining the amount of gravity in a system to ignore the size of the two masses or their distance, but instead to only look at the changes in the ct1 in both the mass and the distance over values of x.

Summing these over very large values of x necessary to get measurements of the sort that we recognize (e.g. seconds or relatively small fractions of a section we get:

1/2ct4(x)^2 for the top portion (where only the changes in x are relevant since the "net" increase in ct1 within the ct4 matrix is the increase in mass and 

1/2ct1^2 for the denominator.

This yields 2ct4(x)^2/2ct1^2 = ct4(x)^2/ct1^2.

What is different about this than the standard mass equation is that we are only looking at the net attractive value of the two masses and not the overall content of the masses themselves, the net increase in ct1 within the ct4 matrix.

Unlocking the anti-gravity which is a part of all ct4 states can be envisioned by shifting the results from having two masses to merely having ct1 changes wtihin a fixed system.

This is the future and it is open to the highest bidder and, of course, to you.

What is unsaid

We leave too much unsaid sometimes;
 trying to make the best of a beautiful day, 
trying not to fight

I often wonder if it is better when we fight
you can't really make up from nothing
you cannot appologize for what isn't promised

the answers always seem to be in the future
there are promises we make to ourselves
we have to keep

I have deadlines to keep
obligations to others
as well as myself and you

but it is a beautiful day

it is hard work to fight

and we both know the words

we have said them so many times

outloud and silently

don't think i dont want to say them again

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GVJpOmaDyU

The photon nomenclature problem*

AuT is getting ready to split science in half and change reality itself from our most irrelevant perspective.
Yet last night I swam in darkness so deep that the mere absence of light could not fully explain it.
It is getting cold and I will soon be forced back inside to swim.
But we're talking about splitting science.
It will be a painful process that, hopefully, will begin in the next few weeks and culminate in December when the theory is presented live in Chicago.
A new nomenclature was developed early using first ct states (1-whatever and we will discuss the whatever in a post that is written, but waiting for my not so deft hands to manipulate it further).
However, there are problems that are only now being reconciled.
One is the near certainty that waves are transitional ct3-ct4 states, just as protons and electrons are.  This is because of gross misunderstandings that only the most recent publications of AuT resolve.
Let me set these out.
1) What I call ct2 photons are not photons by the standard model.  I suppose in the future I will have to call these "proto-photons" or maybe something else entirely.  That doesn't mean they are not important because they give rise to pre-time phenomena like charge and magnetism.
2) What I call ct3 wave energy is actually photonic energy and the waves are low density ct3-ct4 states just as protons and electrons are high density ct3-ct4 transition states.
You might say, "Why are you such a moron?"  Stand in line, one day I will answer everyone by holding up a mirror perhaps, but for the moment I can only offer two reasons: 1) I am only a shadow of what occurs in a pre-time dimension and energy free environment and 2) I am a moron, but I did figure out how the universe works.
The theory is alive and evolves just like everything else; it is built into the system just a ruin is built into advancement.

Sail away

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm-Vh3j8sys

Press Release Algorithm Universe Theory Compendium (AuTC)

Algorithm Universe Theory Compendium Volumes 1 3rd edition, and Volume 2 3^rd edition

Where does dimension arise?  What is time?  What makes force happen?

These questions can be answered.  Sequentially.

Algorithm Universe theory is a model using observed mathematical features to set forth the origin of the universe we experience.

Gregory Friedlander will be presenting his theory of quantum mechanics December 3, 2018 in Chicago at the Astrophysics and Particle Physics Conference. He recent published his 2 volume Compendium on the origin of space time, the origin of quantum mechanics as well as a summary article.

The short paper on AuT is set for publication for peer review in the Journal of Physical Mathematics.

Among other things, the model explains concepts as diverse as the origin and makeup of the big bang, the structure of black holes and their relationship to other forms of matter, and the riddles of dark matter, dark energy, universal expansion and universal contraction to name a few.

For a more in depth look at how dimension, time and force are created please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn.