Aut pp 8

So the next drawing will have to be put up later.
I slogged through the grant posting system today so if the nsf wants to fund me i will travel the world with my assistant lecturing on qunatum mechanics and such.
I am both nervous and very pleased, although I should not be pleased.
I have limite expectations about the grant.  While I am right, I am a little too far ahead of my time and a little too far behind in the final math but I have defined the basics in 4 years.  I am both please and disappointed with the work, but the source of any satisfaction is both within my grasp and infinitely far away.
Perhaps that is a converging series, but if I don't get to the end of it, I will have to wonder about this universe.
I digress.
The greeks and their gods originated my theories, the Italians and their gods provied both the math and the confusion; the english and the french provided the calculus and the germans gave the parameters.  It is a group effort, I'm happy to play my little part, but I wnat to start presenting the theory, I want to move, I am not good at sitting still.

6. Compression per this methodology is based on the number of coordinates changing at once resulting from the alignment of like states along quantum lengths of longer carriers of the same time state to get from 1 to 11 to 111 type sets of F-series numbers of states changing at the same time as a quantum information state.  Variation is possible within these states, for example 123 to 231 as a quantum movement of ct states.  It is: 1) time changes are the quantum length between turns; (0 to 1 at turn 1; 1 to 2 at turn 2, etc).  The figure above shows at the very beginning of two spirals being generated that are offset, opposite and intersecting which can be solved for a point based on features indicated in the drawing.
7. Change of all quantum elements at the same rate on the quantum level in response to a single variable with relative change, dimension and velocity based on changes of compression of one ct state relative to the a common carrier of the same state (comparable to beads on a string).  This solution requires that space (ct1; 1) has neither dimension nor velocity except in the ct2 compressed state (ct2, 11) and then only as a result of the relative change between ct1 and ct2 states.
8. Compression equating to information theory as reflected by the series 1,11,111,1111,etc as more information states change consistent with a common carrier which equates to F-series (x)^2^x for any compression state where x=the number of changes at once.
9. Force and Beads on a string: The long nature of ct1 f-series stacking allows for certain “carried” ct1 states to be carried on other ct1 states like beads on a string.  This yields compression, but more practically Force results from this structure.  For example, since ct4 is formed by ct3 states aligned as “beads” on another ct3 carrier, what we experience as strong and weak forces result directly from this structure of ct3 beads traveling along a ct3 carrier.

10. This applies to Gravity as well as the other forces as discussed in more detail in the body of this paper. The lack of true dimension and net effects suggests that Gravity is a net capacitance of spirals, anti-gravity (dark energy) is a net discharge in terms of the stacking of spirals.   Gravity could be seen where the approach of spirals towards the corresponding “anti-spiral” and Dark energy would be the area immediately past the point where the overlap occurs. Both, however, are merely the reflection of spiral activity toward or away from corresponding anti-spiral states based on each sub-universe added toward the current universe.

Aut Grant pp 7

Traveling to Elberta, Memphis then San Francisco this month and whether that will include skiing before or after is anyone's guess, the question only being whether to live life or just watch it pass.  It will be interesting to see how that plays out.
Time is always running short.
I have 30 pages of edits to make, but I'm ready now with two days to go.
But it can be done in the time frame and while the purpose my be nothing more than a deadline to get this to you, it is there and it is almost done.
There are 35 steps left in this post, but only the first 5 have been edited and only the first 4 don't have a drawing, so this is all that today holds.
It's little enough.

These appear to have basic features:

Information theory and Fibonacci series overlap in this model.  Distance, speed and the like are all functions of non-dimensional, time independent relative information solutions.  They are quantum features, meaning they do not need to be viewed in terms of speed and dimension.  Features of F-series overlap information changes:

1.      The rate of quantum change is the same for all information units.

2.      Light speed is a numerical substitution relative to other states first appearing as 1 ct1 change along a ct1 carrier for each 256 unchanged states along the carrier forming a single ct2 state describing the first stage of compression.  The change in rate possible in higher states yields in discernable quantum amounts the change in speed which is calculable for any state with specificity.

3.      Compression occurs according to the F-series defined as U(x)=U(x-1)+U(x-2) where U is the sum of all quantum points defining a universe for a given value of x.

4.      Compression is according to a scale formula of the type: x =Sum (n-(n-2) or n-3,2,1)^2^n or the equation compression number=(f series (sum(n,n-1,n-2))^2^n.

AuT Grant

I'm in a foul mood today.  My editing has gone slowly and the g key on my keyboard has begun to stick for some reason.  Perhaps it is being confronted with my failings as a human being.  Failins as a human bein is how my keyboard wants to type it.  

I'm goin (going) to chat about reliion (religion) briefly since we apparently are going to ignore the constitution in the US and since its Sunday and since I want to pick a bone with somethin (something) today.

First, my math tells me that man-made religions are unsupported.  That doesn't make them wrong, it just puts them at odds with my theory.  The idea of "faith" requires true self determination and it is an old story that any god worth its pillar of salt could define faith and AuT provides a mechanism for that which leaves no room for randomness, entropy or the like.

Bill Maher has a problem with the muslim religion in particular, the one thing he agrees with Trump on.  Religion makes for strange bedfellows.  But the idea of singling out one religion is both appropriate historically, and logically flawed.

Let me state again that I am not unreligious, I merely don't believe in manmade gods and have problems with the concept of god in any historic sense.  My investigation is designed to explain in logical terms what is otherwise accepted.  No god can make sense in this type of investigation because a god presupposes a higher state of organization existing spontaneously.  Granted in an entropy free environment, this is more likely; it remains the great flaw in the origin of the universe which has nothing to do with a manmade god.

So how do we deal with superstition with all of its problems and benefits?  I think a scale of superstitious beliefs is logical, but not adequate.  That is the trump/maher plan.  Education is also helpful, although education requires accepting a type of faith, the faith of logic.  As AuT points out, correctly or not, what we accept as science is not fixed.  Indeed, all science pre AuT is essentially wrong under the standard of AuT.

I think the idea of seizing the day because there is no faith in tomorrow (carpe diem in part) makes as much sense as any religious philosophy; but it's irresponsible.  Perhaps that is the source of my foul mood.  I failed and continue to fail to live for the day, often not knowing what I do what I do; instead trusting to the same type of imprinting that leads to the blind acceptance of religious dogma.

You'd think the religious would have similar...regrets?  

Physics is more simple.

            This short presentation yields a better understanding of space-time, energy and physical structure than anything that came before it.  Besides answering fundamental questions such as the nature of the big-bang and the structure of black holes, it points out the fallacy of huge expenditures looking for things which do not exist as such, for example the “higgs boson.”

It also holds the promise of information concerning the absence of true entropy suggests the possibility for extreme results, anti-entropy and possibly and anti-gravity features to the universe which could provide immense value.

AuT happens to be the best bet for building floating cars, faster than light travel and freezing things in a suspended state.  It may not produce a floating car or a transporter or immediately change the world, but if there are floating cars and transporters in the future, this work will be attached to it.

            There is no need for expensive equipment or new tests because all of the data required to refine AuT already exists.  The idea is that other theories have misread the data so that applying AuT to existing information will yield the results required.  For example, black hole data is merely the data of the next higher coordinate change state for time from matter.  Likewise, space is nothing more than the lowest time coordinate state and hence the studies of space, energy and matter already conducted contain the data necessary for an analysis of AuT.  

THE UNIVERSE IN A NUTSHELL

1.    A universe of converging series: The universe is defined by math that yields solutions to compressing and decompressing converging infinite series which math can be defined by a single variable algorithm defining sequential stacking of quantum moments.   One model which seems to match observations is defined by the linear-F-series (FIBONACCI series) in an infinite expanding series which is balanced against an ongoing compression of information states in the form of an infinite compressive series.  While simple in concept, its application yields complex results.  The simplicity is illusory, but to the extent it is too simple, the principles of Occam’s razor and Leibniz’s provide an explanation: “when you have two competing theories that make [the same predictions], the simpler one is the better.  Here, this theory stands alone and complete, it just happens to be no more complicated than it needs to be.

These appear to have basic features:

AuT-random thoughts on Volume 1 as an intro

I'm editing a hard copy, at last.  30 single spaced pages, with several drawings.  I think I'll publish this as "the intro" to the 4 or 5 books covering AuT which will render Spirals irrelevant.  That process will take a few months due to the necessary changes.  Don't worry, it'll be pretty inexpensive since it only qualifies as a short story.  Maybe I'll package it with an edited copy of the zeno-socrates dialogs.  I like that story!
I'm thinking about putting some of my romance novel in here.  The blog, not the physics book.
I'd ask for votes but no one, even though this is read literally all over the world, ever comments.  Not, you're insane, you're brilliant, what's your pancake recipe.  Nothing.  Maybe the soft porn of a romance novel would get a rise out of you, ha ha.

And yes, those are blueberry, banana, pecan pancakes.  If you had spent the night with me that is what you would be eating also.  You don't have to feel bad about this as the blueberries were mostly molded, something which is not called for in the recipe. If I die during this blog post it will be up to you to finish my work.

I have the weekend to do this. Like all monumental tasks of editing (don't be dramatic it's only 30 pages and has been rewritten half a dozen times already), it was preceded by changing all the filters out in the house, massive amounts of outdoor labor and organizing until, at last, the cold and bad weather drove me in and, there being no more filters to change, there was nothing left but breakfast and this editing job.

Oh yes, in my other blog I spend a great deal of time talking about my ration of coffee, now that I think about it probably more than I spend talking about anything else, and there it is.  In case you wondered.  A small cup of coffee, now a half cup of coffee.  You did that to me.very sad,"somewhere in the world someone has solved the secrets of the entire physical universe and because of you he can only drink a half cup of coffee.  For only a few dollars a day you can fill this cup.  Please give generously."

Time to get to work.

AuT pp Grantinfo 6

This is repetitive towards the end, but for the moment, it's better than nothing.  There is some editing in it, but the next sections will be new but I'm putting these in order for me.
The universe is about as mixed up as universes can get.  And yet, I view it as a universe which has no entropy.  So why does it, why do you have it out for me?
Anyway, I finished this today (haven't posted the end which is around 30 pages right now and will take a week or so to post) but then decided to add a section.
Comments wouldn't bother me too much.  The next step is to finish book 1 which I'm thinking will be 100 pages or less.  It means reading the hard copy and doing some consolidation.

But I am there, at least sort of.
I'm not thrilled with this, but I'm certainly not thrilled with the universe.

I.            Overview

            AuT provides a detailed explanation for the (1) the origin of space time, (2) the origin of quantum phenomena, (3) quantum time giving rise to quantum gravity, (4) the relationship of gravity to other forces, (5) the origin of force, (6) the transitions of time dimensional coordinates to the different force and dimensional states we experience, (7) explanations of why we experience clock time, (8) why standard clock time disappears at the speed of light (time dilation), (9) the exponential growth of clock time concentration, (10) the reasons for the perception of speed, (11) an explanation of what black holes are and why we can predict clock time 5, (12) wave-particle duality, (13) the origins of what we have previously thought of as dark matter gravitational forces by way of example.  NLT correctly predicted that the alleged reports finding a Higgs Boson was inaccurate. 

            NLT provides answers to many unanswered questions; the minimum and fundamental size of black holes, a concise description of the makeup of black holes, it eliminates the Higgs Bosons, worm holes and strings. It eliminates the idea of a hologram universe, although that is replaced by a singularity.  The singularity is easy to examine since everything around us is a part of it, past, present and future. 

            NLT redefines the concept of randomness and entropy.  It provides a clear basis for standard clock time. It provides the origin of forces and dimensional characteristics.  NLT was no more than a very loose concept. While the mathematics are surprisingly elegant, it has already joined information theory with quantum mechanics in 24 months with no funding.

            NLT is derived by solving equations in mathematics for a non-linear time environment and eliminating any resulting inconsistencies.  A reasonably complete understanding is given here, but the basic theory is fully set out in the first edition treatise “Non-linear Time Theory” available on Amazon.

 

GOALS OF THE INQUIRY:

            The primary goal is to educate and continue refining the model of AuT.  Targets of the inquiry:

1)    Lecturing and meeting with university physics programs and presenting the theory.

For all these meetings Astronomy, Physics and math programs and educators will be targeted.

2)    Lecturing and meeting with groups doing fundamental research, in particular at CERN and Stanford to reconcile their findings with AuT so that the models may be refined. 

3)    Working with other physicists to solve outstanding math for non-linear time environment focusing initially on field equations and relativistic equations.

4)    Meetings with industrial concerns that might be able to apply the new physics is also envisioned as a secondary undertaking.

5)    Attempting to better understand the underlying Non-linear, time and dimension framework of the universe, primarily by looking at large and small systems to see what leads to intermediary stages between compression states of time coordinates.

6)    Attempting to better define dimensions and to better define what “time” is.  No new data is required, but processing the best data obtained will be helpful.  Space is a singular sequential coordinate change “time”; matter is four coordinate change “time”; black holes are five simultaneous coordinate change.  The comparative nature of more compressed information states gives rise to dimension and “time”.  Hence there is plenty to study and must of the work will be making more in depth study of the mathematics and how it matches of “time” around us for the study.  Getting access to other studies and comparing these to the outcomes using AuT methodologies are critical in order to refine the mathematics and this would involve working with those interpreting those results including travel and extended meetings.

Here comes the repetitive part

Nomenclature: The nomenclature reflects the ongoing development.  Early in the process “clock time” states which might be better described as information states were used to designate the various states that we know as space, photonic energy, wave energy, matter and black hole material.  These are called, respectively ct1-5.  We see photons and wave energies as “energetic clock time states” only because our ct state (ct4) changes slower relative to those relative to ct1.  The “amount” is based on one exponential equation and the states in each compressed state is reflected by the 1,11,111 progression for F-series changes for the next information state according to the f-series for successive states as taught herein.

Standard Clock time, SCT or time is what we experience on a watch and which is subject to time dilation and which is typically called “time”.   SCT is largely irrelevant to the underlying algorithms but remains one of the most important features of the model and is the relative change of higher ct states along the “carrier” of other states of the same compression as discussed below.

X or Q is primarily used to define the single variable defining change and quantum instants are changes in x from one number to the next (1,2,3,etc).  Because of Scientific nomenclature, x is often used for other purposes in this book, hence the attempt to change it to Q in the text.

Quantum Fibonacci Spirals or F-series spirals or F-spirals provided the best model for defining the relative changes from ct1 (space) to ct5 (black holes) consistent with observed exponential compression.   In addition, F-Sprial mathematics provides a mechanism to maintain history in a quantum moment universe. 

Carriers refers to individual spirals that are intersected by other spirals.   Carrier states, spiral turns refers the F-series changes in length between two values of X for an F-series.  Quantum state moments or Quantum lengths refers to the individual changes between the  carrier states.  By way of example in the F-series 2,3,5,8,13 there is a carrier state between 8 and 13 when a single change, from 8 to 13 occurs.  However, between 8 and 13 there are 5 quantum state moments.  This relationship is critical to the creation of space time, relative time and velocity changes. In this way, dimension, velocity and time (standard clock time) function based on this relative change between clock times ct1 and higher clock time states. By way of example, light speed represents one ct1 change per 256 ct1 states “compressed” or “carried” along quantum state moments between spiral turns of a carrier ct1 state.  The mathematical solution or algorithm solution for the 256 states aligned by one ct1 carrier define a quantum photon or ct1.  At first glance it appears that the one ct1 carrier state is added to 255 “carried” states to reach the 256 magic number although other solutions are suggested by the mesh created when higher states are formed.

MODEL: It has been determined that ct states are information states that define the relationships between non-dimensional, time independent space (ct1) and higher information states.  Since ct3 and ct2 states “move” relative to ct1 it was determined that they “aged” relative to a “carrier” formed by stacking successive ct states in a fashion that changed the relative movement.  Aging and velocity are known to be interchangeable via time dilation.  Aging is actually a “slowing” of the rate of change of information so that all ct5 states would age faster than ct4 states and all ct5 states would change slower than ct4 states, for example. 

Velocity and time dilation are directly related through this exchange of ct1 states which for ct1 occur at the rate of one every quantum instant Q where a quantum instant is a quantum change in the single variable Q.  For higher ct states (ct4, particularly) the number of exchanges of ct1 for each ct4 is radically higher (specifics follow) and this means that fewer changes per quantum instant slow down the velocity and increase “aging” defined as movement along a carrier more than one quantum state moment instead of exchanging ct1 states.  Minimum speed changes per quantum instant are a part of the conclusion and these are defined in detail below.

For ct4, matter, Time dilation results from moving along quantum points in the ct3 carrier between F-series (Fibonacci series) turns.

Compression and decompression refers to the tendency of ct states to form carriers.  The F-series spirals move through compression and decompression cycles which result in the stacking of time (ct) states or the unstacking of time (ct) states. This allows for a solution that we experience as either time dilation or velocity.  The cycle change can occur at every “Turn” or it can occur according to a different model suggested by intersecting spirals.  Two intersecting F-series spirals form a pair which define solutions which includes a “neutral period” between compression and decompression cycles.  For many reasons, including the “neutral period” between ct1 states (0,1,1,0,1,1), quantum entanglement, and logical origination it continues to be considered a valid model for investigation.  Compression and decompression are reflected in the expansion and contraction of the universe at inflection points.

          Ct1 (and hence higher states) are non-dimensional logical solutions (yes/no, plus/minus, 1/-1).  Distance and dimension are only relative changes between different ct states.  Forces reflect only the exponentially higher relative changes between higher (ct2 and higher) information states.  Gravity is only linearity of ct1 states expressed relative to higher ct states.  The perception of history is preserved in quantum moments by having the current quantum moment made from the stacking of prior quantum moments which is a result of compression.

          The best known example of "compression/decompression" is recognized by the equation as e=mc^2 at the ct3-ct4 interface.  This is not a base 10 equation which would fail at the ct4-ct5 interface (matter to black holes).  The more precise equation is Ctn=Geo(F(n)^2^n.  This equation is explained in detail below but the Geo is an evolving definition of pi which is certain for any set of points with a value of x, F(n) is the Fibonacci number n+(n-1)+(n-2).  If you examine this number in terms of scale for black holes you will get a confirming result (16^16 times the mass of the minimum ct4/matter state).   By combining the F-series model with the information model, a satisfactory explanation is obtained for the origin of the universe and quantum phenomena from a non-dimensional origin.

The theory is not broken, physics and for that matter we are broken
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6cdPeYJh0s

Discussing the log run irrelevant

Everything in the long run is irrelevant.  If you substituted bacteria in a petrie dish for us, we'd pay little attention, but in the grand scheme of things, at least using AuT, it means very little.
That being said, and since no one is forcing you to look at this, I want to talk a bit about politics.
I don't know what is going to happen, although there is a method for seeing into the future with AuT in a general sense that is not very complicated.
To say that the US population as a group are fools would be to grossly over-rate the lack of group intellect.  I've written two books about how we gave away our wealth and our technology to our biggest potential rival and while apparent short term wealth has resulted, in the short run, the long run is far from certain, well death is pretty certain, but the exact manner remains the great option of mankind.
So why raise this intellectual vacuum issue when the president elect throws it like a pie into our faces every day?  It's because he is doing what he should do, by the way.  By this I don't mean his policies are right.  But he's doing something.  When Eisenhower arrived in England in WWII he knew that something had to be done and that is what he requested, "Do something," take the chance it won't be right but don't just sit there waiting to be punched.  That doesn't mean it's right, but its what a president should do (compare President Adams to President Jefferson.  But that doesn't have much to do with stupidity.
What has to do with stupidity is putting out these obvious white herrings (voter fraud, the number of people at the inauguration) and the press (tv press) spending so much time on these that the important issues, such as the denigration of free speech and science, are ignored.  I think this was the election strategy.  So little time was spent on the inability of the president to tell the truth and the need to look at his tax returns because there was a three ring circus.  Don't get me wrong, I think it's brilliant.  It's like the "bit" you see on cartoons where a character is distracted by a riddle while the bank is robbed but in real life.
This is not Hitler, far from it.  More of Tammany Hall.  And no one should really be whining. Even the moron's had to see what was coming.  I suspect before this the Trump empire was probably not that healthy, but today everyone is joining the Mora Lao (at double rates) and everyone is booking conventions at Trump Properties and everyone is looking to do a deal that will get them politically connected.  Illegal?  I don't know, but only the attorneys will every look at it.  Everyone else is going to be distracted by the sideshows and half naked clowns in this circus.
For now it's fun. When they shut down the press and start building concentration camps then things will get serious, but both sides are putting on a show that no one could write.  Green peace putting up the "Resist" banner "over" the white house was classic.  The only thing they did wrong was not to prepare for a long siege.  They turned something that could have been a whole section in this farce into a paragraph.  Still classic, but underdone.  Ahhh don't you miss the 60's?
Of course, the use of issues is only part of it for the Trump team too. Kelly Ann Conway in a toy soldier outfit is a taste of what's to come from Trump and will certainly get more press than the banner.  If they'd surrounded the banner with some sort of sexual counter-strike, but now, the left unfortunately (from an entertainment standpoint) is too politically correct and in this arena only too classy to stoop that low and perhaps, judging from the coverage, too inept at this stage of the comic opera that is the world today to do that.
Given time there will be almost naked goose stepping models, I'm almost sure of it and the coverage will not be on the swastika's they are wearing, but the one ugly fat girl who is driven to tears in the audience or the reality tv show method in which they were cast for the rolls.
It will be some time before the press tries to bore the public when they get to the real issues, but at some point in time, we may see them  Perhaps it will be when they are trying to figure out who is going to harvest the vegetables in a few months or when we're starving or in Hoovervilles if the protectionist/self serving policies outweigh the pubic good being done.

AuT pp Grantinfo 5 Lorentz revisited

Since I have mentioned that there are parts of this which exceed the scope of the book in terms of detail and this is one of the, I am going to post what I was working on today.  It should be noted that critical parts of this discussion appear in the book which is the point of reference if you see something that is a little confusing in the description below.

What the purpose of this exercise comes up to is explaining time dilation (both gravitational and Velocity based) in terms of a dimension/time free environment.  It is not a complicated analysis, but while an explaination exists for how this is done, the complexity of the calculation for a given point is not given although the issues are not mathematical, but scale related.  This scale issue will be addressed in due course and in the writing actually appears before this section but I'm jumping around a little for your amusement.

A.    EQUATIONS: Why does CT4 disappear approaching the speed of light (time dilation)

The one paragraph summary:  If the change in time coordinates is conserved, then as you increase the change along one set of time coordinates, the other time coordinate changes must decrease.  Standard clock time is the perceived change in three coordinates when observed by having a fourth time coordinate from which to observe the other three.  Therefore, acceleration in three-dimensional space decrease the ability of the fourth coordinate to change, decreasing the amount of change perceivable from this perspective.  This indicates that perception does not move from one coordinate to allow perception of three dimensions.  There is, however, no reason for a fixed time dimension; only that one coordinate change allows the view of three others.  Dimensional analysis is irrelevant.  Things “remain” in place despite the number of simultaneous changes because the overall change is conserved.

Time dilation (the Lorentz equation in NLT theory):

Velocity has to be absolute and AuT defines how and why “true change” as opposed to relative velocity is absolute no matter what starting point is used and free from relativistic effects between two ct4 bodies.

There are two forms of time dilation that need to be reconciled for post ct1 states and explained relative to ct1 states:

Velocity Time dilation T0=t’2-t’1 T=t2-t1 =[t’2+(vx’2/c^2)-t’1-vx1/c^2]/sqr(1-v^2/c^2) Using binomial expansion, we get to a novel result.  Using N for the Numerator =N/x N=t’2+(vx’2/c^2)-t’1-vx1/c^2 X=1+1/2[v^2/c^2]+3/8[v^2/c^2]^2+… Velocity is a substitution of ct1 states at a maximum rate of 1 to 256 for ct2 (presumably at a higher rate photons turn into time/space independent ct1).  This rate is less, resulting in a slower speed for higher states.  The 1:256 can be substituted for c in the equations given giving them a quantum basis and an upper limit and v can also be replaced with a substitution value based on the timing of the solution from x=1 to infinity.  This is not a clock time solution, but is, instead a non-time based solution which changes and is specifically only the sum of the prior two universes although the entire history is preserved through this sum process which ensures the total amount of information increases and that the universe must “move” or change with each change in the value of x.  The values compared for different values of x are fixed linear solutions without multiple dimensions although relative timing of the solutions allows a conversion back to dimensional space.

Gravitational time dilation T=T0/sqr[1-(2gm/rc^2)] T=time interval remote from mass Binomial expansion shows: sqr(1-x)=1+x/2+3/8x^2+5/16x^3… Or T=T0/[1+{(2gm/rc^2)/2t0}+{3/8(2gm/rc^2)^2}+…] As gm (mass and gravity) increase they offset to sum of separation and gravity and begin, according the given infinite series which can lead to a value of zero for time only at m=infinitely or r going to zero.  Quantum theory provides that this number need not be infinity but instead is a function of a finite separation and time defined by a similar Mass can be converted to ct1 via the exponential analysis which also is a function of f(n)^(2^n).  While more complicated than the analysis for velocity, the result is identical due to the convertibility of mass to ct1 and ct1 substitution. R, like V can be eliminated based on the changing value of x where the change in R is based on a comparison of two different points based on when they are solved relative to x and V is the same type comparison where meters per   second are converted into two separate values of position for two different values of x.

This shows the “historical” references (3/8x^2) becoming very small in the framework and thereby becoming less of a factor in the determination if these histories are substituted for the more remote aspects of the dimensional analysis.

This shows the “historical” references (3/8x^2) becoming very small in the framework and thereby becoming less of a factor in the determination if these histories are substituted for the more remote aspects of the dimensional analysis. The speed of light (approx. 3x10^8 m/s can be transformed into a change of 1:256 at the ct1 level.

crazy	crazy for this girl
	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjvTkS7e0WA

AuT pp Grantinfo 4-leap

So here I am again.  I keep track of my exercise on my other blog.  I immediately started thinking about things in a universe with a model that calls for illusory coincidence and which necessarily brings things back together, irony and coincidence are explained as is repetition (a universe where each state is built on a prior state embodies repetition and intersecting and diverging spirals suggest recurrence and to some extent separation followed by...what?  redemption?)
It's a little unfair to have these conversations.  So there's a lot to cover between now and the weekend.  If we're not to be crazy, then what are we to be?  That will come later.
Understanding all of this will come later, maybe.  It's a leap of faith.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a59ZpPvN0fo

Broader Impacts :

The narrow and immediate impact of the grant is to continue to define the fundamental structure of the

universe in more detail based on the broad concepts of AuT.   A broader concept

is to show in broader mathematical terms what we observe.  It not only yields a better understanding of the universe, but may have far reaching impacts in our ability to manipulate time and space.

SES Division of PHYSICS

I.            INTRODUCTION to the Investigation Theory

            Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) in a paragraph: The basics of Algorithm Universe theory, and of this inquiry, are (1) All linearity is the result of conserved time coordinates changing in a time free, dimensionless state, (2) that this state can be represented by a single variable algorithm, and (3) that space and time occur as a result of the relative changes between different concentrations of information, the results of sequential solutions to that algorithm.

A corollary is that dimensional aspects of the universe and forces (dimension, energy, gravity, clock time) are created in (a) conserved, (b) consecutive, (c) exponentially separate quantum state groupings based on the accumulated solutions of prior time states and an evolving definition of curvature.

A new vocabulary was developed to describe these features:

AuT explains the origin of space time and quantum theory for the universe.  It is specifically the study of fixed quantum coordinates as the origin of all space-time phenomena.

Methodology: This undertaking began by looking for relationships between different observed phenomena and then locating flaws in poorly explained phenomena.  Models were developed from observed phenomena on gross (universal) scales and micro (quantum) scales.  The result was the determination that the universe is made up of offsetting expanding and contracting infinite series algorithms built on prior solutions to give the impression of linearity in a quantum system.

http://www.trendintech.com/2016/12/28/is-our-understanding-of-gravity-really-that-wrong/

AuT pp Grantinfo 3

Eventually, time willing, and if I can ever get back to things, I will finish that section on the converging series.  Love has the power to motivate and stop us I suppose in equal measure, perhaps another evidence of infinite converging series.
There is the suggestion that net information is growing at a converging rate in the drawings which I have not gotten to discussing yet.  What does that signify?
The two converging series represented by the increasing spaces and decreasing spaces (larger and smaller circle) in the 4/7-4/11 spaces show how alternating converging series work together (the "number" of edges increase, the space between parallel edges increases as a % compared to that part between the straight line and arc angle.
I'm not ready for those edits yet, still distracted.  I do, however continue to work with the proposal information which is effectively editing existing chapters of the book, getting rid of confusing verbiage and repetitive language (at least within paragraphs).
So we continue.

Intellectual Merit :

There are extensive practical and theoretical aspects of AuT. AuT provides a pre-expansion model of (1) the origin of space time, (2) the origin of quantum phenomena, (3) quantum length as information giving rise to perceived time and quantum gravity, (4) the relationship of gravity to other forces, (5) the origin of force, (6) the transitions of dimensional coordinates to the different time, force and dimensional states we experience, (7)explanations of how we experience clock time, and history in a quantum environment (8) The relationship of velocity, gravity, and time dilation, (9) The reasons for the perception of speed in a non-linear environment, (10) The exponential growth of clock time concentration giving rise to a converging series of compressed information states going from  space to energy to matter to black hole states and beyond, (12) wave-particle duality, (13) an understanding that all phenomena  and not just time move in a single direction and that all change is at the same speed, (14) the origins of what we have previously thought of as dark matter gravitational forces by way of example. NLT (the predecessor of NLC) correctly predicted that the alleged reports finding a Higgs Boson was inaccurate, and (15) it takes us far back before the first big bang (traveling backwards) explaining what the latest big bang was and what happened trillions of years before it, (16) How complex interactions, including perceived human self-determination are tied to fairly simple phenomena.

It has practical applications to understanding what we observe, how we can manipulate movement, aging, gravity and time.  IT also provides an explanation of other observed phenomena that we observe.  Do we observe, for example, inflection points?  I think the answer may well be yes and the observation of these localized inflection point phenomena are important and provide information which will be critical in the future. One possible example is the changing earth’s magnetic field.  We do not know when this will occur even though we have a historic record.  The reason for the confusion in the record is because each cycle would be off slightly based on the converging nature of the infinite series represented in the localized inflection point which would, otherwise follow the plan of the overall universe.

From a predictive standpoint, this theory is far better than other theories.   This allows us to make predictions on a gross scale of coming events based on inflection points.  It allows us to better determine the exact nature of the inflection points once we have enough information from which to derive them, something presumably largely in place from geologic records for the localized inflection points of magnetism of the earth for the earth’s magnetic field.  But this is only one, relatively minor element of a much broader, more inclusive predictive theory.

AuT pp grantinfo 2

Today has been disappointing in terms of what has been accomplished.  my efforts toward getting some emotional break are not going well, knowing as I do essentially the only thing that would work is the "nuclear option" which seems overly cruel and more likely to create chaos than the alternative, but it has to be taken seriously.  It is worth considering anything in a universe like ours which provides rewards and punishments in such a random fashion.  There definitely is some reason to think the universe is geared to those who take initiatives.  
My current project, this project in fact, is designed as an alternative to the nuclear option, but it remains to be seen.
I have been considering a discussion of the political ramifications of the theory.  For example, it is inexplicable that the majority of the people in the world cling to superstitions.  In saying that I do not discount the possibility of a god and in fact AuT almost requires some god like 'policy' and 'space' so much so that I call the pre-linearity space g-space.  This particular location is actually visited by o-space up to a point.  By way of explanation, the series observed for space is 0,1,1 which suggests at least a non-linear component to space.  This was assumed until it was discovered that "space-time" was a comparison of ct2 and higher states to ct1 thereby eliminating space time linearity from ct1 except as an effect.  This is complicated, but logical.
Getting back to the point, AuT requires that linearity stem without variation (at least there is no reason for it) from a single variable consistent algorithm which forces faith or a lack of it and forces that features that would be visitations by god.  The only room left for a real god is in the non-linear g-space realm where, for lack of a better explanation, the algorithm is held in god's mind and solved by god putting in the appropriate value of x for each change, noting this done without time as we know, but there is quantum change as we know it.
This is a strange view of god, but not one that is particularly concerned with whether I employ the nuclear option or not, that is whether I functionally kick life in the celestial spheres.
The point being, that to explain why even advanced apes would act as illogical relative to religious options as we do in the face of even pre AuT physics is best explained by the requirements of the nested spirals giving rise to effect related causes, that is we do things because an end result, too buried in stacked spirals to see requires we act that way whether logical or not.
This holds true to political divisions and, of course, AuT provides no basis for distinguishing between bundles of stacked spirals based on color or any other space-time manifestation of the algorithm, nor based on how much one set of spirals can lord over another set, because that lording is built into the system.
I suspect, sadly, that the more mundane potentials of the theory are what are grantable. It holds the more fanciful promise that it could change matter to energy, light or even space, it will allow a better understanding of gravity and perhaps it will allow us to change the gravitational features leading to attraction and making them repulsive instead.  Since aging is a relativistic and not absolute feature, materials science can be changed significantly.  These are the more extreme promises of a better understanding of AuT.

But it also explains phenomena for which there is no explanation, black holes, universal expansion and contraction, big bangs and the like.

In addition to providing the resources to review more data, the grant also seeks money to help pay for travel to go over what to look for in other physic data and lecture on subject (underwrite, some costs will be collected from schools for lecture fees if possible)

Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) is not a minor theory.  It defines not only the source and effects of Quantum Mechanics, but the origin of space time itself.  This latter explanation was not available when the initial grant application was made in 2015 although the factors leading up to it were inherent in the disclosure.  This paper summarizes a published book on the subject which is almost 300 pages long (Spirals in Amber 2nd Edition 2017).  A summary of the findings from that longer paper is provided below.

  The results have been relatively astounding already.  On a quantum level, the fundamental structure of space time which includes the various forms of energy and matter and higher states (black hole material for example) are defined along with the inter-relation of forces and those structures.  On a larger scale, the expansion and contraction features of the universe have been identified,  The nature and length of the expansion phase of the latest “big bang” was defined and the predecessor events back trillions of years identified with relative certainty.  On a more esoteric level explanations are provided for how history exists within a quantum event environment and an explanation of what light speed is and why it is limited.

While the basic formula for this are set out, a part of the grant would be directed to refining those formulae.

Einstein said space was curved, AuT explains why a non-dimensional universe appears curved.

Einstein determined e-mc^2, Aut Explained why.  AuT shows how this equation fits in with other phenomena.

But of course, wouldn't it be grand if it could be applied on both a grand scale and one limited to just us to make our lives make more sense and be happier?

AuT-pp-Grant info

I will, eventually, time willing, get the post eventually that finished the geometric examination of non-dimensional to dimensional analysis.   I have been...distracted.
This theory, hailing as it does from Greece initially (ancient Greece) and Italy (circa 1175 with Leonardo "Fi" Bonacci of Pisa, the reason we need to go there as opposed to any interest in the poorly constructed but famous bell tower) should have a component in those two somewhat in my mind befuddled country and it is only appropriate that they are currently playing such a large role in distracting me from completing what is, after all, a fairly simple, but important edit.
That being said, it's in the book so if you were in a hurry, you could always buy a copy.
Rather than post nothing and just being distracted by distraction, I'll lay out some of the reasons why I am selling myself to the highest bidder.  That's also a joke.  If AuT says anything about mankind it is that everything that separate countries stand for is ridiculous.  Still, if someone, particularly in Italy, wants to have the glory of me teaching  this, two first class tickets and access to an olympic sized swimming pool would go a long way.
But that is for another day, for now let's handle this post:

1.     Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT)- provides a mechanism for the creation of space time from a non-dimensional (including time) framework which is predictive of large and small scale observations.  This non-dimensional frame work is referred to as a single variable algorithm where quantum changes in this single variable allow for the creation of space and time as we experience them.  It is the most fundamental model of the Universe written to my knowledge.  It accurately predicts observed phenomena and allows for a better understanding of phenomena that are unexplained by other theories.

2.     AuT gives a better understanding of the universe and provides guidance in what to look for in sub-atomic and astronomical observations.  It explains minimum size, force (without false leads like bozons) black holes, expansion and contraction of the universe and like phenomena.  Being accurate, it provides accurate explanations.  The universe being complex, it requires the analysis of additional data to be complete.

3.     AuT Provides new avenues for advanced manipulation of quantum phenomena

4.     AuT Saves money being spent on incorrect assumptions, but targeting investigations that are looking for things that don’t exist.

5.     AuT Allows a better understanding of information coming from quantum studies and astronomical studies.

The goal is not only to further develop the theory and to get access to more data to develop the theory, but also to present Algorithm Universe Theory to other physicists to encourage looking at information for correct results instead of the shadow results being sought currently.

I think maybe the Chinese ought to hire me.  They seem to be ascendant right now and I understand the diving at their military bases in the South China Sea is excellent.  We'll see.  Right now, I'd probably settle for Seychelles.

AuT=pp delays

There is only one post left in this series. I may add one post script post, but the end will be here soon enough. For reasons you can figure out, I didn't have time to edit it today,I'm too distracted to do it tonight.. I'll probably have an opportunity to do that tomorrow or when I wake up in the middle of the night. I want you to know that I looked for that blog once, a long time ago.  I wonder if I looked in the wrong place, the wrong name or what.  I wish you'd share it.  It's a lot to ask and the reasons to ask are as obvious as the reasons not to share it. For those of you wondering what that has to do with the price of tea in china, i'd warn you that the long term strategy of china takes their sphere out to the arc islands that include Hawaii and that will certainly affect things other than the price of tea. There are many things I would add if I could figure out a reason to add them, but meaning has been drained out of all this, at least for now. A long time ago, this inquiry was directed towards Zeno's paradoxes.  Since then I"ve written a novella or short story about Zeno and have decided that my work dates from Parmenides, but before that it had to do more with the similarities between my solutions and those from Zeno, which I didn't know until someone told me.  Of course, I take my directions from someone else, it might be said that i transcribe this work, after a fashion. But these posts have a paradox and for lack of a better name and for you or to you perhaps I call it Greg's paradox even though its more of an explanation than a paradox. The exact nature of this Greg’s paradox can be described as the difference between two quantum states defines quantum separation by comparison which comparison leaves less than quantum distances between solutions. That could be worded more carefully and is given more carefully in other places but for the moment, it is something to ponder in light of the prior posts until the final post or two is put up.

AuT-pp: dimension examined 2 of whatever

There will be at least, probably two more posts from what has already been generated, but if you are patient, there will be more.  A few days isn't too long to wait for what you already know if you've read this.long enough or bought the books.
When you do a Geometric proof of d/dtheta(sintheta)=costheta

Y=sintheta (vertical postion of circular “motion”) you end up with a diagram like this.

In a purely linear universe, it is possible to get closer and closer to a quantum shaped curve, but this will not work in a quantum state universe  For this reason we know that we have a quantum state universe which gives rise to a linear state universe, the only question is how.

What’s interesting about this is that gap B (the gap between the straight line q-p and the arc is more narrow than, for example, A (the gap between q-baseline).  AuT, quantum theory suggests that at some point these changes must be quantum difference, that is they cannot be subdivisions requiring minimum lengths B and minimum line lengths p-q, for example.

 Looking at the angles above, it can be seen that a quantum lengths r and y have to be equal for a guantum length of the arc lengths but even then you end up with portions (like A an B) which are sub-quantum lengths but still defined by the quantum values of deltax and deltay.

There are other, more isolated ways to look at how is this problem solved, how do you get from quantum changes to sub-quantum changes, from yes/no answer to answers which appear to have dimension and smaller size?

This is not the way of AuT, but it approaches the method of AuT In order to see this we're going to look at a slightly different way of look at this, we're going to look at some isosceles triangles, the greek delta, a symbol of perfection, but not one of balance.

This shows another way to envision this process of stacking quantum states.  For purposes of this diagram, it will be assumed that the legs of the triangle are yes/no solutions.  This means they have no true distance.  They are, however aligned so they can be compared.  The first layer (the top triangle) is circular in a fashion but it's a lot different from our circle in a linear universe.  This is a quantum circle which not a circle at all.  If you look in the book (or wait for the next post) we'll get to 5 and seven sided equal sized objects, but wait for the moment.

Once start to stack these (and this is not, btw straight F-series stacking although the results are not so different) we begin to generate comparative pieces. which vary relative to one another even while the quantum lengths stay the same.

For example the "distance" or the "percent" of a quantum result C is smaller than b which is smaller than a.  You either have to change what makes up quantum distance, which screws up linearity as indicated above, or you have to look at the comparison between quantum solutions, this is another way of looking at the ratio of yes to no results.  In the triangle you have this and in the F-series 0,1,1 you have this.  You also see this at the 1,1,2 level, the last level that has this pure model although the 0,1,1 model is unique.

To get from the first triangle to a, from A to b or from b to c the size of the figure must grow sufficiently so that the edge of the triangle, a, b and c all have a minimum length and to get from one shape to the next some expansion is required in quantum length, but if you are only looking at one relative to another you don't have the same issues.
You can get the same results as the a, b, c results by comparing the number of 0 states to 11 states or, if you like, the 1,1 states to 2 states when you begin to stack.  In the case of the top it is 1 to 2 in the second drawing it is 2 to 4; in the third it is 3 to 6 but the potential exists at any location for this to be weighted as long as it evens out somewhere else.  But you also have 1,2,3 of the non-base state to 1 base state if the single triangle is a base.  This changes dramatically if you are going from 1 change at a time to two (1,1 to 11, 11)  at a time because the equation for change is 2^(2^2) for the base change to (2^2);4^(2^2);6^(2^3); and 10^(2^4) relative change ratios among others at the state where we find ourselves and the comparative states between these states is enormous whether localized or not.

For the derivation of pi you have a similar issue in reverse, but you still have a comparative analysis.

This is important because the one thing that stays true about this analysis is that the legs of the triangles all stay the same.  The comparative features of the triangle change relatively speaking, one to the other, and seem to require an infinite variation between minimum lengths, but this is illusory since the value of any triangle of quantum length remains constant, the quantum state of the universe is preserved while perceived variation in length or curvature changes.
It's important to see how these features arise, it is important to understand how the relativity this represents expresses itself as the reality we experience, the long and short, the fast adn slow, the light and the dark, it's important what it says to us and what we have to intuit from it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMihKmoYfe8