PRESS RELEASE-no comments?

PRESS RELEASE

MIT study verifies research of CWI into AuT

In October, MIT published results showing "completely unexpected fractals" in "Quantum Materials."

Phys.org: Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material.
https://phys.org/news/2019-10-scientists-fractal-patterns-quantum-material.html
SciTechDaily: “Completely Unexpected” – MIT Scientists Discover Fractal Patterns in Quantum Material.
https://scitechdaily.com/completely-unexpected-mit-scientists-discover-fractal-patterns-in-quantum-material/

Under AuT, Fractals are expected, even required, at both "true" quantum levels and at the quantum levels referred to by MIT.  Four peer review articles were published (copies can be found at this link: http://www.gmfpc.com/aut-details) beginning in 2018 not only predicting the MIT result, but showing the mathematical basis.
Before those articles, books were published on this topic dating back to 2012-2013. This model was also presented at a physics conference in 2018 and to the American Physics Society in April of 2019.
This does not lessen the importance of the study which verified the predictions in the AuT articles by Friedlander.

While such findings by MIT are not required, other observations render the AuT model self proving, it is a gratifying result and it proves the process of AuT is Novel and accurate.

Press release format: chapter 19

Today is a backwards type of day.
It started out at the warmest temperatures of the day.
The air was filled with exhausted bugs, dragon flies and Bees from Mexico, the latter stopped for some of my coffee which I shared.  "Vaya con dios, mi insecto amigo."

My weight is going backwards despite a loosely controlled diet, exercise, however disrupted by the weather, and sporadic regularity.  Perhaps the broken heart is affecting the digestive organs, who knows.  It is a dark time, but this post is the reward for getting past page 20, even though that was my goal for last night.  It is still early this morning, I was up early, riding in the dark with the branch waving wind alternatively in my face and at my back.

Today is also backwards because the sea is in the sky, although it is falling down is sheets.

I'm looking for comments on the following press release.

PRESS RELEASE

MIT study verifies research of CWI into AuT

In October, MIT published results showing "completely unexpected fractals" in "Quantum Materials."

Phys.org: Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material.
https://phys.org/news/2019-10-scientists-fractal-patterns-quantum-material.html
SciTechDaily: “Completely Unexpected” – MIT Scientists Discover Fractal Patterns in Quantum Material.
https://scitechdaily.com/completely-unexpected-mit-scientists-discover-fractal-patterns-in-quantum-material/

Under AuT, Fractals are expected, even required, at both "true" quantum levels and at the quantum levels referred to by MIT.  Four peer review articles were published (copies can be found at this link: http://www.gmfpc.com/aut-details) beginning in 2018 not only predicting the MIT result, but showing the mathematical basis.
Before those articles, books were published on this topic dating back to 2012-2013. This model was also presented at a physics conference in 2018 and to the American Physics Society in April of 2019.
This does not lessen the importance of the study which verified the predictions in the AuT articles by Friedlander.

While such findings by MIT are not required, other observations render the AuT model self proving, it is a gratifying result and it proves the process of AuT is Novel and accurate.

The APS editorial board refused to print at least 3 articles on this topic before the MIT study.  Perhaps they will reconsider now that a major university has verified the results predicted by Friedlander.

Why these guys are wrong.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/10/24/this-is-why-the-speed-of-gravity-must-equal-the-speed-of-light/#2c702d492fc0

SciTechDaily: A Crisis in Cosmology – Measurements of Hubble Constant Disagree.
https://scitechdaily.com/a-crisis-in-cosmology-measurements-of-hubble-constant-disagree/

There is a crisis, its because the boneheads in charge of things are ignoring AuT.
However, both of these articles a full of problems.

Let's talk about Hubble for a starter.  The problem with "constants" is that there is no such thing, except at the quantum level.
If there was, AuT would be wrong and the boneheads would be right.  This article is a classic, I told you so and
may require another press release, but not today.

The hubble constant will change based on the average fuse value and compression states of different regions in the Universe.
The only reason there is close agreement is because the observable universe is all similar enough in x value
and compression state so that concentrations of dark matter and the like are aberrational (an example of a
dark matter concentration would be space that is primarily ct3 vs primarily ct1).

The speed of gravity is not at all equal to the speed of light, sorry forbes bonehead.  The reason this is wrong is, of course,
because gravity averages out in a pre time environment and therefore has no speed limit.  Changes in gravity
are instantaneous from the standpoint of time (as opposed to change).  What the bonehead should be saying is
from the standpoint of time, gravity appears to change at the speed of light because from a time based perspective
we cannot see changes that are faster than light changes because light is approximately the breaking point
between pre-time and post time changes, although more compressed states like 'lectrons' have large quantities
of both pre and post-time changes.
Indeed, there is an energy insight which if I was but free to share it would blow your mind on this issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XaS93WMRQQ

Chapter 19

Cruise Ship

Action: Bring couple over on piroux, as cruise ship crashes into bridge sending wave which swamps boat.

The pumps are holding up.  As long as things don’t get too much worse we will be ok.  They are bringing some pumps from across the levee on the good span of the bridge from the marine base

I thought no one could cross the bridge.

There is some sort of chemical spill.

No one will talk about it.

But they are coming?

These are marines, from the base across the river.

Thank god, its not a moment too soon.

The captain is at a levee station near the remaining bridge with the Supervisor of the Levee system who is waiting for the pumps.  There they are, he says indicating the trucks on the bridge.

A cruise ship is approaching the port.

What’s the ship doing?

Evacuating people, this is the second trip it’s made.

He seems to be coming up awfullly fast.

It docks before it gets to the bridge by the shopping area.

Look at that it looks like there is a riot on deck.

I hate the way those things dock at the riverwalk its going to bring a whole new crowd to the city just when things are getting hairy

Its not going to stop

Of course its going to … my god.

It is very quiet...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Dg-g7t2l4

sirens

I am getting fat again, despite exercising and that despite the tropical weather
that has come up from mexico to haunt my week with visions of the past
hot nights in Monterrey or across the border in Tijuana; 30 foot tall banana trees and saddleback mountains
beautiful mexicans and old hotels.

Anyway, it is night, I just finished 25 minutes on the treadmill and three sets of weights after a bikeride
you could only understand if I told you about it, because it was, after all for you.

Even with all of that I seem to be getting fat again.

The week has ended. Still...
No word from the editors of APS.  Of course I expect them to ignore this.  
They ignored the articles, which MIT accidentally proved correct in every respect
I am so far ahead of everyone, it is no wonder they cannot see me
Just as many conceited people have a hard time admitting they are wrong (hand raised) 
so too do institutions they inhabit and control.
I do not wish a pox on them, but I hope they will find the wisdom to admit that there were mired in darkness
even as I held a light in their faces.
I wrote today somewhere else, that my work was true science fiction, the math of the foundation series
by asimov, the faster than light of star trek and star wars.  I really am all of that.

One of the great things about being in front of everyone else is that you can look behind you...
 and see the entire field of endeavor...and weep for it
So is the state of those to whom we entrust our information 
and such is the challenge faced by those like me who are true pioneers 
and not merely staring at the ocean thinking that the world is flat 
or fearful that knowing it is round it is beyond the capabilities of men.

This article covers a couple of different things, 
there is a link to the existence of some sort of material that "amazing" contains qubit features.  
Of course AuT shows how all things are made up of states that contain qubits 
because of the co-existence of dimensional states, but its nice to see people at major universities catching up.

trying to catch up

Inverse: Quantum computing may be closer than expected with ‘game changer’ discovery.https://www.inverse.com/article/60021-quantum-game-changer

This is a set of disclosure that AuT has long since left behind in the trail of patents.

What is next.

I had to wonder that today, as the tornado sirens moaned over and over again
Air-raid sounds
And wondered how I could be so wise and yet so foolish
You may think I am wrong in my attitude,
You may think I am wrong in my science (in which case you are a horses behind)
And you may even think I am wrong for you, now.
Even though I am far ahead of everyone else, yet somehow there are people in front of me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qyclqo_AV2M

Another day post verification, my empire

I've been pushed inside.
Yesterday I managed 1200 im, but had to do 4x300 instead of 3x400 and this was still only 2200 and I was not over impressed with the speed.
Again I weighed in at 177, can't seem to get back down.

I see the stuff about QC and missing parts that everyone is looking for are already patented by AuT; I wonder why I haven't seen the Chinese showing some interest, but the USA people are pretty slow to come to the table.  I am making progress, assembling my technical team, having too much to do has some disadvantages, but staying on top of this has provided insights, a major one, however well documented in the earlier patents, came to me last night and others earlier in the week.  It is like being in an avalanche of discovery.  I would like to share more of it here with you, but I am at that place where I'm just not able to say everything I want as the patents have to catch up with my ability to edit them.

Another day post verification.

Last week I was gratified as science began to catch up with me and simultaneously insulted by being ignored, the APS ignored the fact that I clearly set out the model on which the "discovery"  years before MIT and they even refused to publish the articles which set it out.  Worse still, they ignore it still, incredibly small minded and they are, perhaps, more conceited and scientifically prejudiced than I am, and that is saying a lot.

However, I am published, the proof is there, in their records as well as in the public domain so  I will continue to gloat about that today.  If the universe is fair, and it is not, I will get the last laugh and if not, I will be the joker in the deck for all the false awards that will be given out for my science to these morally bankrupt scientific competitors.

Who first said: "We have to be mature enough to handle a little moral ambiguity."  I don't think it was me, but if no one else said it, I guess I did.

I pointed this out to the editors (at phys.org); days ahve gone by with nothing and I expect nothing.

 "This is the scientific prejudice I have referred to above.  It would be nice if all of you to write the aps and MIT and tell them what a raw deal this is." I said in my last post on this issue.  You have to be ready to allow the world to treat you like dirt, but like dirt allow beautiful and ugly things to spring forth.

For you, my loyal reader, my only loyal reader and apparently not as loyal as I would hope, I thank you for all you have done and for all the pain too, since both saved me and brought me here, not quite 10 pounds lighter, but still pushing water at a rate that would make most pump systems proud.

There was a significant milestone last week worth considering.
MIT found "completely unexpected" fractals last week:
Phys.org: Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material.

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-scientists-fractal-patterns-quantum-material.html

SciTechDaily: “Completely Unexpected” – MIT Scientists Discover Fractal Patterns in Quantum Material.

https://scitechdaily.com/completely-unexpected-mit-scientists-discover-fractal-patterns-in-quantum-material/

While MIT is right, under the standard model, fractals are unexpected.  Under AuT Fractals are not unexpected. Four peer review articles were published (copies can be found at this link: http://www.gmfpc.com/aut-details) beginning in 2018 not only predicting the fractals, but showing the mathematical basis.

Before those articles, several books were published on this topic dating back to 2012-2013. This model was also presented at a physics conference in 2018 and to the American Physics Society in April of 2019.

This does not lessen the importance of the MIT study which verified the predictions in those articles.  What it shows is that the AuT model is new and unexpected; but is verified by third party observations which are decidedly not looking for it.
 AuT predicts the unexpected.

Not everyone can say "I am 7 years ahead of MIT," but I can and I fart in the general direction of all those who stand in my way.

I have an empire of dirt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ahHWROn8M0

supporting articles on Fractals

I took yesterday off, didn't even think of weighing in today.
I may not exercise today which will be a rare 48 hours off and you will want to have nothing to do with me I assure you, during such a hiatus.  Its still early, maybe my mind will change, but I'm not feeling it.

I want to talk about scientific blindness and the refusal to acknowledge anything that doesn't come from a university.  The article addressed below is a sign of it.

I have shown my material to MIT and to most physics departments around the united states.  

You'll note that I identified the source of these 'unexpected' fractals and their relationship to to one another in an article published in 2018 and the books covering this generally go back 7 years.  You can see this in the comment below.

Its more than a little frustrating that my work which is widely circulated, including having been presented at last April's meeting of the APS that published this story is never mentioned.  I trust you have experienced that yourself.  It is worth noting that I have sent at least 4 articles on this subject to the aps (note they ran the MIT article) and they still act like this is something they never heard of before.  The first of those articles was submitted several years ago.

This is the scientific prejudice I have referred to above.  It would be nice if all of you to write the aps and MIT and tell them what a raw deal this is.  I did.


Phys.org: Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material.
https://phys.org/news/2019-10-scientists-fractal-patterns-quantum-material.html


SciTechDaily: “Completely Unexpected” – MIT Scientists Discover Fractal Patterns in Quantum Material.
https://scitechdaily.com/completely-unexpected-mit-scientists-discover-fractal-patterns-in-quantum-material/

This is hardly unexpected. Four peer review articles were published (copies can be found at this link: http://www.gmfpc.com/aut-details) beginning in 2018 not only predicting this, but showing the mathematical basis.
Before those articles, books were published on this topic dating back to 2012-2013. This model was also presented at a physics conference in 2018 and to the American Physics Society in April of 2019.
This does not lessen the importance of the study which verified the predictions in those articles.

 Some of the books dating back 7 years:

does the aut universe make sense Part 1 Chapter 18

I weighed in under optimum conditions, after morning ablutions
 a 50 minute bike ride and three sets of weights.  I was still at 176.4 which was higher than I hoped.
What is wrong with me?

But I have solved the origin of the universe and have barely any recognition, despite 4 or 5 published articles, so the better question is "what is wrong with you?"

we start with the kiss rule of universe construction.
AuT has some pretty damn simple origin stories; and only in application does it become complex.
Indeed there is just one base equation and it gives rise to multi-dimensional effects almost as a matter of course.
It is ratio based.

https://www.livescience.com/hubble-constant-universe-expansion-not-make-sense.html

I will take a look at the article and get back to you on it.

Before I finish the answer to the primary question, let me revisit the oft repeated physics joke.  Heisenberg and Schrodinger are driving to las vegas when they are pulled over for speeding.  the cop asks heisenberg if he knows how fast he was going.  Heisenberg says I cannot tell you how fast I was going at any point on the highway and neither can you.

The cop doesnL like the answer so he asks if he can inspect the car.  After looking in the trunk he asks Schrodinger, "did you know there is a dead cat in a box in the trunk?" to which Schrodinger replies, "well I do now."

What is the relevance of this seemingly irreverant and irrelevant joke to your question?   Quantum separation is required for a functioning universe.  This has nothing directly to do with Planck length which is nowhere close to quantum  separation.  The reasons for infinite divisibility being impossible take a little while to explain, but suffice to say that you can only cut something up so many times tilll you end up with something that acts like information.  No matter which of my papers you read, this information thing is described in effect, although what it is requires a pretty complex discussion.  The same, of course, is true about change or what you and heisenberg and schrodinger would call time because you are looking at bulk change as opposed to quantum change which occurs without time as we measure it.

A quantum length of change 1/10^44th of a second if you have seconds) describes a moment when everything is frozen in place.  There is no momentum, there is no change in place, there is no thermodynamics and hence the question about Heisenberg's variables and Schrodinger's cat cease to have relevance.  At a quantum moment of change, everything can be determined because everything is frozen in place and the cat is either alive nor dead; although at quantum instances of change it isnt really a cat at all..

The most simple atomic reaction is not just a hydrogen reaction (and it points out the problem with the navy vaguely worried and probably disfunction reaction in all probability, although the issuance of that patent makes little sense to me and I know all about patents) which is you are not working with just protons and electrons and neutrons.  You are also working with energy; but if you were looking at the real math, you are working with all kinds of stuff. 
Revisiting the prior discussion, at a quantum instant, energy is not work, heat or light because those are all manifestations of change over very long periods, at the scale of 10^39 or 10^44 changes.  Talking about a ct3-ct4 compression cycle is not what I would call electron capture, it is merely another step towards compression from ct4t16 to ct4.  T12 is important, so are a lot of other transitional states, but if that is the electron capture you are referrring to; then in in your lingo, I would call it proton to neutron compression but I would also point out that you are not just working with a hydrogen atom as the reactant although that is perhaps the primary reactant, certainly in terms of information content, at least if you ignore the catalyst which I would never ignore.

  So, I ask you, having looked at my work, what is energy, and why do you have so much of it at the end of the compression cycle?  Also, I would suggest you ask yourself what that neutron needs to look like at the end of the cycle.  That is one of many questions my patents answer. 

Want more?  Subscribe to my youtube page (wherever the hell that is and order a book.

Chapter18

Hospital gets overwhelmed,

It is pouring rain out the window.  Flashes of lightening are followed with muffled thunder, some of the bolts come in pairs..

The people keep coming in with these bites.  We are treating them and sending them out with prescription, but more of them come in

What do the police say?

It started with the vagrants attacking tourists, the ones that live under the bridges.  Homeless people.

They have locked a number of people up, but a lot of officers have come down ill.

Its this damn weather, not good for anyone   I hear the river has topped the levee.  That water has flesh eating bacteria in it, I hope people are heeding the medical alerts and staying out of the water, the damn fools.

There is someone here to see you.

An asian man is sitting, his head is lolling as he falls asleep

Are you ok, the doctor asks

Im sorry, I drove all the way from memphis and I havent slept in two days

Why don’t you get some rest.

No, he shouts, suddenly rallying himself.  Are you having problems with patients who bite?

The nobel wizard of oz rant

So, I mathematically define exactly what dark maatter is and what dark energy is yet they give the nobel prize to some guys (I'm sure they are very smart and all) who just flounder around in the standard model and make wild observations.
Why you ask?  What do they have that I don't have?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pWSwfVDiq8

A very short rant.
In light of that I wish to make....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnciwwsvNcc

You can read it here, in the prior posts.  CT2 and 3 and much of the early folding of ct4 is dark matter.  I often say it is ct1, but since ct1 has no gravity, that is true and false, ct2 being folded ct1.  And moreover, it is the net folding tha that is cark matter and the net unfolding that is dark energy, things obvious only if you have read and understood my books. 

And, after all, most of it is in this blog.

the physics elite are morons and i am the joker after a fashion

So I weighed in at 177 this morning.  This "enormous" jump makes little sense, but for reasons which shall not be given, I attribute it to not sitting as much.
I did my normal exercise routine, toned down a little and I did a treadmill in place of a stair workout which was unsatisfyingly easier.
swam the normal 2200.
I figured out initially and long ago that everything had to change at the same rate, a necessity in a true quantum universe because, after all you stupid good for nothing phys.o elite bastards, quantum means one.  duh.
And further you stupid, small minded tyrants, it also means everythng must be the same because otherwise...duh quantum again, you would have to be able to cut everything up smaller meaning...ok you are too stupid to figure it out you scientific bigots, you would have to be able to cut up everything smaller until you get there.
my noble and large minded readers all get this even if the small, nay, tiny minded guardians of  physics stupidity and  exclusion do not.
It did take me a while to figure out how things could change at the same rate, but appear different and, of course, the irrefutable evidence which the limp reproductive organ establishment refuses to see in their academic blindness is that the solution appears all around us which are the 4 (yes i said 4 and not 3 because the numerator of pi is an iterated equation, the simplish x+1) iterated equations and the denominator of pi provides the perfect solution for this.
So with that burst of totally non-petulant and entirely accurate truth saying, lets talk about the stupidity nay cupidity of the morons attempting with no success to hold  back the inevitable tide of my, dare I use the "g" word?

We will start with a recent and entirely  stupid pre-AuT concept totally embraced by the embiciles referred to hereinabove:

Popular Mechanics: The Biggest Quantum Breakthrough Yet—Literally. https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/math/a29339863/quantum-superposition-molecules/
AuT explains how even larges scale phenomena are made of small scale phenomena so that in limited cases characteristics of large scale phenomena in terms of being in two places over values of x and then coming back in terms of time and appearing to be at both.
It is so obvious and trivial an explanation that it apparently requires a genius like me to figure it out.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24332500-900-what-the-quark-why-matters-most-basic-building-blocks-may-not-exist/

An article that says quarks may not exist.  What does Aut say about this?  "Duh."

https://www.livescience.com/black-holes-may-not-exist.html

There is so much wrong with this article that its like, what stupid thing do you want me to address. First AuT says what black holes are and since they defy all the old fashioned math.  Feynman, bah humbug or humbag perhaps.  They try to fit the universe into their perverse dimension opposite models that are wrong and then when the truth is shown to them (dimensions equal small footprints from the perspective of lower dimensions since dimensions arise from folding) depsite the clear logic and then get angry over the rejection of nonsense in favor of better math and logic.

https://www.ft.com/content/59bb5d78-e5d5-11e9-b112-9624ec9edc59

The idea that fusion will be worth it is a dumb thing.  Fusion will be what it is and it will come from my science.  Alas, I cannot put the highest tech stuff here, but it is, like all things AuT, amazing and distressing.

I sound angry?  hardly.  brilliant, not angry, the mad scientist within me dwells on my favorite line from the buildup to the joker movie, yes there is a joker refernce in this blog, "you are one bad day from being me."

amongst the weeds (chapt 16 and 17)

Wow, its been a while.
My weight has been hovering in the right area, I think.
My exercise routine, Meh, but pretty much up to where it normally is.
The physics...well the progress has been breathtaking.
Both scientifically and practically.
I have also been living a little bit, with all the ups and downs associated with being alive.
It is morning, I am sitting here with my half cup of coffee almost finished.
I started to do some writing, then studying writing, then drinking more coffee, ran out of coffee, then decided to come back here, let you know I was not dead.
There are now probably 50 recent posts unpublished (out of more that 300 again!) at different levels of development, but I've been preparing, filing and circulating 50 and 100 page documents, all too technical to share, I am afraid.  It is now about using the science, making the fusion reactor, the quantum computer, not just talking about it.  And there is now a significant movement into real material science, atomic and molecular design.  Time to build the giant lazer or floating car in the garage, but the outreach is to real, big companies.

I will not get into the details of even how I get into the details and some tid-bits may yet make it into this blog.  The truth is that I am not over this blog, nor the intended audience, but I am now working with NDA (non-disclosure agreements, not near death apparitions); collaboration agreements (not the consensual sex disclaimer type) and, above all, secrets regarding the use of the model.

I'm also totally over the whole physics world thing.  I have 5 published articles, so what?  The bozos that run the establishment are not worth talking to.
Let's look at an article:
The absurdity of something being two places at the same time is easily reconciled with the pre-time and post time concept inherent in thedimensional model developed.And yet this article reflects the state of physics today. 
https://www.livescience.com/2000-atoms-in-two-places-at-once.html
 The good news is the opportunity it presents.  In the world of the blind, the one eyed man is king.  Oddly enough that describes me fairly well.  A mediocre excuse for humanity surrounded by people who are so incredibly narrowminded and stupid that even a hint of creativity is a flower among weeds.
I suspect I put in chapter 16 of the screenplay, I number them as I post them, but I'm including that before 17 anyway.  sue me.

Chapter 16

Levee storm doors close sealing off the city

Dr. Chang from Memphis drives across the lake, the water is high on the bridge.  They were stopping cars from going over the long causeway from the north side of lake Ponchetrain to New Orleans but he zoomed around the roadblock and no one chased him.  In his rearview mirror, he saw an officer waving at him wildly and another with both hands on his hips and looked back just in time to prevent his car from crashing into the concrete sidewalls.

On his radio, the news is talking about vagrants who have been attacking tourists.

Oh god, I may be too late. 

Just as he exits the bridge, he hears sirens.  On the other side of the bridge, police cruisers sit on an empty bridge going north with their blue lights flashing.  He hears someone yelling and passes by someone who had to jump out of his path.

He looks behind him.  Large metal doors, as tall as a house are closing the gaps between the levees that are normally open to the lake.  The storm, of course.  They are closing the bridge and the gaps in the levee in case the river rises.  What next, he wonders out loud?

Chapter 17 hotel

Strange news

There is a knock on the door.

The captain goes and swings it open.

Behind him is the female teacher.  Before him stands one of the crew who, seeing the woman, quickly takes off his hat that has “Zombie, New Orleans” on it.

Begging you pardon captain, but some of the crew have gotten sick and there is a riot of sorts going on in the streets.