AuT and Universal expansion: 1 of 2

I'm sitting outside on a muggy summer morning with June coming on quickly.  There are no mosquitos, meaning that my efforts from yesterday have born at least some temporary fruit.
I'm hoping that I have an opportunity to spend time in a place which is muggier than here and which has been described as having bugs the size of chickens flying around.  It's a strange thing to hope for; but there are so many potential problems getting there that it hardly seems like something to worry about today with the thunderstorms in the distance and the mosquitos in the future.
A ceiling fan, probably because there is such humidity, makes a big difference, it is like blowing water around, it turns an opporessive humid heat into something that is almost cold.  I suppose you just can't win unless you climb up and turn down the speed of the ceiling fan.  There, it's so humid, it just started raining, the water was just too much for the sky to hold, I guess.
The discussion of the incongruency in weather is appropriate to the post of the day.  I'm dealing with serious inner ear issues which means I can only write for short periods of time.  It helps to use my bad eye, which is like trying to write on a billboard a mile away through a blizzard where the most I can hope for is to see if one of the letters goes up eventually.  It reminds me of some work I did for the visual impaired computer company back when my vision was good.  I understood the importance of what was being done, but not that I'd eventually need it.  That is getting off the point.  which is that I think it helps the inner ear thing to balance out the use of my eyes so that if this is illegible at the end of the day, it's not that surprising to me.
I occasionally swim with my eyes closed to spare my vision and this is a similar thing, writing with my eyes closed.
Anyway, getting to the point of this post.

Dark and cold energy, cold energy being my term, is the topic of discussion on this muggy hot/cold morning, its paradoxes fitting so well with those I am going to write about.

Dark energy is the algorithm solution that leads to expansion (related as the cause of gravity and not a reflection of it).  Cold energy is the same algorithm during the compression phase.
Today, let's deal with a universe that is expanding faster and slower at the same time, which is the result that AuT suggests, a part of the different converging series inherent in the intersecting f-series.

So, can you have a universe that is expanding faster while expanding slower at the same time?
If the answer is yes, then the increase expansion vs speed of expansion seems to hold the answer.
There are two types of expansion.  One driven by F-series stacking and another is driven by the compression vs decompression solutions.  F-series expansion will constantly increase, compression and decompression (a majority of intersecting vs a majority of moving apart) cycles will change and compression is the result.

So here's the article I want to discuss which is a most "AuT" article and helps to see why AuT is such a strong explanation:

http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2017/05/24/529675773/what-does-an-expanding-universe-really-mean

The description of geometry is wrong, but they understand the reasons.  For example, they say  perspective is the problem and that is correct, but the perspective mistake that they don't discuss is that it is our view of space which is the error, while AuT points out that much information exists in a space time free state.  So let's look at some of what they say:
"Current measurements indicate that the universe has a flat (or nearly flat) geometry. For cosmology, a flat geometry means that rays of light actually travel on a straight line across space. (In a curved geometry, the rays would trace a curved path, like when you run your finger over the meridian of a globe.) Also, and very importantly, a flat geometry means that the universe is probably infinite. If you'd start moving on a straight line, you'd never come back to where you started. (In a spherical geometry, if you move, say, along the equator, you'd get back to your starting point.)"
Solution order has nothing to do with space-time except that the relative solution density gives rise to space-time effects.  Hence, a flat geometric solution merely means that changes occur according to a linear framework which is required since a "break" in solution order woudl disappear as soon as another solution was reached because there is no true distance between one solution and the next.

Hence, this otherwise perfect quote: "there is no space "out there" for it to expand into. What the cosmic expansion does is stretch space itself, as if space were made of some kind of stretchy rubber material. There is no physical border out here, only stretching space..." is confusing because it continues to look at space as a thing, while space is just the way that information is displayed during quantum solutions.  Space isn't "stretchy," instead information increases constantly and at an exponential rate.  However it also compresses (1,11,111,1111,11111, etc) so that it can increase, but it can be displayed as more compressed which is what our premise says; depending on whether it is increasing faster than it is compressing.  Since compression is governed by an intersection/non-intersecting modality when space is non-intersecting, there is no more of it at any quantum instant, but it is increasing at a faster rate because more of 11111 is changing into 1 so it will expand faster between two statest than if more 1's are changing to 11111 even though the amount of information increases more with either version.  This is the solution that AuT suggests and, oddly enough-not really odd at all, the one that observations suggest.

Now, order of solution (as shown in Book1) yields some interesting results because every point allows you to view every other point from that solution so you have relative separation.  But you also have a beginning, even though every point on the chain is the center in terms of its relative location to otehr solutions.  How does this "almost AuT article address this?
"... every point is a center of the expansion, as observers measure their neighbors moving away, carried by the stretching geometry."
This statement is both true, from a center of expansion argument, and confusing because it is not stretching geometry, it is at the quantum level a matter of quantum solution order and over time this appears to stretch because the total amount of information increases (exponentially) even though the way it is expressed can increease or decrease depending on the compression.
The article goes on to describe the Hubble "law":  "where the galaxies move away from one another with velocities that grow in proportion to their distances. So, an observer sees a galaxy that is twice as far away from a closer one move away (or recede) twice as fast."  Which raises some issues which are so large and so important relative to explaining F-series solutions that it requires a separate post.
The broad issue is that in diverging solution (over values of x) the number of ct1 solutions between two points (or galaxies in this case) must increase, but the absorption of these ct1 states only changes based on velocity of the point in question.  Velocity (ct1 absorbtion) is relative as well as important internally, just as gravity generating features relate to the change in ct1 between the two points (m1*m2/r^2 is solved relative to ct1 loosely in book 1 and book 2 and is a major source of the treament coming out in book 3).
A quantum universe means that locational features can be solved at quantum instances, but gravity does not exist except as a solution on the quantum scale because at any quantum point the solution is fixed even though the order of solution and the compression of the solution are different between any two points of necessity.
Hence, you have to depart from the quantum view if a single ct1 is added, and look at the difference between the two solutions where the ct1 affects the distance of both by only 1 solution order.  The gravitational effect and the display effect are, based on non-quantum phenomena are displayed based on the difference and not some elasticity between solutions. 

And here is something worth listening to this week:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wqg4taiLRRE
The only difference between this and the better eric clapton stuff is the guitar volume is turned up a little higher, anyway that's what I think.
^

AuT: Book 1 2nd edition live

After a couple of unexplainable formating issues, the second edition print copy is finally ready, before the end of the month as hoped for.
All of this went into the amended grant proposal which is now winging its way into that dark abyss that is the review system as my 3rd grant application.  The first one, which I largely forgot about, was economic in nature, the second was on the early part of this theory a couple of years ago when it was not a broad or specific as it is now, although it was largely accurate back then.  Yesterday, I started on the audio version, dictating a draft of the first chapter which will probably be ready in June if things don't mess me up, but until then, the basic concept, the e=mc^2, the overflowing bathtub eureka version is available on amazon as both a print and a digital version.
There are half a dozen more drawings and a lot more preamble to book 2 which is also available in the first edition.  I suspect after I dictate the live version there will be a third edition of book 1 and a second of book 2 but nothing dramatic.  The rest of the drama will come from the following books in the series which can be previewed in spirals in amber 2nd edition although why anyone would do that is beyond me.  There are portions of this work scattered now among 3 books at least and until the anthoogy is published (when and if) that work will largely remain in the shadows of out of publish work since I'm trying to minimize orders of out of date work on this subject.  That isn't to say there are not important features in those books, only that they are too old and out of date to use as a primary reference and I hope to drag out what is important from those as I move forward, especially if someone decides to provide some financial support to the theory that describes (in unflatering terms) our state of existence.
I'm working on a screen play for Notes on Venus which is also available (after 51 years) although it could also be a better  book if I get to a third edition.  This effort at self funding my life without the distractions of a normal day job are not expected to bear much fruit and I will, like all eclectic geniuses of my ilk wind up in a ditch somewhere from where my bones can be picked by historians in the future who will wonder why there are not videos of my physics lectures in existence.

Through a publishing error (of mine) the cover of the second print edition has the name and my name in there twice (see above) so if you order a hard copy you want to get one of these.  The kindle edition looks pretty much like the original kindle edition until you open it up and see all the clarified writing and extra pictures with better captions.    If you ordered any of the other editions, you can bring them by and I'll give you one of these and sign both copies for you or you could just order the up to date copy to make my life in the ditch a little more comfortable.

AuT Book 1 Second Edition published and the end of the world

It took 10 years for Einstein to write revolutionary work in full time. Aut was not begun in earnest until 2014 and hence is a mere 2 years old. The Einstein Hologram Universe, the predecessors was not written until September 2013, so even assuming that date it has been less than 4 years.  However this text (books 1 and 2) already defines the universe we experience in quantum moments and by way of a well-defined algorithm rendered complicated by the inherent infinite converging series embodied within the algorithm.  There are few of the mysteries of other theories that have survived as mysteries of Algorithm Universe Theory.

AuT Book 1 Second edition is now published, is live on Kindle.  It will take a little longer for the print edition, but that should be ready before the end of the month, all on schedule.

Notes on Venus, the second edition print edition is also available as of this morning (it was already out on Kindle).

It's time to get to work on Book 3 which will cover some items not completed in Book 1.  I did have to stop short of some of the less important, but interesting portions I wanted to add-I was seriously too distracted to read something technical, but book 3 will bring a lot of this together and a lot of new stuff.

I'm going to discuss a few articles, but I have to write some.  I may take my romance/port writing down a peg because its just not getting cranked out fast enough and is becoming something of a distraction as a result.  It's like the young adult book where basically I had to write the whole thing, except in this case it is almost worse (not quite but almost) because the story plot gets rewritten long after I"ve planned what to do based on the plot that was in place with these time jogs that are a bit disconcerting.  I can't complain however, because they are something from my writing perspective, that is unique. Over the next week or two I'll finish my two week screenplay course because that's all the time I have to finish it.

The big issue is do I do the second edition of wwII or wwc next.  I think I already know the answer to this, but it's still a question to answer.  It will be some time I think before I start on a wholly new book, the idea of writing quests into books that I was given applies particularly well to these two books and both need to be finished before I move on to anything else.

But there are other obligations to keep.

http://www.businessinsider.com/brian-greene-universe-expansion-big-rip-2017-5

AuT provides an explaination of this speeding up of expansion by the creation of more ct1 with each increase in x, but that is not the end game of the universe which the other evidence indicates will reach an inflection point in 14 billion years and start to collapse again.  It's quaint to see what these brilliant physicsts are floundering with pre AuT concepts.  If I had all of the evidence, it would probably provide a lot of insight into how AuT is operating, but unless Brian decides to invite me to speak at his little conclave, it's unlikely that will happen this month.
AuT requires to a large extent the growth of information which pressures the universe towards expansion and then compression stages, but there is a bit of a fly in the ointment (or several flies) that only access to more information will provide.



http://www.highsnobiety.com/2017/05/06/what-happens-when-the-universe-ends/

This cheeful video describes a different view, an opposite view of the universe which is, happily, also wrong.  This shows the universe going out like a light bulb, something it would have done in last dozen or so big bangs if that were going to happen.
Instead, what will happen is between these two articles.  The universe will expand for another 14 billion years, then contract for 18 billion years and then expand again.  Will stars burn out? Yes.  Will other stars form?  Yes.  Will we see even denser concentrations?  Of course those things will happen, it's pretty unlikely we (humans) will see any of that because we'll all be dead long before either of these histories comes to anything because we don't have true logic or we'd have come up with a better way to live a long time ago, at least in the last few years.  But who knows, the night is still young.

What's left of Book 1 and Notes from Venus

So today I finished the next draft of AuT Book 1.  I have three sections to edit.
One of the three sections is on time dilation and aging which is a complicated section because I need to work through the two aspects of time dilation.
Let me explain.
ct1 exchange is pure exchange.  Any two ct1 states are identical in all respects.  Hence ct1 substitutions can be speed, but only the higher substitutions can result in the degredation that results in aging.  The higher the substituion ct state the more degredation that would be possible.
 This means that movement relative to a carrier spiral of a high ct state ages the state through degredation and that movement along the carrier is only possible where shared ct1 take the place of outside ct1 states.  Hence both aging and speed free ct change are possible based on pure ct1 states.
The most logical explanation of aging may continue to result from the absence of relative change while speed can result from ct1 exchange because of its purity.  The nucleus with its ct5 aspects complicates this analysis.
The examination will be covered in more detail in the book, the last really complex portion of the book to write, despite the other two sections.
Internal ct1 substitution does not, in such a case, age quicker than external ct1 substitutions, but higher ct substitutions have no effect on speed, but do affect aging and the experience of time alternatively, the more movement, the less time that is lost, the less movement, the more sharing of higher ct states and internatl high ct states along a common carrier and the more aging.
It is a concept that requires a bit of explanation and it will be coming in the second edition of book one.
I have finished one thing, however.   The second edition of notes on Venus is now on sale and submitted to the competition which may accomplish nothing, but it is, after all done.

Notes on Venus

.

Notes on Venus

Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 3

Ok, here's the last post dealing with information theory outside of AuT's more accurate treatment.  I'm not saying everyone else in wrong, I'm just saying my theory says they are. 

"the arrow of increasing quantum entanglement underlies the expected rise in entropy"
This is, of course, nonsense.  There is no "rise in entropy" in AuT because there is no entropy.  Yes, a hot cup of coffee gets cold, but that is a localized result of the algorithm which makes zero difference over time.  The universe is made up of a diverging infinite series (the increase in x) and a converging infinite series (increased compression).  Within this model the net compression or decompression cycle occurs so that at times things expand and at times they contract, but the two controling series provide a supersymmetry so that entropy is an illusion.  Quantum entanglement is more elusive to me than bozons, because I have not ruled out QE which leads to this next quote:

"the global entropy of the universe stays forever zero..."  This is correct, there is no entropy, so it is at zero, but this is net.   However, this indicates that there is a recognition of the two converging series, they just don't understand how they converge and I do, of course.

"Now in information theory, we wouldn’t say entropy is a property of a system, but a property of an observer who describes a system."  This is intriguing, but it's also nonsense.  The individual aspects of the algorithm are solved for points.  Relativity of observation is imporatnt, but the solution for any point may be solved (in theory and estimated in reality because the numbers are too large to truly solve it except at the beginning numbers of x (note that seconds are created far later when things are too complicated to solve) without reference to an observer.

"information, energy and other “conserved quantities,” which can change hands but never be destroyed," is only sort of worth considering.  Information changes.  It increases in quantity.  Energy is an effect of the algorithm and a red hering for anyone wanting to understand the underlying symmetry.

"a hypothetical quantum system that uses information as a sort of currency for trading between the other, more material resources."  This is sort of rigth, not not really.  Let's read on...
"...the quantum information describing the particles’ energy and spin states can act as a kind of currency that enables trading between the reservoir’s energy and angular momentum supplies."  The right idea is tantilizingly close, but they still can't get past that energy and state (call it spin if you must, ct state is more accurate) are really things.  They are just manifestations of solutions to the equation.

"...many theorists have come to believe that space-time, the bendy fabric of the universe, and the matter and energy within it might be a hologram that arises from a network of entangled quantum information.

Ok, ok, the is AuT.  I admit it.  It's not exactly right, but its close enough that I can't really argue with it.  Do they have the specifics?  No.  Do they understand how it works? No.  But they are looking at it right, a "network of entagled quantum information" if (and only if) you interpret entangled correctly, which they don't.  The matrix is heavily entangled, but not in the way that it is treated by these physicsts.  The true matrix is the manifestation of the Algorithm, it's a solution, not a tangle.

"Knowing the logical links between the concepts could also help physicists reason their way inside black holes, mysterious space-time swallowing objects that are known to have temperatures and entropies, and which somehow radiate information."
Or then again, you can just read my books (wait for the second edition of book 1, it'll be out by the end of the month) and you'll see that someone has already reasoned his way inside, me.  That, by the way, was done in book one and spirals in amber before that and really was essentially done even though the math wasn't finished, all the way back to the Einstein Hologram Universe.

It is, so frustrating to read these articles and wonder who the bozons are that publish them without reading my work.

Transitioning between book1 and book 2 part 2

 I'm watcing "crime of passion" the old barbara stanwyk movie.  I really enjoy watching these well written movies and I especially like the strength of character.  The people involved in this unfairly poorly (not highly) rated movie is impresive.
This raises the recurring issue of how super symmetry yields the depth of self determination, especially with such a minimal variety of information states.  There is, of course, quite a bit of variety within the few states.  The idea is that, like the characters in crime of passion, have so many layers and interweaves, such constant substitutions that all the variety we experience seems seemless rather than quantum steps.
The idea of self awareness coming up spontaneously is, by some of you, considered unlikely, and yet we see the exact same thing as inevitable in computers.  Computers are run by a set program and when enough synapses inter-connect and enough information is introduced, we see this AI as being inevitable.  The interweave of information is so much greater in AuT than in any computer, but this depth is reflected in lesser systems of self awareness.  The evolution of the process includes sequentially more compressed information states which leads to greater impressions of self awareness and organization that underlies the AI that we represent.  Something to think about.
I have not, by the way, forgotten my article on the article on other information theory.  
Continuing in the overlapping portions between the two books.

1.     Ct4 minimum size is not observed easily, instead what we see are neutrons which split into electrons and protons and to a lesser extent these can be split, at least temporarily into quark like states, which we pretty much know are just transitional states which are misinterpreted as pre AuT nonsense because the model was not previously available.

2.     The minimum size can be seen most clearly in the electron and now that we know (from book 2) that protons are derived from exposing ct3 states to ct5 effects, we can see why the fast moving electrons are most closely associated with the minimum size ct4 state.  The reason we know this derives logically from AuT. Minimum size of any compression state is the fastest moving state for that particle and any transition beyond that would result in acceleration to the speed of light.  Hence, as you accelerate a proton, by way of example, it will stretch in terms of ct1 to ct4 minimum size solution until you have a single line of ct4 minimum states which will, at the inflection point, transition one at a time to wave states (ct3).  This is the reason that as you accelerate, matter appears to stretch in length.  While electrons do not move at the speed of light in a perfect vacuum free from other influences it likely would approach that speed due to the changing geometry of the interaction.

Each of the states, whether ct1-ct6 or beyond have their own pi so interactions must be averaged in determining the effect of the geo function on any collection of points.  Logic (of AuT) governs the minimum transition size is at maximum acceleration  because slowing is equal to sharing of ct1 so compression to a proton or neutron is the result of increased sharing of ct1 state, which means increased aging and relative slowing to the surround ct1 matrix.

Transitioning between book1 and book 2 part 1 (note I've changed the name but not the content of this post)

Today I hit the half-way point in the edit of the second edition of book 1.

As you can imagine, there is increasing overlap with book 2, although I try to keep the two separate.

There is a lot going on as the universe tries to distract me from finishing the project but since I may or may not have that luxury (certainly this isn't putting any food on the table); I share with you, in celebration of hitting the half way mark; a portion of the section dealing with curvature of space.

In this section, the ideas from book 2 on the arising forces from ct change (see the book, since you were too lazy to give any comments) are applied to the curvature equations and analysis of book 1.

Spoiler alert:  The last paragraph is the one with the big bang in it.

Enjoy:

5.    Aut-defining Pi

a)     Curvature changes from one ct state to the next.  The preferred formula for pi in AuT is:

Pi=n+(from 2 to max x)N/F(pix)

f(pix)=[(-1)^x]+[2x(-1)^x-1]

note this is a type of the f-series (x and x-1); it is also a reflection of following out along positive and negative spirals outward from a central point.

Pi is considered to be a function of separation as well as the overall value of x, but is driven by the primary equation.

N changes according to the amount of coordinate compression for the given value of N.

b)     The relevance of the order of solution to defining location is fixed by the mechanism of stacking the two prior universes to get the next universe.  

c)     The closer two solutions occur together the closer the proximity; diverging and converging spirals ensures separate points may come together.  The sharing of ct1 states in particular ensures higher CT states can remain together for very long periods.  The longest carriers are multiples of the life of any intermediary period between big bangs because of exponential stacking in F-series solutions to make carriers.

d)     This separation is important because the solution for any intersection of any two spirals of pi for that intersection involves both the separation (based on the order in which the solutions are solved) and amount of information possible based on state of the proximate information in question.  The basic equation for gravity m1*m2/r^2 averaged over the entire universe is relevant to the inquiry but it is solved with a Lorentz equation so that distant solutions can have a disproportionate effect.  Because of the density (16^32) of information in black holes two black holes separated by galactic distances might have a greater effect on one another than the matter in between just as two bodies of matter have a greater effect on one another notwithstanding the wave, photonic and space effects between them.

e)     The equations defining pi for different ct spiral states are suggested by the size and direction of the phase shift related to coordinate change.  This could result in a reversal of the calculation process which is not considered likely but is worth setting out:

Ct1 -1+1/3-1/5+1/7….

Ct2 2-2/3+2/5-2/7…

Ct3 -3+3/3-3/5+3/7…

Ct4 4-4/3+4/5-4/7…

Ct5 -5+5/3-5/5+5/7

While pi builds in this fashion, Pi=n+(from 2 to max x)N/F(pix), when measuring it, a backwards look might make more sense given the strength of the more highly compressed ct5 state.

Perhaps the most important part of this, covered in more detail in book 2, is that the electromagnetic force seems to result from ct2 being exposed to pi from ct4; the weak nuclear force (slowed emf) is caused from having ct2 exposed to pi from ct5; and the strong nuclear force results from ct3 being exposed to pi from ct5.  The exact mechanism for this is the variation in the geo function for solutions where a certain concentration achieves a critical concentration inflection point.

The second edition of book 1 should be available by June 1, in the interim, please enjoy book 2 and this blog.

Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 2

Perhaps in the next two weeks I'll have published the second edition of book 1, with new drawings and much cleared up language.
But for the moment, let's talk about those who are close.  Tne information theorists who are not AuT theorists are the subject of this article.
They are open, let's be fair, but the difference is that information theorists tend to look at information as a part of the universe, instead of the result of a very specific underlying design. 
I attribute their failure to be on board with AuT the result of two things.  The first is that they've never seen it.  Reasonable enough.  The second might be because the design, being so obvious and simple, is considered at first glance too simple.  The beauty to the extent that there is any, in AuT is that it yields a "non-divine" randomly generated universe.  This neither rejects nor disproves the idea of god, since the body of pre-existence that holds the algorithm and feeds the single variable is largely consistent with an unfeeling god-like quality.  
It neither cares nor controls us, but it does allow for the aspects of the universe that create us.
Anyway, the purpose of this blog is to improve the understanding of ... well everything, and since we're going to use this article for that purpose, let's look at some quotes:

"... that energy spreads to cold objects from hot ones because of the way information spreads between particles."
This is accurate and inaccurate (under AuT for purposes of this post).  It is true because the results of the algorithm govern all things, including heat transfer which, of necessity, happens along ct1 exchanges, fundamentally and relative to relative solution order (you have to look at books 1 and 2 for this, although it's covered with some additional pictures for book 1 as amended).  It's also covered pretty well in Spirals, 2nd edition.
"According to quantum theory, the physical properties of particles are probabilistic; instead of being representable as 1 or 0, they can have some probability of being 1 and some probability of being 0 at the same time."
Wrong.  There is no probability, there is only a solution.  Probability just means the non-AuT information theorists see information as something that is part of things, instead of things being the result of information.
Entanglement-This is a troubling aspect of AuT.  Matched spiral sets seem to cover some of this, but it isn't true entanglement.
"A central pillar of quantum theory is that the information—the probabilistic 1s and 0s representing particles’ states—is never lost."
Absolutely correct, but still wrong!  Of necessity under F-series definitions,  the present state of the universe preserves all information about the past, although its relevance becomes less important and the ability to follow it backwards is very difficult because of the offsets inherent and because of how the information is buried and outweighed.  Moreover, for any quantum state, the information building it changes as the spirals making it up change.  Only fundamental space remains unaffected in this analysis and that is a very small part of what is looked at..
AuT explains exactly how this is accomplished with sequential quantum states.
"Over time, however, as particles interact and become increasingly entangled, information about their individual states spreads and becomes shuffled and shared among more and more particles."
Tue and false.  There is a very dense amount of overlap at successively compressed states, but this varies quite a bit, especially since there is compression, what they are talking about and decompression, the opposite result.  Moreover, we are actually in a decompression phase and later, only later, with compression of the type they are talking about become the greater force.
There is a lot to come on this article, but this is where we'll stop tonight.

Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 1

       In an earlier post, I opined that most of physics is 10 years behind me, but there is a reason to say that 3-5 is the proper balance.  Such is the next article I'm going to deal with.

     Again, the primary problem here is not that they physicists are not on the right track.  Other than not have the specific model incorporated into AuT what they discuss is information as a part of the universe.
    The problem is that they are stuck on space time as an aspect of it.  Peter Hanggi has part of the answer when he says that the universe isn't "a giant quantum information processor instead of a physical thing." but he says it against information theory instead of realizing that he is merely looking at the result.
    Of course the Universe isn't a processor, the universe is nothing more than the output form the processor.  And perhaps those two things are not so different.  
Now Hanggi would probably not like this use of his position,  but that's where he's right.  He is not otherwise wrong, because the unvierse does exist; but he doesn't get how you can have it both ways.  The universe is the result of a single variable algorithm, but the texture of it is so thick from the overlapping solution that it appears durable to those of us in it.
    Now I'm not a member of the European research network dedicated to this issue, but when I finish with the rewrite of book 1, I'll send it to them, perhaps.
If they read it they will say, oh we sort of knew that all along, but of course the do and they don't.  They are trying to make information a part of everything else, they are still working with forces that do things and Aut knows that forces only reflect things that are aleady done.

Oh here is the article: https://www.wired.com/2017/05/happens-mix-thermodynamics-quantum-world-revolution/ which was republished from Quanta Magazine, which is somehow related (paid for ?) to the Simons Foundation.

These people are my people, perhaps.


This article shows how close physics is coming to AuT.  They started from the same direction I did, but they haven't figured out it is the wrong way, yet.
The only break between quantum information theory of thermodynamics and AuT is one of perspective.  AuT started by recognizing there was a serious problem with spacetime, a recognition that dated back 2500 years, but still a serious problem.

In Part 2 we'll discuss the article in more detail.

AuT-beginning book 3-another article

I was supposed to finish up the second edition of book one this weekend, but the primary problem in my life decided I needed more distraction, so...maybe next week.
Before I get to some of the new stuff for book 3 (which was originally the second half of book two, I want to mention some "cool stuff" about book 2 since you have asked.
Basically what I did was, after defining the specifics of the origin of gravity, putting magnetism in terms of AuT; I showed the relationship between electro-mag and the strong force, like anyone could have done that.
Oh surely I am light years ahead of everyone else.
All of science is fumbling around and I have the answers.  It is refreshing, and unrewarding.

http://www.sciencealert.com/how-much-do-we-really-know-about-the-speed-of-light
So this article shows how far physicists will go to cling to space time being sacroscint.  Empty space filled with quantum fluctuations?  You're so close, except that empty space is quantum fluctuations, well, information providing a space in the order of solutions and it does affect the speed of light, since light, speed and even spacetime cease to exist in the ct1 state.
It does rather make me want to scream.  You'll notice I've printed like 7 books and the last  pretty much deal with these in detail and where are the articles on me?  No, we have to treat light speed as if it's some bizarre, unexplainable space time thing.  Not.  It's 1 in 256 substitutions of ct1 from an alligned state.
We really need to sit down together one day and discuss this.
Now it would be one thing to unify the forces, which is more or less done; but to show where high states arise and what the forces are from the standpoint of a pure informational system...well, that's just surprising.
Anyway, one day perhaps someone will print an article about my work, but for now, the major press apparently thinks that I'm not adding anything to the huge body of science fiction that mainstream physics is serving up despite addressing what black holes are and their relationship to the strong nuclear force most recently and, of course, describing what light speed is and is not.
So, I'm a third of the way through the edits of book 1 second edition and some time this month I hope to finish it, in the interim, I'm just beginning on book 3.

AuT and Comments on articles

Occasionally, it's worth looking at what other people are saying because they get everything wrong and its weird.  When I read these articles I realize I'm not 5 years ahead of everyone else, its more like 10.
But that isn't the problem here.
The conceptual problem with AuT isn't its inherent accuracy.  You, especially you who have read the second edition (not out yet, but in limited circulation) of the first book and the second book understand that observations match the theory.  That's the reason to discuss the findings in other articles, because those observations should be reconciled with AuT.
What's good about this process is that in most cases, the inconsistencies in prior art are actually suggested by AuT.  Where that isn't the case, the observations are wrong, of course, but the theory is not yet perfect.
The biggest problem that you and the other scientists have is that the big leap (which is also present in traditional physics) is that you have to accept that given the initial formula, after x reaches a very large number, you end up...here!  That's not an easy pill to swallow.  The size of x in the present case defines at quantum instances the entire universe.  Harder still, if you began all over, you woudl end up with the exact same universe.  Identical in every respect.
But as absurd as it seems, think about this.  In an organized universe, where true logic reigned, would you have the juxtaposition of Elizabeth Warren and Mitch McConnel? I don't believe so.  If we were truely ruled by absolute intellect instead of reflected intellect, then you would have some amalgam.  The only explanation for the lack of cohesion in a presumably evolved intelligence is that behind it there is something that forces stupidity into the system.  You don't have to pick sides to see this, you just look at the polarization of both sides.  If either one doesn't work for you, or if the combination doesn't make sense, there you have it.  I'm not wrong, unfortunately, but if I was wrong it would just mean that we're an ignorant, primitive lot that can't fix even our simple problems because we're too stupid.
Need more examples?  You could look at just about anything, living or dead, but politics is sort of fun.  How about the idea that we're sitting here looking at single payer health insurance working in every major country but the USA.  Now, putting aside the fact that they politicians (who are constantly needing to raise money) are bought and paid for by the insurance companies; how can we go in the opposite direction and why would we?  Don't get me wrong, the economic disruption of closing these insurance companies down would be enormous, but intelligent life could work through these things and would.
We are "intelligent," otherwise you would not be reading this.  But we are reflective intelligent.  We don't have actual self determination, but the compression of information is so deep that we appear to have it.  You don't have to look this deeply to see the difficulty.  Ignoring what I thought or felt, I made breakfast for dinner last night, went to sleep at 9 and woke up at 4:30 am and drank coffee I'd put in a glass jar the day before for that purpose.  Now I'm sitting here typing this (6am) with a cat sitting on my lap. What are the odds?  The answer has to be that the odds are 100%.  While a bit incredulous, even for me, we don't hesitate to accept those odds for the orbit of the earth, but to think that exactly these things must happen in exactly this way according to what appears to be a fairly simple algorithm based on self generating spiral solutions is difficult to accept conceptually, but it is there none the less.  Accept it, reject it, doesn't matter.  I am here, because for whatever reason, the solution requires that I present it to you at this point in time.  Why?  Perhaps it's equally valid to ask "why not?"
So these articles don't give the technical specifications so the responses are not technical. I'm going to accept that when you walk outside and feel the wind on your face and look up into the sky through tree leaves, you can't accept it as a specific mathematical result originating from a single formula with one variable solving for everything that happens to be.  Just like, if you're in the united states, you can't accept that when one payer health care works for the rest of the world, it just can't work here or that the best of the best are the choices for president, senator, house member are just too hard to find so you need the collection of clowns that currently run the country and that we are, as a result, that much better than the rest of the world.  You can't accept predestination, I can't accept that logic dictates this result.

https://futurism.com/ripples-in-space-time-might-indicate-that-we-live-in-a-multiverse/
Pre AuT math says there shoudl not be bursts of light between black hole interactions.  AuT suggests just the opposite.  Now you don't have "black holes combining" per say (although book 2 suggests in the presence of ct6 you'll get that result at some sort of super heavy nucleus) but the degredation of the surrounding material yielding light is what the theory is all about.  You have the unwinding spirals of ct4, you get ct3 in massive quantities, and if these unwind you get light or ct2.  Why shouldn't there be bursts of light around  black hole interactions?

http://trendintech.com/2017/05/10/scientists-may-have-just-revealed-evidence-of-the-multiverse/

This is a cold spot article.  It is used by pre-AuT math to ask, does this show there is a multiverse complete with time travel and the other nonsense of pre-AuT math?  Are there "vibrating strings" (something that sounds like it comes from a seance and not physics).  Well the strings are for the next article, but in AuT aberrations of emptiness are not unexpected.  The whole idea of stack more or less requires that there be enormous densities of nothing since if you stack two empties together you necessarily end up with lots more emptiness than you started with. (n=N-1+n-2).  It also requires you get lots of density stacking and if there's a place where the theory needs some answers it's why we don't keep getting more and more dense instead of merely moving.  It's a puzzle, but it's there in the math somewhere.  Perhaps the answer is that you have to move to make room for the density in history, I don't know.  I will soon enough.
The entire idea behind reconciling this universe is that enormous aberrations must come to exist as a result of the massive compression of information and the ongoing decompression that accompanies it because otherwise apparent randomness, entropy, and thought would not exist.

http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/there-are-in-fact-2-dimensions-of-time-one-theoretical-physicist-states
This theory shows everything that AuT disproved, vibrating strings.  Yes, I looked at that, vibration, but then where the quantum states.  It was so obviously a dead end, I have to ask myself...10 years?  How did you not see AuT in all that time?
Of course, the dual time people are about in the pantheon of gods group.  There is no time, per se.  There is a single variable governing the uninverse in quantum steps which is sort of a time, but time is nothing more than the relative change of one spiral to another resulting from the single variable changes.  It's space too.
Dimension?  The biggest illusion of all.  I can't go over all of this since it's a 100 plus page book, but the idea of dimensions is totally accepting reality as a given in which case you might as well say god made it all, we'll just accept it.  Dimensions don't even work out.  How?  Why?  There are not answers to those questions.  Dimensions are too fluid, other than time.  AuT shows how dimensions are merely changes and all of those in a single direction.  Yes you can move backward or stop, but only relative to things that are moving at the speed of light.  Absolution stop? Absolute moving backwards, can't be done and AuT explains precisely why.  Otherwise, we could do all the nonsense in these articles (travel in time, etc).
The gazillion (well 13) dimesnion universe actually does exist, but not the way set out in this article.  It's 1,11,111,1111 to infinity.  It is 1200 AD mathematics, not something fancy that has strings, dimensional strings vibrating way (vibrating away in what?  3 dimensional space?  The whole concept reeks of snakes eating themselves).
If these are the best math models available today then I"m 10 years ahead of everyone else.

AuT-The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 10 of 10

Oh no he didn't
Yes, from the guy who compared Bozons to Quantum ducks
(quark quark, you're all bozon's on this bus)
It is sad, that the most advanced physics theory in existence is in the hands of a practical joker.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B071L7Z1DY
Well, there is it, you've done it again.
Har har
The most brilliant mind in physics, the worst sense of humor.  Well, that's half right anyway.  (Ba Da Bum)
I don't get any respect, but if you want to see what you are, it's there.

Waiting for nothing?

I can see from the lack of comments that you are not satisfied there is anything more to come, even though I know you are dying to know if there is anything of value.
Do you really think there is nothing?
How about how Protons and Neutrons exist?  I explain that in some detail.
It's really just sad.  You can't really torture me with your silence, my version of the universe renders that irrelevant.
So what am I supposed to talk about until I get around the next edition?
There is certainly a lot to talk about.
So my buddy (he doesn't know I exist even though my physics is 5 years ahead of his) Hawkins said we needed to leave the earth like two days after my book on terraforming venus was published.  If you wanted something to read while you're waiting to find out what anti-gravity is (since you won't post comments-too timid?  How about me?  I have to write this stuff) you can order that one (notes on Venus) off of Amazon.
I had this idea about building a new radio being a thing at the end of one of the books that I thought would be a nice touch.  I'm going to enter it into a book contest.
So here's a funny thing:
I can enter books and poems in virtually every category in this contest.  That's worth mentioning, maybe.
It's about making a living, not necessarily fame.  Right now, I could, with a few well placed comments (from others) achieve in life the greatness that undoubtedly awaits me in death.  The reason I don't worry about that is because I am grossly aware of the fact that in a universe powered by irony you can't really expect, at the top of the food chain, to be treated well.
Now I know what you're thinking.  Isn't Bill Gates at the top of the food chain, or the guys that started facebook or google?  All they have is money (and the stuff that goes with it).  Irony awaits them in the form of a french revolution style reshuffling of wealth when they'll be put to work in coal mines, apparently.
No, I'm intellectually (not intelligence, mind you, but in the understanding of the super symmetry of the universe)  at the top of the food chain which means that the universe will constantly taunt me with all the material riches of the universe without delivering.
I am bitter, of course, but my understanding of the universe means that I understand the irrelevance of both bitterness and intelligence.
All the pap about an afterlife fades before my vision.  Originally, I could at least cling to the Einstein model that the present continued to exist, but I now know that even if it does after a fashion (2 plus 2 equaling whatever it actually equals continues to exist, but it's soon lost as this sentence moves in to the past) it is nothing more than the stuff that dreams were made of, not even what they are made of today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa89bt0GZvQ&index=2&list=RDN_ZG6tRGMYk

Pausing to consider what happens next

I will, finish up book 2 over the next week or two.
However, that doesn't mean I'm going to post the last post (10 of 10) in this series.
I am toying with the idea of publishing book 2 (I'm on page 22 of the 106 page edit) or perhaps part of it (for example the first 22 pages) because in the next section I not only explain the generation of the higher forces, but what anti-gravity is and how to get it.
It seems sort of unfair to everyone who comments on my work to put it up here for everyone to read.
I must think about this.
Nothing is really hidden by this, it is merely the truculent nature of the unrecognized genius or whatever I'm determined to be (mad man, genius, spoiled child, etc).
I am a bit irritated at the universe for making things too difficult for me right now anyway and you being a part of that universe may just have to suffer or, of course, you could buy the book when I get around to publishing it.
It gives one pause.
Now if there were to be enough comments from enough countries, saying, for example, it appears as if you are on to something or perhaps, you are clearly the next step in the ladder from Archimedes to...well to me, or even, "why am I reading this tripe" then it would certainly obligate me somewhat to my loyal fan base.
I can tell you that the basic concept is already before you, and although the leap from there to where all things become clear is a short one, if you want me to show it to you, I think a little effort on your part is warranted.
So, I leave it to you.  You may post your comments stating whatever your belief (madman, genius, or merely that you are curious to see what comes next) or you can wait for the publication of the book, or perhaps for me to get past this truculent moment.
P.S. for those of you from Russia, the post is already loaded and you can just hack it if that works for you.

Sunday post 2 part 1

Congradulations to France, I hope.  At least your president wasn't preceded and followed by a joke on the Simpsons.  Of course, humor has never been healthier in this country.

Before finishing up with the Force section, which is largely finished and intuitively complete anyway, I want to chat about some observations in AuT vs Pre-AuT physics.  I won't necessarily answer any questions, but I'll deal with some issues presented from an AuT perspective.  AuT has now essentially covered the transition, although the equations giving rise to that coverage are primarily dealt with from the mirror and not the image.

The three parts of AuT developed, the building of information, the compression of information and the derivation of forces of information present a unique view of the universe and the goal at this point is to reconcile this view to the point where we can use the results more effectively.

The first article deals with quantum entanglement.
https://skullsinthestars.com/2017/05/06/what-is-quantum-entanglement-part-3-entanglement-at-last/

When we look at "discrete bits of matter" and see the wave qualities, we are seeing what AuT and Einsteinian physics says matter is, wave energy.  The difference is that AuT describes this process in terms of information theory alone, while Einsteinian physics looks at it in terms of space time.
The wave elements of matter do exist at the same time as the non-wave elements.
Moreover there is a regular substitution of states meaning that ct3 and ct4 exist togeter especially over the long periods of time in which they are observed.
What we see with magnetism, is that this features of sharing extends around the perceived perimeter.  This is not a "probability" matter, but is instead a calculable feature of algorithm solutions.  We know that in AuT every point at a quantum moment has a specific place it has to be, just as we know that every point changes at the same rate at the ct1 level since there is onlh one variable.  The failure of space time at the ct1 level does not mean that spacetime doesn't exist at the other levels, but it does mean that the very fast changes when time is in place, the 10-37th of a second change, mean that no matter how fast we've looked at change in the past, we're forced to accept an average value of time merely because we can't look at it fast enough (except mathematically) to see anything other than an integrated view of chnge over a high value of x which leads to misleading results.
The problem is that pre-aut, we're stuck with probable outcomes because we are not looking at how the specific outcomes are determined.  We are saying, they are force driven and our understanding of forces is limited.  In Aut we are saying that forces are the results of mathematical calculations and while based on converging infinite series, they are capable of specific results, at least in theory, impractical because it requires a calculation that is too large to determine with specificity with the technology we are liable to have.
The problem with pre AuT analysis is that quantum analysis fails to recognize that at a short enough time frame, time and space cease to exist.
So on to spin.  "Spin of quantum particles is a fixed quantity, based on h-bar (planck's constant) that does not vary but may be positive or negative.
Trying to fit these very large conglomerations of ct4 into some sort of organization begs the question, does spin relate to positive vs negative spirals, compression vs decompression or something totally different?  The same analysis applies to what is a positron vrs an election.
Quantum entanglement looking at the relationship between a P/E pair from a single pion fails under AuT analysis, only to the extent that the derivation of states varies according to the prior information giving rise to both the negative and positive states in a spiral pairing, shown in a simplied version below.

A common result in this situation can be coincidental.
Instantaneous change is a necessity since change occurs independent of space time, but why should two ends of the math solution be tied together.

AuT-formula of gravity-The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 9 of 10

Before we move on to the higher forces, we have to recognize that the nature of the algorithm governs them.  So everything is compressed and everything converges.
Therefore, the differentiation equation giving rise to gravity will be the equation that is compressed to yield the equation for all the other forces more or less.
It is, of course, not as complicated as would make me feel comfortable.  My original equations covered blackboards and essentially led nowhere.  There were pieces and parts everywhere.  Those pieces and parts, like the evolving definition of pi remain because we don't have absolutes in a converging universe.  Curvature changes.
But the underlying equation, like those for the conversion of the various types of information can be easily written.
So in the last post, and apparently it went right by everying, I described this process graphically.
If we have two masses far away from everything but space, then you have m1 and m2 and if they are held stationary relative to each other for a period of time (they will move, of course, with each change in x) each absorbs a certain amount of ct1 in order to maintain stable position to one another and to present unraveling.  This absorbtion is both internal, sharing ct1 states between different ct2 spirals, and external, corresponding with movement relative to everything else and each other.
Of course, if other ct states are present and stable to each other, those also must be absorbed in a manner to maintain a steady state and that, in fact, occurs with ct4 but we are going to use two stable quantum ct4 states in space to minimize distractions.  To make it even less complicated we are going to use quantum ct4 states.  It seems likely that quantum ct4 doesn't exist in a vaccum because it appears, and observations show that quantum ct4 states require a substitution rich orbit of ct3 states, ct2 states.
However, this analysis applies to ct2 states, but since those don't experience mass the same way and since it appears that they change relative to each other more immediately, that is they move relative to one another more with each change in x due to the effection of convergence, you probably don't get as clean an approximation as you do with the larger mass states.  In other words, this process with ct2 states would be cleaner and would include the same perturbation that you see with the geo function based on the evolving solution of pi which is driven by the changes in the amount of information (essentially a function of, at this point in time, very large changes in the denominator making tiny changes in the value).
Knowing the net effect (the gravity equation) and that the change in ct1 over a value of x (time in this case is present since we have ct4 states) is equal to the gravitational force generated.  Mathematically then
dct1/dx=m1*m2/r^2.
The equation is using two different scales, but r is the number of ct1 states separating the two ct4 states.  The mass is proportional to (an equivalent of) the number of ct1 states making up the mass and that over a set time period these are exchanged externally at a set rate, an in particular between the two masses.
Movement and distance, it must be remembered, do not exist in ct1, but in ct2 or any spiral state, you have the necessary relative changes to give rise to space and time.
m1=yct1 changes per change in x, m2=zct1 changes per ct1 change and r=n1 where n1 is the number of ct1 changes between m1 and m2 if their locations remain fixed.  These are the variable giving rise to the equation above which looks like:
dct1/dx=yct1*zct1/n1^2=y*z/n1^2 for gravity for a fixed system.  Now dct1 represents the changes in the center as well as on either side.
d[F(ct1)]/dx=y*z/n1^2
This assumes every other element is equal in the exchange of information since, under the rules of super symmetry, all features affecting the two masses are part of the overall solution.  This analysis is the difference between AuT and forces.
integrating gravity  over time is a force.
In the quantum end of things integration is not relevant and mainly comes into play here if you are looking at a gravitational change which is  not immediately instructive of anything.
Differentiation requires that something changes in little bits, quantum mathematics being more or less perfect for this.
In this case what we are doing is not measuring the change in the force of gravity, which isn't a thing anyway, except to the extent that a shadow or reflection is something.  Instead, what we are looking at is how, as x changes at the quantum level how ct1, the quantum backbone of the universe, changes relative to higher ct states in a given scenario.  This is both simple and not as simple as it sounds.
The ct absorbtion rate for a given system is affected by the entire system.  In localized areas, such as our solar system, the rate change varies tremedously, as on the surface of the sun or deep solar system space.  But between any two higher states within the system, the exchange rate between them becomes less independent on the remaining portions of the system as they get closer together.
Gravity reflects the ct1 substitutuion rate and for stable orbits or acccumulations (planets or asteroids, for example) the substitution rates are fairly constant.  But gravity is affected by the stability or lack thereof of the other substituion rates that lead to forces, but these rates are substituion rates of the same type, often acting in concert with other substitution rates especially at stable relationships.
The overall substitution rate is heavily dependent on ct1 replacement rates, either shared, creating connectivity, or surrounding, creating movement.
Whether movement is involved on shared, however, the total ct1 change for a system creates a gravitational effect for the system and in this way the relative position of a higher ct state has shared ct1 states reflected in connectivity and exchanged ct1 states indicating movement and together, this constant rate change gives the system gravity.
When you look at the gravity equation in this light it can be seen that while you have a constant force of gravity (equal to one ct1 change per change in x), the way that exchange happens can yield a vastly different effect on the mass which is subject to the substitution.
One thing this says is that the gravity function of linearity is directly tied to the exchange of ct1 states for higher ct states.  Space has no gravity because it doesn't substitute for itself.
It also says that gravity is only one effect of the information exchange that is always going on for everything.  But it also says that gravity is tied to the other manifestations of information change at the quantum level.
The higher state exchanges, for waves, matter and black holes work the same generally but change relative to the scale of the exchange of information.
Hence we have an over-riding "force" which is actually a reflection, but that is implied in the AuT definition of force, matter, or anything else.  The over-riding force is ct1 exchange and we see that as gravity.
In wave forms this is complicated, but not replaced, by the addition of ct2 exchange which occurs less frenquently and therefore gives photons and waves the appearance of having the qualities of both when it is clear that they are as distinct as any other things, except that the change from 11 solutions to 111 solution and the resulting continuity of information provides a relative slowing along an access of the ct1 exchange with other ct1 states.  Waves "spread out" as a result and different non-photonic results are experienced.
These types of changes will become more pronounced so ct4 has ct3 exhanges, coupled with ct2 exchanges, presumably but not so obviously, that is we do not radiate light.  But we know the ct1 exchanges are happening, both mathematically (the constant change rate which is fundamental to a single variable universe) and because we don't see things standing still, everything moves (through space, spinning (which is a unique pattern of ct1 sharing that we will get to in later posts), vibrating, fusing, fissioning, and all those other things that reflect ct1 sharing.
In the higher states, the issue of sharing is complicated, but like the compression equation, it is a consistent result of the sharing of various elements with the given system.
Ultimately force can be solved for substitution rates included within the  rates.  We peel off the lowest substitution rate but it remains one of several and is therefore, of necessity, merely part of the solution to an equation for the universe as a whole, but with parts that have consistent types of results because substitution rates are consistent for different types of force within parameters since the equations underlying the substitution rates do not change.
The reason we see forces (keeping in mind the correct definition of force as a reflection of a mathematical result) differently is because ct1 sharing or substitution (sos) is different for ct1 coupled with ct2 subsitution.  Still more complicated is sos for ct3 coupled with ct2 couples with ct1.
Radiation, for example has movement from ct1 substitutions, the dissasociation of ct3 states from ct4 states while maintaining ct3 substitutions and almost certainly includes the ct2 disassociations although it is conceivable that they don't disassociate in every case from ct3 states.
If you go back to the crude deep cave filled with protons waiting to spontaeously end, which they do but only with sharing,  and dropped in some radioactives, you would see the sparks of light, the heat from waves and the resulting losses of mass.  The ct1 substitution changes, however, would happen on such small scales that they would likely be missed with the ct exchange changes, but they would be happening.
Gravity, like space, seems elusive; but, like space, it is the most simple version of information exchange.

Other forces though complicated, but can be determined in the same fashion, by reducing them to their ct exchange properties within quantum solutions.
You can pick one, but magnetism makes as good an example as any.  Since it is exponentially more complicated, there will be a plurality of ways of determining it.  These involve spatial curvature and hence they are tied to variable features of the universe.  Worse still this necessarily means that they are not tied to one method of calculation unless they are feduced to information changes.

Mecahnical force-F=[uH^2A]/2 is a function of Area, which is a function of but ct1 concentration and order of location.  Areas necessarily include compression although uncompressed areas are areas of ct1, space; H is a resulting Force called the magnetic field; u is the permeability of space, 4pix10^7 T-m/a.
Looking for these underlying forces you come up with
Magnetic moment is seen in terms of area, IA.
The current I is a converging series to get to an exact value.
Curent, therefore relies on curvature, separation and change over time, therefore over values of x.  Area varies according to separation and hence the order of a given number of points which are separated according to varying stages of compression.
Hence dct1/x is a =i*A which for two points held in place work something like this:
i(q)=F(geo(1)ct1p1-geo(2)ct1p2)
That is a quanum of current is measured according to changes in ct1(invisible) changing within a set curve relative to its prior position (or at least the tendency towards that change) over a value of x.  Space, in this sense is curved by the magnetism in the system.
While there is a great deal of interest in looking for positive and negative ct1 spirals in this process, and while the easiest explanation of the positive and negative aspects of this is to tie them to those spiral solutions, that is not absolutely necessary to arrive at a solution.
Magnetism cannot, like gravity, exist within a ct1-ct2 system.  Nor is it observed in a ct1-ct2-ct3 system although aspects of it are certainly present there.
The amount of curvature around a black hole is seen from our vantage point as relatively infinite although AuT shows it is quite far from infinite.
Here we are seeing the same thing from the ct3 point of view, matter, being exponentially higher compression, seems infinite and its attraction, actually absorbtion, of ct3 through substitution is very high, the exact order of ct1 substitution being defined by a substitution rate of ct1 below 1:256 underlying ct2 states which is calculated separately in this work as a multiple of each lower state.
What this means is that just as we see "light trapped" by ct5, so too do we see "ct3 trapped" (wave energies) by ct4.  Trapped, in this case, merely means that these higher concentrations of ct2 or ct3 are needed to satisfy the substitution rates required to maintain the stability of the the system.
If the substitution rates are not met, then the underlying higher state falls apart.
Here, what we seen is that the waves, being trapped by the ct4 state have quantum loops of ct1 sharing which can be disrupted, but in a vacuum follow a path defined by the quatum steps around the unit curve (Uc) where Uc is defined by the separation in terms of solution between the points between which the sharing occurs.
In the case of two quantum states of ct4 this process exists.
First we have F(g), the gravity between the two quantum points of ct4. dct1/dx=yct1*zct1/n1^2=y*z/n1^2 for gravity for a fixed system.  Now dct1 represents the changes in the center as well as on either side.
d[F(ct1)]/dx=y*z/n1^2
F(g) represents a set quantity of ct1 changed in a fixed spatial system.
Now were are saying that part of F(g) is the change of quantums of Ct(3) to add a charge to the system.
dct3/dx doesn't help because for current to exist these points must change relative to a point so:
integrating from x=1 to 3 for a P(ct4), for example you'd have Int[1,3](dct3/dx)=P(ct4);geo(y1)p(ct3)+P(ct4)geo(y2)P(ct3)+Pct4;geo(y3)pct3) and each step of difference is a quantum step and therefore very small relative to the highly curved space.
Since the substitutions of ct1 for the ct3 state are adjacent to the ct3 state at all points, they also appear curved giving the current the appearance of curvature even though it is a stepped and quantum process.  This is only half of the equation, however, because the points are also changing relative to their endpoint which is P(ct4)2, the opposite di-pole.
For this, it is understood that:
P(ct4) is a point of ct4
geo(y1-3) is the order of a given solution relative to P(ct4) as x changes from 1 to 3 where the quantum movement is along a varying curve, although the variations are essentially zero for all practical purposes at our levels of compression.
What we are doing here is coming up with a change within a closed system.
With higher forces what we're left doing is not just solving for the changes in CT1 to determine force, but determining what those changes are relative to different higher ct states over changes of x.  This is why gravity appears different, gravity can be determined relative to quantum moments, while other forces have to be determined over periods of changing higher states, so that both time and space figure into it.  This is not, however, a major difference, since time and space can be solved for ct1 and x.
Using the concept of implicit differentiation, theoretically all forces for a closed system (or with greater complexity for a more open system) can be solved implicity for ct1 and x.

This underlying concept forms the basis for Book 2, coming soon to a bookstore near you (really it's only coming to Amazon at first)