Therefore, the differentiation equation giving rise to gravity will be the equation that is compressed to yield the equation for all the other forces more or less.
It is, of course, not as complicated as would make me feel comfortable. My original equations covered blackboards and essentially led nowhere. There were pieces and parts everywhere. Those pieces and parts, like the evolving definition of pi remain because we don't have absolutes in a converging universe. Curvature changes.
But the underlying equation, like those for the conversion of the various types of information can be easily written.
So in the last post, and apparently it went right by everying, I described this process graphically.
If we have two masses far away from everything but space, then you have m1 and m2 and if they are held stationary relative to each other for a period of time (they will move, of course, with each change in x) each absorbs a certain amount of ct1 in order to maintain stable position to one another and to present unraveling. This absorbtion is both internal, sharing ct1 states between different ct2 spirals, and external, corresponding with movement relative to everything else and each other.
Of course, if other ct states are present and stable to each other, those also must be absorbed in a manner to maintain a steady state and that, in fact, occurs with ct4 but we are going to use two stable quantum ct4 states in space to minimize distractions. To make it even less complicated we are going to use quantum ct4 states. It seems likely that quantum ct4 doesn't exist in a vaccum because it appears, and observations show that quantum ct4 states require a substitution rich orbit of ct3 states, ct2 states.
However, this analysis applies to ct2 states, but since those don't experience mass the same way and since it appears that they change relative to each other more immediately, that is they move relative to one another more with each change in x due to the effection of convergence, you probably don't get as clean an approximation as you do with the larger mass states. In other words, this process with ct2 states would be cleaner and would include the same perturbation that you see with the geo function based on the evolving solution of pi which is driven by the changes in the amount of information (essentially a function of, at this point in time, very large changes in the denominator making tiny changes in the value).
Knowing the net effect (the gravity equation) and that the change in ct1 over a value of x (time in this case is present since we have ct4 states) is equal to the gravitational force generated. Mathematically then
dct1/dx=m1*m2/r^2.
The equation is using two different scales, but r is the number of ct1 states separating the two ct4 states. The mass is proportional to (an equivalent of) the number of ct1 states making up the mass and that over a set time period these are exchanged externally at a set rate, an in particular between the two masses.
Movement and distance, it must be remembered, do not exist in ct1, but in ct2 or any spiral state, you have the necessary relative changes to give rise to space and time.
m1=yct1 changes per change in x, m2=zct1 changes per ct1 change and r=n1 where n1 is the number of ct1 changes between m1 and m2 if their locations remain fixed. These are the variable giving rise to the equation above which looks like:
dct1/dx=yct1*zct1/n1^2=y*z/n1^2 for gravity for a fixed system. Now dct1 represents the changes in the center as well as on either side.
d[F(ct1)]/dx=y*z/n1^2
This assumes every other element is equal in the exchange of information since, under the rules of super symmetry, all features affecting the two masses are part of the overall solution. This analysis is the difference between AuT and forces.
integrating gravity over time is a force.
In the quantum end of things integration is not relevant and mainly comes into play here if you are looking at a gravitational change which is not immediately instructive of anything.
Differentiation requires that something changes in little bits, quantum mathematics being more or less perfect for this.
In this case what we are doing is not measuring the change in the force of gravity, which isn't a thing anyway, except to the extent that a shadow or reflection is something. Instead, what we are looking at is how, as x changes at the quantum level how ct1, the quantum backbone of the universe, changes relative to higher ct states in a given scenario. This is both simple and not as simple as it sounds.
The ct absorbtion rate for a given system is affected by the entire system. In localized areas, such as our solar system, the rate change varies tremedously, as on the surface of the sun or deep solar system space. But between any two higher states within the system, the exchange rate between them becomes less independent on the remaining portions of the system as they get closer together.
Gravity reflects the ct1 substitutuion rate and for stable orbits or acccumulations (planets or asteroids, for example) the substitution rates are fairly constant. But gravity is affected by the stability or lack thereof of the other substituion rates that lead to forces, but these rates are substituion rates of the same type, often acting in concert with other substitution rates especially at stable relationships.
The overall substitution rate is heavily dependent on ct1 replacement rates, either shared, creating connectivity, or surrounding, creating movement.
Whether movement is involved on shared, however, the total ct1 change for a system creates a gravitational effect for the system and in this way the relative position of a higher ct state has shared ct1 states reflected in connectivity and exchanged ct1 states indicating movement and together, this constant rate change gives the system gravity.
When you look at the gravity equation in this light it can be seen that while you have a constant force of gravity (equal to one ct1 change per change in x), the way that exchange happens can yield a vastly different effect on the mass which is subject to the substitution.
One thing this says is that the gravity function of linearity is directly tied to the exchange of ct1 states for higher ct states. Space has no gravity because it doesn't substitute for itself.
It also says that gravity is only one effect of the information exchange that is always going on for everything. But it also says that gravity is tied to the other manifestations of information change at the quantum level.
The higher state exchanges, for waves, matter and black holes work the same generally but change relative to the scale of the exchange of information.
Hence we have an over-riding "force" which is actually a reflection, but that is implied in the AuT definition of force, matter, or anything else. The over-riding force is ct1 exchange and we see that as gravity.
In wave forms this is complicated, but not replaced, by the addition of ct2 exchange which occurs less frenquently and therefore gives photons and waves the appearance of having the qualities of both when it is clear that they are as distinct as any other things, except that the change from 11 solutions to 111 solution and the resulting continuity of information provides a relative slowing along an access of the ct1 exchange with other ct1 states. Waves "spread out" as a result and different non-photonic results are experienced.
These types of changes will become more pronounced so ct4 has ct3 exhanges, coupled with ct2 exchanges, presumably but not so obviously, that is we do not radiate light. But we know the ct1 exchanges are happening, both mathematically (the constant change rate which is fundamental to a single variable universe) and because we don't see things standing still, everything moves (through space, spinning (which is a unique pattern of ct1 sharing that we will get to in later posts), vibrating, fusing, fissioning, and all those other things that reflect ct1 sharing.
In the higher states, the issue of sharing is complicated, but like the compression equation, it is a consistent result of the sharing of various elements with the given system.
Ultimately force can be solved for substitution rates included within the rates. We peel off the lowest substitution rate but it remains one of several and is therefore, of necessity, merely part of the solution to an equation for the universe as a whole, but with parts that have consistent types of results because substitution rates are consistent for different types of force within parameters since the equations underlying the substitution rates do not change.
The reason we see forces (keeping in mind the correct definition of force as a reflection of a mathematical result) differently is because ct1 sharing or substitution (sos) is different for ct1 coupled with ct2 subsitution. Still more complicated is sos for ct3 coupled with ct2 couples with ct1.
Radiation, for example has movement from ct1 substitutions, the dissasociation of ct3 states from ct4 states while maintaining ct3 substitutions and almost certainly includes the ct2 disassociations although it is conceivable that they don't disassociate in every case from ct3 states.
If you go back to the crude deep cave filled with protons waiting to spontaeously end, which they do but only with sharing, and dropped in some radioactives, you would see the sparks of light, the heat from waves and the resulting losses of mass. The ct1 substitution changes, however, would happen on such small scales that they would likely be missed with the ct exchange changes, but they would be happening.
Gravity, like space, seems elusive; but, like space, it is the most simple version of information exchange.
Other forces though complicated, but can be determined in the same fashion, by reducing them to their ct exchange properties within quantum solutions.
You can pick one, but magnetism makes as good an example as any. Since it is exponentially more complicated, there will be a plurality of ways of determining it. These involve spatial curvature and hence they are tied to variable features of the universe. Worse still this necessarily means that they are not tied to one method of calculation unless they are feduced to information changes.
Mecahnical force-F=[uH^2A]/2 is a function of Area, which is a function of but ct1 concentration and order of location. Areas necessarily include compression although uncompressed areas are areas of ct1, space; H is a resulting Force called the magnetic field; u is the permeability of space, 4pix10^7 T-m/a.
Looking for these underlying forces you come up with
Magnetic moment is seen in terms of area, IA.
The current I is a converging series to get to an exact value.
Curent, therefore relies on curvature, separation and change over time, therefore over values of x. Area varies according to separation and hence the order of a given number of points which are separated according to varying stages of compression.
Hence dct1/x is a =i*A which for two points held in place work something like this:
i(q)=F(geo(1)ct1p1-geo(2)ct1p2)
That is a quanum of current is measured according to changes in ct1(invisible) changing within a set curve relative to its prior position (or at least the tendency towards that change) over a value of x. Space, in this sense is curved by the magnetism in the system.
While there is a great deal of interest in looking for positive and negative ct1 spirals in this process, and while the easiest explanation of the positive and negative aspects of this is to tie them to those spiral solutions, that is not absolutely necessary to arrive at a solution.
Magnetism cannot, like gravity, exist within a ct1-ct2 system. Nor is it observed in a ct1-ct2-ct3 system although aspects of it are certainly present there.
The amount of curvature around a black hole is seen from our vantage point as relatively infinite although AuT shows it is quite far from infinite.
Here we are seeing the same thing from the ct3 point of view, matter, being exponentially higher compression, seems infinite and its attraction, actually absorbtion, of ct3 through substitution is very high, the exact order of ct1 substitution being defined by a substitution rate of ct1 below 1:256 underlying ct2 states which is calculated separately in this work as a multiple of each lower state.
What this means is that just as we see "light trapped" by ct5, so too do we see "ct3 trapped" (wave energies) by ct4. Trapped, in this case, merely means that these higher concentrations of ct2 or ct3 are needed to satisfy the substitution rates required to maintain the stability of the the system.
If the substitution rates are not met, then the underlying higher state falls apart.
Here, what we seen is that the waves, being trapped by the ct4 state have quantum loops of ct1 sharing which can be disrupted, but in a vacuum follow a path defined by the quatum steps around the unit curve (Uc) where Uc is defined by the separation in terms of solution between the points between which the sharing occurs.
In the case of two quantum states of ct4 this process exists.
First we have F(g), the gravity between the two quantum points of ct4. dct1/dx=yct1*zct1/n1^2=y*z/n1^2 for gravity for a fixed system. Now dct1 represents the changes in the center as well as on either side.
d[F(ct1)]/dx=y*z/n1^2
F(g) represents a set quantity of ct1 changed in a fixed spatial system.
Now were are saying that part of F(g) is the change of quantums of Ct(3) to add a charge to the system.
dct3/dx doesn't help because for current to exist these points must change relative to a point so:
integrating from x=1 to 3 for a P(ct4), for example you'd have Int[1,3](dct3/dx)=P(ct4);geo(y1)p(ct3)+P(ct4)geo(y2)P(ct3)+Pct4;geo(y3)pct3) and each step of difference is a quantum step and therefore very small relative to the highly curved space.
Since the substitutions of ct1 for the ct3 state are adjacent to the ct3 state at all points, they also appear curved giving the current the appearance of curvature even though it is a stepped and quantum process. This is only half of the equation, however, because the points are also changing relative to their endpoint which is P(ct4)2, the opposite di-pole.
For this, it is understood that:
P(ct4) is a point of ct4
geo(y1-3) is the order of a given solution relative to P(ct4) as x changes from 1 to 3 where the quantum movement is along a varying curve, although the variations are essentially zero for all practical purposes at our levels of compression.
What we are doing here is coming up with a change within a closed system.
With higher forces what we're left doing is not just solving for the changes in CT1 to determine force, but determining what those changes are relative to different higher ct states over changes of x. This is why gravity appears different, gravity can be determined relative to quantum moments, while other forces have to be determined over periods of changing higher states, so that both time and space figure into it. This is not, however, a major difference, since time and space can be solved for ct1 and x.
Using the concept of implicit differentiation, theoretically all forces for a closed system (or with greater complexity for a more open system) can be solved implicity for ct1 and x.
This underlying concept forms the basis for Book 2, coming soon to a bookstore near you (really it's only coming to Amazon at first)
No comments:
Post a Comment