AuT ppp-pre calculus

AuT-ppp Pre Calculus

Every once in a while I get a good question.  The one that I have received recently is this, "How is order determined, and why does it force light, waves, matter and black holes to travel sequentially.'
The short answer is that with ct1 you have to trace it back through the chain, but with higher ct states you have overlapping chains that vary the order of solution although they still have to sequentially move as they come together or separate.  You can see that in this old pic, but we'll get some additional detail.

We will get to that in more detail, but before we do, it is important to know what the answer means, otherwise it looks too simple.
One good thing about AuT is that it allows us to look at g-space were true mathematics lives free of the confines of space-time and the haunting illusions of entropy and self-determination and that most misleading of all illusions, faith.

The evolution of a state from non-linear to linear is generally represented, using zero prime as:

0’=0’1/1+0’1/(4-1)  Since 0’ oscillates between 1 and negative 1 in quantum instances, this is very similar to 1-1/3 but it is not.

Zero, in g-space can be replaced with (-1)^(x+1)

This also, of course, means that, part, [0’1/1+0’1/(4-1)]=(-1)^(2)+(-1)^3=0. What this tells us is that for any finite value of x, 0’=0 when summed.  This is misleading, however, in the same way that limit mathematics (as x approaches zero you get a mathematically specific result) is fraught with errors.

This tautology (0=0') while seemingly innocent is actually quite important and indicates that an offset is required in order to prevent the universe from collapsing in on itself and that the offset is inherent in the value of 0’ and is the converging series that powers AuT..

But o-space begins long before this issue is raised.
The first question has to be, what is plus.  We assume the most important parts of this equation are a given, but in truth they are as important to resolve as those which we understand. 
Another problem with o-space mathematics is that it fails to recognize super symmetry which eliminates randomness and entropy in their entirety.  
It is stuck in a space time analysis with self determination and its evil twin faith.
Let's look at some o-space parts of these equations that we take for granted but which are fraught with hidden meaning.

Plus is a relative position of states. 1 plus 1 does not create anything.  If you look at a simplified version of the drawing above you see the sum of the two states generates a third, but the prior two have not vanished although their importance as the top solutions are greatly reduced.  In the drawing below, you have to go from the right side all the way down to where e begins before you can begin to move up the chain to where c appears and hence the two solutions to the left and right side of A are far apart, whereas the solutions between D and C are close but it is based on the order of the solutions and their relationship to history going back to the lower solution of E where things began for this group.

Likewise, Equals identifies a quantum solution, but that solution is only significant in a given location by its solution relative to all points.

Since all points are ultimately sequential solutions to 0’; 0' must incorporate the algorithm and is the only solution that exists.  The plus gives relative positions in terms of a quantum solution based on the perspective.

Spiral value is governed by the equation

[(n=(n-1)+(n-2)]

pi=n(sum(1 to x)[(-1)^(x+1)]/(2x-1)

0’=(-1)^(x+1)

Pi=sum(1 to n)n(sum 1 to x)[0’/(2x-1)

This is one of the more rough post sets although its the most important in many ways.  It will largely reconcile non-linear quantum calculus with what we're used to working with in a linear (non-quantum) universe; but it's confusing even to me in places so bear with me and don't judge till you get to the end.

Dual limits:
xapproaches zero from right x-x0+; right hand limit or from leftx-x0-
In the case of NLC the answers were the same.  But this isn't the case in AuT and in fact there is a question as to whether the past can be approached from the future event because there is nothing built and having built from the past, the changes that occurred to keep the future sold might be impossible to track backwards.  This is not so much a jump discontinuity where the limit from either side exists, it may be where the limit only exists from one side which would help explain why history only goes in one direction.

Another place where this issue comes up has to do with the inflection points.
limit as x-0 for 1/x is infinity; but x is finite at any point so that infinity isn't reached in the universe.  The limit as x approaches infinity from the negative position is negative infinity and this is a balanced equation that may have relevance with positive and negative spirals which do grow out in both directions towards infinity but achieve a quite different result because of their intersection.

This is the first application of calculus to the overall problem and it's pretty messy at this stage of development.  

These features are reasons WHY AUT ARRIVEs AT DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS THAN CALCULUS.

We will get to that in the next posts, perhaps or perhaps this will be the last post.  Who really know?
I have no more faith in this than you do.

AuT ppp + doesn't mean add in AuT and equals is not

Today I checked the temperature in the outdoor pool I use.  Knowing that the minimum comfortable temperature was 72 degrees and it being close to that I did what you would expect me to do.  I managed to get in 2500 yards, only 800 im, but I'm pretty sure I lowered my body temperature by 10 degrees.  I ate and poured myself a glass of wine which I am drinking as I write this.


This blog post is coming from book 2.  It's a very different type of math that will be analysed.
First note that no one knows what they're talking about but me.  Don't hate me, embrace me.

First, Oh no, lol: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/508246/why-the-universe-is-not-a-computer-after-all/The problem with this analysis is that it fails to recognize super symetry.  It is stuck in a space time analysis.  All the so-called geniuses working in the sme area that I am in have the same problem.  Stuck in space-time, Einsteinian blinders chasing each other around the track instead of reading the formula.

https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/context/if-world-computer-life-algorithm
This article is a little more intriguing because it explains what aut theory shows in a different fashion, the transition from non-linear to linear space.
There are 256 ct1 states in a single ct2 state corresponding to the change from 1 to 11 and the consequent change from
F(n)^(2^n) where n changes from 1 to 2 at one unique spot. That unique spot is where n=2 for that the equation becomes 4^(2^2).
Informationally, the results are the same.  The 4 sides come from F(n)=4 but this is only a first dimension.
However good the reasoning, the relationship to information theory is impure because of zero.
Zero is not just positive and negative, it is a function
To start direction it stays fixed, to form pi it changes.

This strange looking collection of F-series spirals does something special.  It shows what's wrong with dimensional math.

When you try to describe these at any quantum moment, you have to take several varables in place.  Let's look at some of them:

1) the length.  At x=1, spirals 2 and 3 don't exist except as potential solutions to an increase in the value of x.  At x=2 the second spiral is present but is offset from the first spiral.  The third spiral is shown as coming off the intersection of the first two and it is one of many potential spirals possible.  To understand the range, you need to look at this chart:

This indicates that at x=3 you can have 4 spirals based on F-series stacking.

But that isn't the point, being an old point and only give to put some perspective on the simplified drawing.

What you see is that 0' at x=4 is not a simple sum.  Instead the quantum moment is represented by the relative position and overlap and F-series state of the different units.  In this case, ignoring all other curves it can be said that at x=4 the following occur:

1) S1 (the first spiral) has an f-series length of 3, s2 has an f-series lenght of 2 and s3 an F-series lenght of 1.  Not only is the angle of each slightly off from one another from the initiation, but these angles have become more complex as they revolve around each other.  In addition, ct2 has overlapped a prior location of ct1, but this is probably not important unless it occurs along a quantum length of ct1 of an "active" length as opposed to a historical one.  This actually happens at the point that s2 overlaps s1 the second time and there is a relative change at this point which would allow for the aging of the two spirals were the concentrations sufficient and the length of overlap more than a point overlap and no spark occurs because there is no photonic energy nor sufficient compression even possible.

What it does show is that when we talk about "adding" and "equals" in mathematics, those terms have different means in absolute mathematics.

AuT-pp: dimension examined 3 of whatever check for inclusion

So it isn't my goal in all of this to undermine anything.  The fact that the indications on the grand design is the solution to a fairly simple math problem was not an intended consequence, even though determing origins an explaining things like black holes and big bangs was.
Another bit of irony is that the only way I can get recognition for what I've done is to prove recognition is irrelevant.   Worse still, a quantum step forward in understanding appears to nothing more than a push towards a massive compression or decompression state (think fission or fusion) localized to the environment where I have an effect.
while the obvious solution is to stop writing and destroy all evidence of my work; that assumes the existence of some monster presence that hasn't already fully comprehended and planned (as a solution to the relatively simple algorithm that defines me)  each step.  Were we, as people capable of rational thought (don't look at history and tell me are and evolution is something of a myth and an understatement under the supersymetry of AuT) the algorithm would still have its way easily via a supernova, meteor, stream of energy from a black hole or any of the other ways in which it can have planned from the beginning of clock time (actually before that by some large factor of x) to deal with pesky rock mites like us.
It's the ultimate horror movie, not unlike the matrix, but without the ability to reprogram things.
So, I will, as the universe slowly removes the various aspects of my lease on life that allows me to contribute, continue to trace this formula back to its origins.

Zero an g-space

The question of zero in curvature is addressed here.  While the numbers below have some relevance, the truth of the matter is that the decreasing amount of information allows for the solution to converge according to the 0 factor described in the prior post.
The convergence on 3.142-3.143 allows us to generate the sin curve approximation.  This solution (quantum states) is the result of needing an exact solution at any quantum moment for curvature which in turn required that distance be replaced with information.  EHT, Einstein's version of AuT, would have had a set value of x andd each big bang would result from the same amount of information.  It took a while (two years?) for AuT to see the absurity of that result even though the infinite series loops of interesecting F-series spirals appear very early in the process.  What a battle it was to admit those functioned according to math instead of some Einsteinian design.
The convergence of for a numerator 1 pi likewise converges according to a different series, converges on .87 and .72 and in between these are other converging series.  The amount of curvature is much greater as these solutions increase and the convergence is much greater for successive spirals in terms of origin.
2 converges between 1.9 and 1.6
3 converges between 2.6 and 2.1
What is common, aside from the denominator being the denominator is that the infinite series comes form a zero funciton that looks like this:
pi=n(sum(1 to x)[(-1)^(x+1)]/(2x-1)
In this equation, 0 is replaced with the operative formula (-1)^(x+1) to shift between odd and even results.  This suggests that the equation under AuT could look like this:
pi=n(sum(1 to x)0'[1/(2x-1)] which in turn suggests that 0'=(-1)^(x+1) over any summation of x when applied to F-series equations.
In pre AuT math, that would be enough, but not in AuT.  It's a little closer to say this:
An equation vibrating between 1 and -1 can be represented in a positive universe by (-1)^(x+1); but how about the negative spirals that come to exist?
This critical difference is why when we try to apply our math to the universe we can "band-aid" things together, but we're not getting the right answer.  While for some limited purposes, defining the pi equation for example,  we can substitute a formula for pi, in terms of providing a solution you actually need two uses of 0' in this format, one for the derivation of the geo function and a second one for the creation of negative offset spirals based on a current solution to pi, but alternating between positive and negative results which can extend out according to the F-series.
In the latter case, "direction" (positive or negative) remains fixed as a negative while in the former it continues to evolve as the amount of information increases at least within a closed system although as indicated, pi changes radically and based on compressive and proximity of solution factors.
This is not the same thing, of course, as saying that 0' is the same for every application in g-space or in o-space since it changes in either direction.
Since we deal with a very large value of x in different versions of this equation, the two appear to have the same effective quality.  What is obvious, however, is that 0' is not at all nothing.
Fractions are different from 0' states and even those have some problems.

A similar problem can be seen in these pictures which show how pi is derived by various changes converging together.  As we know you start out with 4, then add 4/3 then subtract 4/5 and so on.  If the size of space time is the same, then each time you break this down the size of space time must grow so that, for example, the minimum size of 4/15 for pi at the quantum level must be equal to 4/3 pi at the second derivation of pi. Quantum length has to stay at yes/no it cannot get any smaller, so space has to expand to accommodate the definition.

Let’s look at this with the shapes aligned:

As can be seen here the difference (going towards zero as a minimum length is defined between a center and an edge changes slightly with each transition.  Further the Gap (between the straight line between points and the “arc length” which is not really an arc length at all gets “smaller.”  However, if we start at yes/no as the gap distance, there is no gap distances at 4/3.  This is a non-linear environment.  At 4/5 you first get a gap distance which is greater than the distance from the center to edge.

At 4/7 you are beginning to experience space as we understand it with the gap being less than the quantum length.

This close up shows an interesting feature of this problem.  We are focused on a minimum length of the line indicating the length of the gap.  This is considered the quantum minimum size of a leg of the polygon.  The larger circle in each drawing (4/7 they are about the same size) shows the gap between the minimum lengths bisecting the shape and the smaller circle shows the gap between minimum leg length and the point where it intersects the line separating the sides.  In a quantum universe, “gaps” between these distances are not allowed.  Hence a paradox is introduced into geometry even where pi is defined with specificity. We do not see this problem because the size of the circles is small.  The larger circle defines a place where a third quantum line can go which also alleviates the issue.

The point of these figures is that there is an imperfect alignment which either (1) abhors quantum length in which case there is no quantum universe and nothing will ever make much sense or (2) dimensions as we experience them are illusory based on the display of information with gaps between quantum solutions that are progressively eliminated as the amount of information increases which is, after all, what pi requires.

At first blush, the conclusion is that space is linear, which we know to be wrong.  When we look closer, we see that linearity is an illusion.  The numbers which make these features remain quantum numbers, 4/7;4/9;4/11.  The relative positioning of these number begins to build an illusion of space which cannot exist with quantum solutions.  That is, on a quantum level the solution to some equations defining the universe appears to define spaces that cannot exist.

The exact nature of this Greg’s paradox can be described as the difference between two quantum states defines quantum separation by comparison which comparison leaves less than quantum distances between solutions.

One place we can look for explanations lies in the derivative rules:

Product rule (uv)’=u’v+uv’ (deriv of one plus deriv of other) change one at a time.

Quotient rule (u/v)’= (u’v-uv’)/v^2 as long as v not equal to zero
When we look at spirals we tend to oversimplify them and see only addition.  But 4+4+4 is also 3*4 and 3 is 12/4 and any number, including a wildly irrational number (as compared to mildly irrational numbers like pi) like 0'.
While this discussion is very worthwhile, no one else is paying the light bills.

AuT-more on dark matter and different versions of zero

I did a mini biathalon today (6 mile bike ride, 2,100 yards swimming).  As I rode out, seeing the flashing dots in my vision I was again struck by the irony of seeing so much and losing my vision.  It was hot, but too pretty to sit inside, too pretty to just swim so I mixed my workout up, showing that however boring I am, occasionally I can do something at least a little different.
Not sure how much of that I can do, but I continue to thingk that a heart attack might be the lesser of several evils I face.
But that's not what this is about.  This is about zero and how zero, the real zero, not the nothing that you've been tricked by your grade school math teacher into believing.
Read on.
The whole dark matter thing and history is one of the recent break throughs that show how important it is to compare the theory to observations.
But it does more because it forces us to look at gravity and history in another way.  We're going to do that, but first we have to understand what zero is and it's not nothing, as you've been led to believe by Ms. Busstop.
We look at 0,1,1 as being F(1)=2 but that's our universe thinking, o-space math.  This is because there is no true zero in AuT.  The zero is a combination of 1 and -1 at the very least, not true zero.  There is no nothing in AuT only. To our nature the appear to cancel each other out, but in reality, they may well be and I'll posit this now, the algorithmic glue that holds linearity of states together.
We have the evolving pi looking something like this:
Sum(0 to q)[n/2+q] for each pi for each change in q for each state alternating with the negative spiral solutions.  The average pi is a sum of these sum solutions or sum(1toq)[sum0toq(n/(2+q)) plus the negative spiral solutions.
What is significant about this equation.  First, it's not an equation that operates with out math.  Second, it relies on an 'alternating switch.' to go from positive to negative in order to be a converging series.
Note that we're most familiar with this where n=4, but that's not the point.
The point is that this is an F-series equation with a missing factor, a equation that has both positive and negative elements, zero.
So the equation looks like this Sum(0 to q)[0'(n/(2+q)]=geo where 0' is the state of zero alternating between positive an negative states.
The spirals are F-series stacked functions built according to this same equation: S(tot)=sum(0 to q) [geo0(F(q)] so that you have opposite spirals offset according to geo (a function of pi) and according to the F-series for each spiral alternating between positive an negative spirals but having the length change so that the alternating spirals eventually intersect in two dimensional space to overlap after very long periods of curvature, sufficient for the first dimensional pi to cause them to circle back with sufficient consistency to have ct2 overlap, which is, after all very low; but the process repeats itself for higher values of n.
While a bit rough, this introduces a new feature into the mathematics of o-space, the alternating value of zero containing a positive and an offset negative which sequentially expresses itself to yield the observed equation, something built into the F-series for ct1, namely the zero in 0,1,1 which alternating function allows it to glue together alternating solution to form gravity.
Let's look at how this might work:
F(x)=0(F(q) so that spirals would be created (for q=3) like this:
1,1,2,3,5
-1,-1,-2,-3
1,2,3
With each of these offset from the others by an evolving geo function and ultimately overlapping solutions to achieve stable compression states.  While far from complete, what this does is give us an available feature of the equation which we're used to seeing as zero but which, like everything else in AuT, is not what we're used to, but what we know it to be in a non-dimensional universe where neither nothing, nor space time exist.

AuT-No Time Travel Tickets

I felt the icy hands of time tonight, the inevitability of decaying strands of information on the carrier.
I am unhappy.  There is so much potential out there, but not enough time for all of it.  I have to prioritize, one thing at a time till time runs out.
If I could have any one of the many opportunities work, I'd have a hard time picking, I can only ask that something come through soon.
I have dedicated the next 4 weeks to an old life that is dead so I have to do as much as I can for the new one, the short one.
Poems, I need to publish my book of poems at some point in time.  Would that be easier with a lover, since all the poems were written to my lover?
I have to start on my second physics book, now heavy with the potential new insights on history and dark matter, the section that will include the calculus form SIA 2nd.
It's time for me to do a book on tape; several really.  The first will be AUT Book 1 2nd edition, because already I have to make changes to the section on dark matter..  I need a recording studio, but I"m going to be given a mixer by a friend.  Now my voice is not a voice over book, but I have something that is only 25000 words and I can do that, for better or for worse.
There is no time travel.
https://www.inverse.com/article/28840-power-rangers-justice-league-large-hadron-collider-time-travel
One of the great and horrible things about AuT is that it tells you what you can and cannot do.  You can't travel back in time although you might be able to see it.  You can't go into the future, but perhaps you can figure out what will come to pass.
Super symetry of the spiral underpinnings means many things.  In some sense it says given sufficient computing power you could tell you were supposed to turn right and then try to to left.  It's a puzzle, the knowledge is there but if it could be determined, it would provide a paradox in a universe that has no paradox.
Can you change the super symetry, however?  That question is a little harder to answer.  Can the actor on a film change the movie?  The answer seems to be no, but at the same time, I figured out the basis for the model and the model made me figure it out.  Perhaps the model teases people, there is something in nature to cause that, perhaps it is so obvious that it becomes internally visible and expresses that visibility through us, a program that has become self aware and we are its awareness.  If we could change the algorithm, we could do anything.  To stop aging would be child's play.  Following time independent spirals form one place to another instantaneously.  It is where the power in AuT would lie, ultimate power, not just power over life and death, but power over space and time.
Yet I operate without a budget, nearly starving here.  The only one who found the key to the treasure house, destitute, without the resources to raise the keys to the lock.
Irony.  That is clearly built into a system which changes, at 90 degree turns from one direction to another, for isn't that what irony is?
Writing poems to a lover which are never published because the lover is gone.
Me and Parminides, both of our works in pieces.

AuT-25 pp2 A speaking intro and a more specific discussion of homogeniety and its disappearance of dark matter

So I'm working on doing a live presentation.
Here's me writing how I'd like to start it.
(Lecturer walks up in greek robe) I am playing parminides.  I am the Greek father of Algorithm Universe Theory although I would have looked at an algorithm very differently from you.  My very existence was preserved in history by the Moors who I would not have understood very well.  2500 years ago (I was born in 502 BC), give or take, I realized that a linear universe would not work, that the infinities between moments would swallow them whole.  I lived without cell phones or tvs or electric lights so I had plenty of time to parce this out.  I figured out the universe and yet only a small part of my knowlege survives me, fragments of a single poem, "On Nature." which I almost certainly wrote to my lover.  Much of my knowledge survives through my student Zeno.
I argued against nothingness, nothing comes from nothing, a tautology.   I was the first to say that everything must have always been, making the same mistake that Einstein would make 2000 years later, but I correctly determined that the void could not exist, realizing while not fully understanding that existence had to be finite quantum elements, although if I understood the idea of quantum mathematics, that knowledge doesn't survive me.
Zeno indicates I did.  He posed the question, if an arrow is shot at him (zeno) and it goes half the distance to him at a time it will never reach him.  This requires a quantum analysis that prevents the eternal halving of space.  Alas, he was not killed by an arrow.
Fast forward to an Italian (Pisian) Dandy.
My name is Leonardo, but I am known as Fibonacci, Figlio, the son of my father, Bonacci.  I am the mathematician who came upon the self generating series that says so much about how information theory grows.  I was born in 1175, the middle ages and witnessed none of the coming of the Rennasiance which would not start for 200 years; but I was to lay the mathematical practical basics for that in the form of a new numbering system that would allow the great banking families of east-west trade to flourish.  In that way, I played a bigger role than the Medici of Florence
In this way,  I am also connected with the Moors.  What I brought, I stole; the Hindu-Arabic numbering system that the great banking families rose with and that we use today.
Western civilization gives me credit for introducing something that had been around for hundreds of years which is the western way.  Like Parminides, I came from wealth, something of the first accountant of Pisa.  But I also unwittingly, designed the curves that make up AuT.  As Parminides is the father of AuT, I, in addressing the idea of perfectly breeding rabbits, undoubtedly at least thinking of my lover, pointed out how in the propper environment, one of neither nothing or something, could generate something from nothing with the series that is named after myself who am, after all, known by the name of my father.

It needs some work.

How space goes from homogeneous to non-homogeneous in successive big bangs.

The idea that you get overlap sufficient to generate c2 states from very long and not much curved intersecting offset ct1 spirals (with that very gradual turn associated with pi based on a numerator of 1) allows with F-series building that eventually you would have very large numbers of ct1 states overlapping to create gravity, but you still need to create the linearity associate with the equation for F-series solutions.
The creation of gravity from this linearity has interesting features.  While gravity appears to arrise from F-series lines of ct1 (1,1,2,3,5 lines) It appears very likely that the base series 0,1,1,0 phenomena would play a role.  This is necessarily a part given the compression function (F(n)^2^2 or 2^(2^1) for space
2,4,6,10,16 for ct1,2,3,4 and 5 respectively.
The homogeneous nature of space explains why it doesn't appear to be all of the dark matter.  The lack of consistency is interrupted by concentrations of matter and black hole material.  These histories form more densly within clusters of matter which explains why older galaxies have more dark matter than younger ones (more history, the hidden form of ct1 linearity).
Early on, before the latest big bang, the concentration levels that exist before the universe begins to expand again must create a homogeneous gravity before the concentrated historys begin to spread out again.  Unlike big bounce and big bang concepts, AuT recognizes an imperfect compression (increasinly perfect, but never reaching perfection) meaning that some galaxies don't fully integrate into a hot dense state although at our level of compression and that of the big bang that we saw 13 billion years ago and which will come around a little denser in a time frame set out in detail in Spirals in Amber 2nd, even the outlier galaxies might be in a precarious environment before the inflection point in the algorithm starts them outward again.  It make sense that the presence of dark matter would become steadily easier to see as more dense universes allowed for the irrigularities that grow from the more homogeneous universe if, as suggested in AuT, history is hidden (darkly) behind the present from which it is made.

AuT-pp2 Dark Matter and Hidden History

Here is one of those articles that shows how durable AuT is when confronted with scientific observation.

The suggestion of this article is that Dark matter develops over time and the corrolarry, not discussed by the article, is that Dark matter is,at least in part, historical information. The primary source of dark matter is seen as linear ct1 pre-ct1-ct2 transition. Another idea  is that is increases as light transitions to ct1 (ct2 decompresses to ct1) or a concentration of increased ct1 linearity transition.
AuT (as shown below) teaches that history, being one derivative step behind "present information," is hard to see.  Further, history starts off small, but becomes noticeable and, of course, no matter how small it is, there is more and more of it over time.  The solution should match the "speed" study of time (already used to determine when the universe will stop expanding) and raises facinating questions of the interface between history and compression states.
Even more impressive is the long list of paragraphs (excerpted below) where this historical informaiton is indicated as "hidden" from view in Spirals in Amber.
This explains that dark matter could be, history that is preserved in the system in ever increasing amounts just as the article predicts and long before the article was published.
What is neat is that in advance of this article, Spirals in Amber, 2nd edition describes history as "hidden" but "maintaining its gravitational effects."  In other words, SIA specifically and AuT in general gives a basis for more dark matter appearing in later universes, more being visible in later galaxies than early ones.

https://medium.com/@ScienceEditor/lack-of-dark-matter-in-early-galaxies-perplexes-astronomers-so-where-did-all-the-dark-matter-e54577f3ac64

Exerpts:
Here are just some examples from SIA 2nd:
P. 13 The perception of history is preserved in quantum moments by having the current quantum moment made from the stacking of prior quantum moments which is a result of compression.

p.32 no 31.    This suggests that many spiral universes almost as big, with almost as much information, as ours exist but that each is defined by what we perceive as only two dimensions and the composite universe is built upon only the prior two with the extra information being “hidden” as history which remains tangible but is fixed beyond the current quantum moment.
no  35. Observation indicates that each prior solution remains in place but out of sync by the value of 1 (the change in x) from the other giving the appearance of history.

22. This suggests that many spiral universes almost as big, with almost as much information, as ours exist but that each is defined by what we perceive as only two dimensions and the composite universe is built upon only the prior two with the extra information being “hidden” as history.
37. Due to the changing value of pi, there are several ways to approach this, but the one that seems best suited to observation is an exponential building as opposed to a pure F-series construction and that this building world occur with each spiral quantum change, that is to say, with each change in x.  Observation indicates that each prior solution remains in place but out of sync by the value of 1 (the change in x) from the other giving the appearance of history.
p.52 The extra information forces it to appear likes its moving and changing historically even though the basic information is not changing.  

Movement, includes spin and all the other symptoms of movement.  

The other place it is hidden, in plain sight, is history.  Since the F series solution is n=n-1+n-2 history is inherent in this model, otherwise we'd look back and see nothing nor would there be any prediction.  

p. 53History and velocity makes sense as the location of information.  We don't see it correctly because we're looking for information to be solid.

p. 82 What we see are these quantum moments, that is if you look at the drawings above, you don’t see them from the top as they are drawn, instead you look at the leading edge, the “history” is still there because every point is built up this history, but it is hidden to a large extent by the leading edge.  It is not completely hidden because of the offsets; suggested by calculus to be of a lower order 
p. 91 So for our equation (f(x) is d/dx(x^2^n)=2^n(x^((2^n)-2) + O(dx)^2

Another difference is that we do not want to get a total or sum for the various answers or ignore O(dx).  Summing information gets rid of quantum relative changes to x (sct and dimension) and Odx is where the history of the equation resides, that is, obviously, the present is the derivative of the past in AuT since the F-series equation defines the present in that fashion (NOW=past 1 plus past 2).

p. 92 There are complicated questions that arise from the formulation of this algorithm is the question of what happens when you add two prior states to get the next state with an offset.  We can and will draw this out.  As these are stacked to get to higher ct states (past ct1) the relativity of ct2 to ct1 allows for higher factors Ox^2, Ox^3, etc (using calculus nomenclature) to drift into what we call history which is the only place it can go; there is no "new" state and the information has to be parked somewhere.

p. 172 Looking closely you can see the history through cracks in the matrix.

p 173 The display mechanism for AuT is the relative movement along successively more compressed spirals which are offset from one another where the entire matrix shifts and grows exponentially larger (exponentially according to the F-series function) for each change in x making the universe more massive than it appears with most of the information hidden in the history of the next

p 190 Just looking at this it can be seen that each higher state is literally the addition of the two preceding lower states so that the historical maintenance of states exists, but fades just as history fades in this

history 1

history 2

history 3=history 2 plus 1

history 4=history 2 plus 3 but 3 is 2 plus 1

etc. so history is preserved but becomes harder to see.

Observation shows that the gravitational element is preserved notwithstanding the change in state and the relative slowing.

Taking all of these together, we can make a change to the thoughts on Dark matter as underlined below

Dark mater is fairly well described primarily as the manifestation of the gravity of non-dimensional space in a dimensional matrix.  Without a detailed examination of the results of this inquiry which has not been done, there are possibilities that should not be discounted.  None of these possibilities changes the fundamental structure of AuT.

Dark matter is an expression of information (or clock time) linearity.  But what features would account for it being spread out in the universe.
The primary suggestion is that historical spirals, being hidden behind the matrix of current history provides a basis for gravity.  Looking at this it can be seen that each higher state is literally the addition of the two preceding lower states so that the historical maintenance of states exists, but fades just as history fades in this

history 1

history 2

history 3=history 2 plus 1

history 4=history 2 plus 3 but 3 is 2 plus 1

etc. so history is preserved but becomes harder to see.

Observation shows that the gravitational element is preserved notwithstanding the change in state and the relative slowing.  This can be explained in theory as being manifested by dark matter.
Other ideas that mighthelp explain dark matter can include:

One is that the dark matter description may include features other than space.

It is possible that these concentrations reflect the conversion of light back to space; a process that might account for the localized expression of greater spatial concentrations of gravity.

I might add that the "less likely alternative" is that ct6  may manifest itself as dark matter.  Given its dimensional density (6 coordinates changing at once) we have no idea how it would appear (or not appear) and how it would manifest itself being exponentially larger than black holes and made up of chains of black holes in a way that we can only understand based on what huge lengths the strands of ct5 would have to form for it to exist for any period of time.

In the backwards world of AuT, the density of ct1 around black holes and matter is not tied to gravity, but instead is because at the speed of change a certain amount of ct1 is required in the solution in order to maintain the speed of change of the body in question.

In CT6 this would manifest itself in a density that might achieve a certain level of solidity.

The idea is that there are other places where dark matter might manifest itself.  Given the number of dimensions involved, the ct6 state, with its accompanying jacket of space, might appear like a point or even less than a point or perhaps as several points.  The gravitational element might express itself in ways that are not immediately obvious from a pre-AuT perspective.

AuT-Book 1 Kindle "print" edition-is the universe messing with me

And now...this.  The print version apparently has numbers doubled and other formatting issues which perplex me, but I'm going to have to dwell on this later.  At least the content appears to be largely unphased by this.
There is irony (irony is one of the indicators that AuT is accurate).  The irony is that the numbering problem in the print content-which was directly uploaded by Amazon from the Createspace version- is an F-series exponential problem; that is 1 to 11 to 111.  In this case, chapter 1 is shown a 11, 2 as 22, etc.
I have to wonder where this programing problem originated or how it came to be or it is just the universe singling me out to mess with as it does repeatedly.
I'm not sure if I should be excited or worried that the theory seems to be all mine on Amazon:  https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=algorithm+universe+theory
As I have said many a time to many a person, I am either brilliant or insane and most people who know me have the answer to that question.

Algorithm Universe Theory Book 1: An Overview of the origin of space time and quantum phenomena Kindle Edition

by Gregory Friedlander (Author)

Be the first to review this item

---

See all formats and editions

Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) is not a minor theory. It defines not only the source and effects of Quantum Mechanics, but the origin of space time itself. This paper summarizes the first chapters of a published book on the subject which is almost 300 pages long (Spirals in Amber 2nd Edition 2017). It is the first of a multi-volume set which updates the original. 
The results are considered astounding. On a quantum level, the fundamental structure of space time, 

AuT pp22 notes on dark matter

So we've discussed some of the more complicated aspects of this.  Now the good news, Book one is published  It may not be available for a couple of days, but it's our of my hands unless there is something large that happens.

I'm going to post a little bit on dark matter, but first visit some minor issues.

Algorithm Universe Theory Book 1

Back Jacket
This book was written by an algorithm.
It was not an algorithm like the one which operates a computer or even artificial intelligence as we understand it.  It is both more simple in design and more complex in result.  The great mystery of AuT lies in determining the nature of the place where the algorithm is created and held.  The algorithm which wrote this book is one solved to a number of points for a single variable in some huge number with twists an turns so complex that it defines the universe we experience in quantum instances and, as a very small part of its operations, writes these books.  Or that's what the theory suggests.

Some notes on Dark Matter

Dark mater is fairly well described primarily as the manifestation of the gravity of non-dimensional space in a dimensional matrix.  Without a detailed examination of the results of this inquiry which has not been done, there are possibilities that should not be discounted.  None of these possibilities changes the fundamental structure of AuT.
Dark matter is an expression of information (or clock time) linearity.  But what features would account for it being spread out in the universe.
One is that the dark matter description may include features other than space.
It is possible that these concentrations reflect the conversion of light back to space or where space is going linear; a process that might account for the localized expression of greater spatial concentrations of gravity.
A less likely alternative is that ct6 which may manifest itself as dark matter, we might be nothing more than a spark on particle of ct6, for example.  Given its dimensional density (6 coordinates changing at once) we have no idea how it would appear (or not appear) and how it would manifest itself being exponentially larger than black holes and made up of chains of black holes in a way that we can only understand based on what huge lengths the strands of ct5 would have to form for it to exist for any period of time.
In the backwards world of AuT, the density of ct1 around black holes and matter is not tied to gravity, but instead is because at the speed of change a certain amount of ct1 is required in the solution in order to maintain the speed of change of the body in question.
In CT6 this would manifest itself in a density that might achieve a certain level of solidity.
Given the number of dimensions involved, the ct6 state, with its accompanying jacket of space, might appear like a point or even less than a point or perhaps as several points.  The gravitational element might express itself in ways that are not immediately obvious from a pre-AuT perspective.

Aut pp 21-AuT Book one Finished

The weekend comes to a close.  I look out over the clouded water and sand.  The wind has carried away the mornful sound of the foghorn and I could be the only person in the world.  After swearing off coffee for the week, I have my second cup in two days.

Last night, for the first time in a long, long time I slept uninterrupted the full night.  It was as if, having completed Book One of Algorithm Universe Theory (Or AuT Book One) the universe having taken its toll against me determined I should rest.

It lacks only those words for the back cover and subtitle, already largely part and parcel of the second volume to be typed in order to make the book available for the first time.

So, a short walk down memory lane.  As I look at these it is immediately evident that what I did in the beginning is but a whisp of where I arrived.   And yet, the kernel of everything is in that first book published in September of 2013 while I was facing so many issues and was compelled by a universe that seemed to be people by vengeful gods whose goal was to torture me unless I fulfilled this quest, the same ones that let me sleep last night.  How odd and how very Greek.

Here is the kernel (from the description of EHT below: "Space, dimension and the contents- mass and energy, and gravitational attraction are directly linked to time at a fundamental level."  If you only substitute "algorithmic results" for "time" is it not the tag line for this book published 3.5 years later?  Well, not exactly, but pretty close.  The description of SIA2nd is a laundry list (the less politically correct description from my youth, a chinese laundry list) of accomplishments of the theory.   It doesn't give you any real idea of what it is about even though it is a more or less complete albeit filled with inaccuracies, typographically, historical outliers and false leads of the type that are inevitable when you rush something into print.

I largely put that volume aside for a month or so before picking it up again and saying, "enough, time to rut out all the inaccuracies and put something in print that can be read once, highlighted, set down and with a satisfying belch say, "ahhh, so that is how the universe works."

Of course, despite the fact that the universe seems to be run at some level by Greek Gods (at least from my perspective) who torture us for their purposes and then let us be when they are done, it appears that something both more rich and less satisfying lies beyond the illusion that we live in.  How do I synthesis what has already been done and err not on the side of yodeling the results or pithy quotes but on saying, this is why this book is.  Do I tell the truth, "an algorithm wrote this book?"  Would that not be a proper and appropriate ending to this part of the series?  

First (in reverse order) the two books still available:

Spirals in Amber 2nd Edition: Algorithm Universe Theory (1/8/17)

Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) is the most fundamental view of the universe in existence. It appears counter-intuitive; but when understood is so predictive and consistent that it overcomes the problems of intuition from our limited perspective. AuT provides (1) a pre-expansion model of the origin of space time, (2) the origin of quantum phenomena, (3) quantum length as information giving rise to perceived time, dimension, and quantum gravity, (4) the relationship of gravity to other forces, (5) the origin of force, (6) the transitions of dimensional coordinates to the different time, force and dimensional states we experience, (7)explanations of how we experience clock time, and history in a quantum environment (8) The relationship of velocity, gravity, and time dilation, (9) The reasons for the perception of speed in a non-linear environment, (10) The exponential growth of clock time concentration giving rise to a converging series of compressed information states going from space to energy to matter to black hole states and beyond, (12) wave-particle duality, (13) an understanding that all phenomena and not just time move in a single direction and that all change is at the same speed, (14) the origins of what we have previously thought of as dark matter gravitational forces by way of example. NLT (the predecessor of NLC) correctly predicted that the alleged reports finding a Higgs Boson was inaccurate, and (15) it takes us far back before the first big bang (traveling backwards) explaining what the latest big bang was and what happened trillions of years before it, (16) How complex interactions, including perceived human self-determination are tied to fairly simple phenomena

The einstein Universe (submitted 9/11/13)

Fundamental physics springs from time more than any other feature. Space, dimension and the contents- mass and energy, and gravitational attraction are directly linked to time at a fundamental level. The evidence set out within the discussion of the Einstein Hologram Universe (E-H-U) empirically shows that space and its contents must stem primarily from time, and at least mathematically from a "singularity" which exists without dimension or time as we experience it.
If you are looking for Einstein's hidden secrets, the secrets of the universe and unified field theory, you have come to the right place.
Leave it to the theoretical physicists to prove that religion, the occult and fortune telling are legitimate sciences.

Then we get to the middle versions which, although they were not completely brought into the subsequent books, are not in print

NLT's description (successor to EHT)  This book gathered a great deal of data about the universe together.  It was the first very long version of what is now AuT.

Non linear time theory sets out to be an elegant, internally consistent theory of space time originally set out in vague terms in “The Einstein Hologram Universe.”  It would be radical, even implausible, were it not for string hologram theory.  It is partially developed.  The book was written originally to be a 15 page grant application for the purpose of finishing it.  It is mathematically incomplete, but intuitively correct.

It undermines self-determination, it either discloses or creates a universe so vastly different from anything we experience.

It questions space and time, envisioning an environment where those limitations do not apply.  This is vastly different from an environment where you can move about instantly or travel back and forth in time.  This environment is one where time and distance have no existence.  It is as if those two critical elements of our perception, space-time, were created for no reason other than our ability to perceive them.  It suggests that we exist in the non-linear space and that our perception of a past and a future, of a here and there, are only illusion.  It almost requires that every moment exists simultaneously with every other moment that every quantum point exists with every other quantum point.

It suggests that our ability to manipulate our surroundings, to invent concepts of our surrounding, even our ideas of awareness are but an illusion.  We do not think because we are, we think because in the world of non-linearity our entire existence is laid out for us.  I can decide to write this and you can decide to read this, but it is a decision that is already made.

The theory is as much a terror as a triumph.

Non Linear Time Theory provides an intuitive approach to space, matter and force.  NLT provides intuitive answers to what have been mysteries in prior theories. The list includes (1) the origin of space time, (2) the origin of quantum phenomena, (3) quantum time giving rise to quantum gravity, (4) the unified field relationship of gravity to other forces, (5) the origin of force, (6) the transitions of time dimensional coordinates to the different force and dimensional states we experience, (7) explanations of why we experience clock time and (8) why it disappears at the speed of light, (9) the exponential growth of clock time concentration and (10) the reasons for the perception of speed, (11) an explanation of why we can predict clock time 5, (12) wave-particle duality, (13) the successor of standard clock time that allow us to have self-awareness, (14) the origins of what we have previously thought of as dark matter gravitational forces, (15) the reasons why we should doubt the expansion of the universe and (16)an explanation of what would be the driving force of dark energy if it did exist (however unlikely that appears now), and the list goes on.

A spiral in amber-the origin of quantum mechanics

This is a first edition, really more of a draft with only the first 250 pages edited for consistency.  It is less for general distribution, that will be the second edition, as a way of putting the new physics of NLC into the public hands.  

It is loosely based on Hologram theory from where it had its roots, but quickly departs from any dimension based theory.  It departs entirely from time.  It describes the universe as it is, not as we perceive it.

The first step departing from Hologram theory to NLC was recognizing that (1) everything happens at once in the absence of time.  This led to the concept that (2) time had both linear and non-linear attributes.  What we call time was linear time and ignored non-linear time as a predecessor or generator of linearity.  The next step in the progression was (3) the determination that time had different "phases".  Several analogies were then formed to describe the features of these time phases, numbering them (clock time 1(CT1), clock time 2(CT2), etc); looking at them as orbits or states; developing the inter-relational aspects (conservation of time, dimensional change-speed, expression as dimensional or force elements, and exponential compression) and the process of beginning to explain these relationships and how they were derived from a static environment.  (4) Next was the recognition that compression occurred according to algorithms based on position and not time and the ratios were exponentials of 2 which led to the idea that space-time reflected information theory.  (5) This led to the idea that all moments in time were fixed permanently, most likely in a shrinking spiral, the movement inward reflected by the compression of coordinates.  (5) Common existence of points indicated that quantum moments of time continue to exist and our perceived ability to change the universe only exists by way of “slowing” down one way change in all coordinates and hence time is illusory, only location along the spiral of existence defines location in space-time, (6) One way change meant not just a “one way” clock time, but also “one way” dimensions so that there is no difference between the dimensions of time and space; no true space time, just coordinates in different states coexisting with our own.  The “manipulation” of dimension was nothing more than slowing down one set of coordinate change relative to another, just another manifestation of the rules of physics, and (7) there was no randomness, god truly doesn’t play dice with the universe, not even with our seemingly independent actions. (8) The changes in the nature of the primary spiral reflected features that could be represented in terms of origin and change by linear, intersecting mirror image spirals which are fixed algorithms meaning that we live our lives a quantum moment along two intersecting spirals in amber.

Spirals (1rst ed) the single variable solution to the universe and the origin of quantum mechanics

This book defines the origin of quantum phenomena in terms of AuT, quantum and macro phenomena based on a single variable intersecting spiral algorithm model with exponential compression.

This is the forth  edition of this theory and the first relatively complete model.

The most surprising results are an explanation of the (1) big bang as one of a long series of similar  intermediary events, (2) how history is possible in a non-linear environment and (3) why history fades and (4) an explanation of the natures of space and higher information states beginning with black holes.

These features alone set AuT as the standard for the examination of quantum mechanics, but there are other surprising results.

The list of features explained includes (1) the origin of space time, (2) the origin of quantum phenomena, (3) an explanation of of dark matter and quantum gravity, (4) the relationship of gravity to what was previously described as dark energy, (5) and explanation of dark energy along with the an explanation of expansion and contraction of the universe at inflection points, (6) the origin and solution of space curvature.

The theory begins to explain (1) time dilation, (2) the conversion of time dimensional coordinates to the different force and dimensional states we experience, (3) how we experience clock time; (4) how speed in general and light speed are generated in a non-linear environment; (5) why we perceive exponential growth of clock time concentration, 

The theory does too much, but the reason is that other theories were looking for the wrong answers.  Once you start looking for the right data, it turns out that it was there all the time.

FINALE

Perhaps, you should chime in, you who have read this so diligently, post your suggestions for the jacket?  I'm not holding my breath.

Instead, since it appears there is no reason to wait for the rain to stop, since I have a slicker, since I have had my coffee and put this information together, I will go for a walk and see, perhaps, if those same gods and that same algorithm will provide me the answer in whatever way they chose.

And lastly, something that has nothing to do with how this book should be jacketed.  When this post was started, some time ago, it was started to put the opening paragraph of an interesting section forward.  In this edition, there are highlights throughout the book to point out words used to give meaning, the new lexicon that is covered in the earlier chapters and of which you can see an almost complete version in the earlier posted posts and an example of which from the last 20 pages appears below in a discussion of one of the pieces for which I have chosen a result but of which I remain largely unsatisfied, even today.  And, despite a full nights sleep, I am far from satisfied.

23 Coordinate Memory: 

1)     Coordinates may change as they become part of history or may be fixed.  The solution determines whether there is stagnate coordinate history or active coordinate history.   The evidence points towards active history, but that means that the past changes over time which would eventually change the present.  That might explain the reason for the imperfect repetition of history and for the way it fades over time.  It might also explain the heavy appearance of randomness.  If the underlying basis of the next quantum instance changes, it would render the next quantum instance much more random in appearance even though it was mathematically predestined.   Thus while a stagnate history appears logical to us in a space time environment, the evidence may actually point to the opposite result.
narrow range (3 pts) or broad range active history or narrow at ct1 going broader with each ct increase