AuT-pp2 Dark Matter and Hidden History

Here is one of those articles that shows how durable AuT is when confronted with scientific observation.

The suggestion of this article is that Dark matter develops over time and the corrolarry, not discussed by the article, is that Dark matter is,at least in part, historical information. The primary source of dark matter is seen as linear ct1 pre-ct1-ct2 transition. Another idea  is that is increases as light transitions to ct1 (ct2 decompresses to ct1) or a concentration of increased ct1 linearity transition.
AuT (as shown below) teaches that history, being one derivative step behind "present information," is hard to see.  Further, history starts off small, but becomes noticeable and, of course, no matter how small it is, there is more and more of it over time.  The solution should match the "speed" study of time (already used to determine when the universe will stop expanding) and raises facinating questions of the interface between history and compression states.
Even more impressive is the long list of paragraphs (excerpted below) where this historical informaiton is indicated as "hidden" from view in Spirals in Amber.
This explains that dark matter could be, history that is preserved in the system in ever increasing amounts just as the article predicts and long before the article was published.
What is neat is that in advance of this article, Spirals in Amber, 2nd edition describes history as "hidden" but "maintaining its gravitational effects."  In other words, SIA specifically and AuT in general gives a basis for more dark matter appearing in later universes, more being visible in later galaxies than early ones.

https://medium.com/@ScienceEditor/lack-of-dark-matter-in-early-galaxies-perplexes-astronomers-so-where-did-all-the-dark-matter-e54577f3ac64

Exerpts:
Here are just some examples from SIA 2nd:
P. 13 The perception of history is preserved in quantum moments by having the current quantum moment made from the stacking of prior quantum moments which is a result of compression.

p.32 no 31.    This suggests that many spiral universes almost as big, with almost as much information, as ours exist but that each is defined by what we perceive as only two dimensions and the composite universe is built upon only the prior two with the extra information being “hidden” as history which remains tangible but is fixed beyond the current quantum moment.
no  35. Observation indicates that each prior solution remains in place but out of sync by the value of 1 (the change in x) from the other giving the appearance of history.

22. This suggests that many spiral universes almost as big, with almost as much information, as ours exist but that each is defined by what we perceive as only two dimensions and the composite universe is built upon only the prior two with the extra information being “hidden” as history.
37. Due to the changing value of pi, there are several ways to approach this, but the one that seems best suited to observation is an exponential building as opposed to a pure F-series construction and that this building world occur with each spiral quantum change, that is to say, with each change in x.  Observation indicates that each prior solution remains in place but out of sync by the value of 1 (the change in x) from the other giving the appearance of history.
p.52 The extra information forces it to appear likes its moving and changing historically even though the basic information is not changing.  

Movement, includes spin and all the other symptoms of movement.  

The other place it is hidden, in plain sight, is history.  Since the F series solution is n=n-1+n-2 history is inherent in this model, otherwise we'd look back and see nothing nor would there be any prediction.  

p. 53History and velocity makes sense as the location of information.  We don't see it correctly because we're looking for information to be solid.

p. 82 What we see are these quantum moments, that is if you look at the drawings above, you don’t see them from the top as they are drawn, instead you look at the leading edge, the “history” is still there because every point is built up this history, but it is hidden to a large extent by the leading edge.  It is not completely hidden because of the offsets; suggested by calculus to be of a lower order 
p. 91 So for our equation (f(x) is d/dx(x^2^n)=2^n(x^((2^n)-2) + O(dx)^2

Another difference is that we do not want to get a total or sum for the various answers or ignore O(dx).  Summing information gets rid of quantum relative changes to x (sct and dimension) and Odx is where the history of the equation resides, that is, obviously, the present is the derivative of the past in AuT since the F-series equation defines the present in that fashion (NOW=past 1 plus past 2).

p. 92 There are complicated questions that arise from the formulation of this algorithm is the question of what happens when you add two prior states to get the next state with an offset.  We can and will draw this out.  As these are stacked to get to higher ct states (past ct1) the relativity of ct2 to ct1 allows for higher factors Ox^2, Ox^3, etc (using calculus nomenclature) to drift into what we call history which is the only place it can go; there is no "new" state and the information has to be parked somewhere.

p. 172 Looking closely you can see the history through cracks in the matrix.

p 173 The display mechanism for AuT is the relative movement along successively more compressed spirals which are offset from one another where the entire matrix shifts and grows exponentially larger (exponentially according to the F-series function) for each change in x making the universe more massive than it appears with most of the information hidden in the history of the next

p 190 Just looking at this it can be seen that each higher state is literally the addition of the two preceding lower states so that the historical maintenance of states exists, but fades just as history fades in this

history 1

history 2

history 3=history 2 plus 1

history 4=history 2 plus 3 but 3 is 2 plus 1

etc. so history is preserved but becomes harder to see.

Observation shows that the gravitational element is preserved notwithstanding the change in state and the relative slowing.

Taking all of these together, we can make a change to the thoughts on Dark matter as underlined below

Dark mater is fairly well described primarily as the manifestation of the gravity of non-dimensional space in a dimensional matrix.  Without a detailed examination of the results of this inquiry which has not been done, there are possibilities that should not be discounted.  None of these possibilities changes the fundamental structure of AuT.

Dark matter is an expression of information (or clock time) linearity.  But what features would account for it being spread out in the universe.
The primary suggestion is that historical spirals, being hidden behind the matrix of current history provides a basis for gravity.  Looking at this it can be seen that each higher state is literally the addition of the two preceding lower states so that the historical maintenance of states exists, but fades just as history fades in this

history 1

history 2

history 3=history 2 plus 1

history 4=history 2 plus 3 but 3 is 2 plus 1

etc. so history is preserved but becomes harder to see.

Observation shows that the gravitational element is preserved notwithstanding the change in state and the relative slowing.  This can be explained in theory as being manifested by dark matter.
Other ideas that mighthelp explain dark matter can include:

One is that the dark matter description may include features other than space.

It is possible that these concentrations reflect the conversion of light back to space; a process that might account for the localized expression of greater spatial concentrations of gravity.

I might add that the "less likely alternative" is that ct6  may manifest itself as dark matter.  Given its dimensional density (6 coordinates changing at once) we have no idea how it would appear (or not appear) and how it would manifest itself being exponentially larger than black holes and made up of chains of black holes in a way that we can only understand based on what huge lengths the strands of ct5 would have to form for it to exist for any period of time.

In the backwards world of AuT, the density of ct1 around black holes and matter is not tied to gravity, but instead is because at the speed of change a certain amount of ct1 is required in the solution in order to maintain the speed of change of the body in question.

In CT6 this would manifest itself in a density that might achieve a certain level of solidity.

The idea is that there are other places where dark matter might manifest itself.  Given the number of dimensions involved, the ct6 state, with its accompanying jacket of space, might appear like a point or even less than a point or perhaps as several points.  The gravitational element might express itself in ways that are not immediately obvious from a pre-AuT perspective.