The nobel wizard of oz rant

So, I mathematically define exactly what dark maatter is and what dark energy is yet they give the nobel prize to some guys (I'm sure they are very smart and all) who just flounder around in the standard model and make wild observations.
Why you ask?  What do they have that I don't have?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pWSwfVDiq8

A very short rant.
In light of that I wish to make....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnciwwsvNcc

You can read it here, in the prior posts.  CT2 and 3 and much of the early folding of ct4 is dark matter.  I often say it is ct1, but since ct1 has no gravity, that is true and false, ct2 being folded ct1.  And moreover, it is the net folding tha that is cark matter and the net unfolding that is dark energy, things obvious only if you have read and understood my books. 

And, after all, most of it is in this blog.