Since I have mentioned that there are parts of this which exceed the scope of the book in terms of detail and this is one of the, I am going to post what I was working on today. It should be noted that critical parts of this discussion appear in the book which is the point of reference if you see something that is a little confusing in the description below.
What the purpose of this exercise comes up to is explaining time dilation (both gravitational and Velocity based) in terms of a dimension/time free environment. It is not a complicated analysis, but while an explaination exists for how this is done, the complexity of the calculation for a given point is not given although the issues are not mathematical, but scale related. This scale issue will be addressed in due course and in the writing actually appears before this section but I'm jumping around a little for your amusement.
A. EQUATIONS: Why does CT4 disappear approaching the speed of light (time dilation)
The one paragraph summary: If the change in time coordinates is conserved, then as you increase the change along one set of time coordinates, the other time coordinate changes must decrease. Standard clock time is the perceived change in three coordinates when observed by having a fourth time coordinate from which to observe the other three. Therefore, acceleration in three-dimensional space decrease the ability of the fourth coordinate to change, decreasing the amount of change perceivable from this perspective. This indicates that perception does not move from one coordinate to allow perception of three dimensions. There is, however, no reason for a fixed time dimension; only that one coordinate change allows the view of three others. Dimensional analysis is irrelevant. Things “remain” in place despite the number of simultaneous changes because the overall change is conserved.
Time dilation (the Lorentz equation in NLT theory):
Velocity has to be absolute and AuT defines how and why “true change” as opposed to relative velocity is absolute no matter what starting point is used and free from relativistic effects between two ct4 bodies.
There are two forms of time dilation that need to be reconciled for post ct1 states and explained relative to ct1 states:
Velocity Time dilation
T0=t’2-t’1
T=t2-t1
=[t’2+(vx’2/c^2)-t’1-vx1/c^2]/sqr(1-v^2/c^2)
Using binomial expansion, we get to a novel result. Using N for the Numerator
=N/x
N=t’2+(vx’2/c^2)-t’1-vx1/c^2
X=1+1/2[v^2/c^2]+3/8[v^2/c^2]^2+…
Velocity is a substitution of ct1 states at a maximum rate of 1 to 256 for ct2 (presumably at a higher rate photons turn into time/space independent ct1). This rate is less, resulting in a slower speed for higher states. The 1:256 can be substituted for c in the equations given giving them a quantum basis and an upper limit and v can also be replaced with a substitution value based on the timing of the solution from x=1 to infinity. This is not a clock time solution, but is, instead a non-time based solution which changes and is specifically only the sum of the prior two universes although the entire history is preserved through this sum process which ensures the total amount of information increases and that the universe must “move” or change with each change in the value of x. The values compared for different values of x are fixed linear solutions without multiple dimensions although relative timing of the solutions allows a conversion back to dimensional space.
|
Gravitational time dilation
T=T0/sqr[1-(2gm/rc^2)]
T=time interval remote from mass
Binomial expansion shows: sqr(1-x)=1+x/2+3/8x^2+5/16x^3…
Or T=T0/[1+{(2gm/rc^2)/2t0}+{3/8(2gm/rc^2)^2}+…]
As gm (mass and gravity) increase they offset to sum of separation and gravity and begin, according the given infinite series which can lead to a value of zero for time only at m=infinitely or r going to zero.
Quantum theory provides that this number need not be infinity but instead is a function of a finite separation and time defined by a similar
Mass can be converted to ct1 via the exponential analysis which also is a function of f(n)^(2^n). While more complicated than the analysis for velocity, the result is identical due to the convertibility of mass to ct1 and ct1 substitution.
R, like V can be eliminated based on the changing value of x where the change in R is based on a comparison of two different points based on when they are solved relative to x and V is the same type comparison where meters per second are converted into two separate values of position for two different values of x.
|
This shows the “historical” references (3/8x^2) becoming very small in the framework and thereby becoming less of a factor in the determination if these histories are substituted for the more remote aspects of the dimensional analysis.
|
This shows the “historical” references (3/8x^2) becoming very small in the framework and thereby becoming less of a factor in the determination if these histories are substituted for the more remote aspects of the dimensional analysis.
The speed of light (approx. 3x10^8 m/s can be transformed into a change of 1:256 at the ct1 level.
|
| crazy | crazy for this girl |
 | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjvTkS7e0WA |
No comments:
Post a Comment