Here's a wasted billion. I figured out why they'd never find the higgs boson. Don't believe me? Read back in the old posts, you'll not only see the prediction and the reason but you'll see me cry "bullshit" when they said they'd found it before they admitted they didn't.
Same with dark matter. Idiots spending a billion dollars to find something I already told them what was. Incredibly stupid.
Anyway, the big bang is another issues that was explained away (albeit the route led to the big bounce type of methodology although I explained it whereas the big bounce theory is just more 3 dimensional idiocy. But we see three dimensions. Why the third dimension? It is to prevent to types of information from occupying the same place at the same time. Because they close in (converging infinite series) there is no overlap in 3 dimensions although as the drawing shows there would be in two.
It has been shown that alignment and not overlap seems to work. Why? Because if you look at those triangular drawings you think in terms of space. However, the triangles are only representations of non-linear environments, they are only yes/no or in the case of the triangles 0,1,1,0 drawings.
The drawings in the prior page show a single spiral which is interesting because it goes back and forth, but it isn't as inconsistent as it looks because the single spiral (each two prior states added to make the next one) include within them all the echos of those prior spirals states so you have both a single main spiral and as many sub-spirals as there are values of x! Not surprising, but there it is. This suggests that movement of each point or at least along each point 0to1, 1 to 1, 1 back to 0 and the negative for each point in space as each change is made is logically included, although this requires a great deal more discussion of those drawings and you'll have to wait for that.
The movement from 0 to 1 is the movement from non-linearity to linearity which is where gravity can be found (as opposed to the mythical particle they spend billions to find. Likewise, mass necessarily comes from the same function which is why looking for dark matter is so inane when we're surrounded by it, it being the information in this half in/half out state.
Since everything has mass, we can also posit that other states maintain this so that, for example, photons are not just 1,1,2 but are instead 0,1,1,2; wave energy being not 1,2,3, but 0,1,1,2,3. There are problems with this, because the sharing of the 1 state makes the wave/particle duality of energy attractive because of the shared state, but it's worthy of consideration both ways.
The other seductive quality is that this allows us to "slow" change. For matter you have one change at a time so 0,1,1,2,3,5 would be slower to occur than 0,1,1,2,3 but this is probably a "red herring" in the universe. Instead the 1,1,2, the 1,2,3 and the 2,3,5 exist individually just as other F-series functions do and the compression of states reducing the interaction with the lower states controls the dilation of time. Again the sharing of the 1 state in all prior states (space, photon and wave) might keep them aligned better in terms of speed although the compression function of AuT almost has to control (you can find it ad nauseum in these posts or in the book).
Both need to be developed.
It's pathetic because if I had 1% of the funding for any of those projects where they're looking for something I've already told you how to find I could finish the several plots necessary to determine the exact mathematical derivation that best fits the observed universe just as I fairly handily with no money from anyone figured out how compression works, how that makes the big bang operate, what dark matter was, and the fundamental way in which the universe is built from a single variable universe, history included.
No comments:
Post a Comment