Intellectual Merit : a summary of nearbyconcepts

Why do you want to have me present this to your institution?
Space appears curved, but why?  AuT answers this and the answer is both simple, relativistic and surprising.  You can get the infrmation from books1-4, the summary in book2, bu tit is a fraction of the information and there is so much that can be added by hearing someone whose name will one day be up there with...who?  I don't know  That is up to someone else, but I dont have that many years left so it's that time.
Or you can be one of those people who just copyies hundreds of posts when you could get better information for 2.99 by downloading the books from Kindle (better still a hard copy you can get me to sign!  Imagine if you had one of the first editions of book 2 before it was fixed.)
I will get back to it, but I need time.

What is intellectual merit?  Understanding, is that enough?  Does the explanation of all phenomena and the source of dimension enough to give merit to the undertaking?  I cant say.   Let's ask some other questions.
What is love in an illusory universe that has so much power?  In a universe driven by irony, why does love give power to observation?
Life is not what we have and think it is, we are a reflection of the underlying, curvature an accident of relative compression and transitional features of mathematics, yet merit is what we do because we have no choice.  Where do you find merit in that?
  But we don't do in quantum, we only do in ct4-5 environments, we only do in 4-5 places at once with all the density and complexity of the overlap inherent in such a comparision and while we see at the ct0-ct1 state a singular solution, but we also know that the value of x affects solutions at higher ct states, the reason who the exaimination is so complicated at any state over ct1..
There is a story of Niels Bohr coming up with the complimenary principle relatied to the impossibility of thinking simultaneously about position and velocity of a particle (eliminated in a quntum universe as an issue) because of his son's act of theft simultaneously see in terms of love or justice.
And darkly in these posts, there is the effect of love on this undertaking, very dark, much darker than is shown here.
Why can't science accept what I have seen so clearly?  It isn't the reasons you imagine, because the algorithm makes the determination.  It is not mine or theirs to determine things.  It may be because science doesn't love as deep, but that ignores the question of how irony plays into the derivation of mathematical outcomes or more particularly how mathematical outcomes give rise to irony, something already addressed as embedded within converging and diverging infinite series.
Another question that AuT answered is why, when we write out the derivation of pi, we ask about the constants.  Why 4?  The answer is that 4 is only one in a succession of numbers representing place.  All of the other aspects have to do with the vibration relationship of -1^x to single place from which the infinite series are drawn.  Indeed in writing out the equations for pi, this is the first portion of the equation for pi in all of its forms, from 0 to whatever.
In the article under discussion, there is teh question of hidden anti-matter within the proton.  While we now know, from AuT that antimatter and matter do not balance but change throughtout the solution for an universe based on whether the universe is expanding or contracting, the amount of anti-matter, is relevant to any inquiry.
The concentration of electrons in the nucleus might suggest that either electrons or neutrons were anti-matter.  The idea behind this concept is that we have much more anti-matter than what is disclosed by an examination of the rmainder of the universe but that it is in a transition from ct5 to ct4.  his makes a frightening amount of sense.  First, we know the forces involved make the strong force appear like a ct5 phenomena.  Second we know that there is a strong breakdown effect in thermodynamics, entropy.  While we know that entropy is illusory from AuT, its presence indicates that there is a breeakdown of this proton state, what you would expect during an expanding universe.  Why not a breakdown from a ct5 quantum state (black hole) towards a ct4 state causing the expansion?  It fits very well within the model, gives a basis for the positive vs electron negative result and provides a basis for the strong presence of entropy within the model.  Stars represent the opposite effect in balance and have a different force effect.  Stars have traditional energy, the breakdown of matter, the movmeent towards fission instead of fusion, reflected in entropy or expansion of the universe. 
This requires a mathematical analysis which has to come later.  There is the question in such a case of what is "pure" anti-matter.  What differentiates anti-matter in its form that anihilates (converts to energy and space) matter from degrading black hole stuff?  Is it direction along the transitions of 2^n compression arms?
There are seductive reasons to pursue this.  Orbits might represent teh gradual disentegration of the ct5 state reflected in the release of ct4 phenomena.  The whole idea of electon or matter waves indicates that the existence of matter in its positive and negative forms is little more than transition from higher to lower state solutions.
Why all electrons are the same?  This is an easier question to answer, electrons are quantum state changes where the information arms are full.  This indicates that transitional states do not have multiple different ways they can go together. The transitional states appear as forces (gravitational, magnetic/electro, strong and weak).  The state itself remains the same but merely appears with a force characteristic between states.  So these electrons are the same but appear with the strong and weak force and the various levels give rise to the illusions of quark type particles when instead they are merely transitional breakdowns under circumstances.
This, however, raises the question, why are all protons the same?  Black holes transition just like electrons do, but the intermediary results between quantum electrons and quantum black holes might appear anywhere along a transition state spectrum.   The initial concept is that they do, the different forms of matter reflect different combinations of transition state effects and vary because there are so many information arm states from which a molecule can derive its base mathematical solutions.  But why not at the proton level?  Why shouldn't the proton be equally confused?  Why should a proton be a plus one all of the time even while the nucleus transitions more consistently with the 32 information arm states?   The initial best answer is that protons represent a solution in proximity to electrons.  Their size represents a matrix based solution perhaps tied to the stepped result (i.e. each step is 2^1 greater than the prior step or less than the prior step).  Likewise the proton result could be tied to the 2(f(n)) solution which is constant no matter where it appears along an information arm.
The bottom line is that while the model remains accurate, to use it predictively requires a better idea of what is happening about the quantum state within the matrix of solutions.
Under this analysis matter is a ct4 state transitioning away from ct5, anti-matter is ct4 states transitioning towards ct5.  When combined, they stop transitioning merely because they break down.
Why the stunning difference if they are just moving different directions in terms of solution?  Why a difference between addition and subtraction, multiplication and division?  This are necessarily inflection point events.  You don't have "half division" although you can have division along with multiplication, at the point of solution you don't do this in halves. 

Let us stop this discussion for the moment, secure in the idea that the brilliance of AuT has not solved all of mathematical-physics inquiry...yet.

As I write this, Puerto Rico is being savaged as have many of the islands.  Victims of non-existent climate changen necessarily part of a non-steady state universe.  Let us think the same about Mexico's earthquakes and the world wide victims of other people.  Let us think for a moment of the human victims, that we will need to help them and end with a quote from out of doors in the holy land:

"we find here far less of human squalor and misery to sadden us with thoughts of "What man has made of man."
"Is not this Christ's work that is still doing in Christ's town, this teaching of the children, this helping of the sick and wounded, for His sake, and in His name? Yet there are silly folk who say they do not believe in missions."

Intellectual Merit :

There are extensive practical and theoretical aspects of AuT. AuT provides a pre-expansion model of (1) the origin of space time, (2) the origin of quantum phenomena, (3) quantum length as information giving rise to perceived time and quantum gravity, (4) the relationship of gravity to other forces, (5) the origin and reason for force, (6) the transitions of dimensional coordinates to the different time, force and dimensional states we experience, (7) how we experience clock time, and history in a quantum environment (8) The relationship of velocity, gravity, and time dilation, (9) The reasons for the perception of change (speed) in a non-linear environment, (10) The exponential growth of clock time concentration giving rise to a converging series of compressed information states going from  space to energy to matter to black hole states and beyond, (12) wave-particle duality, (13) an understanding that all phenomena  and not just time move in a single direction and that all change is at the same speed, (14) the origins of what we have previously thought of as dark matter gravitational forces by way of example. NLT (the predecessor of NLC) correctly predicted that the alleged reports finding a Higgs Boson was inaccurate, (15) AuT takes us far back before the first big bang (traveling backwards) explaining what the latest big bang was and what happened trillions of years before it, (16) how complex interactions, including perceived human self-determination are tied to fairly simple phenomena.

It has practical applications to understanding what we observe, how we can manipulate movement, aging, gravity and time.  AuT also provides an explanation of phenomena that we observe but don’t understand that has a direct effect on us. 

Do we observe, for example, inflection points without realizing we are looking at them?  I think the answer may well be yes and the observation of these localized inflection point phenomena are important and provide information which will be critical in the future. One possible example is the changing earth’s magnetic field.  We do not know when this will occur even though we have a historic record.  The reason for the confusion in the record is because each cycle would be off slightly based on the converging nature of the infinite series represented in the localized inflection point which would, otherwise reflect the plan of the overall universe. The expressed goal includes meeting with the scientists who study this data to help refine the converging series models that will help predict those phenomena and better explain the compression and decompression phenomena of AuT.

From a predictive standpoint, this theory is far better than other theories.   This allows us to make predictions on a gross scale of coming events based on inflection points.  It allows us to better determine the exact nature of the inflection points once we have enough information from which to derive them, something presumably largely in place from geologic records for the localized inflection points of magnetism of the earth for the earth’s magnetic field.  But this is only one, relatively minor element of a much broader, more inclusive predictive theory.

Finally, please order the books since they not only provide more information, but the sales inspire me.  Thanks to those who have ordered.  A positive review, understanding these are not works of entertainment, but scientific inquiry would not be amiss perhaps?  And given the level of genius inherent within the theory, if any, why not arrange for me to speak at your institution before it is too late, which it could well be too late already since you read this in arrears.