the next patent

It is early in the morning and cold, but I am up; putting my insights down on paper.
With the pool closed exercise is the dry, earthly kind that does not appeal to me.
I think I have come a little closer, recognizing the value of time, that thing which doesn't exist at the quantum level.  No one has tried knocking down my door to force a nobel prize on me, but there is some progress.
There is an order to things and that is a key after a fashion, how to do things in the right order, but that won't be explained here; it was explained in the last patent and will be explained again in another way in the next patent and perhaps another in the one after that.
I wrote a letter recently, and this is an excerpt from that for you who I haven't written to in a while.
***

This is a new model of thermodynamics.  If this is accurate there has to be a certain amount of post discovery obviousness.  Observe:

The first is that is has to be right, we see this because there are observed iterated equations and resulting fractals, fundamentally the denominator of pi and the resulting golden ratio.

The second is that the model must be durable, in the face of observations it must hold up.  There are innumerable examples from solving Zeno’s paradox to wave particle duality to explaining time and force.  In this case the best example may be how easily it unifies force.  You can do this with a hand calculator and the relative value of forces (e.g. from Wikipedia)  using 2f(n)^2^n where n=1, 2, 3, 5, 8; the first 5 solutions to the Fibonacci series or golden ratio.

Folding from 1:2 yields the relative value of gravity, from 3:5 yields the mass energy equation (e=mc^2); 5:8 folding yields the strong force.  The other forces are internally reconciled by the standard model as electromagnetic phenomena, although what that means is explained with more detail.

The third observation given here is that the model is confirmed by otherwise unexpected observations.

MIT in October of 2019* found smoking gun evidence of what we proved mathematically in 2013 and applied to fractals at the end of 2018.  Equally important, the evidence of the model surrounds us, just hidden at the subatomic level by time.  Time is defined as a dimensional result of pre-time change by this model with great specificity.  As a result, energy is also defined in a new way which changes its manipulation exponentially.

Equally important, the model must have some use.  This model explains why fusion has not been achieved, except in bombs, and how to solve that problem.  In the patents it is shown to be widely applicable.

We have been invited to file a full phase 1 NSF grant on our fusion project which we plan to file the first of the year.

AuT could be called "not just fusion."  We have a new approach to fusion, what some call a 10 trillion dollar industry* (* https://cen.acs.org/energy/nuclear-power/Fusion-start-ups-hope-revolutionize/96/i32).  We have also redefined quantum mechanics and fusion is the tip of the iceberg despite its importance.

***

What do you think of that?

There is a mistake I see, or saw.  It is the ultimate in obviousness, but is it really only obvious in light of AuT?  Are there not aspects of it that were obvious before?  But then if no one could see it without the science; maybe it is not obvious at all.
It would make me nauseous to see all the crackpot fusion projects being funded when the one based on real science languishes, but I am sick anyway and this is just another sick, such is the problem with technology, such is the problem with life.
I now have enough material for the next patent to be filed the first week of January; indeed it now screams to be filed.  "Quiet patent, quit screaming, it is too early."
It is surprising how quickly that date is coming up and attempting to get ready for it is a growing challenge, the more I do, the closer I get; the more there is to do.
Each step is handed to me, after a fashion, the model forces its solutions on me, deliver the plasma and what to do afterwards, therefore how to do it.
While the work for this specification technically has been done and the science essentially disclosed, there is enough new material to include the new specification and it will be very and specific in conjunction with the requirements for actual construction; why does it have to scream at me?
Pause for an advertisement, "Looking for the perfect holiday gift?"

The goal is to build it within the nsf budget in a form that will have initial combustion if not continuous combustion.
There is every reason to believe that it can be done.  They are throwing hundreds of millions of dollars into total nonsense and I am targeting a solution for a fraction of that.
If the nsf budget is not forthcoming, well that is a different story.  Disappointment hounds me, snapping at my heels.

Here are a couple of articles, the first showing the weakness in terms of strength of the standard model.
https://www.quora.com/Why-must-quantum-physics-and-general-relativity-be-united-Isn%E2%80%99t-that-like-uniting-the-behavior-of-a-human-with-the-cells-that-make-up-that-human

The second rendered total nonsense by the relentless logic of AuT
https://www.quora.com/What-are-electrons-made-up-of-Are-all-electrons-made-of-the-same-material