defining dimensions as gravity time

There are 3 dimensions of space but only one of time. Time and gravity are interchangeable Matter and energy can be defined in terms of gravity; and the three dimensions of space in terms of time. Theses are some of the previously explored concepts of the hologram universe. In order to address this concept some artificials constucts and tautologies will be used (for example we decide all dogs are hereafter named ralph, you have a dog therefore we know its name-if you dont know your dogs name or otherwise get it you had best move own to another blog entry, you will not be happy with this one). Now self proving statements and circular arguments may seem an arbitrary approach but we are trying not to fully define the universe but only to provide an intuitive basis to the concept that all that we experience is the projection of a tendency to return to gspace, what we call a singularity where Einstien's "everything happens at once" is projected onto time (space is just an impression like 3-d on a movie screen which might make Einstein uncomfortable, but we'll talk about comfort more when discussing whether Bill Murray deserves a Nobel Prize in Physics-spoiler alert-sorry Bill, not in the hologram universe). Spacial dimensions can be defined in terms of tendencies projected onto time and separated by the artificially dimension of time itself, the projection being from the singularity and the projection of what has already happened in g-space onto time which creates the impression of o-space. The most troubling aspect of this is the differentiation of "particles" which we experience (quarks and such which give rise to atoms and such) which are not absolutely required in modeling, but should be a natural result of the model. Note that as three colors are necessary to get a colored picture, so multiple types of matter seem to be required in order to imprint g-space onto time to create teh impression of o-space. Now dont get incredulous. Our "accepted"approach is that on the micro level (we only function in the macro level between the micro level I am about to mention and the super macro level-what is 1 foot past the edge of the universe...the micro and macro are both gspace in the hologram universe and are both at the same spot!) there are these tiny particles (inexplicably created) separated by massive spaces-relative to their tiny size- which equally inexplicable forces- however unified -allow to group up in the macro world to prevent us from passing through walls(except for ghosts and in nightmares) and alllow commedians and earth destroying meteors to bump in to things. Worse still are traditional thoughts of quantum placement (tunneling) probability and quasi matter-energy strings which extend into unobserved dimensions. Ipso facto our existence as a holographic projection onto time from an enigmatic Einsteinian gspace (which i will address later given time and sufficient interest) is not as far fetched as our caveperson ancestors would expect from us by now. Anyway, on to tautologies and circular arguments to render this intuitive. Matter has the tendency to return to the singularity and therefore to combine into a singularity which manifests itself to us in o-space as gravity. Separation in time, observed by us as separation in space reduces the concentration of gravity/matter but doesn't change its fundamental structure since it can be combined at any point in time(space for those of you stuck on that conceptually) to create a black hole and actually sink to the singularity (which is one spot despite being separated impression wise) Light has a tendencey to acceleration, thereby absorbing time at an increasing rate which may be slowed by being in proximity to a high tendency to return to the singularity (special relativity). Time and its consequent space relate to other points according to time and the movement of light. So here is the tautological approach of defining matter in terms of time and gravity G=(m1+m2)/d^2 Speed=d/t. Note speed is not a fundamental (as are distance and time, it's just a combination which is why I say we are reduced to using circular arguments and this is less than a full proof. You'll have to wait for that) T=d/speed d=t/speed which is general relativity after a fashion E=mc^2 E/m=C(d/speed)^2 where C is a constant that takes the unit of d/s the speed of light and can be anything for purposes of this analysis since we're only interested in units of our space in terms of the g-space/o-space projection Since mass and energy are interchangeable, you can have C1/C=d/speed)^2. While a tautology, it is merely an illusion to provide intuitive support for the projection concept of the hologram universe. By solving Mass for time, this yields interesting results. G=cd/s/(t/s) or cd/s*s/t or cd/t T=d/g with a constant thrown in. Now i have played loose with units and squares but this shows a type of relationship between time and gravity is intuitive and d=txg indicating that distance or space and manifestations like energy and its twin matter are nothing more than manifestations of gravity (the tendency to return to the singularity) against time. While mathematically undeveloped it gives an intuitive or observable support to our being in a projection of the tendency to return to gspace from o space projected onto time. While this argument is largely the same as me arguing that my pool robot is smarter than my dog because given nothing but a steady supply of water it keeps my pool clean while my dog does nothing consistently,it should not be rejected outright since my pool is clean and my dog is not.