Pages

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I am too close

It isn't as big as you might think and while I think more energy would be better, I am limited to three phase power, alas.
I think it is important to go slow in things that are poorly understood.  I think CERN might actually be safer and I'll explain that.  In the hologram universe as I envision it, there are only two parts; time and the singularity.  The fact that time may be part of the singularity is signficant, but not overly so since everything else is projected onto time whether within the singularity or not.
At CERN the possibilitymust be admitted that a gateway to the singularity might be opened.  This is different from the creation of a singularity or black hole because in my design there is only a single singularity (sounds verbose, but its actually insightful).  The chances of doing anything spectacular at CERN would, in this theory, be limited by the fact that you are bumping tendencies together.  You can see the interaction of tendencies (see prior blogs) but you don't really get to the singularity itself.  It is possible, but I think unlikely that time would be affected signficantly because you are not experimenting with time itself overly much and you are doing it with great expenditures of energy on a very small scale.  The study of time is also not the main focus (the focus is on matter which are just tendencies back to the singularity expressed onto time).  However the high speeds and therefore slow times experienced might yield something significant if there was a way to observe time and that is half of what I am attempting.  The other half is to explore the singularity, seeing everying rather than trying to expend energy outward to see just one thing (for example flight to mars).  The reason there are only these two issues is because there is only time and the singularity in this theoretical model and looking at other things is merely a way of observing these two things in their interaction.
Care must be taken in this sense even at very low energies since the generation of energy (the big bang) from the application of time to the singularity is "singularly" powerful (technical gufaws might be in order here).
In fact, vertigo or a sense of disorder might be generated from minor changes in time related to these observations.  Unfortunately it might also be associated with radiations known or unknown which is why a greater sense of caution than I originally envisioned might be in order even working with low energy and admittedly crude models.  One can wonder if typical radiation indicators would be relevant, but I don't even have the old fashioned film at hand, nor developer to test it.  It seems unlikely that traditional radiation would be a part of any examination, although there was certainly radiation generated in the only other known application of time to the singularity.
Of course this begs the point that you made already.  How can a manifestation or tendency on time affect time and that question is part of the answer perhaps since I conclude that it is possible that being part of the singularity projected on time we have the ability to act from within the singularity and join with our projected tendency (or burning tendency if you would) on time simultaneously and if this suggests any modeling then you are on the right track.

No comments:

Post a Comment