Pages

Monday, June 29, 2015

NLC-the circle flux capacitor part 5-where do circles come from

This month we have been focusing on the theory that we're made up of quantum spheres which are made up of quantum circles.  Now we address the question of where these circles come from and, more importantly, why.
For those of you waiting for the last post, waiting a little longer won't kill you, at least not quickly.
As has been set out previously, pi is one of the many things, like infinite division, that proves we live in a quantum universe. While this is generally known to every student of geometry, I explained that there was a solution to pi, even though it is a very long solution because once we get to the total amount of information in the universe in terms of decimal places, the solution to pi ceases to have any relevance.  This isn't a solution, but recognizes that, in conjunction with the Xeno paradoxes in support of Parminides that dimension is illusory.
We have also determined that circles form a crucial model for our universe, allowing for lenses of two dimensional concentration of information which in turn allow for three and successive dimensions along the same framework.  More importantly, this type of solution allows for the existence of the smaller quantum units within a larger quantum unit (energy and space within mass, mass, energy and space with black hole stuff, etc).  But where and, more importantly, why do these quantum circles exist.
There cannot be true circles, that would require a solution to pi.  So quantum circles are actually quantum spirals where the differences between true circles and spirals are so small that they are not easily observed,
Pi is like a sign post pointing quantum physics in the right direction.  We don't need a sign post because we're all pre-programmed.  If physics tells us anything, it is that randomness is just another word for not having sufficient information or understanding to plot a predetermined outcome and it turns out these outcomes are curved.
To fully understand this, you have to go back to a prior post which discusses what the pre-universe looks like.  It is a very, very high gravity point which has left non-linearity the only way it can (since it has no dimension yet)  It is spinning.  It is spinning in every direction at once and so fast that the only way we can calculate its speed is to assume that it is spinning at the rate of all quantum moments in the universe (past present and future) at once and since it is spinning in every direction at once, it appears motionless (but don't touch it!).  This spinning is a type of dimensionless, and essentially timeless playback of the entire universe and it continues to exist, it is a type of vibration without movement as we perceive it.  When we talk about the next state of the universe, it is only a perceived state, something is going to "touch" the universe and "project" our existence.  What is this event?  What is this thing?  You ask too many question.  It's like asking how long will this take and will you be there when it is finished.  Its a very good question, but the answer is unsatisfactory already, why dwell on it?  And why is that relevant anyway?
The point where the vibration ceases to be non-linear is upon us.
We talked about points being composed of dimensional and force characteristics.  The euclidean analysis suggests that the points are vibrational in nature; going in one direction yields spirals resembling circles, the movement in the other direction generates force characteristics, at least gravity.
Not immediately upon us but close enough.  But we're talking about the transitions from non-linearity to linearity.  Something touches the singularity, now set into motion and the vibrations transition from in place to linear and gravity comes into existence.  In this model, the movement from non-linear spinning vibrations to linear vibrations happens on a quantum scale and the movement, following immediately as it does from the spinning (and returning to the spinning) is in a quantum spiral.  Hence the framework for the curvature of space, the framework for the spinning universe and the framework for the quantum solution of pi are all necessary.  Now, why does the universe as we perceive it curve primarily along an axis if the initial point spins in all directions at once?  The only solution that suggests itself is that the application of non-linearity is at a point along the vibrating singularity.  Going back to our "cd" analysis of the universe, the cd is set to spinning and the information is accessed by a laser contacting the cd at one point in its rotation and information is pulled off from this one location as the universe cd spins by this one point.  The information comes off in lines that are curved at such a quantum level (the speed with which they come off is a non-linear speed and are not governed by speed of light considerations, but instead are limited by the amount of information involved.
This spinning shoots off spirals and these spirals turn to curve in on themselves due to gravity which, must also spiral at the quantum level in the very tight minimum size for pi type spiral since gravity is vibrational counter-movement to linearity.  These are informational changes, data changes, since the singularity remains constant but they exist for us, nonetheless.  This means that while we argue that gravity is a straight line force, it is not, it just curves at a very very small quantum level.
If space were real, then we would observe it, but since space is merely the expression of non-linear information, the only way we see it expressed is the curvature of "space-time."  This provides an intermediary answer to why and how much space is curved by gravity, but what's one more nobel prize winning theory more or less compared to the time apart, eh?

No comments:

Post a Comment