Pages

Friday, July 28, 2017

AuT Range

The primary proof that AuT is correct is prediction and result; or explaining where no prior explanation was provided.
Let's take the issue of range which as I said the prior post is explained by AuT.
Pre-AuT physics defines the distances, but leaves it to AuT to explain range.
AuT as you will remember, discovered that information exists in a dimension and time independent environment and that time and dimension arise from relative changes between this uncompressed state and the compressed state.
Moreover, the "place" changes in the F-series (1 to 11 to 111 to etc) relects directly the dimensions created in terms of the number of coordinates chhanging at once.
CT1 having only a single dimensional change is non-relative although there are arms from the ct0 state.
AuT has also stated from nearly the beginning, that gravity must arise from the move from non-linearity to linearity in the ct1 state.  Gravity has an infinite application, and this is reflected in the infinite effect of gravity, and the instantaneous effect.  AuT shows that this consistently evolving mathematical process also necessarily involves continuity from one moment to the next.
Now you say, but E-M forces are also infinite.  And it is a great point, but also totally consistent with what is observed with AuT.  The ct2-ct3 "speed" shows the same transition rate.  It's time to go back to our drawings, but the key is that ct2 substitutions occur all along the two dimensional "face" or "front line" of ct3 wo that speed is not eliminated until a force acts on ct2 changes that changes their rate of change, in the presence of ct4, for example, as discussed.
1/137th strength is, however, 10^37 times as strong as gravity.  In fact, the weak force, which is considered by AuT to be a compressed form of EM force, is 10^33 times as strong as gravity.
The reason suggested has to do with where the force is observed, in the presence of a higher state.  The ct2 force is relatively pure by comparison because it is not resent only in the face of higher states.
This requires a more significant mathematical explanation which will come later.


No comments:

Post a Comment