AuT Range 2 or 3 or whatever

As we continue on, please don't think that I'm trying to force my faith on you.  I don't expect you to think I'm smarter than you are, despite the fact that by some measures I am.  If the richest person in the room is the smartest, that isn't me, but if the one who'se figured out the fundamental nature of the universe is the smart one, well, let's just leave it there.
AuT describes why things happen.  Other physics says the strong nuclear force functions in a region, AuT explains why.  Other physics says e=mc^2, AuT explains why.  Pre AuT physics, what all the physicists except me would have you believe (and you if you're a physicist and understanding this) is that a rock is hard.  I explain why.  It's no more of a jump than from being a caveman to an executive at google, but there it is.
Now, you may be saying that I'm bragging, but alas, my theory of the universe reduces everyone to a bundle of intersecting lines, not necessarily spirals although I am fond of saying that; but the truth is that in a predestined universe the significance of what I write and what you believe is about as relevant as the musings of a turtle in a pond.
What were we talking about, ah yes, the reason for the range of forces.
Part II

You can see the range issue in this figure, because range involves those elements involved.  If it is c1, then what we're looking at is only the interface of ct3 with ct4, this is the weak electronic force and cannot function except with this electron driven range.  The substitution and therefore the transitional states of ct3 to ct4 cannot occur anywhere but within the ct4 space.  Likewise the transitional state of ct4 to ct5 cannot occur anywhere but within the ct5-effect nucleus of the atom.  Hence their range is limited by their funciton.  this function, in turn is based on the compression of the area which is a function of the limited number of ct1 states within that very small diameter.

Hence when pre-AuT mathematics discusses the range of the various forces, what they are talking about in AuT terms is where you can solve for a transition from ct4 to transitional ct4 states and that only occurs along the mathematically defined ct5 informational arms.

More particuarly, the ct4 to ct5 interaction at the nucleus of the atom is the substitution within the range of the nucleus of an atom where ct1 concentration is limited to a solution that allows two ct4 states to be joined with ct5 separation to form the proton/neutron state within an atom.

But there is more to this than the obvious.

AA1 in the ct1 to ct2 state shows a standard movement, but what does aa2 show?  It is believed that this mathematical feature, the loss of information at the highest state of compression, occurs.  The high carrier state exchange suggests the creation of a long lived, low ct level (ct1) exchange.  This "space" at aa2 is not a differentiated type of information.  If, however, this occurs within higher states, such as ct4, it is likely that the offshoot would be a transitional ct2 state that has characteristics of the unbalanced (see the prior post) positive or negative features that are indicative of a neutrino.  This is a neutrino, but an AuT neutrino where the positive or negative effects are governed by the imbalance of information and where it is an information state and not a particle result.  

These neutrino transitional states would be longer life, because of the longer F-series arms involved in carrying their solution, and would have more of the features of transitional ct1-ct2 state which is what we would have to expect from the math model if we have the alternating F-series expanding and informational (2^n) compression states which are predicted by AuT and by observations of the universe.

AuT information arms give rise to other effects due to the relative degree of change and the relative solution step numbers.  One of these effects is to limit the extent of the resulting force.  Gravity results from ct1 linearity so it is not affected by distance.

Photons and Electromagnetic forces have relatively few steps. 

The four places, dimensions, in the fseries (1111) give dimension primarily, but ct4 has 2^4 arms and these 16 arms result in force being restricted over several different arms.  The difference between the two states that are involved is significant, but range is a function of the fact that one only results from the other.  This is more true for the ct5 32 arms that appear at work with ct3 states for the strong force.

 Looking at the weak and strong forces, it can be supposed that the weak forces involve ct2 state compression compared to ct5 and the strong force reflects ct3 states in light of ct5 with range changes that should be calculable based on these differences.  That is, if you take the number of information arms of the various states and the distances observed for their application, you should get a solution which can be carried in both directions to get the observed distances through a very limited trial and error.
Anyway, there are three published books on this, might as well start with book 1 before I get around to editing it although most of this comes from book 2.