nlit-beginning again

The idea of determining the quality and transitions of exponential growth as information manifests itself in different forms is the next big challenge of NLT/NLIT.  In this sense "information" is no more what we perceive as "information" than "time" in Non-linear time theory is what is traditionally thought of as time.
What we call "change" and "linearity" are illusory terms.  Therefore we start off with a linear view of time which is illusory.
We talk of all things having "their own time" in traditional physics.  But in NLT we know that time is only the ability to observe illusory time from the vantage point of an additional coordinate change happening simultaneously and in concert with at least one other coordinate which therefore gives rise to the illusion.
We had to invent the idea of "time orbits" which now perhaps I'll have to call "informational orbits" which allow independent movement at a rate and in a concentration and in "at least general" direction with other points to allow the shared viewpoint.  The best example being a planet headed in the exact opposite direction of ours.  Everyone would experience the same time if it were going in a collision orbit to our earth, but the real "opposite" direction would be towards non-linearity at the same rate that we move away from non-linearity.  It is not, however, an acceleration we experience (the result of acceleration is an increase in gravity) but is instead a velocity, a constant rate of change with the amount of "acceleration away from non-linearity" gravity remaining more or less constant.
Likewise, increasing the rate of change in one direction, increases perceived gravity and because we are stuck at a constant overall rate change results in a decrease of the perceived rate of change that we call time.
This concept works so much better as a math than as a logical model because the math is simple while the logic fails: d(total)=dx,dy,dz+dt.  As any combination of these points change at an accelerated rate, the other must decrease.  However, any point must be represented as P(x,y,z,t)d(total).  Traditionally, and practically, we view "t" as different, independent of the other two.  But an examination of states and "blind acceptance" of information theory (nlit) where the is exponential growth in information 2^n we run into some problems because this suggests that t is not independent of x,y, and z) because the Point can result from the change of a quantity of points.
In the next post, we will discuss the alternatives:
1) time is independent, but only one coordinate change can happen at once in t1, 2 in t2, etc
2) time is not independent, it is only a function of the number of changes at once
3) there are a fixed set of dimensions and other changes (time and ct5 for example) happen without increasing the number of dimensions
40 there are no fixed number of dimensions and each increase in time concentration results in the addition of a dimension.
For now, however, it is enough to start again.