At this point in time everybody but you should just say, ok, he's done all the hard work, it's just up to us to pick up the pieces. And that is true, but since you can say I'm not worthy of this; you being the cause of all of this hubbub as it were, and since K-Physics has lots of whining physicists who want to cling to their practical applications and deny what is, let's face it, undeniable interpretation; we're going to, now that we've figured out where movement comes from, translate it into dimension.
All the hard work has already been done. In fact, much of it appears around page 132 and again on page 214 in Spirals. It is, of course, a work in progress. Rome wasn't built in a day, since time doesn't really exist and SCT (standard clock time) only exists relative to CT1.
A blog in the future, will talk about methods for looking back into space from an environment where times are stacked up together, but that's for historians to wonder about, not physicists. And while we're at it, BAA (building an algorithm) 8 exists, it's just not as relevant at 9 and 10 so it'll be posted in due course, assuming I live long enough.
Let's instead talk about how space exists and how it changes to give the impression of movement in more than one direction.
Baseline movement cannot change, we know it can only speed up and slow down relative to ct1 (or another ct state). We know this because there is a single variable algorithm defining the universe.
If velocity is the result of coordination with different CT1 states, the substitution of one ct1 state with another, and the resulting changes in standard clock time, then these changes can also explain the features of three dimensional acceleration we experience.
Space defined by movement along ct1.
Ct1 movement can vary according to several built in parameters
1) Moving from one ct1 to another ct1
2) Moving from a "expansion ct" intersecting spiral combination to a contraction ct1 intersecting spiral combination (or vice versa)
3) Moving from a positive ct1 spiral to a negative ct1 spiral (or vice versa)
"Moving" in this case appears to be a substitution of one ct1 spiral for the aligned ct2 spirals at the rate of one substitution (per 256 ct1s in a ct2) each quantum instant (1.07x10-39th of a second or each change in the value of x in the single variable algorithm).
The same moving occurs in higher ct states, and in ct4, where fewer substitutions occur per 256 ct1 quanta in the ct4 group, the speed is reduced through space and aging (according to standard clock time) increases which is called time dilation. There is an upper limit for time dilation which is one ct1 change per all ct4 quantum which is the equivalent of standing still in the universe and not expected. Bla, bla, already covered, been there, won that prize.
The importance of this is that it allows us to translate non-dimensional solutions into velocities and distance.
By way of example, a single photon on an outward moving spiral arm would go the same speed but would continually (every quantum moment) shed a ct2 spiral for a ct1 spiral. That transition from one space to another would be interpreted by us as movement. These would have formed, probably what we'd call billions, if not trillions of years after the first movement outward and perhaps after billions of big bangs. Early in the universe, big bangs would happen very quickly, in fractions of a second initially. They would, however, have no dimensional features since they'd be space recycling.
By the time photons started to form, big bangs would be further apart, but since photons only require 256 ct1 states, they might occur relatively early in the process. Certainly things would slow down by the time ct4 states occurred. This universe is very different from the current big bang models or even the big bounce models, because the amount of information is increasing and the amount of concentration is increasing steadily and not all at once. Singularities don't exist after x=1. Certainly ct5 (black holes) have nothing to do with singularities which was proven early in AuT theory, even in NLC that became obvious. That idea was moronic, but since I had it too for a short period of time (EHT held to it) I can't be too hard on anyone else. It took almost a year to disprove it completely, maybe 18 months.
Likewise since compressed states unwind over time, photons are generated on far out timelines and follow them on inward moving spirals as well as outward moving spirals. The same is true of matter and wave energy and black holes.
The net effect of all of this is a universe where the average moves in one direction or another, but vast amounts move in multiple directions depending on the net direction of the spirals which are substituted. Of course the substitution changes more rapidly where more ct1 states substitute.
In the next post, we'll follow a couple of photons around this process using items 1-3 above, or maybe in a couple of posts I'll do it and we'll see how the combination of outward and inward spirals can translate into perceived lateral movement to define the illusion of dimension that we cling to so desperately.
Or maybe I won't who really knows?
No comments:
Post a Comment