AuT-do we agexx

Originally I was going to name this "do we have to age?" but that implies aging.
Information doesn't age so we don't age.   You look at my whithered form and guffaw, but you are like the bozo and particle physicists, looking but not seeing.
Information does not age.  It varies state, the states may change, it has a total solution based on proximity to anti-information, but it is either yes or no.  It doesn't become old yes or young no.
The changes that are called ct1 in AuT reflect a single variable (it is possible, but not necessary to have a second one) increasing by quantum changes and then the results that were obtained with the first preceeding and second preceding changes are added to get a total result for any moment.  Age, is not associated with this process.
Equally important, the system is forever moving to a more organized or at least more compressed state.  The fact that x increases can be said to result in a higher number, but that is not entropy, there is no entropy.  That is another bozo concept.
Because everything has quantum gravity, observed, we can pretty much guess that information remains constant throughout the compression cycle.  If that proves wrong later, well, we're all bozos on this bus.
So we do not age.  What we call standard clock time (here) is a relative change to space and that is all.  It is age to us, so you can say that we age, but even bozo or K-physics recognizes that while matter changes, it remains constant.  Once you replace the temrs space, energy and matter (and ct5-infinitiy) with information, the reason for this becomes fairly clear.
If the source for an increasing x stopped the universe would freeze at that point, but it wouldn't get older.  If the state that holds the algorithm so that the solutions appear a quantum events were to release the algorithm, the information might cease to exist, but it would not age.
No, age is the amount of ct1 contacted by any higher information state and that is that.  The more ct1 contacted, the slower you age, sort of an opposite of what you'd expect result, but it appears accurate.  As you get heavier and heavier you age faster and faster so  you'd age pretty quick in ct5 relative to ct4 (black hole material relative to matter).  This makes sense if you think about it, because the "end game" of the universe is total anti-information in one change and total information in one change (full compression)with no ct1 between them and therefore no separation leading to recompression.  This recompression doesn't happen because of the growing value of x being offset by the never-ending converging series.  Every time there is an inversion point at a higher state of compression you get closer to the unreachable goal, but you never get to it.  Alas.
Age being relative change, you can stop it, but to be exposed to full ct1  you have to have all geometries of the solution for a quantum bit of information be in contact  with adjacent ct1 states which requires the point of reference for non-aging to be a ct1 state which is why what you'd call accelleration (and I'd call touching more ct1 states per quantum change in x) results in a conversion to ct1 at high enough values by definition.  But there is no aging, we only grow old because of the relationship between compressing (intersecting)spiral solutions and the alternative (de-compression, moving apart spirals or parallel spiral solutions).
For those of you having a conniption fit about using the intersecting offset linear quantum spirals for a solution, you're welcome to come up with your own formula. It will still be my theory and that is ageless.