If SCT is following a single thread of CT1, then sharing 2 threads of CT1 should involve sct at half speed. This doesn't mean that a vibration between two would have this effect because the method of sharing is complicated.
Also, if a ct4 state moves back and forth from a ct1 state, it isn't necessarily sharing just 2. There is so much time in any space, that the sharing in vibration should be enormous and ct1 states change all over.
However, when ct1 states are concentrated at gravitational (high ct state) wells, the number of different ct1 states may increase so that the amount of sharing increases or it may be that the shifting between ct1 states increase so that time slows down. If greater time dilation occurs at high gravity states, then the first result appears to be the case.
If this is the case then it stands to reason that if you accelerate two watches, one using straight acceleration in space, the other vibrationally by heating its environment, it is likely that even though they were moving at the same speed the dilation of the heated would be less because at least some of the ct1 states would be shared.
indeed, compression, higher ct states that have time appear to compress because they share a common ct1 state for the time during which they are compressed.
so a group of 256 ct2 states sharing a common ct1 state are a photon. LIkewise, a group exponentially larger using F(series n)^2^3 where n-3 is wave energy as long as they share a common group of ct1 or perhaps a common group of ct2s but when they vary, the break into photons until they join back with a common group of ct1 or ct2 and so on. This exact mechanism while it has to be better understood, this feature of the algorithm stacks one F series on the next lower to form the missing part of the compression algorithm.
No comments:
Post a Comment