Pages

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

AuT SMIT 4 xx the flaw in ct1 which allows the universe to be recorded

What you are about to read is perhaps one of the most important posts to date although if you haven't read the others, if you are not familiar with the equation that drive the universe and F-series stacking of prior universes to get to the present one it will be missing pieces; but since it is about a missing piece that is altother appropriate, so I encourage you to read on.
This work in its entirety is an amalgam of greek teach, which I was given and the modern work of coincidentally jewish and non-jewish physicists.  Since much of the greek teachings were preserved by muslims or moors it represents an amalgam of western cultures and perhaps it points out the binding nature of the spiral methodology.  I owe much to the greek who pointed out some of the flaws in the earlier work directly and indirectly which allowed to refinement of the original, inaccurate work which was mistakenly tied to Einsteinian and Hawkinian physics which were defective.  Only by looking at the more fundamental work and examining the flaws reflected by modern work was it possible to see how unbalanced the universe was and how it relies so extensively on converging infinite series to progress.
In this way not only do we solve for all the big mysteries of modern physics, either by eliminating them or by explaining them; but we also see our place in the universe.  While our place is not particularly glorious, we explode bombs as part of the compression/decompression cycle while thinking we are gloriously discovering things, the fact that the universe gives us the ability to solve for our place is fascinating and can only be explained by the ironies that gave rise to this seminal work, the first of its come which defines these features.
You don't have to believe it, but I don't have to care.  There is, as I've said many times, only one thing that I care about and irony has, so far, kept me away from that.
In order for information to drive the universe and for there to be a relative separation between space and higher ct states that allows for the universe to be generated and displayed, there must be some fundamental different between ct1 (space) and the other forms of existence.  It just so happens that this fundamental difference is so obvious that it walks up behind you and in the name of love stabs you in the back.
Space resets every two changes of x.  Higher ct states do not.  By resetting it gives a bench mark against which other changes which do not all reset can be measured (relativity) and against which the changes can be compared (distance and velocity).
Compression past the initial ct1 state can, in this event, be seen as "not resetting" over a period of time and the stacking of ct states along with the failure to reset to zero, provides a mechanism to prevent higher states from degrading.  There is no mechanism for them to reset.
Further it explains why higher ct states do not obviously degrade to space.  To allow degradation past photonic, they have to go to zero.  The methodology for this could be changing places with a ct1 state which allows for velocity and separation to become possible or it could be that only the comparative changes against the three step heartbeat yes, yes, nothing, yes, yes, nothing of ct1 is important.
Just as apparent lengthening with speed, a relativistic concept, or the shrinking of slower moving objects, can be seen as reflecting with greater speed and increased substitution of reset states, it is possible that the fewer the less of the high ct state that is exposed to the effects of reset.
In any event relativity has to be in reference to some defect in ct1 and the obvious one is the zero point in the 0,1,1 cycle.
F-series addition of universes assures us that the features of the defect are preserved.  The fact that it is every third point in the cycle ensures that it is an odd and not an even function which might produce a universe too uniform to give rise to what we observe.  Indeed the two positives before the negative may be what give rise to the unique definition of pi:
x/1+(x/3)-x/5+x/7 skipping two beats in the denominator and starting off as two positive beats.
One can think of this as an old fashioned film where every third frame is blank.
One would expect the universe to flicker, but since there is a change every 1.07x10-39th of a second it cannot be easily observed with our primitive tools on the macro level and we need to look for the indirect consequences, such as how it is reflected in observed physics.
The hand of fate having written moves on, but it preserves each of the pulse changes and the defect in every third pulse of ct1 which is not present in the higher ct states allows for a quantum notch in the universe similar to the notches that run a player piano.  We are the song.

No comments:

Post a Comment