AuT-1 The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 1 of 10

One thing we should talk about before getting into the meat of this, is whether we should exist.  For example, when I was walking tonight my thoughts moved to the observation of the transparent moon, half reflection, half pre-sunset solid rock.  Just that event at just that moment requires randomness according to modern thought.  But that is much more unlikely than that these exact events are predetermined by events that started the process.  We'll come back to that; but first lets admit that there is somethng that has to happen to ct4 states during the compression process to get us where we are today.
There are several ways to look for the relationship between what we call neutrons and fundamental ct4 compression states.
The first, most obvious, is to look at quarks, but quarks have their quirks and we don't need to go there for the overview.
Why neutrons?  Neutrons are seen to embody the elements of electrons and protons so we're merely coming up with a starting point to work from.  We could start with black hole material or anything else to arive at the same place.  Also, the conversion of matter to energy skips the intermediate steps that we call quarks and this suggests that quarks are largely phantom intermediate steps existing because of what we do with gross compression intermediaries.
The first question, is why have intermediate stages at all?  That is, why not go from fundamental ct4 states to fundamental ct5 states?  The answer lies in the makeup of ct4 which embodies ct3 states which in turn are embodied with ct2 and ct1 states.
Why positive and negative?  One suggestion by dual spiral theory is that ct4 protons are made of positive spirals taking on positive spirals and ct4 electrons are made of positive spirals taking on negative spirals; (2) or positives taking on negative/negatives taking on positives being negatives and postiives taking on positives and negatives taking on negatives being positive or other similar combinations.
Another suggestion is simpler, that the positive portion, being larger, requires more stability so that the substitution rate is less, hence the negative portions by virtue of the higher ct1 substition rates have to move faster and therefore circle the related (because they are two halves of the same proton) slower subsitution state.  This raises the question of what is going on when you get a stream of electrons independent of the protons and this is not hard to answer because what you are doing is destablizing both parts.
But we're early into this discussion, there is no need to rush anything.