AuT-3 The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 3 of 10; plus my pitch

Here is my pitch-any comments?

Over the last 4 years I've been developing a theory on Quantum Mechanics.

The theory is published and read by a very limited audience all over the world, it's also a work in progress.

I'd go so far as to say it is accurate and relies heavily on a math model developed 600 years ago and is an extension of the work of Parmenides.

It takes a lot of effort to accept the theory.  It will challenge a number accepted concepts in physics.

I'd like an opportunity to present it as a lecture to your physics, astronomy and math departments for whatever teachers and students might want to attend. This presentation would largely be for my benefit, presenting the theory to a sophisticated group and taking questions if anyone wants to ask which I may or may not be able to answer.

  While I cannot say that it will be worth their time, I will explain what the big bang was, what occurred before it, how space time arises, why there is quantum phenomena, what black holes are, what space is, and many other things with some mathematical precision. I will explain how history exists in a quantum universe environment.

I will provide an explanation of super-symmetry, i.e. how our universe does not have true entropy.  It will take me 45 minutes-1 hour.  What do you think?

The ultimate culprit is the algorithm itself.  No matter the intermediate mechanisms, the basis for intra ct4 compression is the algorithms model of converging infinite series which requires multiple big bangs for each state and during successive big bangs, net compression increases as well as the compression into higher and higher ct states.
Compression is so high at the big bang inflection point that many things temporary in nature exist and continue to exist because the unwinding process is so slow due to carrier lengths being so large for older spirals.
One dangling part of the theory which has yet to be shown to have an specific basis is whether ct states can only jump during a net compression state, that is must there be a imminent big bang for the next higher state.
In the book Tau Zero, the protagonists survive by stepping outside of the big bang.  This is not a requirement of AuT because there is no singularity at the big bang, only a net compression state.  To the extent in Tau Zero, the protagonists were not part of the gross universe, they fit the bill, but it doesn't work that way.   It is entirely possible when the next net compression state/big bang occurs that there will be entire galaxies survive far (solution wise) from the center of compression which, due to the solution model would have great compression at the center (enough to go to the next higher ct state) and according to observed galactic speeds and due to this similarity of solution times (not identical but very close due to massive overlap/compression) would be compressing very fast.  Multiple of light speed compression.  At the point of inflection, this speed would "instantaneously" at least in net terms reverse.    What it would be like to experience this is complicated to envision since localized inflections would not change.  The net shift in the universe would be instantaneous, but the only the average, for other points, they would shift according to their own rules.
Of course the background radiation observed suggests that this alone might kill everything not already dead although that is not a foregone conclusion.
Space itself would be "relatively finite," that is you couldn't get really really far away by universal standards, but you might get quite a distance away on a galactic basis.  Would the sky in such an event fill with light?  The suggestion is that it would be very bright, more space compressed into light or near light states, but also that the speed of expansion would mean that the edges of space would "outrun" light speed as ct1 can increase without reference to space time it is not subject to the speed limits of space and hence the light would quickly disperse as temporary compressed ct1 was converted back to ct1 from ct2.
This suggests that while apparently stable, our state is also subject to dispersion during this process so that what is solid today would eventually, due to localized expansion reach a net maximum dispersion before collapsing back again to some extent.
One problem with what is "observed" is that the model suggests the amount of information is increasing at an alarming rate.  While this provides the "fuel" for compression (looking at things backwards it gives sufficient mass for the universe to re-collapse) the speed with which this would happen in the suggested model is sufficient so that it should be observed both locally and overall even over the short time that we have observed the universe.  That is every 10^-37th of a second if the model was, strictly speaking, correct, we'd see a near doubling of the amount of information in the universe; something which is not observed.  While much of increase is hidden as history, there would still be wild increases and these have to be defined by movement, expansion of space until the big compression and after that by a steady increase in the weight locally.
Where am I going?  Only 3 of 10, we'll see, although I'll give a free copy of the book to the first person to guess correctly in the comments section.