Well, I'm very disappointed in everyone's guessing ability. But it's Friday and I want everyone to see how right this solution is going into the weekend, so here goes:
So why all this attention on big bangs if we're talking about neutrons? That answer becomes very clear as we look at why there is compression in the pre-big bang compression point and how that compression occurs and then applying that same process to Neutrons.
When you look at this it is critical to remember that if you're looking for forces to drive this, then you're looking at the results driving the equation rather than the equation driving the results It is, after all, Algorithm Universe Theory, not force Universe theory which is the failed version that even 2500 years ago was acknowledged as fault.
However, it is also important that the process show that mathematical result events reflects what we see from our force driven point of view.
While fundamental ct4 states are very small, pre-quark type states, ct4 has so much compression (space or the lack thereof is very important as you will see shortly) so that you get Neutrons which are an intermediary step between ct4 and ct5 and hence they are considered to be temporary compression states even though they are extremely durable from our perspective. To understand this, you have to look at the big bang inflection points when most of space becomes compressed to temporary (from a time perspective) ct2 (or higher) states, so there is not so much space, but lots of light. Later, after the inflection point, this light will begin to degrade to space in the model at a rate that gives the resulting faster than light expansion that is observed, especially when coupled with the rapid increase in ct1 due to F-series phenomena.
The same features of high compression that give rise to state changes (more coordinates changing at a time) give rise to these intermediary steps.
Representation of compression F-series states is merely the number of coordinates changing at once and once we define the exact equation leading to these changes: 1,11,111,1111,11111,etc; then we have the equations powering the universe. These equations relate the amount of ct1 to the higher states controlling both speed and separation in the fashion described right now!
Something happens, an equation is defined, during intersections that causes the above reference results to be fixed along carriers for given numbers of spirals.
At net compression states (around big bangs) you have short term ct2 compressive states. These are defined by having short carriers between "turns." While short might be defined in terms of billions of years, they are short relative to the mass carriers. They are all, of course, different. The result is that there is less space and lots of photonic ct2.
You are going from many ct1 states (1,1,1,1,) to ct2. These are solution based results so it is important to understand how you get from 1,1,1,etc to 11,11,11, etc.
How about from 11,22,33? do you get to the next higher number and if so how? In this case 0,1,1; then 11,11,22, then 111,222,333; then 2222,3333,5555. Does the absence of zero make the compression possible in the algorithm? Is there a different type of compression that includes zero, the neutron state?
To understand this you have to remember that ct1 substitution provides for velocity and the absence of ct1 substitution provides for compression. On the galactic scale, you can't expand beyond space because there is no ct1 to substitute, any ct4 beyond this point would be frozen in time, something not allowed by single variable solutions, although very slow movement with very little ct1 substitution is about to become very important. For therein lies the answer to intermediary stages of ct4. They are stages where the order of solutions are such that there is not enough ct1 to move within the accumulations of ct4. The neutron is the basic result but where there is not enough compression (lack of ct1) to form a neutron, the result is the electron/proton pair, where there is sufficient ct1 to allow movement of one set of a pair. Presumably the pair can be negative proton as well well as positive proton plus positive electron plus negative electron although for whatever reason we don't experience high quantities of those in o-space at least not localized.
The idea of anti-matter "destroyed" is a stupid, pre-AuT idea because information is not destroyed. It may transform into space, ct1, however which may explain why we don't experience it locally, any positive and negative combination in proximity would result in unraveling at that solution.
One way of looking at this might include changes back and forth between positive and negative states at rates that cannot easily be accepted, e.g. at every change of x, but that is a diversion to the overall process and will be dealt with later.
Since solutions are spiral based in the model, Positive and negative would appear to originate with the direction of the spirals forming the solution. In such a case, what we would see, for example, is that a positive carrier plus negative carried spirals would be, at ct1, positive, so that ct2 would be positive in this structure. Then you have ct2 formed by the opposite arrangement and this forms ct3 as negative. Then you have ct3 stacking in the opposite direction going positive again.
Let's assume that in this process there are intermediary steps at the ct4 level (ct3 stacking). In such even the "inflection point" would occur at the electron-proton interface. In this way, at very small concentrations of ct3 moving towards ct4 compressed stability, you get a negative result and then at some point of ct4 concentration it shifts to positive.
This stacking, inflection point works closely with the solutions limiting the proximity of ct1 during the compression process to increase the compression.
And how is that done? Well, there are 5 more posts in this series.
No comments:
Post a Comment