We are discussing where the Nuetron arises as an intermediary step after the creation of the basic ct4 state. The changes are toward converging compressed series of which the ct4 state is very near the beginning.
There's a lot of ground to cover and only 5 posts left to cover it.
It remains possible that beyond the visible ct5 (black hole) states are ct states which already exist and have more than 5 coordinate changes at once. It is possible that these are so compressed with so many coordinates changing at once that even their gravity is not perceived from them. That is, just as light is not seen to radiate from ct5, so it is possible that from ct6 not even gravity is perceived.
Why is this important in this discussion? It is merely because the intermediary stages of ct4 may be tied to higher ct states. This is not considered likely, however. Instead, we must look to F-series stack in order to find the answer as to why ct4 states form intermediary stable compression states before getting to ct5.
Electron Inflection: Let's assume that in this process there are intermediary steps at the ct4 level (ct3 stacking). In such even there would be an "electron inflection point" which would occur at the electron-proton interface.
The first inflection point is the ct3-ct4 variation.
There is precedent for this in ct3 (ct2 comrpession) where you have waves of various types, the short to the long. It makes sense that ct4 (ct3 compression) with its more complex matrix would have more complex and less transitional inflection points.
Election Inflection suggests that at very small concentrations of ct3 moving towards ct4 electron compressed stability, you get a negative result and then at some point of ct4 concentration it shifts to a positive result.
This stacking, inflection point works closely with the solutions limiting the proximity of ct1 during the compression process to increase the compression.
The obvious place to look for this transition is size, but that isn't the suggested result:
Size:
Now roughly speaking a Proton is 1830 times the size of an electron (1838 and change for a neutron and 1836 and change for neutrons)
While this ratio makes little sense, it has a substitution rate of 7 (and change) difference at the speed of light (1830/256). Why important? Because the proton is lowed to a relative near stop compared to the fast moving electron (which is far slower than the speed of light).
Let's look at the specific numbers:
Proton Diff 1836.153 (p/e) Substitution ratio (1836/256) 7.17247
Neutron Diff 1838.68 (n/e) Substitution ratio (1838/256) 7.17241
The relative speeds between protons and electrons is the measure that determines what leads to the relative compressions, the faster allowing for negative electrons, the slower allowing for the more dense protons and the combined neutrons.
The electron moves at 2200 km/sec; 1% the speed of light, 1% or 2.56 substitutions per change relative to the ct1 state changes along the carrier.
This doesn't appear to be the type of relationship that matters.
What we want to look for is a relationship that makes sense at least in terms of scale, between the proton features and the electron features and find where these are eliminated in favor of a common scale in the neutron.
It's worth speculating where the 1830 comes from. One place is ct4/5*(ct1 compression-256)^5; but that has little relevance other than coincidence although this type of analysis does work in some cases, the division of ct3 state compression by 256^3 yields one.
https://socratic.org/questions/how-fast-does-a-proton-have-to-be-moving-is-order-to-have-the-same-de-broglie-wa
Sub CT state changes
A more likely suggestion is that the negative electron is related and compressed according to ct2 substitutions within its underlying matrix.
The slower moving proton is associated with the postive, slower changing ct3 substitution.
The neutron results from the combination of the two substitutions.
Both are primary changes and overall velocity and separation continue to be tied to the underlying ct1 substitutions that are below both ct2 and ct3.
CT2 substitutions are closer to light speed in the ct4 matrix. These substitutions presumably result in what is observed as a negative charge were any charge possible at that level. Note again that charge like any other force is a result and not a driving feature. The force result aspect of AUT is one of the crucial differences between that and the more primitive pre-aut physics which accepts space-time as a given and assumes that forces drive the universe instead of the supersymetry of the underlying algorithm envisioned in AuT.
Back to our discussion: This fits well with the model that each stage of compression is opposite (ie in this case solved as oppositely charged) from the prior state. That is once you get to ct4 (ct3 substitution) the results are complex enough to yield charge from the forces that in prior state do not show charge, but they are energy.
This also indicates that there are multiple stages of compression possible for CT4, at least there are two (positive/negative; proton/electron) and those two combine to form a 3rd (neutron) which is our target of inquiry.
The indication here, then, is that the electron grouping compresses along a different path than the proton group, the former purely or primarily an effect of ct2 compression and the latter purely or primarily a result of ct3 compression; and presumably the former being from "negative spiral solutions" and the later from "postive spiral solutions". The question remains are the carriers positive/negative; are the carried positive/negative or both. Another question is whether there are places in the universe (an equal number) where these are reversed to give us the balance of anti-matter or perhaps during the post decompression cycle we are currently in will we see a steady increase of anti matter over matter as a result of the pre-eminance of the compression solution spirals during those states.
Quarks
Quarks fit well into this inquiry and deserve some discussion. There are two stable quarks called up and down. There are "high" and "very high" energy quarks which are temporary. The correspond to intermediary starges of different types. The up and down quarks which make up protons can be seen as reflections of the positive and negative ct3 spirals. The higher energy quarks are those temporary states that exist only as non-stable transitions, such as a photon with only 255 and not 256 spirals. In the case of the unstable photon, it would exist as space, but unstable ct4 states transition between ct3 and ct4 states because of the large amount of matrix and this transition can be observed just as ct3 transitions between ct3 (wave energy) and ct2 (photonic energy).
In the AuT analysis the Electron also has quark-like features but whereas the Q features of protons are the features of transitioning ct3 states, themselves relatively stable by comparison to their faster parent solutions of ct2, the q-features of electrons derives from the faster and simpler ct2 solutions.
The results are:
1) Small fast ct2 substitution based electrons where ct1 interactions allow for 2200k/s movement averages without compression and
2) Larger (1800 times larger) ct3 substitution based proton elements where the ct2 interactions result in more compressed, slower movements.
Note that ct1 substitutions provide for ct2 changes and ct2 changes provide for ct3 changes relative to their carrier spirals and the ct3 subsitutions along a ct3 carrier provide for relative change along the ct3 spiral carriers that make up ct4.
For the ct4 states, the complex resulting exchange between ct4 states of ct2 or ct3 allow for intermediate (between ct4 and ct5) stable compression states we see as electorns and protons and the combination of these as neutrons.
Thus endith the 6th post on this subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment