AuT-details on interaction and curvature

So a few days ago I thought I had an easy way of describing the interaction of pi and the Fibonnaci series but I was disappointed.
There are interactions and there are what might be mathematical coincidence or might be places where they diverge from each other (very low values, 2 and 3, of x); but to understand this a more in depth analysis seems necessary which I will start here.
Pre-Aut physics can be forgiven for gluons since the sharing of ct1 states, being quantum, are essentially the same as particle sharing except the way they are shared is unusual and the quantum level of sharing is eratic because of compression, history and velocity.  However, this is a good place to start our inquiry because nothing is as it seems in AuT.
One problem is that AuT happens on different levels and even on different dimensions.  Separation has to be done without dimension and at quantum points time is absent; results are solution based at quantum moments and the second that traditional thermodynamics are introduced you've completely left the supersymetric framework of the universe and you're wasting time, which doesn't exist.  I know, I'm sounding like an abbot and costello routine, time to get to work.

1) quantum moments contain reference to prior quanum moments which allows for comparative perception.  Change is irrelevant.
2) Velocity, as a result, is merely a quantum moment with the history of the prior quantum moment built into it.
3) Quantum moments are closely related, in fact the amount of new information is very close to 38% from the prior quantum moment
4) History and velocity come from how new information is added, either as new ct1 states or shared ct1 states.
5) History and velocity do not occur with ct1 because there is no ct1 sharing because all ct1 states are independent of each other.
6) space-time, velocity and history result, by definition by compression which occurs based on the fibonacci scale and history and velocity also occur based on this scale as a result with the maximum outside ct1 sharing, new ct1 states, being 1:256 for any higher ct state; although this theory remains to be tested.
7) Pi evolves according to the equation in the prior post based on compression state and therefore curvature evolves.  There is a fixed formula (also given in the prior post as F(pix)) for curvature change which is an infinite series converging on 1.  The rate of convergence on 38% also converges on 1 and a relationship which should take into account substitution of ct1 states should exist, however tenuous.  Each change of 38% creates a length 38% greater than the length before with quantum moments between the lengths.
8) All solutions are simultaneous, but a relative solution order exists for higher ct states and this higher solution order relativity gives rises to all dimensional characteristics and also must be tied to pi and thereby to the 38% informatin increase (II%).
9) II% is a product of higher ct states and lower ct states can operate in the quantum moments between II% increases.
10) In the case of ct2, at each change in ct2 there is an relative change of 256 to 1 with space and the exchange rate means that 255 ct1 states making a ct2 remain shared while one ct1 state changes so that the rate of history to velocity is 256 to 1 and pi is defined by 2 an N in the F(pi) function (not to be confused with the sub-part f(pix) function).
11) CT state increases result from a shift between F-series compression defined as the number of coordinates changing at once which follows the features of 1,11,111,etc in a F-series model so that compression derives specifically from the number of orders from 1 to infinity changing together.  Sharing compression steps based on this scale whcih happens according to F(n)^(2^n) where N derives from the order and F(n) is a F-series number based on the order (111, for example being 3) and is, for 3, 3+2+1 which results from the historical building: 111,11,1; because the state is literally built from from the prior states.  It is possible that all lower states are build into this system.  For example, ct4 is seen as F(4) or 10.  But it could also be 11 (1111,111,11,1) where the lowest compression states are too small to have a signficant effect on the numeric outcome because of the amount of comrpession involved.
12) Compression changes are durable over F-series lengths between turns, turns being defined as the ends of the lengths created.
We will continue in the next posts.