60717 Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 4

60717 Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 4
This is one of a couple of posts that discuss this article in light of AuT which renders irrelevant most of the mysteries; although some of them require solutions that are less than perfectly defined although the methodology for finding the solution is set forth below.
There was something of a hiatus while I was busy with other matters including finishing the "Notes From Venus" which is currently published as Notes on Venus but which will be replaced by the much edited version this week or next.
While I would prefer to dwell on less technical matters for a while, mosquitos have driven me inside where I will publish this first post on the so called "pre-aut unsolved mysteries."

http://trendintech.com/2017/05/21/unsolved-mysteries-that-scientists-just-cant-get-to-the-bottom-of/

1. Dark Matter and Dark Energy-dark energy is easy since it is nothing more complicated the reflection of the amount of unraveling spirls vs compressing spirals giving next expansion which is actually capable of being time and is calculated in Sprials in Amber 2nd Edition.  It is an effect and dark energy will be overtaken by gravity, the effect of the opposite occurace (more intersecting than decompression spirals) in a bout 14 billion years when the universe will start to contract from our perspective although the amount of information will continue to grow.
Dark matter appears to be nothing more complex than space but the localized effect indicates something more complex.  The solution to the connundrum suggested by the strong force and the magnetic force as seen from the perspective of AuT is that (1) dark matter is space and (2) the compression of space in regional areas is an intermediary space state, much like magnetism, that occurs in the presence of some higher ct state.
In prior posts (Parts 1-3 of this series and Book 2 of Algorithm Universe Theory) this phenomena is discussed and we see that magnetism is a temporary state of ct1 to ct2 in the presence of ct4; that is it is a function of the F-series function where the substitution rate comes from ct1 states that are solved within a narrow range (i.e. they spiral around the ct4 states). This same phenomena creates matter (ct4) in the compressed atomic state (neutrons and protons) by way of compressive proximate solutions that are reflected in the strong force (and the weak force as a further compressed state of ct1 to ct2 magnetic compression) so the existence of localized ct1 compression in a dark matter state is not unexepected although the exact states are not well identified.  One example of how this would be possible is ct1 in the presence of ct5 or even ct6.  The half life of the resulting phenomena can be quite long as indicated by the strong force which continues notwithstanding a long period between ct5 exchange, perhaps as long as the period for recompression, which only begins14 billion years from now.

2.  Why more matter than anti-matter-exponential growth of offset F-series spirals requires an imballance.  The length and number of spirals built on an f-series will always be much greater, exponentially greater for one type than the other.  However, this supposes that the intersecting spirals form two different types, one built on spirals solved for one direction, the other built on spirals of the other direction.  This actually works well with the models for this reason.  Lets say a positive spiral with intersecting negative spirals of matter contacts with a negative spirals with intersecting postive spirals.  While no information would be lost, it can be seen that it could cause spontaneous decompression of both yielding wave energy, light and space which we'd interpret from pre-AuT math as the destruction of the particle even though we're actually just looking at conversion where the amount of each type can be readily calculated based on the F-series compression series which lies at the core of AuT.

3. How big is the universe-the non-question since the universe has no size, but the universe does have information so the size of the universe is equal the amount of information in the universe which changes constantly (but at a predetermined rate) and while the amount of information is great, it is the result of the effect of a single variable so that the true value of the universe is a function of its age in seconds times 1.07x10^39th (or is it 37th) except that part of the "aging" of the universe occurred before there was standard clock time.

4. Are there parallel universes?  This is a dumb pre-aut question because parallel requires distance which doesn't happen.  While the information that makes up the universe may be expressed in any number of ways that may confuse the appearance, the idea that space is anything more than sequence of relative solution is largely disproved by the appearance of a uniform size of the universe from any point and this is discussed in Book one and in prior posts.