I did not weigh myself today. After a long bikeride, a long walk and a short bike ride I should have, I suppose. IT is cloudy and windy, muggy but not too warm this morning as I sit with a sweatshirt and drink my coffee this morning
it is stormy enough toquestion what iwill be doing tody. i havent looked into things like pool temperature which i suspect may be fairly high and spots of sunlight are predicted so we will see.
There are loud noises of trrucks backing in the distance. It is easter sunday, so I wonder what that means. I think food delivery, particularly in perilous times, remains important and does not wait for superstition.
God becomes much less important in an i/mediate sense in a deterministic universe.
I-mediate or i/mediate or immediate; god does no day to day mediation.
You go about your programmed activities, I write what i was destined to write a thousand trillion tillion trillion and so on changes ago, time being so un-a-part of the true universe as to have no signficance whatsoever.
I suppose we can start a countdown to 52020 now. Its still over 30 days and what does that deadline mean anyway?
I decided to pickup the DOE Fission grant which is a very cool area because it deals with a different, but closely related process to the original fusion grant and it’s a lot bigger.
I am working on the next patent which would be a great place to work together, but I don’t expect anything these days.
If you have seen the course, the development of dimension is laid out in a way that is easy to see and understand.
This post is about a partially resolved issue in the science
The idea of a photon as energy in the old science, vrs the photon as a representation of states with more pre-time elements is simply facinating.
Imagine how little effect time has once you can reduce it to a dimensional effect. Time travel and other romantic nonsense is sadly lost, but our ability to manipulate space, time and energy are much greater.
I am not thrilled to be killing traditional god and time travel romance and the continuing ignorance which will eventually be lost does not bother me as much as it would if I did not love the idea of time travel, multi dimensions and other preaut concepts which seem so beautiful but turn out to be fantasies, no better than trolls living under bridges, they turn out to be just homeless people.
There is a science discussion of the photon I want to revisit here along with charge.
There are some semi-stable transition states I work with based on the base 3/6 system of ct3-4 transitions (1,1,2,3,5... where the base 3 yields ct4t3,t6,t9,t12 and t15 states all of which appear surprisingly well beginning at t12.
The question becomes what is the roll of t6, t9 and t12 building blocks (there are approximately six of these making up the next state because of the base six aspect, at least in electrons which are 5-6 t12 states instead of a t13) in photonic and electromagnetic phenomena. Beginning at the electron we can see t12 states as the building block with crude preAuT science; but that science has to give way to math and rough estimates below t12.
The neutrino mass corresponding closely to t6, suggests a photon as t9, the absorption into an electron shell suggests a t12 change. The whole idea of electromagnetism and photonic light works well with these features up to a point and the exchange between the proton and electron can be seen as a stable exchange of these states which might all be involved, but the charge element has to be one just as the photon element has to be one.
Traditionally the idea of an imature photon being electromagnetism works well with either a t12 or t9 state. Having a dissassociated t12 state at the carrier or charge effects (keeping in mind it is surrounded by a cloud of lower states) is attractive although the balanced process of absorption and spew between the electron and the proton and energized orbits all counsel caution in making hard assertions.
it is stormy enough toquestion what iwill be doing tody. i havent looked into things like pool temperature which i suspect may be fairly high and spots of sunlight are predicted so we will see.
There are loud noises of trrucks backing in the distance. It is easter sunday, so I wonder what that means. I think food delivery, particularly in perilous times, remains important and does not wait for superstition.
God becomes much less important in an i/mediate sense in a deterministic universe.
I-mediate or i/mediate or immediate; god does no day to day mediation.
You go about your programmed activities, I write what i was destined to write a thousand trillion tillion trillion and so on changes ago, time being so un-a-part of the true universe as to have no signficance whatsoever.
I suppose we can start a countdown to 52020 now. Its still over 30 days and what does that deadline mean anyway?
I decided to pickup the DOE Fission grant which is a very cool area because it deals with a different, but closely related process to the original fusion grant and it’s a lot bigger.
I am working on the next patent which would be a great place to work together, but I don’t expect anything these days.
If you have seen the course, the development of dimension is laid out in a way that is easy to see and understand.
This post is about a partially resolved issue in the science
The idea of a photon as energy in the old science, vrs the photon as a representation of states with more pre-time elements is simply facinating.
Imagine how little effect time has once you can reduce it to a dimensional effect. Time travel and other romantic nonsense is sadly lost, but our ability to manipulate space, time and energy are much greater.
I am not thrilled to be killing traditional god and time travel romance and the continuing ignorance which will eventually be lost does not bother me as much as it would if I did not love the idea of time travel, multi dimensions and other preaut concepts which seem so beautiful but turn out to be fantasies, no better than trolls living under bridges, they turn out to be just homeless people.
There is a science discussion of the photon I want to revisit here along with charge.
There are some semi-stable transition states I work with based on the base 3/6 system of ct3-4 transitions (1,1,2,3,5... where the base 3 yields ct4t3,t6,t9,t12 and t15 states all of which appear surprisingly well beginning at t12.
The question becomes what is the roll of t6, t9 and t12 building blocks (there are approximately six of these making up the next state because of the base six aspect, at least in electrons which are 5-6 t12 states instead of a t13) in photonic and electromagnetic phenomena. Beginning at the electron we can see t12 states as the building block with crude preAuT science; but that science has to give way to math and rough estimates below t12.
The neutrino mass corresponding closely to t6, suggests a photon as t9, the absorption into an electron shell suggests a t12 change. The whole idea of electromagnetism and photonic light works well with these features up to a point and the exchange between the proton and electron can be seen as a stable exchange of these states which might all be involved, but the charge element has to be one just as the photon element has to be one.
Traditionally the idea of an imature photon being electromagnetism works well with either a t12 or t9 state. Having a dissassociated t12 state at the carrier or charge effects (keeping in mind it is surrounded by a cloud of lower states) is attractive although the balanced process of absorption and spew between the electron and the proton and energized orbits all counsel caution in making hard assertions.
So with this in mind, here is a discussion for the day:
Electrons carry electric charge which is to say the ct4 transition state seen as charge in abs and spew is part of the electron cloud. The EM field is a cloud of these states and lesser states spread out around other compression states, such as atoms or molecules.
Electric charge is the source of the electromagnetic field. In a quantum field theory, this interaction between the electronic field and the electromagnetic field comes in set chunks, set units at any given frequency/energy. Therefore, whenever an electron interacts with the electromagnetic field, this interaction is in the form of emitting or absorbing such a unit, or quantum, of electromagnetic field energy. That quantum is known as the photon which being quantum is likely a t12, t9 or t6 unit state.
Some insight is available from observations. Neutrinos are 1/500,000th of an electron mass. This difference between 10^5 and 10^6 suggests a neutrino is NOT an uncharged electron, but is instead a t6 state creation, possibly approximately 6 t-6 state. There are no bosons, of course; so when we talk of an electron “emitting a neutrino” what we are really talking about is an electron losing a t-6 state so that the remaining material has insufficient t-6 to continue exhibiting charge, but the mass would largely remain the same unless the entire particle fell apart as mostly pre-time, therefore mostly energy.
Electron neutrinos do not interact with (emit or absorb) photons at all because they are effectively too small to do that; perhaps being photon component t6 states.
The “so-called” W-boson is the left over electron short of its t6(?) states which suggests that perhaps the t6 states are the carriers of charge.This is worth considering on a galactic scale.
So you have a galaxy of fairly tight spiral arms (2) around a black hole. It is very time dependent so everything happens slow as molassas compared to the fractally smaller and less time dependent electron.
Something (we will call it an interloper state) comes into the spiral which is large enough to shift the spirals outward, the equivalent of an excited electron shell. What is it? It is actually a collection of things. Assume a minimum size galaxy around a neutron star instead of a core of black holes so we we are really talking about a Hydrogen equivalent. This interloper state is not just a big star, it is a collection of things, a solar system perhaps would be enough, but it addes momentum and destabilization to the neutron star galaxy and is only rebalanced when a like state is ejected or the interloper state passes through. It must be big enough to provide long term destabilization of the neutron star galaxy and no so big as to change its structure.
The uncharged electron can absorb photons, probably gaining back their ability to exhibit charge.
AuT has a number of "Stability factors" from the math: These features all come from the lowest state ct1 to the next state ct2 for compression, or more precisely just ct1 folding and unfolding; but since the universe is fractal these qualities applie more or less exactly (slower because of time involvement, but mathematically at similar, exponentially different rates allowing for the greater complexity at higher compression states):
Raw data (sum of fuse lengths, direction of compression, decompression, etc)
One can look at a Data point vrs value of sum of data for a matrix (matrix being defined as a region of compressed ct states so you can have a ct5 region, a ct4 region, a ct3 region, a ct4t12 region, etc depending on how much compression you want to look at)
One can look at the Inflection point for a matrix vs value of the inflection point, the inflection point is where the energy changes, the value of the inflection point is how much data has to change before that energy change occurs.
In charting points, Abs (Inflection point height) is 2x the number where it appears at many locations, notably at compression states but also otherwise at each negative inflection point. You need to look at the charts of absorpotion and spew or the math that generates them if you can picture math results.
For positive inflection points, the abs height-1=2*(number of inflection point-1)
This suggests a point of origin for the sin equation.
There are processed data charts (sum of positive or negative)
First # of pt vs value of sum (of just +/- without fuse)
No of pt is value of sum^2 for stable trasitions (2,4,8,16 and also 2^n) and also for 1 and 3 and 9 and 27 which are 3^n)
These are all observed mathematically in geometry as they need to be lest the model exhibit inconsistency and you can see these in the early work showning sin1 to sin-1 for example.
These are all observed mathematically in geometry as they need to be lest the model exhibit inconsistency and you can see these in the early work showning sin1 to sin-1 for example.
Second flips:
At ALL points (not just 2f(n)^2^n) the of inflection point is (value of infl)^2; abs value of inflection point and also abs value of inflection point is 2^n for stable points
Note that for stable points, the first “value of sum”=value of location^2 and this applies also for the 3,9,27 set tying the inflection point to the stability by squares of the number of the point and the value at that number.
Ask yourself, does compression increase because 16 is first number above 8?
so next one is above 16, e.g. 32?
End of setsLets do an old vrs new lesson since its easter and I have killed that aspect of god pretty much.
The Quora question is the relationship of mass on spacetime.
The Old science comes from:
Viktor T. Toth, IT pro, part-time physicist
Answered Dec 25 · Upvoted by Frederic Rachford, PhD Physics, Case Western Reserve University (1975) and Jesse Raffield, Master's degree in physics
O-electromagnetism is a field
N-nonsense, EM is an exchange of ct states with mostly pre-time features so field approximations are relevant, but misleading.
O-talk of "light rays" and "matter" are mentioned.
N-bastardizations or true quantum, fractal phenomena.
O-The way matter responds to the presence of an electromagnetic field is determined by its charge
N-Fractal ct4-5 compression states include ct4T states which contain the fractal component viewed as charge which is shared when the ct4-5 state is stable, but in the presence of other concentrations, it extends outward, just like two galaxies approaching one another begin to combine long before the cores approach.
O- the magnitude of the force the field exerts on matter is relatd to charge and inertia, N- roughly acurate
O- The resulting “charge-to-mass ratio”, and therefore, the manner in which an object responds to the electromagnetic field, depends on the material properties of the object. N-material properties is a compression function, but its similar ineffect
O-In the theory of gravitation, we can also speak of a field that exists on its own: the gravitational field. (The gravitational equivalent of rays of light is gravitational waves.) N-gravity is merely ct1-ct2 folding, the lowest order of space is ct1, the highest true space is ct3, although certain aspects of ct4 transition states are seen as space.
O-The gravitational field is also sourced by matter, but it is sourced by another property of matter: its “stress-energy-momentum”. This is a complicated quantity, not a simple number, but a thing that encodes the mass-energy, momentum, even internal stresses of matter, though in everyday cases, only mass matters; the contributions of the other quantities are minuscule. It so happens that this same “stress-energy-momentum” is also the source of inertia. So the gravitational “charge-to-mass ratio” is always the same, for all forms of matter. Therefore, the manner in which an object responds to a gravitational field does NOT depend on the material properties of the object.
N-This is horse manure, even though on a gross scale accurate. Matter decompressing is anti-gravitational, a rocket leaving the earth is an example where underlying decompression is reflected on a gross scale, we send the rocket into space because the underlying summetry requires that amount of decompression which is the hardest aspect of AuT to accept and I only accept it as a likely explanation. What is really being ignored is the grand scale, the movement of the entire universe involved in this gravitational effect of ct1-ct2 winding and unwinding.
O-Every force can be represented using geometry. But in the case of electromagnetism, different, incompatible geometries would be needed to characterize the motion of charged vs. uncharged particles, particles of the same charge but different mass, etc. That is because they have different charge-to-mass ratios.
N-Forces are all fractal compression changes, you can see this in the charts which align gravity with the other forces merely using the F-series compression function. Why no one saw this before AuT is a mystery as deep as any other in terms of human frailty.
O-In the case of gravity, this is not a problem. The ratio is the same for everything, so only one geometry is needed. In fact, it is the only geometry that we can observe, since our instruments, even ourselves are made of matter that has the same gravitational “charge-to-mass ratio”.
N-this is not a great way to speak of it. What AUT would say is that gravity being a net fundamental quantity, it is at the base of all forces and all dimensional change so its geometry is more simple, 0 to 1 dimension as opposed to 2 to 1 and 0 dimensional change and the more complicated changes that follow. The old art does not understand dark energy (unfolding) and the changing nature, albeit very slow, of gravity in any matrix.
O-So it makes sense to identify the one-and-only geometry that we can observe around us as the geometry of spacetime. And yes, this geometry is indeed determined, in part, by the presence of masses (or more generally, stress-energy-momentum quantities.
And it kind of works the other way around, too, though not exactly as suggested in the question. The geometry of spacetime does not determine the mass (or stress-energy-momentum) of matter; it does, however, determine how matter moves.
N-This is a complete mishmash of everything. Space, time and matter are all informational constructs and geometries exist together (0-4, time is not the 4th, the 4th is the continued compression you see finalized in black holes and the universe of black holes is combinining into a 5th dimension which the old art inexplicably lumps into space time, presumably due to a failure to recognize succesive exponential compression).
In other words, the old art is a lot of bull shit because the prior art has its head up its whatever and one day it will take it out and say, ahhh, the fractal, true quantum, determinative world of AuT. We knew it all along, give the nobel prize to someone else.
No comments:
Post a Comment