NLC-Gravity waves three-the other problem with LIGO

Gravity waves are actually pretty important to NLC, to the underlying concept of successive compressed states.  You'll have to read the book to get it all, but in this fairly long post (you can skip to the end if you've read the book) I'll give the short version.
This is a long post that will need to be edited slightly.  To really get it you probably want to look at pages 54-64 in the book (an amber in spiral).
Here's a pretty good summary of gravity.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/02/09/what-will-it-mean-if-ligo-detects-gravitational-waves/#1a7aa1a54726
If it's pretty good, what's the problem.
The problem is that these analysis counsels adapting NLC to mainstream physics when just the opposite should be the case.  NLC rejected early the idea of the boson.  For example, the discovery of gravity waves would require that streams of bosons would be shooting through space causing ripples like bullets through the air.  It's an attractive model, but only from a vast distance.
To understand this, you have to look at what force really is and this requires that you look at what NLC says about force.
Force is not a movable feast.  It is a function of static quantum moments.  This applies equally to gravity as to strong and weak forces.
Forces change based on algorithms and these algorithms are likely caused by a stacking process which has been discussed previously, but basically involves solutions where common points of reference exist, the point of the overlap of spirals in the simplified model used.
In such an environment relative change and therefore relative force has to be created by the effect of one algorithm on another when matched.  Energy which we use in ct4, comes from a ct3 state.  No separate force occurs,  but the effect of freeing up spirals allows for relative change to increase or slow given the effects of force.
So gravity and photonic energy both reflect non-linearity (gravity) but for the second spiral changes, their change relative to the first allows for the force characteristics that we associate with photonic energy.  To put it another way, the non-linearity is gravity, the overlap of two non-linear points creates photonic energy.  Likewise the overlap of the third spiral to the second creates wave forces and the  fourth overlap in conjunction with the others follows an accumulation of spiral algorithms that gives rise to the atomic forces which we say "hold the ct4 states together" but in NLC they are held together by the math that changes the information and the atomic forces are merely results that we observe from the application of these algorithms.
While I use the concept of spiral algorithms as being the source, this is mainly because they fit the gravitational model and all higher states are merely combined algorithms so that a change in the algorithm is not suggested more than a set of mathematical results that brings them together in the fashion shown and, primarily, at the points where the spirals collide.  I don't claim that a single algorithm in a vacuum explains the universe, but the stacking of these algorithms is an attractive model and the analysis has been extended to the spontaneous generation model for the universe.
If we take the F-series building of the universe as a model, it suggests that overlap occurs from lower to higher since the alternative would leave more of higher states than of lower states in the model.
One alternative approach is to increase the number of intersections by having each higher F-series universe travel in a direction opposing the prior, whether 180 degrees off or less might be factored in so that each intersecting algorithm would be the combination of odd intersections and the other a combination of even intersections.  Using the series 0-1-1-2-3-5-8 you'd have 0+1+3+8 in one direction and 1+2+5+13 in the other.  Since each number (0,1,1,2,3,5,8) represents a single quanta of data the numbers in the universe as we perceive it on either side would be enormous but not equal.  Offsetting them at other angles would further complicate the concept, e.g. each pair filling the middle ground between other pairs.
However the system is built up, the resulting system has interconnected adjacent representations of data.  How do waves move through this system?  An examination of a bulge in data would give rise to the changes we experience by reflecting an algorithm that moves successive spirals to a more or less compressed state along the highest spirals that connect the universe or that do the same along the spirals that represent the most fundamental or some group in between the highest and lowest clock times.  In this way, ct2 (photonic force) can be seen as the effect of ct2 against ct1 (a secondary spiral against a primary spiral).  On aspect of the model indicates that certain effects (like standard clock time) can only be observed from the next higher information state.  In this example, standard clock time doesn't exist in ct4 even though only ct4 entities "have time".
So what does NLC suggest that gravity waves are?  It's so delicious really.  One option (rejected, for now at least) is that gravity waves are waves carried by the first spiral.  But the suggestion of spirals is that waves reflect an algorithm that affect secondary spirals along a length of a primary spiral or tertiary spirals along a secondary spiral, etc.  For the primary spiral, the effect would go to non-linearity which while intriguing is outside of our mathematics.  Further, a wave along the primary spiral doesn't really have a point of reference to change.  It would, because of the other spirals relying on it, likely have some enormous effect vs the relatively small effect observed.  Now this is not entirely true because shifting space a proton width is probably a huge enough effect to suggest movement along the primary spiral so its too early to completely rule out changes in the primary spiral.
 Is there an option that works well with the algorithm pushing overlap along the spiral dimensionally and timewise at the same time but not affecting the primary spiral?  Yes there is.  Remember that to black holes (in this case the generators of gravity waves) matter would look energetic having coordinate changes which are relatively (and exponentially) faster and less compressed along the spiral point of reference than ct5 changes.  You'd need a higher point of reference to see them relative to the other spirals.  If "currents" carrying these are algorithms functioning to change spiral interactions along a line, then Gravity waves could be the currents carried by matter (vrs those carried by wave or photos or space).  And there you have it.  Happy Valentine's day.