nlc-other scientists get close

http://observer.com/2016/02/michio-kaku-explains-gravitational-waves-as-baby-pictures-of-the-big-bang/

I could spend a week looking at the issue of time dilation in more detail.
Movement along one algorithm compared to the movement along several algorithms sounds like a simple concept, but the fact remains that the movement along different algorithms has to have some intersection for them to change in a relative fashion which incorporates exponential compression and relative dilation of change.
I suspect that to god we are like a work of art, you know what it looks like but you can always admire it.  This is different from saying that what we think of god would matter at all to him. NLC requires that we are little more than dry dots of paint.  If the dots of paint got up and bowed to the artist, of course, the artist would show shock.  But we are a series of stop animation dabs of pain and not moving dots of paint and when we bow, we bow because we were painted as a series of 10^-49th second series in the act of bowing.
And this doesn't mean there is a god, at least not one in the sense that we would be made to bow to one (or more).
I have fought with the scale issue, clear to me based on information theory which must, of necessity apply to compression, but why does it work so well with a relatively random base 10?
I have worked with the two natures of information change, forward and backwards.  I have fought with the idea of perspective.
Scale is a reflection of nothing more complicated than 2^n.  Any factor of 10, must be a random method of counting this simple equation.
Change exists, but only between fixed quantum moments.  And change has some strange aspects.  It appears that we only see change at one state from a higher state and it appears that force (photonic, wave, gravity) comes only from change in a lower state.  This perspective issue, however, makes no change in the quantum nature of moments.  Hence, standard clock time which we observe on our watches even though it affects us specifically in CT4 states is only observable because of CT5 states (exemplified by the compression/coordination of change seen in black holes).  At the same time, the force characteristics appear to arise from lower states and can only be observed from higher states.  Energy is only visible, only capable of 'control' from higher states.  While it is interesting to wonder what form of energy is visible from ct5 arising from ct4, the truth is that energy, force, what have you, is nothing more than the relative change of lower clock time states to others.
Likewise, there appears to be constant change and change in only one direction, the dimensional changes we think we control (well, I don't think we control them exactly) is only relative change.
All these must be correct, but what does that mean?
And NLC must be right, at least from the standpoint of the painting.  There are details that are poorly understood, even by me, even after all this study, they taunt me.  But as everyone else gets closer, perhaps eventually the holes will be plugged.
I was in Death Valley, not long ago, a normally dry place, but this year the barren nature was marred by heavy rains and heavier snows in the mountains, flowers blooming to drown out the harsh beauty of its hostility.  If our universe mimics anything, why does it contain such dramatic shows of beauty, what is it copying in the singularity.