This section is being edited to be included in the third Edition of NLT/EHT which will be NLC; a third edition which is not a third edition at all, sigh.
For those of you that like to see this stuff brought into a more clear context, read on.
THE IMPORTANCE OF
BEING ZERO
Linearity,
gravity and velocity dilation
NLT shows
conservation of coordinate changes which mimic informational change. It can be said that Time as used in NLT is
the equivalent of bits of information on a quantum level.
Zero, in the
sense of nothing, is redefined by NLT.
Zero is not nothing, but instead is the sum of all information.
Itot=0
sum(from -inf to
inf)I=0
sum(from 0 to
inf)I=inf
sum(from -inf
to0)I=inf
sum(0to inf for
n)I^n=sqr(inf)=infinity if there is no limit of information, but if there is a
limit to the amount of information in the universe, this is a real number. It can be predicted that while the amount of
information is so large as to be beyond measure from an earthly analysis, it is
not infinite.
sum(0toinf for
n)I(x)^n=inf
(sum(0toinf-y
for n)Ix^n=inf -(y) where y is the difference between infinity and x
I=Information
y may be
rewritten as follows
sum(0 to inf for
n)=Ix^n-y *Ix^y
This in turn my
be extended for other elements as follows
Ix^n=Ix^n-y-z*Ix^y-z*Ix^z
sum(n from 0to
inf)Ix^ndn
It is accepted in this analysis that zero
is not nothing, but is instead the sum total of all things in a non-linear
environment. In a linear environment, it
is suggested that zero may not exist at all, but the suggestion that linearity
is only a force like any other force (gravity, electromagnetic, etc) raises the
possibility that our universe is part of something that can be determined from
an examination of what we previously thought was nothing but is the sum of all
things in two or more directions.
The existence of
an unreal number defining a circle suggests that the size of the loop may be
beyond measure, but that it still must exist.
Such infinite
zeros make sense in an environment where all things are non-linear because
everything happens at once, there is no beginning or end, so the application of
linearity must eventually loop back because there is a finite amount of
information in a singularity by our measure, but that need not be the case in a
non-linear universe.
In a linear environment zero may appear to
be a random location, as with a line on a graph where one mark is the
"beginning of either positive or negative linearity.
negative--------0-------positive. Non-linearity information theory
suggests that everything comes from nothing and that nothing is the sum total
of all information which makes zero, nothing something much different from what
we are taught in grammar school.
The idea that
zero, as magical a number as it is, could be something so much greater than
what we perceive is not at all inconsistent with math, however. 1/0 is
infinity, after all. This suggest the following equation:
sum(i) from 0 to
infinity is 1/0. One might suggest the correct equation would be the sum
(of information) from negative infinity to infinity=1/0; however, this
equation, has the alternative of meaning that 0=1 which is not likely.
The former equation has an equally unlikely outcome since it suggests
that 1=0*sum(i)from 0-inf.
This zero, of course,
is the true zero. Many are confused
because we "re-use" zero in our base 10 system to restart our count.
1-9 in a base 9 system should restart at 11, but instead in our base 10 system
11 is replaced with 10. The zero symbol
is re-used and hence from childhood those of us who use this numbering system
are confused about the difference between zero and the place marker of the same
shape and size but which is otherwise irrelevant to the discussion.
Even the zero
used in graphical analysis is an arbitrary point where linearity already exists
and has already limited its scope. The true zero in absolute mathematics is
apparently non-linearity of necessity. The features of zero that allow it to
function are the features of non-linearity.
There are several
"zeros" in math:
1) The least
significant is the one used as a place marker after another number to quantify
base 10 numerals. 0, 10, 20...100, etc. This is not zero at all, at least after
the first use, it is just re-using a symbol for multiple purposes.
2) The next
least significant zero is the one used as a starting point in linearity. 1+0=1,
1-0=1, 0-1=-1, etc. This allows graphs -----0-1-2-3-4, for example, to start
from a common point which can be placed anywhere since it is only important
from a relativistic starting point. Non-linearity has an absolute point of
zero-no time and no space. This is not the same as non-existence as discussed
in more detail below.
3) The more
significant zero is the one used in multiplication and it has some, but not all
of the features of non-linearity. 0*1=0; 1/0=infinity. If you have zero of
something (none of something) you have nothing. The concept of nothing that
this represents, however, is wholly a creature of linearity. If you have
everything in a singularity, there is not the possibility of none of anything
that exists withing the singularity. There are philosophical nothings (zero
non-singularity inhabitants, for example; or zero linear moments) but in terms
of the "contents" of linear existence, everything is there. Even all
of linearity is represented although not being linear it provides no clear
point of reference, at least not yet. While one might easily assume this zero
to be the same as the non-linear zero, it is not because it exists in a
non-linear environment. It can be said to be the point of singularity applied
to linearity. The examination of this point of reference in the coming sections
will add significantly to the understanding of non-linearity in a most
discomforting way.
4) The final
zero is the zero where change is stagnant. dt=0 is one designation, but this
assumes a fixed point. Instead it is better represented as the point where the
sum of the change of all coordinates is nonexistent. Sum(d(all coordinate
points))=0. You will note that not a single point is lost in this equation.
There is no multiplication which results in the coordinates being lost, only
their change is non existent. As any coordinate changes, zero loses its
absolute quality and instead becomes the zero of item 3.
To test this,
let's look at a couple of simple equations:
zero/zero=1: Normally
any number divided by itself is one, but this would make no sense if zero was
truly nothing (instead of the pre-linear state). If 0/any number=zero, how
could zero/0 not be equal to zero. However, if zero is all things, just without
linearity then zero/zero could be one and zero/any number=non-linearity/any
number which if not zero would be very difficult to rationalize in our way of
thinking of the universe.
Let us look at this:
zero is both the lack of linearity and, as result, the sum of all linearity.
That is zero as all change either positively or negatively in the
universe. Then there is zero which is
the absence of change in the absolute sense.
But if zero exists only within the universe, the zero cannot be the
absence of the universe and if it exists outside of the singularity that is the
universe, then there is existence outside the universe even if it is the
existence of what we would call nothing.
The importance of this
cannot be overstated since if even nothing can exist outside of the singularity
it has important implications to our understanding.
Within the
singularity, zero represents a non dimensional storage with all the information
relative to a mathematical whole. It is so large that any number from within it
effectively becomes zero based on the size, but that is not why the equation
works. Zero is non-linear. 1 is a linear expression. +1 or -1. Linearity and
non-linearity do not equate because one is the absence of change and the other
is the expression of change.
Zero can be either,
but it appears to be both, Linearity and non-linearity, change and the absence
of change. The number of coordinates changing at once can be seen as
multiple axis extending from non-linearity with one exception. Two
coordinates (or more) may change along one axis while none change along another
and still get an expression of ct(2), ct(3) or the like.
In this way, an axis
is different from what we perceive which remains linear. Things change position within the projected
universe while remaining within the singularity by quantum information bit
changes and even with only one axis changing, it is possible to experience time
as long as two coordinates change at once on that axis. In fact, the very observation of time
indicates that the changes along the axis are along a single connected medium
since otherwise how could one observe change of one coordinate from the
next. This observational requirement
means that the separation between coordinates is...zero.
Something both obvious and subtle is that
nothing doesn't exist in the universe. Since NLT is a singularity with
everything in it, nothing cannot exist there either. Zero then, is just a
math tool. Now there are places where zero makes sense (no apples in a
basket) but in truth, that use of zero is inappropriate because there are only
no apples there now and only then because no one has put in any yet and the
basket exists only as a tool to define what isn't in it. Even space is
not empty, especially not to NLC.
No comments:
Post a Comment