This concept works so much better as a math than as a logical model because the math is simple while the logic fails only when we insist on sticking with existing, one dimensional features (mass, gravity, etc) looking for the holy grail in this group without realizing that the failure of the equations to be satisfied by one or the other dictates that change that is perceived must result in a change between these otherwise observable phenomena in a non-linear manner even while the information giving rise to them does change just as addng information to a movie may result in change which is not linear. Not just more image until the image goes black, but color, sound,motion and the rest.: d(total)=dx,dy,dz+dt. As any combination of these points change at an accelerated rate, the other must decrease. However, any point must be represented as P(x,y,z,t)d(total). Traditionally, and practically, we view "t" as different, independent of the other two. But an examination of states and "blind acceptance" of information theory (nlit) where the is exponential growth in information 2^n we run into some problems because this suggests that t is not independent of x,y, and z) because the Point can result from the change of a quantity of points.
In the next post, we will discuss the alternatives:
1) time is independent, but only one coordinate change can happen at once in t1, 2 in t2, etc
2) time is not independent, it is only a function of the number of changes at once
3) there are a fixed set of dimensions and other changes (time and ct5 for example) happen without increasing the number of dimensions
40 there are no fixed number of dimensions and each increase in time concentration results in the addition of a dimension.
For now, however, it is enough to start again.
No comments:
Post a Comment