Pages

Monday, April 11, 2016

AuT Time dilation 3

Several issues will be raised in this blog which will then be dealt with individually in subsequent blog posts.

two factors then affect time dilation
1) The first is the speed through a separate set of ct1 spirals.
2) the second is the speed through the same set of ct1 spirals.
Both of these result in a slowing of time relative to the set of ct1 spirals through which the higher time state does not move.
Observing whether the space through which to ct4 moves is altered is more difficult, because space does not appear to be contained.  While both ct4 and ct1 are made of information and while ct4 contains information and occupies quantum moments in association with space within the algorithm solution, the changes have to be relative and not actual in the ct4 changes, but there is no point of reference for ct1 states to change.
It is hard to ascribe the appropriate feature of the clock keeping aspects of time.
If a CT4 state moves independent of a set of CT1 states in which matter resides, there is no known difference.  But if a CT4 state moves more quickly through a set (whether next to or far away from another set of ct1 states) of ct1 states, the relative aging to "all" ct1 states is slowed.
This relationship must be examined in the next post on the mathematical model of the algorithm.

Since a higher universe (one with exponentially more infomration according to F-series growth from out) cannot have a bit that changes at less than yes/no, the largest information state is space and not some smaller state.  Such a system change only has the effect of changing the total amount of information along one spiral solution.

The issue of whether we are at c5 or ct6 results from whether we have the appropriate mass in any of the known super-massive black holes.  We can determine this by  looking at the newest equations given before for determining the size of the ct6 time state (see the previous post on this issue) and checking it against the black holes observed.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160406133616.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment