AuT-the illusion of circles and randomness

Most of the pre-AuT pictures of gravity show space being deformed by a ball.  Likewise, the model of Hydrogen atoms shows a sphere of probability defining the location of an electron.  So the pre-NLC, pre-AuT physicist takes a skeptical eye of the algorithm linear models.  This pre-NLC thinking is quite frustrating because it is a return to the dark ages in turns of understanding.  So, for those who are tuning in for the first time, let's see why everyone is wrong except those of us who know what we're dealing with.
First you have to look at all these wrong models and remember that they are not static models. dk
NLC then changes all of the parts one quantum moment at a time.  So you take those pictures and you move them and as you do they turn linear and circles become spirals. That is, a static circle begins to take on the features of a spiral as it moves.  Likewise a frozen segment of a spiral is hard to distinguish from the curve of a circle as you approach quantum length.
The problem with pre AuT thinking is that it freezes images for 2 dimensional representation.  Even 3 dimensional representations are inaccurate because they look at them as if they stood still.  The inability to stop movement in the universe, to even accelerate to the point where stillness is possible and the amount of change required to maintain that status.
This same graduation of points from one instant to the next coupled with movement gives the perception of curvature even with linear, quantum steps.  This can be shown in the operation of the "false randomness" which was defined in the last post.  However, randomness, the changing of spirals, only happens gradually, just as straight lines change gradulally in a series of straight line changes to give the impression of curvature.
The amount of consistency we experience requires that the universe that we live in be composed of sequentially similar universes of consistently larger number.  The number of spirals changing at any one point must be relatively small compared to the number that stay the same.  That is, each universe building spiral must spin off proportionately more universes of the same type for each quantum change  This is, as expected, identical to the methodology by which intersections increase the number of stacked spirals.  Otherwise the algorithms would require multiple methodologies to exist which would require that the algorithms be more complicated or, worse still, change, which would defy the logic we experience within the universe.  The model is like this for stacked (compressed) spirals:

Just as the image above shows for the largest spiral the most "short" new stacks, so too must the universes build up in the same method so that the most recent universe must have the most similar trailing back to the least similar.  Otherwise the changes that happened would occur so rapidly that instead of what we perceive as randomness there would be chaos.  Instead, most of the spirals are only slightly off so they gradually achieve a majority at any inflection point.  In this way, even if defined by straight lines the transition from an expanding to a contracting universe will be gradual and more and more universe point defining spirals transition to the inward moving solutions to the algorithm.  In this way, we can expect it is less likely that universe will suddenly change, but we can expect a gradual change from expansion, to a long neutral period, to a contracting universe subject to flaws in the basic F-Series intersecting spiral model.