Aut Post intro 1

I'm going to start this post off with a personal reflection. Last night, I was far from home, and yet surprisingly close.  Perhaps closer than far away.  That is not even relevant to the post, but I was with someone, a younger person in transit between the farther home and the other side of the world, a place she will be leaving for soon enough, already gone for me.  But what happened at dinner is worth recording for the sake of AuT and spiral theory.  For coincidence is an important element of this science.   I say science, because what I am going to talk about is, in my opinion, as much science as it is about something deeper, more personal.
Anyway, in picking out a place to eat, I left the decision to my passenger and she took two methods and in the one ultimately decided on there were 5 choices.  Two were quickly dispelled for reasons of coincidence (Jerusalem Artichokes and the problems with traveling after eating mexican food).  Of the 3 remaining, perhaps the most unlikely was chosen and it was determined to wait for 45 mintues for that one.
If all of those "coincidences"" had not lined up, then my companion would not have run into a friend who was there from Houston as a result of an entirely different set of circumstances.  And yet the person who was the reason for the 5 choices, was the "big sister" of  the person who arrived at the same place for reasons which were entirely outside of the reasons why we arrived there.
So what does this have to do with physics?  When one has a theory of physics which relates to intersecting solutions, and where individual changes, what AuT calls the source of apparent randomness, in spiral state changes can separate states to allow the various appearances of what we improperly call randomness, they also remain tied by their common intersections giving rise to what we call coincidence.
But there is more to this than coincidence, there is also a type of predestination which I believe, whether it is logic or wishful thinking, that must tie me together with another, that must make us spiral back together no matter how far the choices of fate may separate me today, so close and yet so far.

AuT-bunking and de-bunking anti matter and gravity

Ever since Copernicus determined the earth was not the center of the universe and Kant envisioned his space islands, our current galaxies we have rethought our size and place in the universe.  AuT goes a little further, breaking our existence into imperceptible 10^-47 instances or solutions to x.  The solidity, indeed the linearity of the universe only appears to us and our machines because the quantum instant is so small and the amount of quantum points so large for any quantum instant that they appear solid to our perception at what on a quantum level would be seen as imperceptibly fast or slow relatively speaking. 

Gravity is an effect of the transition from one solution to the next, it arises from quantum changes in linearity and mathematical solutions indicate that these primary changes interact based on a decrease in relative movement associated with compression.

AUT envisions G-space as a potentiality space without dimension, a place where algorithms may be expressed.  It is critical to understand that in our universe this changes perception from a non-dimensional algorithm to a representation of a linear environment as a two state mathematical solution.  

This solution is, for lack of a better reference, a "yes/no" or 1/-1 solution.  Both of these solutions have their attractions.  Yes/no is a primary, indivisible logic and 1/-1 suggests the theoretical model of two opposite intersecting spirals.

The 0/1 solution is not workable because the end result originally is nothing/linearity.  This might be a predecessor state that changes, it evolves, to a 1/-1 model, the intersecting spiral model being one of the closest models to what is observed so far.  The result as it is developed is more of a paired model.  yes/no vrs no/yes.  This is true because both intersecting lines should be made of complete data points.  

Stacking of complete yes/no and no/yes pairs would allow for more complexity, e.g. (ct2):
y/n:n/y, y/n:y/n, n/y,n/y, n/y:n/y and the same increase in the level of complexity (exponential increase) at each subsequent time state.  In this model between yes and no or between 1 and -1 there is gravity.  The separation from maybe to yes/no yields a solution, a spatial solution if you must, that is filled by gravity.

The two spiral model suggests an arrangement “driven” by the algorithm which means that for each quantum change (a 10^-47^th part of a second and a 10^100^th part of a single quantum instant for the designation might be entropy since it is solution driven much as entropy, although entropy might better be defined as the instant when the change occurs for a quantum spiral (one 10^-100^th) changes from gravitational to anti-gravitational.

The spiral model suggests that in the future, the amount of gravity driven solution (solving for the algorithms moving inward should increase to the point where it reverses the net direction of the universe.

This reverses the direction of the entire universe and it means there can be gravity and there can be anti-gravity.  In the course of events there can be a tearing apart and a bringing together, this can translate to events of individuals.
  It is theorized that the amount of anti-gravity is so large at the quantum instants after the “latest” big bang that it is overwhelming the force of gravity.  This has been incorrectly designated as dark energy, but a better description is that it is the reflection of the solutions to algorithms explaining a direction opposing the direction in which gravity is explained.