AuT leading the world

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/string-theory-co-founder-sub-atomic-particles-are-evidence-0#.V2XUN8BYmDw.facebook

This kind of nonsense is out there because the mainstream hasn't had access to AuT yet.  I'm working on it.  This isn't to say that "Nothing" in this universe, the one that we see, is a reflection of god, the whole universe is a reflection of sorts, more of a solution than a reflection, but being presentably as a solution means there is a matrix in the background on which a solution may be solved.
The article contains this quote:
“We need a theory that goes before the Big Bang, and that’s String Theory. String Theory says that perhaps two universes collided to create our universe, or maybe our universe is butted from another universe leaving an umbilical cord…."
No, that part is just silly.  I explained what the big bang was and addressed all the issues raised relative to the most recent big "inflection point" and why there is supersymetry (it's because its a simple equation with a recurring type of solution, recurring in the sense that it is a infinite converging series in response to the solution based on a single variable.
So some of what this author derives is almost AuT worthy, the "evidentiary nature" but since the author (not the scientist) is talking about "sub-atomic" particles is just misinterpretation of the "evidence" since the idea that the sub-atomic (smaller than atoms) particles are actually particulate in the fundamental structure or even "made" of something is just...It's frustrating.  Millions, nay Billions, are being spent on physics projects and research that are looking in the wrong direction.  I know some of you haven't read everything here and are thinking this is nonsense, and I feel the same way about this nonsense.
If a theory not only explains the big bang but goes trillions of years before it, shouldn't it have some of the support given to theories that are still guessing what the big bang was or that assume it has something to do with god?
If a theory not only explains quantum particles but explains why a minimum size is both possible and non-existent shouldn't it get some of the support that all these particle accelerators get?
There is more potential for understanding and at least illusory manipulation of the universe in AuT than...well perhaps it's the fact that it shatters the illusion that makes it so hard to accept.
But we all know that the illusion is important.
There is 90% humidity this morning, the sun which I greeted has not yet lighted the lower reaches of the yard and that is important.  All our humanly concerns are important, but go doesn't lie in anything other than the matrix, which is not space or time, in which the algorithm can be solved, all that we hold important lies in this place and our ability to seize, illusory or not, renders our inaction and mistakes intolerable.