The changing face of AuT part dos-how big is space

Unlike you, there is little I will do this weekend other than write and work on my life.  It is a very noisy, unpleasant exercise, the life work, not the writing.  I have decided, however, I must take radical steps, just as AuT is radical, so let's take about radical changes in AuT
Another early theory that appears to have lost its place is the idea that there is an actual spiraling down to two infinitely dense states, one positive and one negative where the two have no separation of space.  What is unique about the correction is that the same result occurs.  The problem with the original one was that spiraling down meant the spirals had to stay in existence and what is observed is that the spirals are solved for each point but that there is no spiral that remains which is a "primary" or "carrying spiral" for all the other spirals to get to this result.  Worse still, that solution would require that the universe actually follow rules of dimension and dimension doesn't exist.
It turns out the way to deal with this is by having the same result, but that it be obtained with solutions to increasing numbers of spirals which end up giving the same result but not by any one spiral spiraling down independent of the others, but only because there is a solution point at compression as x gets larger where at each compression state you get closer to this fully compressed result, but, of course, you'd never get there because if you did there would be a final x.
This brings us to another stupid pre AuT question:
 What is beyond the universe?  This is another stupid pre AuT question.  It is completely wasted here, but it serves a purpose in continuing to support AuT over every other theory.
The idea that the universe ends is such a primitive idea the fact that it took AuT to completely invalidate the concept borders on the bizarre.
The answer, of course, is that distance doesn't exist so neither does space.
The amount of "space" in the universe is simply a measure of CT1 information state in the universe.  There is a set amount at any solution of x and that defines the perceived size of the universe.
One of the concepts that is hardest to understand it the infinite series towards a universe where there is only two totally dense states, one defined by one spiral equation, the other defined by the negative of the first.  It is important to remember that the "spiral" is only the closest model derived so far and intersecting spirals only the most simple version of that.  We are hopelessly far from the solution where we are even approaching this infinitely dense solution to be able to actually see it begin to form, but we can envision this solution from the fact that the spiral methodology itself suggests this end result and since there appears to be no other solution or final solution to the universe that is more logical than this one which returns the universe to non-linearity.